Kirtland command at Vandenberg for ICBM test launch
Feb. 17—LOMPOC, Calif. — The Air Force test squadron responsible for evaluating U.S. intercontinental ballistic missile capability plans a test launch late Tuesday or early Wednesday from Vandenberg Space Force Base on California's central coast.
The 377th Test and Evaluation Group, assigned to Kirtland Air Force Base in Albuquerque and based at Vandenberg, conducts a few test launches a year to evaluate the system's performance and accuracy. The tests are also a demonstration of the Department of Defense's nuclear arms capability. The most recent test was carried out successfully in November.
"An airborne launch validates the survivability of our ICBMs, which serve as the strategic backstop of our nation's defense and defense of allies and partners," Gen. Thomas Bussiere, commander of the Air Force Global Strike Command, said in a statement following the Nov. 6, 2024 test.
Tuesday's launch will be observed by Air Force Col. Michael Power, 377th Air Base Wing and installation commander at Kirtland, overseeing the ICBM test organization as well as other operations and programs in space, missile and laser technology. Power assumed command of the 377th in 2023.
The test will launch an unarmed Minuteman III missile, of which 400 are in service at bases in Wyoming, Montana and North Dakota, according to the Air Force. Weighing nearly 40 tons and propelled by three solid-fuel rocket motors, the missile travels at speeds reaching 15,000 miles per hour.
Besides the ground-based ICBM system, the U.S. nuclear weapon arsenal includes submarine-launched missiles and bombs designed to drop from the air, together known by the Department of Defense as the "nuclear triad."
Regular test launches are scheduled years in advance and the missiles are randomly selected from the U.S. arsenal.
Preparation for the test is tightly scheduled. It begins early Tuesday morning ahead of a six-hour flight window in the evening. The conditions are also carefully coordinated on the ground and in the airspace from Vandenberg to the target test site on Kwajalein Atoll in the Marshall Islands — a distance of approximately 4,200 miles.
The Minuteman series has been in service for more than 50 years and is slated to be replaced in the coming years by the Sentinel missile. Yet the timeframe for that changeover has been unclear since the Pentagon announced a restructuring of the program last year in response to cost overruns.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Explosives topple ULA launch complex towers to make room for SpaceX Starships at Cape Canaveral
Following a quick succession of orange-flamed explosions, United Launch Alliance's mobile service tower and high-reaching lightning towers toppled to the ground Thursday, June 11, at historic Launch Complex 37 at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station. The demolition clears room for SpaceX to build new launch pads, landing pads and surrounding infrastructure for enormous Starship-Super Heavy rocket systems — which could start rumbling to flight from Launch Complex 37 as soon as next year. "Shout out to the @SLDelta45 and @SpaceX for the clean and precision demolition operation!!! Cheers to the future!" SpaceX Vice President of Launch Kiko Dontchev said in a tweet. Cape Canaveral: Is there a launch today? Upcoming SpaceX, Axiom, ULA rocket launch schedule at Cape Canaveral ULA previously launched Delta IV rockets from the complex. The 16th Delta IV Heavy triple-core rocket notched its final fiery liftoff in April 2024 on a National Reconnaissance Office mission, marking the last launch at the site. Now, SpaceX awaits key environmental and regulatory approvals from the U.S. Air Force and Federal Aviation Administration to start launching Starships from the complex. A 176-page Air Force draft environmental impact statement spells out proposed new infrastructure at LC-37: Two integration towers, each measuring about 600 feet tall. Two concrete launch pads about 400 feet long by 400 feet wide. Two concrete landing pads, each measuring about 225 feet in diameter, with two Super Heavy first-stage-booster catch towers. These will stack up similar in size to the integration towers. Flame trenches and diverters to reduce acoustic and thermal energy during launches and landings. Utilities, propellant tanks, staging and storage buildings, water storage and stormwater ponds, lighting and other improvements. In addition, SpaceX would widen about seven miles of Phillips Parkway. Roughly four miles of this stretch lie on the Space Force installation, while the other three are on NASA's adjacent Kennedy Space Center. Crews would also widen and improve about one mile of Old State Road A1A. ULA's lease of LC-37 expired after that April 2024 Delta IV Heavy launch, and infrastructure at the launch site was turned over to the Air Force, said Emre Kelly, Space Launch Delta 45 media operations chief. "The (Air Force) does not intend to make a future leasing decision on SLC-37 until the Starship Environmental Impact Statement is complete and Record of Decision has been published," Kelly said in an email. Launch Complex 37 construction wrapped up in August 1963, three months before President John F. Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas. Six Saturn I and two Saturn IB rockets launched there during the 1960s before NASA deactivated and mothballed the complex by November 1971, according to the Cape Canaveral Space Force Museum. After lying dormant for more than two decades, crews built new infrastructure at the complex and the first Delta IV launched in November 2002. 