B'desh high commissioner in Tripura to review bilateral issues
2
Agartala: The high commissioner of Bangladesh to India, M Riaz Hamidullah, arrived in Agartala on Friday for a three-day visit to review bilateral issues related to Tripura.
This is the first time since the collapse of the Sheikh Hasina govt in Aug last year that a top diplomat of Bangladesh has visited Tripura.
The people-to-people relationship, which was built over a decade under Hasina's regime, frayed under Muhammad Yunus's administration, and the border between the two countries became hostile.
Continuous atrocities on minorities in Bangladesh and anti-Indian activities, defamatory statements, social media posts, videos, and hostility of Bangladeshi nationals against Indians, have further strained India-Bangladesh relations over the year.
Amid a crisis in the relationship, Bangladeshi envoy's visit is considered significant.
He met CM Manik Saha and their meeting lasted for an hour. It was aimed at further strengthening the bilateral relationship between India and Bangladesh. The key connectivity projects of India and Bangladesh, cross-border crime and illegal movements, trade and commerce, and renewing socio-cultural relationships have gained importance in the discussion, officials said.
The high commissioner will be in the state till Monday.
On Sunday, he is scheduled to meet governor Indrasena Reddy Nallu at the Raj Bhavan.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
26 minutes ago
- India.com
Israel-Gaza War Puts Billion-Dollar IMEC Project At Risk; India-Saudi Strains Leave China Smiling – Why This Corridor Matters
New Delhi: The war in Gaza is not only claiming lives. It is dismantling billion-dollar plans stretching from India to Europe. Among them is the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC), a flagship connectivity project backed by India, the United States, Saudi Arabia, the European Union and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The project had a grand vision. Announced during the G20 Summit in New Delhi in September 2023, the IMEC aimed to link India with Europe via the Middle East. A series of modern rail networks, ports, pipelines and digital infrastructure would form its spine. Israel was expected to play a central role as the corridor's critical junction. But war changed that. The fighting in Gaza has triggered diplomatic cold fronts across the Arab world. Hostage crises and hunger deaths have gripped global headlines. Behind the scenes, the IMEC blueprint is beginning to look fragile. Several conversations linked to the corridor's normalisation process have stopped. The air of political instability has raised new doubts. Investors are now cautious. Talks have lost momentum. Security concerns loom larger. Reports from Israeli media outlets such Ynet cite growing fears that the project may now face indefinite delays. The timing has worked in Beijing's favour. The IMEC was widely seen as a counter to China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), with its own web of global infrastructure alliances. A stalled IMEC is a strategic breather for China. It removes immediate competition from a rival corridor that was built to tilt trade flows away from Chinese influence. For India, in addition to being a transport network, the IMEC was a geopolitical leap. With 47 trillion dollars in combined GDP between its partners, it held the potential to upgrade India's role in global trade. The corridor also fit into New Delhi's broader push to develop digital public infrastructure, enhance green energy ties and open secure channels to Europe and the Americas. Though the dream has not died, it has dimmed. The longer the war in Gaza drags on, the harder it gets for IMEC stakeholders to keep the political will alive. Saudi Arabia's frustration over Israel's war posture is deepening. Strategic cohesion among partner countries is thinning. The risk of indefinite pause is no longer a whisper. Whether the IMEC becomes reality or remains a footnote in G20 speeches now depends on what unfolds on the ground in Gaza.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
‘Turned Adivasi assertion into a political force that birthed state': Shah to Rajnath, Mamata to Stalin — tributes pour in for Soren
Union Home Minister Amit Shah, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh, Chief Ministers and other leaders across the political spectrum paid tribute to Jharkhand Mukti Morcha co-founder and former Chief Minister Shibu Soren who died Monday. Shah said in a post on X that Soren 'struggled for decades for the rights and empowerment of the tribal community in Jharkhand'. 'With his simple personality and humble nature, he connected with the masses,' Shah wrote. Singh said Soren was counted among the towering leaders of Jharkhand who struggled throughout their lives for the rights and empowerment of the weaker sections of society, especially the tribal community. 'He always remained connected to the land and the people,' he said. West Bengal Chief Minister and TMC chief Mamata Banerjee said Soren's death has brought a chapter of Jharkhand's history to an end. BJP leader and Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma said Soren's life was dedicated to the well-being of the deprived, tribals, and labourers. Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M K Stalin wrote on a social media post, 'Thiru Shibu Soren's life was defined by relentless resistance against exploitation and an unshakeable commitment to social justice. As one of the key architects of Jharkhand's statehood movement, he transformed decades of Adivasi assertion into a political force that gave birth to a new state.' Telangana Chief Minister and Congress leader Revanth Reddy hailed Soren's struggles for the formation of Jharkhand and his efforts to address the problems of tribals. JD(U) leader and Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar said Soren's 'significant contribution to Jharkhand's politics is noteworthy'. 'His passing has caused an irreparable loss not only to Jharkhand but also to the political and social spheres of the entire country,' Kumar wrote. RJD president Lalu Prasad spoke of 'memories of our joint struggles' for achieving 'social justice and empowerment of deprived classes'. Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath said the former Jharkhand chief minister dedicated his life to the upliftment of tribal society. BJD chief and former Odisha CM Naveen Patnaik, said Soren would be remembered for his dedicated fight for the rights of tribal and marginalised people. Meghalaya Chief Minister Conrad K Sangma said Soren was a towering figure in Indian politics and a dedicated statesman who served the people with unwavering commitment.
