
Modiv Provides Clarity on Reverse Stock Split Proposal
'A few weeks ago, we filed our 2025 annual proxy statement. We have received a small number of inquiries regarding the reverse stock split proposal that we put forth. Given that there appears to be a pattern of confusion (not surprising given the legalese of the proxy), we decided to send this missive out so that everyone can hopefully receive a clearer explanation straight from the horse's mouth. I have attempted to present this in a digestible format but there is a lot of content to understand so please do not hesitate to email us, as needed, at the email address listed down below. Here it goes…
Background –
The fourth proposal in our proxy statement seeks stockholder approval to give the Company the right, but not the obligation, to implement a reverse stock split of our common stock only (not the Series A Preferred Stock) anywhere between 1:500 to 1:1,500 at any time prior to December 31, 2026. That's a very large reverse split, far greater than the 1:10 that any company can do without stockholder approval. Without full context, an investor might surmise that we want to make Modiv's share price $7,500 per share or higher – which would not be very retail investor friendly. I am here to tell you that is NOT the case at all and the reverse split (which would be followed by a forward split that I will describe a bit later) is purely an administrative function intended to reduce cost and potentially increase liquidity. Before I get into the sausage making of how it would work, let me step back and tell you why we are even seeking approval.
For those new to our name and unaware of our history, we are the only direct-to-retail crowdfunded REIT to ever publicly list on a stock exchange and we did that in early 2022. However, our legacy enterprise first started raising capital directly (with no brokers/advisors) from individual retail investors as early as 2012 back when crowdfunding was hoping to be the next big thing and long before I joined in 2018. Thousands upon thousands of investors made very small investments, in some cases as small as $500. They were issued shares in the predecessor REIT and they collected dividends but the shares couldn't be freely traded and their ability to sell their shares was very limited. It was basically a very high risk start up that happened to buy real estate. When I joined, my job was to make the Company more mainstream or 'institutional' which included cleaning up the real estate portfolio, providing stockholders full liquidity, reducing headcount and wherever possible making the Company more efficient and less costly. It is from this original mission that the reverse stock split proposal is derived.
When we listed the Company on the NYSE in February 2022, we needed a seasoned transfer agent to handle the litany of daily stockholder changes that would be occurring with a publicly traded stock. At that time, we chose Computershare, a globally recognized transfer agent that works with numerous publicly listed companies. When we onboarded all of our existing investors to the Computershare platform (originally it was all handled internally), there were nearly 10,000 separate accounts, each holding varying amounts of shares. Just for reference, that is a very large number of accounts for a company of our size and very atypical (befitting our history) as most newly public companies might have a small handful of accounts directly at the transfer agent with thousands of other accounts indirectly held at brokerage firms given that most companies raise their equity via investment bankers and brokers. Since we didn't raise our capital that way, we had a ton of accounts and the stockholders who owned these accounts were used to us being both their customer service agent and their investment (whereas most of you get your customer service from your broker not your stock investment).
Computershare was able to put together a service offering for our existing stockholders but it came at a significant cost to the Company – a meaningful six digits expense every year. For those who have ever dealt with the vast majority of transfer agents, then you know they are good at transferring shares and keeping records but their 80's vintage COBOL-esque software systems don't provide a good brokerage account experience (as they never intended it to be). Suffice it to say that using a transfer agent account as a brokerage account is like using a rotary phone instead of your smart phone. That fact alone led to numerous accounts transferring out to 'street name' where they could hold their shares in their modern brokerage accounts. Further, over the past several years we have made repeated attempts to get investors to move away from the transfer agent into a brokerage account and we have also whittled down the service offering to reduce cost, but the cost still remains relatively high for a small company and every dollar matters to you the stockholders.
As it stands today, we are hovering at a little over 4,000 accounts in total at our transfer agent with 3,500 of those accounts holding less than 1,500 shares and, further, a large number of those 3,500 accounts holding less than 500 shares. These accounts have not chosen to switch to brokerage firms and have been unresponsive to our communications. In fact, for many accounts we get returned mail when we send out 1099 tax forms, we get bounced emails when we try to reach them and many no longer have current phone numbers listed. These investors don't appear to be voting and don't appear to be logging in. It's as if they made an investment ten years ago and then simply forgot about it as time went on. I know, it sounds odd that someone would neglect that sum of money, but it appears to be the case as far as we can tell. Personally, I moved my shares over to my Schwab account within days of our NYSE listing.
