SoCal wildfires caused as much as $164B in damage: UCLA research
The two biggest blazes that recently ravaged the Los Angeles metropolitan region may have caused property damage and capital losses of up to $164 billion, new research has determined.
Insured losses, meanwhile, likely made up around $75 billion of that total, according to the report, issued by economists at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Anderson School of Management.
The economists also predicted a 0.48 percent loss in county-level gross domestic product for 2025, or about $4.6 billion, and a total wage loss of $297 million for local businesses in the affected areas.
Although both blazes are now 100 percent contained, the Palisades Fire scorched 23,707 acres in the Pacific Palisades area, while the Eaton Fire burned 14,021 acres in Altadena, north of Pasadena, according to Cal Fire.
On Tuesday, Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) signed an executive order to minimize the red tape that could have impeded the dispersal of widespread relief services for wildfire survivors. The order suspended certain rules, extended relevant deadlines, provided regulatory relief for rebuilding and broadened access to essential services.
'As Los Angeles rises, we will continue to remove the barriers that would stand in the way,' the governor pledged in a Tuesday statement.
Later in the day, Newsom also announced that more households in the impacted zip codes would now be eligible to receive Disaster CalFresh food benefits.
Although the fires may now be contained, the UCLA economists warned that the consequences will be hard-hitting and have a wide range of knock-on effects.
The wildfires directly destroyed 16,420 residential and commercial properties, as well as many automobiles and personal belongings, according to the report.
Of the buildings ravaged, 6,822 structures were in Pacific Palisades and Malibu, while 9,418 were in Altadena, the research showed. With these figures in mind, the authors used data from California's previous most catastrophic blazes to generate preliminary loss estimates.
Without a substantial boost to wildfire mitigation efforts and investments, Californians could face increasingly expensive insurance premiums, the economists noted.
'All wildfire mitigation investments will be justified, considering the astronomical costs associated with wildfires,' the authors added.
They also forecast that Los Angeles housing markets will become increasingly unaffordable — with these conditions specifically affecting rental units.
Although LA County has issued permits for approximately 20,000 to 25,000 new housing units over the past decade, wildfires in the region have eliminated two-thirds to three-quarters of the annual housing supply, per the report.
'The wildfires have further exacerbated the already critical issue of insufficient housing supply in LA,' the authors warned.
In addition to the direct economic losses and future housing problems, the researchers also focused on medical issues linked to the inhalation of wildfire-related contaminants.
In addition, they noted that exposure to fire-borne particulate matter caused up to 55,710 premature deaths in California between 2008 and 2018 — resulting in costs of up to $456 billion.
'The economic impact of LA wildfires extends far beyond property destruction,' the economists wrote. 'Wildfires produce large smoke plumes that can travel long distances, posing significant threats to public health.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
44 minutes ago
- Forbes
Lakers Sale Makes NBA Expansion Even Hotter Topic Post-Finals
LOS ANGELES, CA - OCTOBER 31: Jeanie Buss attends a basketball game between the Los Angeles Lakers ... More and the Detroit Pistons at Staples Center on October 31, 2017 in Los Angeles, California. (Photo by) With the NBA due to crown its seventh different champion in seven years when the 2025 Finals conclude, expansion was already going to be at the top of the agenda, according to recent remarks from Commissioner Adam Silver. Salary cap machinations under Silver have pushed more parity for the NBA – something the league's still working on taking full advantage of from a media standpoint – so it only makes sense that opportunity is a selling point for prospective new owners in ways it may not have been previously. The newly announced sale of the Los Angeles Lakers, for a record $10 billion, would also do a lot to warm the NBA's existing owners to the idea. Not even 12 months ago, the going rate for an NBA team sale seemed to sit around $4 billion or so. Then the Boston Celtics sold for a then-record $6.1 billion, and now this Lakers deal ups the ante even further. It's not to say that the value of every NBA team is now $10 billion. But the Lakers selling for that price puts the potential out there, and increases the inherent value of the other 29 teams. The number also increases the expected expansion fee – which gets pocketed by the league and current owners – from something in the $5-6 billion range, to potentially much