![[UPDATED] 'Fewer cases hanging over him': Najib happy with SRC DNAA](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.nst.com.my%2Fimages%2Farticles%2FDATUK_SERI_NAJIB_TUN_RAZAK_1750387182.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
[UPDATED] 'Fewer cases hanging over him': Najib happy with SRC DNAA
KUALA LUMPUR: Datuk Seri Najib Razak is happy that he had been given the discharge not amounting to an acquittal (DNAA) over three money laundering charges RM27 million linked to SRC International Bhd.
Najib's lawyer, Tan Sri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah, said the former prime minister is pleased with the decision of High Court judge K. Muniandy, who had issued the DNAA order today.
"He is happy simply because there are not too many cases hanging over his head. He has been asking for a DNAA for sometime.
"He can concentrate on the 1Malaysia Development Bhd (1MDB) case now," said Shafee in a press conference after court proceedings.
Shafee said the prosecution cannot appeal against Muniandy's decision today.
"If they are ready, then they can recharge. But, we hope they do not.
"There is enough prejudice on Najib. We implore the Attorney-General to use his good office and discretion to close this matter," he said.
Najib, however, will return to prison.
"For this case, he is freed. But because he is serving another jail term, he goes back to jail," Shafee added.
Shafee said Najib was charged in 2019 but the case was postponed multiple times over the years despite close to 30 days of trial set for proceedings.
"At last, the judge said the prosecution had conveyed to him in May that although they want to proceed with the case, they are not ready yet.
"This is because there are many documents, up to 500 pages, not in their hands because those documents are also required in the other SRC case, SRC civil case and cases involving others, so it (the documents) is everywhere.
"So when the judge asked if the documents could be obtained as soon as possible, the prosecution could not commit because they do not know when themselves," he said.
Shafee said Najib should have been charged for the offences in the first case of SRC involving RM42 million, where he was later sentenced to 12 years jail and fined RM210 million.
However, the Federal Territories Pardons Board reduced Najib's fine to RM50 million and halved his 12-year jail term to six.
"These three charges came later from the first SRC charge. Otherwise, Najib could have had a different outcome and he does not have to face a double journey.
"The prosecution should have known whether the charges were connected. In fact, they knew, but somebody forgot to bring it up to the same court for one joint case.
"As we know, money laundering charges cannot stand on their own. It has to be always associated with a predicate offence," he said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
35 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
Couple jailed 34 years for maid's murder
KOTA KINABALU: A couple charged with the murder of their maid were each sentenced to 34 years' imprisonment by the High Court today. Justice Datuk Dr Lim Hock Leng also ordered the first accused, Mohammad Ambree Yunos @ Unos, 44, to be given 12 strokes of the cane. However, Etiqah Siti Noorashikeen Mohd Sulong, 37, was spared the otherwise mandatory punishment of whipping due to her gender, under Section 289 of the Criminal Procedure Code. In the dock, Ambree appeared calm, while his ex-wife Etiqah was seen covering her face and bowing her head. Ambree, a contractor, and Etiqah, a former reality TV cooking show finalist, were found guilty of murdering their maid, Nur Afiyah Daeng Damin, 28, between Dec 8 and 11, 2021, at a condominium in Penampang. They were convicted under Section 302 of the Penal Code, which provides for the death penalty or imprisonment for a term of not less than 30 years and not more than 40 years. If not sentenced to death, the offender shall also be punished with not less than 12 strokes of the cane. In its decision, the court stated that the prosecution had proven its case beyond reasonable doubt under the said charge and that neither Ambree nor Etiqah had raised any reasonable doubt in their defence. In particular, the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt the essential elements, namely, the identity and death of the deceased; that the deceased died as a result of injuries sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death; that the accused persons caused those injuries with the requisite intention under Section 300(c) of the Penal Code; and that they acted in furtherance of a common intention in causing those injuries. In passing the sentence, the court said that although both defence counsels made impassioned mitigation pleas, it could not ignore the cruelty suffered by the deceased at the hands of the accused, as highlighted by the prosecution. The court considered the nature of the injuries and the manner in which they were inflicted over time. Earlier, despite the recent abolition of the mandatory death penalty and the enforcement of the Abolition of Mandatory Death Penalty Act 2023, deputy public prosecutor Dacia Jane Romanus urged the court to impose the death sentence. She argued that the case had shocked not only the conscience of Sabahans, but of the nation as a whole, and for that reason, must be met with the full weight of the law. "The deceased