
School funding worries: Area treasurers, superintendents decry policy change
Supporters of the proposed cap on cash reserves, also known as carryover balances, say schools are carrying too much cash from year to year, which they believe should be returned to taxpayers.
Opponents say capping cash reserves will hamper long-term planning and result in uneven tax rates, with tax rates rising and falling from year to year based on a district's operating expenses and cash balance.
The carryover balance cap would affect more than 500 school districts in Ohio, according to the Ohio School Boards Association, which opposes the measure.
Bath's concerns
"It would be a loss of local control," said Bath schools Treasurer Joel Parker, who intends to testify before the Senate next week in opposition to the carryover cap.
The resolution adopted Wednesday says Bath schools "has taken a conservative approach (to) fiscal management to always be prepared for unforeseen circumstances and excellent bond rating to maximize utilization of taxpayer money and should not be punished for this."
The board cites its aging infrastructure, inflation and "unfunded mandates," which require a "well-defined plan for short-term and long-term spending." Such spending is "not flat by design," according to the resolution.
The Bath school board is asking lawmakers and Gov. Mike DeWine "to allow local school districts to manage their districts by funding all schools fairly and continuing to allow management of taxation levels and cash balances at the will of local residents."
Parker said he'd like to see lawmakers remove the carryover cap from budget discussions so lawmakers can work on property tax reform separately.
Lima's losses at $8.2 million
Lima schools could lose as much as $8.2 million in the first year if the proposal is approved, though that figure could change if the school board takes action and based on the timeframe the legislature uses to calculate district spending and reserve balances, Treasurer Heather Sharp said.
Sharp said the district's cash balance exceeds operating expenses by 44%. That's down from last year's 68% rate, she said.
"We are on the right trajectory in terms of lowering our cash on hand," Sharp said.
Spencerville's $5 million cut
Spencerville Superintendent Brian Woods said his district could lose as much as $5 million in existing funds if the proposal prevails. The district's cash balance reached 71% of operating expenses as of last June.
"This is deeply concerning, as we have a carefully planned, multi-year capital improvement plan that relies on these funds for essential, long-term investments," Woods said. "A cap would not eliminate the need for these projects — it would only eliminate the funds we've responsibly saved to complete them.
"The result would force us into an impossible position: either allow our facilities to deteriorate or return to voters to request additional funding. Neither option makes sense when we already have taxpayer-approved dollars set aside for these needs."
Deficit spending in St. Marys
St. Marys Superintendent Bill Ruane said his district plans to use its cash reserve, which is roughly 62% of the previous year's expenditures, to cover a deficit projected by the district's five-year forecast.
"Instead of hiring and creating new positions and using money received during COVID, we offset current expenses to build a healthy cash balance to ensure long-term fiscal health, which under this proposal would be erased," Ruane said.
He estimates the district could lose $8.8 million in local revenue if the cap is approved.
Budget debate
Lawmakers are still drafting the state's biennial budget, which will determine school funding for the next two years.
In addition to the debate over carryover balances, lawmakers are debating the future of the Fair School Funding Formula, a bipartisan formula introduced in 2021 to comply with Ohio Supreme Court rulings, which found the state relied too heavily on property taxes to fund public K-12 schools.
Gov. Mike DeWine's version of the budget retained the formula but froze cost inputs at 2022 levels.
The House version of the bill would increase public K-12 school funding by $226 million using a different formula, but would cap carryover balances at 30% of annual operating expenses.
Both bills would increase funding for private school vouchers.
The Senate is now working on its version of the bill, which must be reconciled with the House and signed into law no later than June 30.
Biggest change in policy
Ottawa-Glandorf Superintendent Don Horstman described the carryover cap as "the biggest change to public school tax policy in 50 years" written "in less than a week," the superintendent said during an April town hall in Ottawa.
Horstman said it took years of delayed maintenance and an income tax levy for his district to go from having 45 days cash on hand, far below the recommended 90 days cash, to having a $10 million cash reserve, or six months cash.
"We were derided by some of the current House leadership for not being more frugal and keeping cash on hand for economic emergencies we were experiencing (in 2008)," Horstman said at the town hall. "Now some of these same leaders are attacking districts for being good stewards."