India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
How The U.S. Rewired Pakistan's Air Force; Why That Legacy Still Matters Against India
New Delhi: When Indian jets pounded Pakistani positions under Operation Sindoor, Islamabad's narrative tried to flip the script. Claims of tactical success echoed through Pakistani media, even as damage reports told a different story. But behind these optics, Pakistani defence analysts are pointing to a system that did not come from China, but from the United States nearly 70 years ago. Defence portal Quwa highlighted how the foundations of Pakistan's air force still rest on operational practices and doctrine handed down by the United States as far back as the 1950s. The report claims that what many today call 'software', mindset, structure and operational culture, was installed in the early days of the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) by American advisors. That legacy has shaped PAF's command philosophy to this day. It even influenced the decision to move the Air Force Headquarters from Rawalpindi to Peshawar, giving the force its own command ecosystem, distinct from the army's shadow. How America Gave PAF Its Operational 'Software' According to Quwa, in the early 1950s, Pakistan's air force lacked both equipment and a professional framework. The turning point came with the 1950 Mutual Defense Assistance Agreement with the United States. Under this, Washington not only provided F-86 Sabre aircraft to Pakistan but also embedded an entire operational doctrine into the PAF. Considered the architect of a modern PAF, then Air Marshal Asghar Khan recognised that the United States was sending jets as well as exporting a full system. This included depot-level aircraft maintenance, rather than the traditional squadron-level model; strict safety regulations, based on U.S. Air Force protocols; and clearly separated departments for operations, maintenance and administration. This model replaced the older British system and gave Pakistan's air force an American-style command structure that is still in use today. According to Quwa, this is the backbone that allows the PAF to integrate foreign fighter jets, including the Chinese J-10CE, into its arsenal smoothly. The report argues that this inherited mindset enables faster pilot adaptation and more coherent training cycles, which translates into better performance during real combat situations. A Quiet Nod to the U.S., Not China While Pakistani media has hyped up the role of Chinese-origin J-10CE fighter jets in countering India's Rafales, Quwa takes a more nuanced position. It suggests that the real enabler was not Chinese technology, but American methodology. The systems laid down decades ago by the United States, it claims, allow the PAF to function as a streamlined and adaptable air force, something its regional rivals have had to build from scratch. This legacy also explains the PAF's ability to quickly operationalise new platforms. Pilots transitioning to newer aircraft often show higher mission-readiness because the doctrine standardises procedures across the force. And it was this very consistency, Quwa argues, that allowed Pakistan to mount any kind of coordinated air response during India's strikes. What Really Happened in the Skies? Despite Pakistan's claims, the outcomes of the recent aerial confrontations tell a more complex story. Islamabad managed to shoot down one Indian aircraft, but failed to intercept or prevent Indian strikes on nine strategic sites in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK). Indian Rafales inflicted heavy damage. In military terms, Quwa concedes, these results raise questions. One of the contributing factors was a misjudgement by Indian forces regarding the range of China's PL-15 missiles, a gap in calculation that Pakistan used to its advantage. Even then, say Indian analysts, PAF's performance could only be counted as successful if it had prevented India's deep-penetration airstrikes, not merely retaliated after the fact. A Legacy That Still Shapes Air Battles Pakistan's narrative of victory, critics say, may not hold up under scrutiny. But the story that emerges from Quwa's reporting is not about flashy dogfights or headline-grabbing missile launches. It is about how a 70-year-old framework continues to define one of South Asia's most professionalised air forces. In the end, as Quwa puts it, it was not Chinese, but American 'software' (a system of discipline, structure and long-term strategic thinking) that made the real difference.
