
Trump says he is ‘thinking about' nixing capital gains tax on home sales. Here's what that could mean for homeowners
'We are thinking about … no tax on capital gains on houses,' Trump said.
Soon afterwards, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia posted her thanks to him on X for what she interpreted to be his support for a bill she introduced this month, calling for the elimination of the capital gains tax when someone sells their primary residence.
Will anything come of it? Who knows.
Especially since Trump just signed into law a mega tax-and-spending cuts bill that the Congressional Budget Office estimates will increase deficits on net by $3.4 trillion over a decade while at the same time knocking 10 million more people off health insurance.
But should it become an idea that Congress pursues seriously, it's worth reviewing just how the capital gains tax on home sales works currently and who might benefit most if it were killed.
If you sell a primary residence on which you realize a big capital gain — meaning you sell it for more than you bought it even after accounting for closing fees and qualified home improvement costs along the way — you may owe a capital gains tax on at least some of that gain.
Or not. It depends.
If you sell your house within a year of buying it, any capital gains will be considered short-term and you will have to pay ordinary income tax on all your gains.
But if you have lived in it as your primary residence for at least 24 months (consecutively or not) in the previous five years before you sell it, you may be allowed to exempt from the capital gains tax the first $250,000 of your gains if you're single or $500,000 if you're married filing jointly
Any gains above those thresholds are subject to the long-term capital gains tax. But just how much you'll pay is based on your income, broken out below.
You also may get a break on the capital gains tax if you don't meet the eligibility tests but had to sell your home 'due to a change in employment, health, or unforeseen circumstances,' according to the IRS.
(Note, too, that the capital gains tax rules work somewhat differently when you sell a second home or rental property.)
In 2025, filers will owe 0% in capital gains tax for gains above the exemption threshold if their taxable income is below $48,350 (or $96,700 if married filing jointly), according to the IRS.
They will owe 15% if their income is between $48,450 and $533,400 (or between $96,700 and $600,050 for joint filers).
And any filer with income above those levels will pay a 20% capital gains rate.
In all instances, however, the long-term capital gains tax rate is often below the top ordinary income tax rate a filer faces.
Since the $250,000 and $500,000 capital gains exemption thresholds have not adjusted for inflation since they were set in 1997, a growing number of homeowners, especially long-time ones, may realize taxable gains even if they don't live in the highest-priced areas by today's standards.
Generally speaking, three categories of home sellers are the ones most likely to have to pay the capital gains tax if they make out well selling their home: 1) Anyone living in an area where homes have appreciated greatly in recent years, especially in neighborhoods where home prices are typically well above the national average; 2) anyone who has lived in their home for decades during which time nominal home prices have shot up; or 3) anyone with high income and sufficient wealth to buy a very expensive home wherever they live.
A recent study by the National Association of Realtors, which has advocated for doubling the exemption caps and adjusting them as if they'd been indexed to inflation since 1997, estimates that 29 million homeowners — about one-third — may already have enough equity in their home to exceed the $250,000 cap, while 8 million — or about one-tenth — may have enough to top the $500,000 threshold.
Looking ahead, it forecasts that by 2035, close to 70% of homeowners might have gains exceeding $250,000 and 38% of them will have more than $500,000.
'In states with exceptionally high-priced markets, such as California, Massachusetts and Colorado, the trend is even more pronounced,' the report said.
Broadly speaking, NAR contends, the current caps may be disincentivizing homeowners to sell. 'Over the past 28 years, home price inflation has eroded the value of these exemptions, especially for older homeowners who have lived in their home for 20 years or more. At a time when many of these homeowners are considering downsizing or moving to a retirement facility, more and more are facing gains well in excess of the exclusions, which can leave them owing many thousands of dollars in taxes and reduce their ability to afford a new home.'
In another analysis, the Yale Budget Lab, using the Federal Reserve's 2022 Survey of Consumer Finances, noted that the minority of homeowners who might currently benefit if the capital gains tax were eliminated are largely wealthier, higher-income, and older on average.