Ottawa-Glandorf schools would lose an estimated $6.9 million in revenue the first year if the 30% carryover cap is approved, Horstman said during a town hall meeting in April. "That is devastating to a school district," he said.
The district's $10 million cash reserve balance is enough to cover six months of expenses.
The cash balance took years to build: Ottawa-Glandorf once held as little as 45 days cash when it passed an income tax levy in 2019, far below the recommended minimum of 90 days cash balance, Horstman said.
The district delayed maintenance projects, but now plans to use its reserves to replace a 25-year-old HVAC and roof at the high school, as well as decades-old parking lots, tennis courts, stadium lights and other projects, Horstman said.
Featured Local Savings
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Boeing in Talks to Sell as Many as 500 Planes to China
(Bloomberg) -- Boeing Co. is heading closer toward finalizing a deal with China to sell as many as 500 aircraft, according to people familiar with the matter, a transaction that would end a sales drought that stretches back to US President Donald Trump's last visit in 2017. The two sides are still hammering out terms of the complex aircraft sale, including the types and volume of jet models and delivery timetables, according to one of the people, who asked not to be identified discussing confidential matters. Why New York City Has a Fleet of New EVs From a Dead Carmaker Trump Takes Second Swing at Cutting Housing Assistance for Immigrants Chicago Schools Seeks $1 Billion of Short-Term Debt as Cash Gone Neom's Desert Ski Resort Strains Saudi Prince's $1.5 Trillion Plan The mega sale to China, years in the making, is contingent on the two nations defusing the trade hostilities that hark back to Trump's first term in office — and could still fall apart, they said. Chinese officials have already started consulting domestic airlines about how many Boeing aircraft they'll need, the people said. The transaction taking shape is similar in scope to the order for as many as 500 jets that China's central planners have struck with Airbus SE, but haven't yet announced, they added. The Boeing order is expected to be the centerpiece of a trade agreement that would benefit both Trump and China's President Xi Jinping, the culmination of long-running and sometimes contentious negotiations. The nation's leaders were close to a similar announcement in 2023, but then-President Joe Biden and Xi left a San Francisco summit without consummating an aircraft sale. Complicating matters for Boeing is a leadership void in China. Alvin Liu, its top executive in China and a fluent Mandarin-speaker with extensive government contacts, left the company in recent weeks. Carol Shen has been named interim president of Boeing China, said people familiar with the matter. Boeing declined to comment on any potential deal or management changes. Shares of the US planemaker advanced less than 1% in New York on Thursday following Bloomberg's report, as most members of the Dow Jones Industrial Average declined. The stock had risen 27% this year amid a turnaround under Chief Executive Officer Kelly Ortberg. Aircraft orders for Boeing have figured large in US diplomacy since Trump returned to the White House in January, with nations touting new, tentative and existing deals for airplanes, which are as expensive as skyscrapers, to narrow trade imbalances with the US. The US and China have engaged in several rounds of talks since de-escalating tit-for-tat tariffs that soared to as high as 145%, but have yet to reach a final trade deal. Earlier in the summer, Xi, in a phone call, invited Trump to China at an unspecified date. One opportunity for the pair to meet is in late October, ahead of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in South Korea. For China, the deal would secure aircraft delivery slots that are hard to come by at both Boeing and Airbus, which are largely sold out into the 2030s. The world's second largest aviation market is expected to more than double its commercial fleet to 9,755 airplanes over the next 20 years, by Boeing's estimation, far more than China's homegrown planemaker Comac could manufacture. While Boeing slots are scarce, the company likely has some flexibility in its delivery schedule to accommodate strategic customers, Jefferies analyst Sheila Kahyaoglu said in a research note. The country's top economic planning agency, the National Development and Reform Commission, recently sought input from Chinese carriers about how many jets they want, one of the people said. Talks centered on the 737 Max series of aircraft, Boeing's popular single-aisle jet, in a sign Beijing is laying the groundwork for a major order. Boeing's last Chinese deal was unveiled in November 2017 during Trump's first state visit to China. The deal amounted to orders and commitments for 300 single-aisle and twin-aisle planes valued at $37 billion at the time. The next year, Boeing's China deliveries peaked, when a quarter of its jets ended up in the mainland. Airbus has dominated sales and deliveries to China since 2019, when the nation's regulators were the first to ground the 737 Max after two fatal accidents. Boeing has notched only 30 orders with Chinese carriers and leasing companies since the start of 2019, according to the company's website. In an interview with Bloomberg in January, CEO Ortberg was optimistic that years of talks with Beijing would finally pay off. 