City council halts delayed IT system launch
Norwich City Council is embroiled in a legal dispute with the contractor, Civica, and has sought compensation.
The £1.3m project is now suspended, though the council says it is looking for a "positive outcome".
Civica said "active discussions" were taking place.
The council had been trying to implement a new system called Civica D360, a workflow management tool covering benefits, council tax, revenues, business rates and housing.
A new contract with Civica (UK) Ltd started in April 2022 and D360 was due to go live a year later.
Progress reports released under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) have revealed a catalogue of setbacks as staff and contractors struggled with technical issues and problems migrating data from the council's old system, known as W2.
The contract specified that 2.5 million documents would need to be transferred.
"The system has had stability issues," according to one report, which continued: "Whilst issues have been fixed, other issues appear."
The project status has now been downgraded from a risk rating of "amber" to "red".
By the end of last year, six major technical problems - described as showstoppers - remained, alongside "70 other issues pending resolution".
In November, the council's executive decided to pause the project when it became clear an updated version with fixes would not be ready by an agreed deadline.
There were continued talks between the council and Civica at this time and to compound matters, the decades-old W2 system that was due for replacement would need upgrading, as otherwise it would be unsupported.
Civica has held a contract with Norwich City Council for the past 20 years to provide and support W2, and a new agreement was reached after it offered the updated D360 system.
One person familiar with the situation described it as "depressing and embarrassing".
They said: "Initially it looked good but it quickly became obvious that the system did less and wasn't anywhere near finished.
"Instead of looking at alternatives, the council has double-downed and spent a fortune.
"It often feels like IT policy is just made up on the spot.
A Norwich City Council spokesman said: "We are continuing to have legal discussions with our contractor for this service and we are hopeful that a positive outcome will be agreed by both parties in the coming months."
The authority would not comment further, owing to legal discussions.
Civica said: "Norwich City Council is a highly valued and longstanding customer, using fully supported Civica products.
"We remain engaged in active discussions with the council and are fully committed to achieving a positive outcome for both parties."
Follow Norfolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Norwich City Council
Civica
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Wealthy Americans are quietly buying their way out of US with ‘golden' visa programs
America's elite are increasingly drawn to 'golden' visa programs with new opportunities emerging in sunny and desirable locations. The latest countries to be included in the trend are some Caribbean Islands — namely, Antigua and Barbuda, Dominica, Grenada, St. Kitts and Nevis, and St. Lucia. Advertisement The islands offer citizenship-by-investment (CBI) programs, also dubbed 'golden passports.' The visa can be obtained by making one of two qualifying investments. The first is 'a direct contribution to the Government (commonly known as the contribution to the Economic Diversification Fund route), starting at U.S. $200,000 for a single applicant,' according to the Commonwealth of Dominica. The second is 'the purchase of pre-approved real estate at a minimum value of U.S. $200,000.' Advertisement Many Caribbean Islands do not have wealth, gift, inheritance, foreign income or capital gains taxes. The CBI program allows investors to retain their existing citizenship and grants visa-free entry to most countries around the world. America's elite are using 'golden' visa programs to reside in more desirable locations across the globe. Earth Pixel LLC. – Nadia Dyson, owner of Luxury Locations Real Estate in Antiqua, told the BBC there has been a surge in business. Advertisement 'Up to 70% of all buyers right now are wanting citizenship, and the vast majority are from the U.S.,' Dyson said. 'This time last year, it was all lifestyle buyers and a few CBI. Now they're all saying, 'I want a house with citizenship.' We've never sold so many before,' she told the BBC. The Caribbean Islands feature multiple countries in which America's wealthiest citizens want to explore next, including Antigua and Barbuda, Dominica, Grenada, St. Kitts and Nevis, and St. Lucia. SeanPavonePhoto – New Zealand recently saw a surge of Americans seeking its 'Active Investor Plus' visa, Fox News Digital previously reported. Advertisement In April, the government relaxed its visa rules to attract more high-net-worth individuals, with such changes as removing an English language requirement and reducing the amount of time required to spend in New Zealand. In under three months, 189 golden visa applications were received, while previous applications were at 116 submissions over the span of more than two-and-a-half years, Reuters reported. Nearly half the applications were submitted by U.S. citizens. Former New Zealand Minister for Economic Development Stuart Nash, co-founder of Nash Kelly Global, told Fox News Digital the visas are becoming more popular. 'There's a lot of global uncertainty at the moment,' he said last month. 'You've got a war going on in Europe, you've got the tinderbox, which is the Middle East. You've got a change in the U.S. administration,' said Nash, 'which is causing more polarization than we've seen in a long, long time.' He added, 'In the past, people were looking for tax havens. Now they're looking for safe havens for them[selves] and their family.'