'I have great feelings of nostalgia for that pad. I was fortunate enough to capture several Delta Medium and Delta Heavy launches from that pad. The Delta rockets were just beautiful to photograph," Indialantic space photographer Michael Seeley said after capturing demolition video and images. "And so, watching it topple, I was reminded of that. And I'm reminded that, with change comes opportunity. I'm interested to see what comes next,' Seeley said. For the latest news from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station and NASA's Kennedy Space Center, visit Another easy way: Click here to sign up for our weekly Space newsletter. Rick Neale is a Space Reporter at FLORIDA TODAY. Contact Neale at Rneale@ Twitter/X: @RickNeale1 Space is important to us and that's why we're working to bring you top coverage of the industry and Florida launches. Journalism like this takes time and resources. Please support it with a subscription here. This article originally appeared on Florida Today: ULA rocket towers demolished at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station
Politico
16 hours ago
- Politico
Wanted: One NASA administrator
Presented by WELCOME TO POLITICO PRO SPACE. Thanks to everyone who read our inaugural issue. The excitement continues this week with speculation on the next NASA administrator, Congressional Golden Dome talk, and a Florida push to snag NASA HQ. Who do you think the next NASA chief should be? Email me at sskove@ with tips, pitches and feedback, and find me on X at @samuelskove. And remember, we're offering this newsletter for free over the next few weeks. After that, it will be available only to POLITICO Pro subscribers. Read all about it here. The Spotlight Now that Donald Trump has pushed NASA administrator nominee Jared Isaacman through the airlock, the search is on to find the space agency's next boss. We spoke to 12 insiders and analysts about who could get the nod. The conclusion? They'll probably be retired military. Starship Troopers: At least three former two- and three-star generals with space ties could be in the mix, according to four industry officials, who like others were granted anonymity to discuss internal discussions. These include retired Space Force Maj. Gen. John Olson, Lt. Gen. John Shaw, and Air Force Lt. Gen. Steve Kwast. Olson served in the Space Force and in NASA. Shaw retired as deputy commander of Space Command in 2023. Kwast last served in the Air Force, but supporters pushed for him to lead the Space Force. (Notice a theme?) The industry buzz follows Trump's decision two weeks ago to rescind the nomination amid a feud between SpaceX founder and Isaacman ally Elon Musk. The president then made the head-turning announcement that Joint Chiefs Chair Gen. Dan Caine would weigh in on the search for the next administrator for NASA — an agency that is not part of the military. Starfleet: Retired service members rarely lead the civilian agency, whose employees are known more for studying the stars than working with weapons. It has some people worried. Other potential names floating in the stratosphere include NASA's Kevin Coggins and astronaut Mike Hopkins. Coggins is a former military official who serves as head of NASA's Space Communications and Navigation program. Hopkins is a former NASA astronaut who joined the Space Force — from space — and was the first astronaut for the U.S.'s newest military service. Former Rep. Mike Garcia (R-Calif.), who served on the House science subcommittee on space before Rep. George Whitesides (D-Calif.) unseated him this year, is yet another name circulating. Under Pressure: Both industry and lawmakers are eager to fill the role amid the White House's proposed budget cuts to NASA, competition with China to return to the moon, and Trump's plans to land astronauts on Mars. 'I had thought we would have [an administrator] by now,' Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), chair of the Senate Commerce Committee, which oversees NASA, told my colleague Joe this week. 'I don't know what their timing is, but I hope that the White House moves swiftly.' Some senators were even willing to swallow their concerns about Isaacman, a billionaire who had no experience in government, to speed up the process. 'In this landscape of getting back [to the moon] quickly, usurping China, I was ready to give a technology entrepreneur a chance,' Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.), the ranking member of the Senate Commerce committee, told Joe. Twilight Zone: But industry officials were not aware of any candidates the White House had spoken with yet, a sign that no one has emerged as a frontrunner. A White House spokesperson declined to comment. The physics of the nomination process is also working against the space industry, thanks to a nomination backlog. Isaacman, who Trump tapped early relative to past NASA administrators, took six months to even get on the roster for a Senate vote. And we all know how that turned out. Galactic Government THE NASA HQ RACE TRAILS ALONG: States have spent months duking out who will snag NASA's headquarters once its Washington lease expires in 2028. Florida has just upped the ante. Much of the Florida congressional delegation sent a letter this week to Trump urging him to consider moving NASA headquarters to Florida's Space Coast. It looks remarkably like a letter sent in April by Texas Republicans making a similar plea to relocate NASA to Houston, aka the 'Space City.' All in? But only two of Florida's eight Democratic representatives stamped their approval. None of Texas' 12 Democrats did. 