'We certainly hope that there's an opportunity for some additional orders in the next year with China,' he said. --With assistance from Jenni Marsh. (Updates with Jefferies comment in 12th paragraph) Foreigners Are Buying US Homes Again While Americans Get Sidelined Volkswagen EVs Outsell Tesla in Europe a Decade After Dieselgate What Declining Cardboard Box Sales Tell Us About the US Economy Survived Bankruptcy. Next Up: Cultural Relevance? Women's Earnings Never Really Recover After They Have Children ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Walmart raises guidance despite EPS miss, tariffs weighing
Walmart still managed to sprint past nearly everyone else despite profits falling this quarter and a rare miss on earnings-per-share, snapping a 12-quarter winning streak. But revenue rose, guidance climbed, and the retail giant once again reminded Wall Street that it's better at surviving storms than celebrating streaks. Adjusted earnings came in at 68 cents, short of the 73 cents analysts expected, sending the stock down about 3% in premarket trading. But revenue jumped nearly 5% to $177.4 billion, U.S. comparable sales rose 4.6%, and Walmart raised its full-year forecast for both sales and profit. The picture was less a stumble than a reminder of what makes the company hard to knock over: When profit is pressured by tariffs, labor costs, or insurance claims, Walmart has multiple levers to pull — and it's not shy about using them. CEO Doug McMillon acknowledged that tariffs are steadily increasing costs and that the cumulative effect of higher costs is beginning to impact shopping patterns. He said, 'As we replenish inventory at post-tariff price levels, we've continued to see our costs increase each week, which we expect will continue into the third and fourth quarters.' But if tariffs were the headwind, Walmart's answer was the same tailwind it has relied on for decades: everyday low prices. 'With regard to our U.S. pricing decisions, given tariff-related cost pressures, we're doing what we said we would do,' McMillon told investors. 'We're keeping our prices as low as we can for as long as we can.' This quarter, his answer — and the company's — was to lean into the brand's oldest promise: low prices. In practice, that meant 7,400 'Rollback' discounts during the quarter, a not-so-subtle reminder to shoppers that Walmart intends to be the last place inflation shows up. 'Shoppers for the past few years have spent somewhat cautiously, leaning toward needs over wants, but tariff-related price increases have caused middle- and low-income shoppers to rein in their spending even more,' McMillon told analysts. The pattern is clear: smaller baskets, sharper focus on value, and a consumer leaning harder into Walmart's core strengths. Most retailers would see that as a warning flare. Walmart is treating it as a competitive weapon. Its scale allows it to swallow some of the added costs and still plaster those 'Rollback' tags across aisles, daring rivals to keep up. Groceries, memberships, and ads buffer margins, letting Walmart absorb blows others can't. Ahead of the earnings report, Jefferies' Corey Tarlowe described those share gains as 'durable momentum,' pointing out that tariffs may nick profits but also accelerate the company's ability to pull traffic away from mid-tier competitors. But those rollbacks weren't a magic trick. Groceries and health products carried the quarter, providing steady traffic while more discretionary categories lagged. Membership income climbed more than 5%, helping pad recurring revenue. E-commerce surged 26% in the U.S. and 25% globally, with store-fulfilled delivery now accounting for nearly half of the company's growth. Advertising revenue — the kind of high-margin side hustle that most retailers dream about — jumped 46% worldwide. Chief financial officer John Rainey described the quarter as one of quiet share gains. 