was a young woman who left her home and entered the home of the accused persons to work honestly and earn a living during a global pandemic. "While others remained at home in search of safety and protection, the deceased experienced the opposite. "She endured prolonged suffering in her place of employment, which ultimately became the site of her tragic demise. "The accused persons, as her employers, were meant to provide her with shelter, food, and safety. "Instead, the deceased was subjected to daily torment, denied basic rights, and robbed of her life," she said. Dacia said evidence before the court, including videos and images recovered from the accused's phones, stood as disturbing documentation of the deceased's torment. This evidence not only corroborated the abuse but also revealed the accused persons' chilling intent to record and preserve her suffering. "We wish to remind the court that in this case, the condition of the deceased's body was so severely deteriorated that her husband was only able to identify her by the bangle she wore on her wrist, a silent witness to the life she once lived and the violence she endured. "This was not a murder committed in a moment of rage or under provocation. "It was a prolonged abuse. "This murder was not impulsive; it was cruel and intentional. "The injuries sustained by the deceased did not occur all at once, they were inflicted over time, in a prolonged campaign of cruelty that speaks volumes about the intent of the accused persons to cause her death. "We submit that the only just and proportionate punishment is the death penalty under Section 302 of the Penal Code. "The law must reflect the value we place on human life, and in this case, justice demands nothing less than the ultimate sentence," she said. If the court was not inclined to impose the death penalty, the prevailing trend in custodial sentencing for deaths caused by prolonged abuse was 40 years' imprisonment and 12 strokes of the cane, she said. Counsel Datuk Ram Singh represented Ambree, while Datuk Seri Rakhbir Singh represented Etiqah. Ambree and Etiqah, who had been out on bail pending the outcome of the case, were ordered to begin serving their respective sentences from the date of conviction. This case was first brought to court on Dec 29, 2021, and the couple claimed trial on Nov 17, 2022.
Daily Express
an hour ago
- Daily Express
SRC DNAA for Najib a judicial matter, I do not interfere: PM
Published on: Friday, June 20, 2025 Published on: Fri, Jun 20, 2025 By: Bernama Text Size: PUCHONG: Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim ( pic ) asserted that he had no involvement in the Kuala Lumpur High Court's decision to grant a discharge not amounting to an acquittal (DNAA) to former prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak over three money laundering charges involving RM27 million from SRC International Sdn Bhd. 'That is the judge's decision, and the Attorney General's. I do not interfere,' he said briefly when approached by reporters after performing Friday prayers at Masjid Kampung Seri Aman today. Advertisement Earlier, Judge K Muniandy allowed the defence's application for a DNAA, citing the prosecution's lack of preparedness to proceed with trial proceedings, which have been marked by persistent postponements since 2019. The court was informed that the prosecution had yet to obtain the necessary documentary evidence. The delay, the judge noted, had denied the accused the right to a fair and timely resolution of the case. A DNAA means the accused is temporarily discharged from the charges, but may still be prosecuted for the same offences in the future if the prosecution decides to reinstate them. * Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel and Telegram for breaking news alerts and key updates! * Do you have access to the Daily Express e-paper and online exclusive news? Check out subscription plans available. Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express's Telegram channel. Daily Express Malaysia
New Straits Times
an hour ago
- New Straits Times
High Court upholds senior cop's one-year jail sentence for graft
KUANTAN: The High Court here today upheld the jail sentence and fine imposed on a senior police officer convicted of accepting a RM5,000 bribe in connection with a drug case seven years ago. Judge Datuk Mohd Radzi Harun dismissed the appeal by Assistant Superintendent Hasbullah Ali Alias, 48, against the one-year jail term and RM25,000 fine meted out by the Sessions Court here on Dec 15, 2023. Hasbullah, who is attached to the Pahang Narcotics Crime Investigation Department, was charged with receiving a bribe from a man at a restaurant in Jalan Beserah here at 12.37pm on May 7, 2018. The prosecution was handled by Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) deputy public prosecutor Muhamad Asraf Mohamed Tahir, while the accused was represented by lawyer Ahmad Nur Faid Afiq Aziz. Ahmad Nur Faid applied for a stay of execution, pending Hasbullah's appeal at the Court of Appeal. Asraf told the court to impose a higher bail amount to ensure that Hasbullah attends court. Radzi granted the stay, offering bail at RM15,000 and ordered the accused to report to the nearest MACC office on the first Monday of every month. Hasbullah was told to surrender his passport until the case concludes. Hasbullah, who has been suspended from duty, has 14 days to file an appeal to a higher court.