'In 2022, homeowners with gains above the exemption had an average net worth of $5.7 million. For homeowners below the exemption, this number was just over $1 million,' the researchers wrote.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Analysis-Out-gunned Europe accepts least-worst US trade deal
By Mark John LONDON (Reuters) -In the end, Europe found it lacked the leverage to pull Donald Trump's America into a trade pact on its terms and so has signed up to a deal it can just about stomach - albeit one that is clearly skewed in the U.S.'s favour. As such, Sunday's agreement on a blanket 15% tariff after a months-long stand-off is a reality check on the aspirations of the 27-country European Union to become an economic power able to stand up to the likes of the United States or China. The cold shower is all the more bracing given that the EU has long portrayed itself as an export superpower and champion of rules-based commerce for the benefit both of its own soft power and the global economy as a whole. For sure, the new tariff that will now be applied is a lot more digestible than the 30% "reciprocal" tariff which Trump threatened to invoke in a few days. While it should ensure Europe avoids recession, it will likely keep its economy in the doldrums: it sits somewhere between two tariff scenarios the European Central Bank last month forecast would mean 0.5-0.9% economic growth this year compared to just over 1% in a trade tension-free environment. But this is nonetheless a landing point that would have been scarcely imaginable only months ago in the pre-Trump 2.0 era, when the EU along with much of the world could count on U.S. tariffs averaging out at around 1.5%. Even when Britain agreed a baseline tariff of 10% with the United States back in May, EU officials were adamant they could do better and - convinced the bloc had the economic heft to square up to Trump - pushed for a "zero-for-zero" tariff pact. It took a few weeks of fruitless talks with their U.S. counterparts for the Europeans to accept that 10% was the best they could get and a few weeks more to take the same 15% baseline which the United States agreed with Japan last week. "The EU does not have more leverage than the U.S., and the Trump administration is not rushing things," said one senior official in a European capital who was being briefed on last week's negotiations as they closed in around the 15% level. That official and others pointed to the pressure from Europe's export-oriented businesses to clinch a deal and so ease the levels of uncertainty starting to hit businesses from Finland's Nokia to Swedish steelmaker SSAB. "We were dealt a bad hand. This deal is the best possible play under the circumstances," said one EU diplomat. "Recent months have clearly shown how damaging uncertainty in global trade is for European businesses." NOW WHAT? That imbalance - or what the trade negotiators have been calling "asymmetry" - is manifest in the final deal. Not only is it expected that the EU will now call off any retaliation and remain open to U.S. goods on existing terms, but it has also pledged $600 billion of investment in the United States. The time-frame for that remains undefined, as do other details of the accord for now. As talks unfolded, it became clear that the EU came to the conclusion it had more to lose from all-out confrontation. The retaliatory measures it threatened totalled some 93 billion euros - less than half its U.S. goods trade surplus of nearly 200 billion euros. True, a growing number of EU capitals were also ready to envisage wide-ranging anti-coercion measures that would have allowed the bloc to target the services trade in which the United States had a surplus of some $75 billion last year. But even then, there was no clear majority for targeting the U.S. digital services which European citizens enjoy and for which there are scant homegrown alternatives - from Netflix to Uber to Microsoft cloud services. It remains to be seen whether this will encourage European leaders to accelerate the economic reforms and diversification of trading allies to which they have long paid lip service but which have been held back by national divisions. Describing the deal as a painful compromise that was an "existential threat" for many of its members, Germany's BGA wholesale and export association said it was time for Europe to reduce its reliance on its biggest trading partner. "Let's look on the past months as a wake-up call," said BGA President Dirk Jandura. "Europe must now prepare itself strategically for the future - we need new trade deals with the biggest industrial powers of the world." (Additional reporting by Jan Strupczewski in Brussels; Christian Kraemer and Maria Martinez in Berlin; Writing by Mark John; Editing by Nick Zieminski) Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
International Business Machines Corporation (IBM): Don't Abandon The Stock, Warns Jim Cramer
We recently published . International Business Machines Corporation (NYSE:IBM) is one of the stocks Jim Cramer recently discussed. International Business Machines Corporation (NYSE:IBM) is one of Cramer's favorite technology stocks. Throughout this year, the CNBC TV host has expressed optimism about the firm's CEO and the firm's consistency in winning contracts for its enterprise computing business. International Business Machines Corporation (NYSE:IBM)'s shares fell by 7.6% after the firm's latest earnings report saw software revenue of $7.39 billion miss analyst estimates of $7.43 billion. Cramer discussed the earnings report: 'Most of the news is good this morning, IBM. I still think not as bad, uh, Chipotle we have to talk about. Copyright: believeinme33 / 123RF Stock Photo Previously, he discussed potential future International Business Machines Corporation (NYSE:IBM) share price movement: 'Oh, I like IBM very much. I mentioned Ben Wright earlier. I think that Ben, he's really turned me on to this stock. We did a very positive piece about it. I think it goes, I'm going to say not much higher but creeping higher over time, and that's actually a great place to be. So I like IBM.' While we acknowledge the potential of IBM as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the . READ NEXT: 30 Stocks That Should Double in 3 Years and 11 Hidden AI Stocks to Buy Right Now. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey.
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Norfolk Southern Corporation (NSC): Jim Cramer Reveals How Its Merger Could Succeed
We recently published . Norfolk Southern Corporation (NASDAQ:NSC) is one of the stocks Jim Cramer recently discussed. Norfolk Southern Corporation (NASDAQ:NSC)'s shares have gained 20% year-to-date and are up by 8.5% since mid-July due to chatter of mergers in the railroad industry. During this episode, Cramer's co-host David Faber discussed reports of Norfolk Southern and Union Pacific merging. Faber outlined that issues in the railroad industry, such as streamlining traffic flows through the Chicago interchange and the handoff of significant volumes in Chicago yards, were driving incentives for railroads to merge. For the deal to proceed, here's what Cramer believes: '[On talks of a merger] 5 year pledge to not raise prices, deal gets done.' Cramer discussed how Norfolk Southern Corporation (NASDAQ:NSC) might be ripe for a deal: 'I think that Norfolk Southern could be vulnerable.' While we acknowledge the potential of NSC as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the . READ NEXT: 30 Stocks That Should Double in 3 Years and 11 Hidden AI Stocks to Buy Right Now. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data