logo
‘The world is deaf' — the life of Afghanistan's forgotten women

‘The world is deaf' — the life of Afghanistan's forgotten women

The Hill2 days ago
In August of 2021, I was in Kabul with my infant daughter, waiting to apply for her identification card, when I learned the Taliban had officially seized power in Afghanistan. As I looked down at my baby, my first thought was the need to seek our safety.
My second: We have to fight.
In the first objective, I was fortunate. My family and I were able to flee Afghanistan to Poland. But for the millions of my fellow Afghani citizens who were not so lucky, their lives are now a nightmare.
Women and girls in particular are living a special form of hell. After two decades of unprecedented progress and opportunity, they risk public punishment — beatings or worse — for showing their hair or walking alone. It doesn't matter if a woman was previously a judge, journalist, a doctor or a professor. Today, she is barred from holding nearly all jobs, attending parks and gyms and even beauty salons. Young girls cannot attend school beyond sixth grade, leaving 1.4 million unable to learn.
The stories I have heard from the women surviving in this dystopian universe, trickled through whispers and covert messaging apps, have shaken me to my core. A young woman was abducted, raped and tortured for refusing to give up her job at a hospital — then warned not to speak to any international media about what she had endured. Another was nearly stoned to death for seeking a divorce from an abusive marriage. A former female police officer was beaten in Taliban custody.
For every story I hear, I know there are hundreds of others that are not getting out. Between January 2022 and June 2024, Afghan Witness documented 840 incidents of gender-based violence against women and girls in Afghanistan, including 332 killings, based on open-source information.
The Taliban has of course, abolished the legal framework and institutions dedicated to protecting women — like the Ministry of Women's Affairs, family courts, and prosecution units for gender-based violence, so that victims are left without protection, perpetrators act with near-impunity, perpetuating the cycle.
I am confident this situation would engender global outrage if it were happening in Europe or the U.S. But the international response has been limited to symbolic statements, weak sanctions, and grossly underfunded aid. The U.S and European Union sanctions against the Taliban don't mean much when countries that host and support them remain untouched.
With the world's attention turned elsewhere, Afghan women are trying to force change unilaterally at great personal risk. They run underground schools, whispering lessons in secret. They organize protests and try to relay their dire straits to the outside world. 'We are not silent,' one woman told me. 'The world is deaf.'
Their courage deserves to be rewarded with solidarity and acknowledgement, but most importantly action to force real change. This can include funding the fight for women's rights. Grassroots projects like the Afghan Women's Network run underground schools on shoestring budgets.
There should also be sanctions against national governments that enable the Taliban, such as Pakistan and Qatar. Ban them from global forums like the G20 and impose real trade restrictions until they take responsibility.
We must elevate Afghan women's voices, amplifying their strategies and solutions, not just their suffering. Programs like the Women's Peace and Humanitarian Fund help women lead change in their own communities and deserve far greater support.
We have seen some progress in the international arena. On July 8, the International Criminal Court issued arrest warrants for Supreme Leader Akhundzada and Chief Justice Abdul Hakim Haqqani for crimes against humanity, including gender- and political-based persecution from August 2021 to January 2025. And Groups like the World Liberty Congress, the world's largest global alliance of dissidents, human rights defenders, and pro-democracy leaders, are working diligently to implement these objectives.
But we need more support. The world must not look away. This fight is not just about Afghanistan — it's about defending dignity and freedom everywhere.
If we fail to act now, history will remember our silence as complicity.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

European leaders to join Ukraine's Zelenskyy for White House meeting with Trump

time7 hours ago

European leaders to join Ukraine's Zelenskyy for White House meeting with Trump

KYIV -- European and NATO leaders will join Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy for his crucial meeting with President Donald Trump, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said on Sunday. The move in relation to the key White House meeting on Monday is an apparent effort to prevent a repeat of the heated encounter Zelenskyy faced when he met Trump in the Oval Office in February. The European leaders' presence at Zelenskyy's side, demonstrating Europe's support for Ukraine, could potentially help ease concerns in Kyiv and in other European capitals that Zelenskyy risks being railroaded into a peace deal that Trump says he wants to broker with Russia. Von der Leyen, head of the European Union's executive branch, posted on X that 'at the request of President Zelenskyy, I will join the meeting with President Trump and other European leaders in the White House tomorrow.' In a quick succession Sunday, a stream of European leaders also announced that they'll be going. They included French President Emmanuel Macron, the chancellor of Germany, Friedrich Merz, and the secretary general of the NATO military alliance, Mark Rutte. The grouped trip underscored European leaders' determination to ensure that Europe has a voice in Trump's attempted peace-making, after the U.S. president's summit on Friday with Russian leader Vladimir Putin — to which Zelenskyy wasn't invited.

