
Pub & restaurant bosses slam Rachel Reeves' tax hikes for sending inflation rate soaring by more than expected
PUBS and restaurant bosses angrily hit out at the higher-than-expected inflation figures - blasting a slew of government taxes and regulation for higher prices for consumers.
Hospitality chiefs aimed their fire at decisions to raise national insurance costs for firms and called for lower business rates for the suffering sector.
1
Pubs and restaurant bosses angrily hit out at Rachel Reeves today
Credit: PA
The call came as inflation shot up to 3.5 per cent in the year to April which was a steep rise on the month before when it stood at 2.6 per cent.
Kate Nicholls, UK Hospitality boss also hit out at a new packaging tax, known as the "bevvy levy" for also hitting consumers in the pocket.
She said: "Political and tax decisions have consequences for consumer prices - we need downward pressure on regulation and costs of doing business with action on business rates, NICs, packaging and tourism taxes."
Union boss Sharon Graham said the cost and living crisis is "alive and kicking".
Read More Money News
RATE SPIKE UK inflation rate soars by more than expected after millions hit with huge bills
She added that growth and profit must turn into jobs and wages.
Tory shadow Chancellor Mel Stride said that the news was "worrying for families" who are seeing prices spiral.
Why does inflation matter?
INFLATION is a measure of the cost of living. It looks at how much the price of goods, such as food or televisions, and services, such as haircuts or train tickets, has changed over time.
Usually people measure inflation by comparing the cost of things today with how much they cost a year ago. The average increase in prices is known as the inflation rate.
The government sets an inflation target of 2%.
If inflation is too high or it moves around a lot, the Bank of England says it is hard for businesses to set the right prices and for people to plan their spending.
High inflation rates also means people are having to spend more, while savings are likely to be eroded as the cost of goods is more than the interest we're earning.
Low inflation, on the other hand, means lower prices and a greater likelihood of interest rates on savings beating the inflation rate.
But if inflation is too low some people may put off spending because they expect prices to fall. And if everybody reduced their spending then companies could fail and people might lose their jobs.
See our UK inflation guide and our Is low inflation good? guide for more information.
He said: "This morning's news that inflation is up – and now well above the 2% target – is worrying for families.
"We left Labour with inflation bang on target, but Labour's economic mismanagement is pushing up the cost of living for families - on top of the £3,500 hit to households from the Chancellor's damaging Jobs Tax.
"Higher inflation could also mean interest rates stay higher for longer, hitting family finances hard.
"Families are paying the price for the Labour Chancellor's choices.'
Richard Tice, deputy Reform UK leader, said: "Terrible inflation numbers soaring to 3.5% Due to Labour's awful budget and economic mismanagement."
Ms Reeves said: "I am disappointed with these figures because I know cost of living pressures are still weighing down on working people.
"We are long way from the double digit inflation we saw under the previous administration, but I'm determined that we go further and faster to put more money in people's pockets.
"That's why we have increased the minimum wage for millions of working people, frozen fuel duty to protect commuters and struck three trade deals in the past two weeks that will go towards cutting bills."
What does it mean for my money?
Rising inflation reduces people's spending power because things cost more.
Core inflation, which excludes volatile items, also increased, driven mainly by higher household bills like energy and water.
Businesses are passing on increased employment costs to consumers, contributing to inflation.
Rising inflation means prices will rise faster, pushing up grocery and household bills.
The Bank of England may keep interest rates higher for longer to control inflation, which could mean that mortgage rates will rise again.
Rob Wood, at Pantheon Macroeconomics, said he believes inflation will stay around 3.5% for the rest of the year.
He said: "We think the Monetary Policy Committee will have to proceed cautiously.
"We stick with two more rate cuts this year, but are very close to reducing that to only one."
However, this isn't guaranteed.
If economic growth remains slow, the Bank could continue to lower interest rates to encourage spending and investment, helping to give the economy a much-needed boost.
The base rate is currently set at 4.25%, and the Bank of England's Monetary Policy Committee will next review its level on June 19.
Wage growth is slowing, and job insecurity is rising and this puts more pressure on personal budgets.
While energy bills may fall in the summer, many households are still struggling.
It's important to review budgets, cut wasteful spending, and manage debt.
Homeowners and first-time buyers may be discouraged as interest rate cuts could slow down.
Savers need to be aware that higher inflation reduces the value of their returns.
It's important to secure good savings deals now and consider tax-efficient savings strategies like ISAs to protect savings from tax.