'Both states could rally their delegations if it was important,' an industry official said. Military GOLDEN GANG: The Trump administration may not know how it will build the president's 'Golden Dome' defense shield, but that hasn't stopped lawmakers from creating a caucus for it. Reps. Jeff Crank (R-Colo.) and Dale Strong (R-Ala.) launched the House Golden Dome caucus this week to complement its counterpart in the Senate, created in May by Sen. Tim Sheehy (R-Mont.). The highly nebulous plan involves placing interceptors in space to shoot down enemy missiles, a scheme that could cost more than $500 billion. Crank, a first time lawmaker, represents Colorado Springs, home of Space Command. Strong represents Huntsville, a space hub and possible future home of Space Command — over the opposition of his colleague. What Next: Trump announced in May that he had selected a design for the multi-layered system and tapped Space Force Gen. Michael Guetlein to lead development. But senators from both parties have said the plan is opaque, and the Pentagon canceled a major conference with industry on its plans just two weeks before the meetings were set to take place. The Reading Room House appropriators call for new Space Force acquisition pilot: Breaking Defense How Private Space Drives Space Force's Intel Delivery: Payload Space Force's first next-gen missile warning launch pushed to 2026: Defense News Voyager raises $383 million from upsized IPO: SpaceNews Event Horizon MONDAY: The Washington Space Business Roundtable holds a discussion on 2025 priorities for the FCC's Space Bureau. The Paris Air Show starts Monday and runs through Sunday. TUESDAY: The Lunar and Planetary Institute holds a virtual and in-person discussion of NASA's Europa Clipper mission. WEDNESDAY: The National Security Space Association hosts a classified forum on the Space Force's strategic plans. The Senate Armed Services Committee holds a hearing on the Defense Department's 2026 budget request. Photo of the Week
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Air Force: Starship to cause few environmental impacts at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station
Would launching up to 76 massive SpaceX Starship rockets atop Super Heavy boosters per year — accompanied by up to 152 sonic-boom-producing landings — generate few significant environmental impacts from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station's Launch Complex 37? That's what a newly released Air Force draft environmental impact statement determined. However, Charlie Venuto, past president of the Merritt Island Wildlife Association, worries how Starship's thunderous noise and vibrations will affect ecologically threatened Southeastern beach mice and nesting sea turtles — along with air and water quality — across the nonprofit's namesake 140,000-acre national wildlife refuge and Canaveral National Seashore. The draft EIS acknowledged that Starship-Super Heavy launches and sonic booms from Launch Complex 37 would constitute a "community annoyance" for areas like Cape Canaveral, Titusville and Cocoa Beach. And in a move cheered by MIWA officials, the study eliminated from further analysis the thought of building new Starship launch complexes at two greenspace areas at the Cape, citing high potential of endangered species and archaeological sites. Cape Canaveral: Is there a launch today? Upcoming SpaceX, Axiom, ULA rocket launch schedule at Cape Canaveral "The refuge has more endangered and threatened species than any other refuge in the continental U.S. So you know, we have an obligation. I know, working on shuttle, that was always a major concern," Venuto said. He was manager of environmental safety for USBI, NASA's prime contractor for shuttle solid rocket boosters. "We wanted to maintain that balance between technology and nature. And it seemed like we did a pretty good job of that," Venuto said. SpaceX seeks regulatory permissions to start launching Starship rockets from Launch Complex 37 at the Space Force installation and pad 39A at NASA's neighboring Kennedy Space Center. The enormous economic undertaking will generate at least $1.8 billion of capital investment and generated about 600 new full-time jobs by 2030, Gov. Ron Desantis' office announced. The Air Force's 176-page draft environmental impact statement analyzed potential environmental, social, economic, historic and cultural ramifications from redeveloping about 230 acres of Launch Complex 37 to support Starship-Super Heavy operations starting next year, including launches and booster landings. United Launch Alliance previously used LC-37 to send up hulking triple-core Delta IV Heavy rockets. The last Delta IV Heavy launched in April 2024. Starship infrastructure includes two concrete launch pads, launch mounts, twin 600-foot integration towers, twin 225-foot-diameter landing pads, and landing catch towers. In addition to up to 76 annual Starship launches, the draft EIS examined 76 yearly Starship static-fire tests, 76 Super Heavy static-fire tests, 76 Super Heavy landings and 76 Starship landings. The draft EIS said Starship would have no significant impact on wildlife from LC-37, though "some federally protected species would be exposed to light, vehicle traffic, noise (including sonic boom overpressures), vibration, and heat during launch operations." What's more, the study determined Starship operations would not have significant impact on air quality, the maritime transportation system, hearing damage, structural damages, groundwater or surface waters. The Air Force draft EIS eliminated consideration of building a new Launch Complex 50 for Starship operations from greenspace at the northern portion of Cape Canaveral Space Force Station. This is "an area with high potential for endangered species and archaeological sites," the study said. Also eliminated was the potential, unbuilt 175-acre Launch Complex 49 near KSC's northern border, in proximity to Playalinda Beach. This