Drought, dams and diplomacy: Afghanistan's water crisis goes regional
Drought, dams and diplomacy: Afghanistan's water crisis goes regional

Yahoo

time13 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Drought, dams and diplomacy: Afghanistan's water crisis goes regional

Over four decades of war, Afghanistan wielded limited control over five major river basins that flow across its borders into downstream neighbouring nations. But as Taliban authorities swept to power and tightened their grip on the country, they have pushed for Afghanistan's water sovereignty, launching infrastructure projects to harness precious resources in the arid territory. Dams and canals have sparked tensions with neighbouring states, testing the Taliban authorities' efforts to build strong regional ties, as they remain largely isolated on the global stage since their 2021 takeover. At the same time, the region is facing the shared impacts of climate change intensifying water scarcity, as temperatures rise and precipitation patterns shift, threatening glaciers and snowpack that feed the country's rivers. Here are key points about Afghanistan's transboundary water challenges: - Central Asian states to the north - Afghanistan is emerging as a new player in often fraught negotiations on the use of the Amu Darya, one of two key rivers crucial for crops in water-stressed Central Asia, where water sharing relies on fragile accords since Soviet times. Central Asian states have expressed concern over the Qosh Tepa mega canal project that could divert up to 21 percent of the Amu Darya's total flow to irrigate 560,000 hectares of land across Afghanistan's arid north, and further deplete the Aral Sea. Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan are likely to face the biggest impact, both joined by Kazakhstan in voicing alarm, even as they deepen diplomatic ties with the Taliban authorities -- officially recognised so far by only Russia. "No matter how friendly the tone is now," water governance expert Mohd Faizee warned, "at some point there will be consequences for Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan when the canal starts operating". Taliban officials have denied that the project will have a major impact on the Amu Darya's water levels and pledged it will improve food security in a country heavily dependent on climate-vulnerable agriculture and facing one of the world's worst humanitarian crises. "There is an abundance of water, especially when the Amu Darya floods and glacial meltwater flows into it" in the warmer months, said project manager Sayed Zabihullah Miri, during a visit to the canal works in Faryab province, where diggers carved into a drought-ridden plain dotted with camels and locusts. - Iran to the west - Iran is the only country with which Afghanistan has a formal water sharing treaty, agreed in 1973 over the Helmand river, which traverses Taliban heartland territory, but the accord was never fully implemented. Longstanding tensions over the river's resources have spiked over dams in southern Afghanistan, particularly in periods of drought, which are likely to increase as climate shocks hit the region's water cycle. Iran, facing pressure in its parched southeastern region, has repeatedly demanded that Afghanistan respect its rights, charging that upstream dams restrict the Helmand's flow into a border lake. The Taliban authorities insist there is not enough water to release more to Iran, blaming the impact of climate pressures on the whole region. They also argue long-term poor water management has meant Afghanistan has not gotten its full share, according to an Afghanistan Analysts Network report by water resources management expert Assem Mayar. Iran and Afghanistan have no formal agreement over their other shared river basin, the Harirud, which also flows into Turkmenistan and is often combined into a single basin with the Morghab river. While infrastructure exists on the Afghan portions of the basin, some has not been fully utilised, Faizee said. But that could change, he added, as the end of conflict in Afghanistan means infrastructure works don't incur vast security costs on top of construction budgets, lifting a barrier to development of projects such as the Pashdan dam inaugurated in August on the Harirud. - Pakistan to the east - Water resources have not topped the agenda in consistently fraught relations between Afghanistan and Pakistan. Afghanistan's Kabul river basin, which encompasses tributaries to the greater Indus basin and feeds the capital and largest city, is shared with Pakistan. The countries, however, have no formal cooperation mechanism. With the Afghan capital wracked by a severe water crisis, the Taliban authorities have sought to revitalise old projects and start new ones to tackle the problem, risking fresh tensions with Pakistan. But the lack of funds and technical capacity means the Taliban authorities' large water infrastructure projects across the country could take many years to come to fruition -- time that could be good for diplomacy, but bad for ordinary Afghans. sw/ecl/rsc/cwl