Myron Jobson, senior personal finance analyst at interactive investor, said: "While the increase might come as a shock to households, it's important to remember that CPI inflation is an annual measure, comparing prices to what they were a year ago.
"Britons should approach headline inflation figures with perspective. Everyone has an inflation rate that is unique to them, depending on their individual spending habits.
"It's crucial to focus on maintaining financial resilience in uncertain times – whether by reviewing budgets, building up emergency savings, or managing debt – to better weather any bumps along the road ahead."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
40 minutes ago
- The Sun
Surge in support for Reform in by-election puts Labour seriously under threat, warns expert
A SURGE in support for Reform in a hotly-contested by-election puts Labour seriously under threat, an expert has warned. Nigel Farage's party finished a close third with more than 26 per cent of the vote narrowly behind both Labour and the SNP in the ballot in Hamilton, Scotland. The party said it was a 'remarkable' turnaround picking up 7,088 compared to just 58 votes in the constituency in 2021 as it attempted to win its first seat in Holyrood. Election guru John Curtice said it would be a 'serious misreading' to believe that Labour had turned round its election fortunes, with the Scottish elections next May. He told the BBC: 'Reform are making the political weather north of the border, as indeed they are south of the border.' Reform deputy leader Richard Tice said: 'We've come from nowhere to being in a three-way marginal, and we're within 750 votes of winning that by-election and just a few hundred votes of defeating the SNP.' The performance came just hours after Zia Yusuf resigned as party chair plunging the party into chaos following a row about banning burqas. In a parting shot, he said he no longer believed trying to get Nigel Farage elected as PM was a 'good use of my time'. Mr Yusuf's shock resignation - just weeks after masterminding their local elections triumph - came after an internal row about banning the burqa. The multi-millionaire ex-businessman had attacked the party's newest MP Sarah Pochin as 'dumb' for asking Sir Keir Starmer to outlaw the Muslim face covering in the Commons. But insiders said tensions at the top of Reform had been brewing for some time, with the chairman feeling increasingly sidelined. In a statement, Mr Yusuf said: 'Eleven months ago I became Chairman of Reform. Watch moment Nigel Farage makes back door exit as Reform UK leader dodges protesters in Scotland 'I've worked full time as a volunteer to take the party from 14 to 30 per cent, quadrupled its membership and delivered historic electoral results. 'I no longer believe working to get a Reform government elected is a good use of my time, and hereby resign the office.' 2


Daily Mail
44 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
ALEX BRUMMER: 'Wise old hen' Chancellor dances on a pinhead
Rachel Reeves's pledge to restore fiscal stability and confine herself to one budgetary event a year is threadbare. When she delivers Labour's first full spending review next Wednesday, it will be her fourth visit to the dispatch box. As the Economist magazine remarked this week, it has been 'all pain, no gain'. Most of her difficulties can be traced back to the alleged discovery of a £22billion black hole in her public spending audit on July 30 last year. Reeves established a narrative, repeated by rote by her Cabinet colleagues, about a terrible inheritance. The number was contrived, in that the biggest element was a giveaway to public sector unions and railway workers, which brought a temporary truce. The Chancellor has made a series of tactical and strategic mistakes. At that very first appearance at the Treasury, she sowed the seeds of festering political dissonance by withdrawing the winter fuel allowance from pensioners. A costed gain to the Exchequer of £1.4billion last year and £1.5billion this year has proved ferociously politically expensive. It is now to be partly reversed in the spending review with the fuel payments restored but taxed as income for better-off silver surfers. Reeves then created a new rod for her back in her first Budget in October. The impact of £40billion of tax increases, fuelled by the debilitating rise in National Insurance Contributions, caused a growth stammer. The fundamental error was in shaping the fiscal rules. Taxation and current spending would be broadly balanced. The Government would only borrow for investment. But by leaving herself so little room for error on current spending, £10bn of headroom, the Chancellor sprung a trap. She ignored Harold Macmillan's dictum, 'Events, dear boy, events.' The headroom detonated another booby trap. Reeves's third intervention came in the spring. She took the axe to welfare, most notoriously to personal independence payments (PIPs) for those claiming disability benefits. It started a debate about Labour values, which has exposed Reeves to pressure to restore £3.5billion of payments to families with more than two children. Which brings us to the spending review. Any hopes that this would be the moment for Reeves to repair struggling public services have been smashed. A downgrade to the Office for Budget Responsibility's growth forecast, surging defence spending, the U-turn on winter fuel and the rocketing cost of servicing the national debt mean the envelope for current spending is negligible, with overall increases confined to 1.2 per cent or so. The joy, such as it is, will come from the capital spending plans. We had a flavour of this earlier in the week when Reeves unsheathed £15billion of transport investment across the North. One cannot but think most of these are reheated plans already announced by her predecessors. Infrastructure is critical and the Elizabeth Line in London and HS2 activity around Birmingham provide graphic evidence of how bold schemes can generate growth. But axing a supercomputer project in Edinburgh, as the Chancellor did last July, hardly speaks to UK tech ambition. In conversation at the CBI this week, Reeves described herself as a 'wise old hen' among G7 finance ministers as elections have brought newbies to the table. Her fiscal fortitude is creditable. Further tax increases, having pledged not to come back for more, would be a deception too far.