'We have seen growth across all income cohorts in the quarter,' he said, stressing that inventory levels remain healthy enough to keep the company nimble in a shifting economy. Analysts largely sided with management's framing. JPMorgan said the report doesn't fundamentally change its positive outlook on the stock. Wall Street wants to know how long Walmart can keep absorbing costs before it feels the pinch, yet the stock largely remains rated a 'Buy.' With analysts calling out its pricing power, Walmart has turned tariffs into both a moat and a marketing message; higher costs may be a storm, but it's one the company seems built to weather better than anyone else. The quarter may have ended Walmart's EPS streak, but it didn't change the story. The contrast with rivals only sharpens that point. Target, once seen as Walmart's trendier twin, has been struggling with slower foot traffic and tariff exposure in apparel and home goods. Home Depot and Lowe's are contending with stalled home-improvement spending . Even Costco, whose membership model is its shield, has seen sales growth flatten as households stretch their budgets. What ties the sector together is a pivot to more resilient revenue streams: loyalty programs, advertising, and delivery services. But where others are experimenting, Walmart is scaling. With more than 90% of U.S. households shopping at its stores each year, the company has a platform that can turn side bets into profit engines. Its ad business now looks less like a pilot project and more like a media arm. Its e-commerce growth suggests it's no longer just chasing Amazon but carving out a different model, with stores doubling as fulfillment hubs and groceries anchoring digital loyalty. That's why the market's fixation on the earnings miss may seem out of step with the substance of the quarter. Profits slipped. But sales rose, forecasts climbed, customers kept coming, and Walmart kept widening the gap with peers. For most retailers, a 3% dip in premarket trading would sting. For Walmart, it was almost comic relief — a reminder that even when it trips, it keeps outpacing the field. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Mark Cuban's Top 3 Money Mistakes (And What He Learned from Them)
Businessman and television personality Mark Cuban has become one of the richest and most successful men in America. From founding to owning the Dallas Mavericks and later investing in entrepreneurial hopefuls on 'Shark Tank,' Cuban knows a thing or two about savvy financial decisions. Yet, his journey is not without missteps. Trending Now: For You: Here are three of Mark Cuban's most high-profile money mistakes — and what he learned from each. Failing To Secure a New Contract with Steve Nash After becoming the majority owner of the Dallas Mavericks, Cuban took the team's win rate from 40% to an impressive 69%. But not all his decisions were good ones. Failing to secure a new contract with Steve Nash has openly been Cuban's biggest (and most expensive) regret. The decision to not bid higher (to re-sign Nash) was based on the advice of doctors who said Nash's body was breaking down. But Nash proved them wrong after moving to the Phoenix Suns. 'Nash won back-to-back MVP awards while playing for the Suns,' wrote 'In Phoenix, Mike D'Antoni let him run a run-and-gun offensive scheme that would change the landscape of the NBA.' Try This: No only did Cuban miss out on winning additional championships, but he lost the subsequent revenue that come with increased ticket sales, merch and higher team value. Cuban learned a valuable lesson that sometimes the best business and financial decisions have nothing to do with spreadsheets (or medical data and opinions), but, instead the tenacity and character of those you invest in. Never forget the personal element. Not Investing in Uber In the early days of Uber, Cuban had the opportunity to invest in the company but turned it down. While he liked the idea, he had reservations. 'He didn't agree with the valuation of the company,' stated insurance and finance expert at Melanie Musson. 'He saw the possibility of negatives, like pushback from the taxi industry, instead of the complete disruption that Uber would cause.' Today, Uber is valued at roughly $187 billion. 'When you're trying to disrupt, just bust through the doors and deal with regulatory issues later,' Cuban has since said. In other words, it's easier to ask for forgiveness than permission. Cuban learned it's better to take a risk on a good idea rather than getting bogged down by all the potential obstacles. Misusing Credit Cards Back in the day, Cuban played fast and loose with credit cards. He wasn't paying off his cards on time, and interest was accruing out of control. This cost him a ton of money. In fact, Radio Shack once turned down his attempt to buy a computer on credit because his credit score was so bad. Cuban has frequently stated, 'cut up your credit cards […] if you use credit cards, you don't want to get rich.' Paying 15% to 20% interest is rarely a smart move — especially when you consider the S&P 500 only has an average return of 10% per year. Nowadays, Cuban advises that, instead of investing, just pay down your credit cards and then burn them. He learned an important lesson familiar to young people: Don't become too heavily dependent on debt to get ahead — especially if you have no immediate path to pay it off. More From GOBankingRates 3 Luxury SUVs That Will Have Massive Price Drops in Summer 2025 I'm a Retired Boomer: 6 Bills I Canceled This Year That Were a Waste of Money 5 Cities You Need To Consider If You're Retiring in 2025 This article originally appeared on Mark Cuban's Top 3 Money Mistakes (And What He Learned from Them) Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data