Drought, dams and diplomacy: Afghanistan's water crisis goes regional
Drought, dams and diplomacy: Afghanistan's water crisis goes regional

Yahoo

time13 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Drought, dams and diplomacy: Afghanistan's water crisis goes regional

Over four decades of war, Afghanistan wielded limited control over five major river basins that flow across its borders into downstream neighbouring nations. But as Taliban authorities swept to power and tightened their grip on the country, they have pushed for Afghanistan's water sovereignty, launching infrastructure projects to harness precious resources in the arid territory. Dams and canals have sparked tensions with neighbouring states, testing the Taliban authorities' efforts to build strong regional ties, as they remain largely isolated on the global stage since their 2021 takeover. At the same time, the region is facing the shared impacts of climate change intensifying water scarcity, as temperatures rise and precipitation patterns shift, threatening glaciers and snowpack that feed the country's rivers. Here are key points about Afghanistan's transboundary water challenges: - Central Asian states to the north - Afghanistan is emerging as a new player in often fraught negotiations on the use of the Amu Darya, one of two key rivers crucial for crops in water-stressed Central Asia, where water sharing relies on fragile accords since Soviet times. Central Asian states have expressed concern over the Qosh Tepa mega canal project that could divert up to 21 percent of the Amu Darya's total flow to irrigate 560,000 hectares of land across Afghanistan's arid north, and further deplete the Aral Sea. Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan are likely to face the biggest impact, both joined by Kazakhstan in voicing alarm, even as they deepen diplomatic ties with the Taliban authorities -- officially recognised so far by only Russia. "No matter how friendly the tone is now," water governance expert Mohd Faizee warned, "at some point there will be consequences for Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan when the canal starts operating". Taliban officials have denied that the project will have a major impact on the Amu Darya's water levels and pledged it will improve food security in a country heavily dependent on climate-vulnerable agriculture and facing one of the world's worst humanitarian crises. "There is an abundance of water, especially when the Amu Darya floods and glacial meltwater flows into it" in the warmer months, said project manager Sayed Zabihullah Miri, during a visit to the canal works in Faryab province, where diggers carved into a drought-ridden plain dotted with camels and locusts. - Iran to the west - Iran is the only country with which Afghanistan has a formal water sharing treaty, agreed in 1973 over the Helmand river, which traverses Taliban heartland territory, but the accord was never fully implemented. Longstanding tensions over the river's resources have spiked over dams in southern Afghanistan, particularly in periods of drought, which are likely to increase as climate shocks hit the region's water cycle. Iran, facing pressure in its parched southeastern region, has repeatedly demanded that Afghanistan respect its rights, charging that upstream dams restrict the Helmand's flow into a border lake. The Taliban authorities insist there is not enough water to release more to Iran, blaming the impact of climate pressures on the whole region. They also argue long-term poor water management has meant Afghanistan has not gotten its full share, according to an Afghanistan Analysts Network report by water resources management expert Assem Mayar. Iran and Afghanistan have no formal agreement over their other shared river basin, the Harirud, which also flows into Turkmenistan and is often combined into a single basin with the Morghab river. While infrastructure exists on the Afghan portions of the basin, some has not been fully utilised, Faizee said. But that could change, he added, as the end of conflict in Afghanistan means infrastructure works don't incur vast security costs on top of construction budgets, lifting a barrier to development of projects such as the Pashdan dam inaugurated in August on the Harirud. - Pakistan to the east - Water resources have not topped the agenda in consistently fraught relations between Afghanistan and Pakistan. Afghanistan's Kabul river basin, which encompasses tributaries to the greater Indus basin and feeds the capital and largest city, is shared with Pakistan. The countries, however, have no formal cooperation mechanism. With the Afghan capital wracked by a severe water crisis, the Taliban authorities have sought to revitalise old projects and start new ones to tackle the problem, risking fresh tensions with Pakistan. But the lack of funds and technical capacity means the Taliban authorities' large water infrastructure projects across the country could take many years to come to fruition -- time that could be good for diplomacy, but bad for ordinary Afghans. sw/ecl/rsc/cwl

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store