more. Expansion was already an enticing prospect for the NBA. Now? It's a no-brainer. For the NBA to add teams, owners need to recommend a formal expansion exploration, and they will almost certainly do so when they meet at the board of governors meeting in July. The league then meets with prospective ownership groups and cities, gets a better understanding of who has the finances and infrastructure (existing or planned) to make it happen, then starts making decisions. It's no secret to Silver that various markets and groups would like expansion teams. So while there will be a desire to hear all potential bids, the expansion fee likely narrows the list immediately and it's not like the league is unaware of the current frontrunners (by all accounts, Seattle and Las Vegas). Silver has said he wants to address 'underserved' markets with expansion. What might those be? That depends… SEATTLE, WASHINGTON - OCTOBER 10: A Seattle Sonics fan holds a sign before the Rain City Showcase in ... More a preseason NBA game between the LA Clippers and the Utah Jazz at Climate Pledge Arena on October 10, 2023 in Seattle, Washington. (Photo by) As U.S. pro sports have become absolutely ubiquitous across culture due to streaming, 24/7 coverage and the marketing dollars invested in these leagues, you could argue it's hard to find many 'underserved' markets or fans that don't already have allegiances in place. Even the NFL, for all its overwhelming financial success, hasn't added a truly 'new' market since 1995 (Charlotte, Jacksonville). The last three teams were all retread markets filling a void left by teams that relocated. For at least one of the teams the NBA will likely add, it seems like an obvious script to follow. Seattle SuperSonics fans have felt abandoned by the league for 17 years now, and no time more than these past couple weeks as the Oklahoma City Thunder (the one-time Sonics) knock on the door of their first championship in OKC. The Seattle area has the means and desire to support a team, and already proved they could. Plus, the arena's already built, assuming the team would play at ClimatePledge Arena, current home of the Kraken (NHL) and Storm (WNBA). After that, though? It gets trickier. There are retread U.S. markets like St. Louis (Hawks), Kansas City (Kings) and San Diego (Clippers), and you could argue all are currently 'under-served' by the NBA to an extent. Given the NBA's global focus, international expansion to somewhere like Vancouver (former home of the Grizzlies) or Mexico City also has upside. Current U.S. policies might present the most hurdles for both. But both markets could be seen as 'under-served' as well. Las Vegas is the leader for spot No. 2, but it's also not 'under-served' as an NBA market as it is, which is where Silver's comments could shed light on an atypical city selection. Just to play devil's advocate on Vegas: The NBA already has a large footprint in the city between annual Summer League showcases and the NBA Cup played there. It's effectively the league's West Coast headquarters without a team, and league functions there feel like an event because they're not in any team's home market. The once-plucky story of Vegas as a pro sports city is also gone at this point. It's a Golden Knights town that also happens to have the Raiders and soon, the Athletics. The NBA adding team No. 4 to the mix has questionable appeal on its face. All of this doesn't mean Vegas fails to get an expansion team. It's simply a reason why it may not be as much of a lock as many assume. No matter which cities the NBA eventually expands to, however, they'll be entering a new dynamic that must demand more of the league's media partners to prop up less-established franchises. The roster-building rules focused on parity are just part of it. To really reap the rewards of that open playing field, and expansion as well, league media has to find ways to market all 30 (32) teams, and not just the same handful of squads. Whether they're the Lakers or one of those expansion teams, they're all businesses worth well over $5 billion each now. If coverage reflects that, it'll lead to even more growth beyond that in the long-term. And any expansion group should be making those sorts of demands upon admittance.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Municipalities tap AI for permitting