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
DWP state pensioners able to cut TV licence to £0 in fully legally manoeuvre
TV licence costs are one of the most controversial taxes in the UK - along with the likes of Inheritance Tax - which can leave pensioners in particular trying to search for ways to make ends meet on their weekly state pension. Despite the surge in popularity of streaming platforms like Netflix, Disney Plus and Amazon Prime Video, the TV licence is still required for nearly all households, as watching any live programme as it's broadcast, or any BBC show, obligates you to pay the charge which is now set at £174.50, reports While some are happy to fund the BBC and the free-to-air broadcast infrastructure the TV licence funds, others are increasingly asking why they are paying up for something they find themselves not using. READ MORE: Warning over rise of DWP pension age in the future Get breaking news on BirminghamLive WhatsApp, click the link to join There's never been a better time to see if you can cut the costs of your TV licence, possibly all the way to £0, depending on your income and personal circumstances, according to the rules set by TV Licensing. State pensioners don't automatically qualify for a TV licence that's free. Instead, they need to be aged 74 or over, with an income beneath a certain threshold. Your income also needs to be low enough to qualify for Pension Credit. The benefit is given to those who have less than £227.10 per week income (£346.60 for a couple), based on the new rates which were introduced in April. Anyone who hit state pension age before April 2016, will be on the old basic state pension, which only pays £176.45, unless you have other top ups like the Pre-97 Additional State Pension. Therefore, unless you have other income or savings, everyone on the old state pension will be eligible to claim Pension Credit. This is not automatic, and it must be claimed from the DWP with an application. In turn, those who are claiming Pension Credit will be able to apply for a free TV licence. If you were already claiming Pension Credit, you can make your free TV licence application aged 74, instead of waiting until you're 75. TV Licensing says: "You can apply for a free TV licence if you, as the licence holder, are 75 years or older AND you, or your partner living at the same address, receive Pension Credit. "If you already receive Pension Credit, you can apply for your free licence when you are 74 years old. "We'll update your payments to cover you until your 75th birthday, and then you'll be covered by your free licence. "We'll confirm this in writing." Even if you have too much income to qualify for pension credit, if anyone in your household is legally blind, you could at least cut your TV licence in half to just £84. It only needs one person in the household to be legally blind to cut the whole household bill in half.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
How would a holiday lottery work? Simon Calder spins the travel roulette wheel
The old town of Dubrovnik has a spectacular location on the edge of the Adriatic, and a deep history. Churches and cottages line the cobbled streets and heavenly stairways, all wrapped in ancient walls. And on any day in summer, the place is overrun with tourists. Some are attracted by the sheer good looks of the Croatian city; others are lured by the Game of Thrones connection. The remainder were simply dropped off for the day by a cruise ship and are following (and augmenting) the crowd. Residents of other key tourism 'honeypots' across Europe, including Amsterdam, Barcelona, and Venice, say visitor numbers are unsustainable and are damaging the community, as well as the fabric, of the city. Glenn Fogel, chief executive of parent company, believes visitor numbers to key destinations could be limited by a combination of 'higher cost and lottery'. He told the BBC: 'Even though you may not be wealthy, you should still get a chance to visit some of those beautiful and great places in the world.' So how might such schemes work? These are the key questions and answers. Surely the easy (and lucrative) way to limit tourism is to raise prices? That is certainly a valid mechanism. Venice imposes a visitor levy on certain days, and there have been calls this week to increase the admission charge to €100 (£87). Meanwhile, authorities in Amsterdam are raising accommodation taxes. And in Edinburgh, which at this time of year is hosting the Festival and Fringe, hotel rates are so high that 'normal' tourists are staying away. Read more: Travel agents hit out at claim by boss that 'AI can find the best holiday for you' Justin Francis, chief executive of Responsible Travel, says: 'Price rises, tourism taxes, regulating accommodation – especially Airbnb – and 'demarketing' are ways to ensure limit numbers.' In the context of high fees, he cites the example of gorilla tracking in Africa, where permit prices can reach $1,500 (£1,130). Mr Francis says: 'Far from causing outcry, tourists view the handful of expensive permits as an exclusive, once-in-a-lifetime experience. The experience has not been boycotted; permits regularly sell out. Better still, the forests remain intact, and gorilla numbers, which were once threatened, have increased substantially since the introduction of tourism.' But high prices can exclude less wealthy travellers from iconic locations, which many people believe that is unfair. In France, for example, many museums – including the Louvre in Paris – have designated days when admission is free. But when demand is unrelenting, using a lottery system has some appeal. Are lotteries currently used to manage tourism numbers anywhere? Yes. The principal that access to fragile locations should be decided randomly is used at a small scale to limit visitor numbers to US National Parks. For example, each year 450 permits are granted for rafting through the Grand Canyon on the Colorado River. At a hikers' refuge in the National Park, Phantom Ranch, bed spaces are allocated by lottery 15 months in advance. Justin Francis, an advocate for accessible tourism, says lotteries are also used for cultural events in Japan and some Antarctic expeditions. Read more: Are online travel agents cleaning up their act? Could the principle be extended to entire cities? In a few specific cases, quite easily. Notable examples are cities such as Venice, surrounded by water, and the old town of Dubrovnik, with a big wall around it and limited access points. At present visitors arriving in Venice on 'permit days' have to present either ID proving they are a local or a worker, or evidence that they have paid the levy. That could be changed to proof that you have been successful in the lottery. But for large, sprawling cities such as London it would be utterly unmanageable – there will not be tourist checkpoints on the M25. However, key locations could operate with a quota system. For example, the royal parks have fences and gates that would allow for relatively easy control. How would a lottery actually work? Systems for allocating scarce resources through chance are already well-established for key sporting events, such as Wimbledon, the Olympics and the World Cup, so there should not be a problem with the technology. Applicants would go online and state their wish to visit on a particular day. At some appointed time, an electronic lottery would allocate the correct number of prizes – with lucky winners having a QR code to show at the gate. Residents and workers would need to show ID. What could possibly go wrong? Plenty. For a start, consider a family group of six. Would they all be able to apply together – or might some win and some lose? Individuals will doubtless try to game the system, for example by submitting multiple applications using different email addresses. Given the ability of sharks and touts to profit from excessive demand, however sophisticated a ticketing system may be, some permits coud be sold for inflated prices. While some locations in a few key cities are hopelessly overcrowded, inbound tourism in most places is rightly regarded as huge benefit – the closest that a city, county or nation can get to free money. Were parts of a country to start cordoning off areas and making tourism into something of a lottery, visitors may simply move to other nations. A highly localised case of overtourism could be alleviated, but at the cost of livelihoods for many in the tourism industry.