land is part of the Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge and managed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. During a FLORIDA TODAY interview, Venuto and MIWA President Nancy Bray praised those moves. "The good news we were glad to hear was that they were going to repurpose these facilities," Venuto said of LC-37. "We felt that was impressive. That was good thought: Use the infrastructure that you have, and build on that. So we applauded that." Bray logged a 34-year NASA career, serving as KSC's director of spaceport integration and services. SpaceX is also developing a Starship-Super Heavy site there at pad 39A, pending environmental approval and issuance of a Federal Aviation Administration vehicle operator license. The goal: Conduct up to 44 annual launches and 88 landings from KSC. In a June 2024 letter to the FAA, the MIWA — which boasts roughly 2,500 paid members and interested "constituents" — expressed holistic concerns about Starship-Super Heavy in light of cumulative rocket-launch impacts across the Cape. That includes Blue Origin's heavy-lift New Glenn rockets, the second of which could launch as soon as Aug. 15. Plus, SpaceX seeks permission to boost Falcon rocket launches from 50 to up to 120 from Launch Complex 40 at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station. "The SpaceX facility on Roberts Rd. continues to expand and there are many build projects at the KSC Visitors Center. There are several other construction projects planned for KSC and CCSFS," the letter said. "The cumulative affects to water quality, air quality (including damage to the stratospheric ozone layer), habitat destruction, ability to practice conservation management techniques such as controlled burns, and increased carbon emissions need to be examined in total," the letter said. Bray and Venuto said they will monitor the Starship environmental permitting process during the coming months. Now, officials are collecting public comments on the Air Force draft EIS for the Launch Complex 37 proposal. Officials will conduct three Brevard County public hearings to present information, answer questions and collect comments. Hours are 4 p.m. to 7 p.m., with formal presentations starting at 5:30 p.m. July 8 in Titusville: American Police Hall of Fame and Museum, 6350 Horizon Drive. July 9 in Cape Canaveral: Radisson Resort at the Port, 8701 Astronaut Blvd. July 10 in Cocoa: Dr. Joe Lee Smith Recreation Center, 415 Stone St. In addition, a virtual meeting will be available from July 15 to 28 at Public comments can be submitted through July 28 at and by emailing contactus@ with the subject line 'SpaceForceStarshipEIS.' Or, mail comments to CCSFS Starship EIS, 5401 W. Kennedy Blvd. #300, Tampa FL 33609. Starship operations would have a beneficial impact on Brevard County's economy, decreasing unemployment and likely increasing the median income in the area, the draft EIS said. "Up to 450 additional full-time employees or contractors would be needed to support launch activities 24 hours per day, 7 days per week, throughout the year," the study said of LC-37 operations. In addition, Starship launches from the Space Force station would "increase the space launch mission capability of the (Department of Defense), NASA, and other federal and commercial customers and enhance the resilience and capacity of the nation's space launch infrastructure, while promoting a robust and competitive national space industry," the study said. Noise represented the study's lone known potential significant cumulative effect — which it labeled a "community annoyance" for areas like Cape Canaveral, Titusville and Cocoa Beach. To mitigate noise, SpaceX would: Employ sound suppression systems, such as water deluge and flame diverters. Work with Space Launch Delta 45 to notify the community of noise and sonic boom events. Structural damage claims would be investigated, with claimants compensated according to FAA regulations, the Commercial Space Launch Act and Air Force policy. On that topic, the Cape Canaveral City Council is partnering with the Florida Institute of Technology on an upcoming $10,019 rocket launch impact study. Researchers will install sensor suites this summer at buildings across the beachside city to collect data on decibel levels, vibrations and air quality before, during and after all launches from the Cape. Starship-Super Heavy's noise, vibrations and sonic booms will likely adversely affect Southeastern beach mice and Florida scrub-jays, per the draft EIS. SpaceX would develop monitoring plans in coordination with Space Launch Delta 45 and USFWS to better understand noise and overpressure impacts on these threatened species. "Southeastern beach mouse habitat permanently lost during construction would be mitigated by providing funding to offset the loss of habitat at an offsite location in accordance with an agreement with the USFWS. This mitigation would also benefit Florida scrub-jay habitat," the draft EIS said. Similarly, SpaceX would submit a lighting management plan to minimize effects on sea turtle nesting and hatchlings. For the latest news from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station and NASA's Kennedy Space Center, visit Another easy way: Click here to sign up for our weekly Space newsletter. Rick Neale is a Space Reporter at FLORIDA TODAY. Contact Neale at Rneale@ Twitter/X: @RickNeale1 Space is important to us and that's why we're working to bring you top coverage of the industry and Florida launches. Journalism like this takes time and resources. Please support it with a subscription here. This article originally appeared on Florida Today: Merritt Island refuge backers concerned about Starship wildlife impacts