This story was originally published on Construction Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Construction Dive newsletter. In order to cut down on long wait times for environmental and building permits, the cities of Los Angeles, Austin, Texas, and Honolulu have turned to artificial intelligence to give their planning departments a boost over the past year, according to the cities. Austin and Los Angeles are using Australia-based Archistar to help expedite permit review, according to official announcements. Austin officially adopted the technology in October 2024 following a three-month pilot, and the city and county of Los Angeles launched the service on April 30, according to Gov. Gavin Newsom's office, following wildfires that devastated the region. In addition, the city of Honolulu plans to speed up the permitting process with the help of these AI-based technical upgrades starting later this year, Mayor Rick Blangiardi told the Honolulu Civil Beat during a June 4 event. These changes come as the federal government, at the behest of President Donald Trump, seeks to change its environmental and federal permitting process with the help of technologies such as artificial intelligence. Austin has begun using Archistar for residential permits, with plans to expand into other areas. There haven't been critical errors or unexpected behaviors from Archistar, a common concern when adopting AI, Stephanie Sanchez, senior public information specialist for the city of Austin, told Construction Dive. At this time, it has only been tested within the residential building plan review permitting process, Sanchez said. In California, Archistar's technology uses computer vision, machine learning and automated rulesets to instantly check designs against local zoning and building codes in the assessment process for building permits, according to the Newsom's office. With it, property owners can pre-check plans before submission to ensure validity and prevent delays. 'We see AI as a powerful support tool that can improve both speed and customer service in our permitting process,' Sanchez wrote in an email to Construction Dive. Newsome signed an executive order on Jan. 12 to expedite the rebuilding process for homes and businesses destroyed by the fires. 'The current pace of issuing permits locally is not meeting the magnitude of the challenge we face,' Newsom said in the news release. Honolulu will use technology developed by Vancouver-based Clariti to guide owners through the permitting process and replace the city's 1990's-era software system, according to the Civil Beat, which pegged the median wait for a commercial job permit at 393 days during the first quarter. Honolulu is also using Chicago-based CivCheck, which will use AI to scan building plans and make sure they're code-compliant. Recommended Reading The time is now to protect your firm from ransomware attacks Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Why Lakers' Jeanie Buss decided to vote for $10 billion sale
The post Why Lakers' Jeanie Buss decided to vote for $10 billion sale appeared first on ClutchPoints. Jeanie Buss has for the longest been the face of the Buss Family and their Los Angeles Lakers ownership, a legacy that spans back to 1979. On Wednesday, a majority of the six siblings voted in favor of selling the Lakers to billionaire Mark Walter, who is also the owner of the Los Angeles Dodgers. Despite previously being against a sale, Jeanie was among her siblings who voted in support. Advertisement Reports indicate that the decision came as a result of the offer being seen as 'impossible to refuse,' especially at a time when the Buss family had begun to contemplate estate planning and were already in favor of a sale. While Jeanie was the last among the family who wanted to keep the team, a sale had for the longest looked inevitable. 'I believe it's a good day for the family, and [Dr. Jerry Buss] is smiling down from heaven,' a source close to the Lakers stated, via Tom Friend of the Sports Business Journal. The Buss family will retain around 15% ownership of the team, with Jeanie set to continue as the team governor. Mark Walter has been a minority stakeholder in the Lakers since 2021, and will now be the sole majority owner. Dr. Jerry Buss had structured the trust in such a way that only his six children could vote on any potential sale, according to Ramona Shelburne of ESPN. Jeanie's siblings were known to be in favor of a sale for considerable time, and had even tried to force her out as the chairman of the board back in 2017. However, she ended up winning the vote, and finally appears to have sided with her siblings. Advertisement The Buss family's fortune was reportedly majorly tied up with the Lakers. This is in contrast to most other NBA owners, who make their wealth outside of the league. As a result, they were known to have operated frugally in various secondary aspects, including paying coaches, front-office executives, and buying second-round draft picks. With NBA ownership demanding regular external capital, a sale is understood to have been on the cards for a long time. One league source noted that the Lakers will now be able to 'spend like they should spend,' thanks to Walter's liquidity and $6.1 billion net worth. The Buss family may have struggled in recent years when it comes to the Lakers' ownership. However, they revolutionized NBA ownership and were chiefly responsible for making Lakers a global brand. Jeanie Buss is expected to continue playing an important role in the organization, although things can change once Mark Walter officially takes charge. Related: Lakers rumors: Nick Wright predicts Austin Reaves' trade value after Desmond Bane deal Related: Sources: Why Lakers rivals hoped Jeanie Buss would never sell franchise