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Swinney is punished for decades of SNP failure in crushing by-election defeat
'Humiliated' John Swinney saw his party beaten by Labour in another by-election amid claims voters punished the SNP for 18 years of 'abject failure'. Just hours after the First Minister confidently predicted there was 'no way' Labour could win the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse Holyrood seat, Anas Sarwar's party triumphed by 602 votes in what should have been a safe bet for SNP. The surprise win, achieved in spite of voter fury at UK Labour cuts and a media-shy candidate dubbed the Invisible Man, left SNP activists reeling at the count. New MSP Davy Russell said the Nationalists had 'broken the NHS, wasted money, and after nearly two decades, they don't deserve another chance'. And Scottish Labour deputy leader Dame Jackie Baillie said: 'John Swinney has been humiliated by this result. 'The voters have clearly punished the SNP for their 18 years of misrule.' In other developments: Nigel Farage said Reform UK's strong third place showed it was 'just getting started in Scotland' Russell Findlay apologised to voters after the Scottish Tories came fourth, saying 'My party let you down in government and we accept responsibility for our mistakes' Former SNP cabinet secretary Alex Neil said 'the current SNP leadership needs to be replaced urgently', while former SNP deputy Jim Sillars accused Mr Swinney of a 'manifest failure to read the street' and called him 'unfit' to lead Ex-SNP MP Joanna Cherry KC said her party was 'stagnant' and 'needs a major rethink' An elated Mr Anas Sarwar yesterday said it was the springboard to a Labour win at Holyrood and predicted the era of Nationalist rule was coming to an end. Celebrating with Mr Russell and a throng of activists in the summer sun, Mr Sarwar said it was 'pretty obvious' that Mr Swinney was now on 'borrowed time'. He said the SNP had run a 'shameful' campaign that glossed over the party's record and tried to focus on Reform because Mr Swinney 'knows the record is one of abject failure'. He said: 'What we're seeing now is the running down of the clock. This is an SNP government that has lost its way. The balloon is burst. They're out of ideas.' Mr Sarwar said he believed the victory to be 'even more significant' than the party's win in the nearby Rutherglen and Hamilton West by-election in October 2023 - which he said had been key in helping to secure Labour's general election win in July last year. At a low-key press conference in Edinburgh, a dejected Mr Swinney admitted his party had not recovered last year's general election thrashing, when it lost 39 of its 48 MPs. 'The SNP's made some progress but it's not enough and we've got to make further progress before the elections next May,' he said. The by-election was triggered by the death of SNP minister Christina McKelvie from cancer at the age of 57. It was one of the ugliest campaigns in modern Scottish politics, with accusations of racism levelled against Reform after it homed its attacks on Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar. A Reform campaign advert claimed Mr Sarwar had said he wanted to 'prioritise the Pakistani community' based on a 2022 speech in which he said no such thing. Mr Swinney tried to use the advert and Reform's rising support to turn the contest into a battle between his own party and Nigel Farage's and exclude Labour. He claimed it was a 'two-horse race' in which Labour didn't feature. 'I'm confident we've done enough to win the contest,' he said on the eve of the poll. 'Labour can't win. It's over for the Labour Party. There's no way they can win here, after the disastrous record of the Labour government.' But Labour's traditional door-by-door campaigning and an affable local candidate who highlighted deteriorating public services under the SNP narrowly won out. Mr Russell erased an SNP majority of 4,582 on a 7 per cent swing to Labour. Labour's share of the vote was 31.5 per cent, down from the 33.6 per cent at the 2021 Holyrood election. The SNP's vote share slumped by more than a third from 46.2 per cent to 29.3 per cent. Despite hype about overtaking Labour or even winning, Reform UK came third, but achieved a 26.1 per cent share despite not having a Holyrood candidate in the seat before The Scottish Conservatives came fourth but narrowly held on to their deposit.