Right about now you might be thinking…why doesn't Modiv put the cost of the account back to the accountholder? We looked into that, and it is not allowed. If they don't move to a broker and if they have more than one share, then all of us will simply have to bear the cost of these accounts. For those accounts that were less than one share, we have already cashed them out, but we still have thousands of accounts with more than one share. However, we did figure out a way to clean it up, to save long term costs and potentially increase liquidity, and that is where the reverse stock split comes in.
Sausage Making –
In this section we will get into some of the nitty gritty detail of how the reverse split would work if approved (and if implemented). It is far more information than you will typically see a CEO share in a press release, but hopefully by now you have come to appreciate that we at Modiv value transparency and candor. Our name may be derived from the concept of MOnthly DIVidends, but it is just as applicable to think of us as a Mutually Owned Dividend Investment Vehicle – with emphasis being on mutually owned in this instance. We are all in this together, it's all our monies, and I strongly believe that transparency and candor are of utmost importance in our pursuit of making our money grow.
Let me caveat the following by saying that all of this information was not readily known to us as it is rather abstract, and it took us several months to piece this education together by talking to multiple people at our transfer agent as well as other sources to include external counsel and our designated market maker. I am hopeful that I have it all right, but if some transfer agent whiz out there knows the intricacies better, then shoot us an email.
Given that we have the ability to cash out accounts that hold a fractional share (less than one share) by either paying cash from the Company's coffers or selling those fractions in the open market (thereby creating liquidity), we understood that the only way to solve the aforementioned excess dormant account issue, barring the accountholder either selling their shares or transferring to a brokerage firm, was to make all those accounts fractional shares. The only way to get fractional shares is to introduce a reverse stock split. Given that the vast majority of these seemingly dormant accounts hold somewhere more than 500 but less than 1,500 shares, we identified that a large reverse split, held in place for only a brief moment in time before reverting the share price back to a more normal share price via a forward split, is the most effective way to address this legacy administrative burden and cost issue. The thinking is…implement a large reverse split, address the new batch of fractional shares, implement a forward split, and then back to business with reduced cost and less administrative burden – all in one fell swoop.
The inefficient alternative, that would not require a stockholder approval, would be to implement a 1:10 reverse split every year until such time that all the dormant accounts are addressed, but that would mean we would all live with a ridiculously high share price for a very long period of time and that is simply not palatable. So, if the proxy proposal is not approved, then no problem. We will just continue to bear the cost burden, but we felt it worthwhile to put it out there for your approval.
I believe the confusion from our recent investor inquiries pertains to how the reverse split would impact all the smaller stockholders who hold their shares in a brokerage account. The short answer is that we do not believe there is a meaningful impact other than a temporarily higher share price. The reason we believe this is where it gets really in the weeds and it pertains to the three primary levels of stock ownership – 1) DTC level, 2) Participant level, and 3) Beneficial level.
The Depository Trust Company (DTC) is a central securities depository system utilized by brokers, transfer agents, NYSE and Nasdaq. It is estimated that over 80% of all U.S. public equity is held at the DTC (the first level) on behalf of a multitude of participating financial institutions like Fidelity, Schwab, etc. (the second level) who, in turn, hold the equity for the benefit of countless investors like yourself (the third level). You can look this up on the internet, but each publicly listed company has a DTC account (i.e. Cede & Co) at their respective transfer agent that represents the aggregate ownership of all those shares held in 'street name.' The DTC level is represented by a single account, the participant level reflects a small number of accounts (e.g. typically a few accounts for each financial institution depending on how they separate their taxable, non-taxable and non-retail accountholders), and the beneficial level would be hundreds of thousands of accounts representing the accounts you and I see when we log into our brokerage accounts.
At our transfer agent, amongst those ~4,000 accounts, is a single Cede & Co. account that represents the majority of our shares outstanding. Our transfer agent does not see your individual account at your broker, just those ~4,000 accounts. Further, all corporate actions happen initially at this first level. For example, when we issue a dividend payment, it goes to all ~4,000 accounts. The DTC account then distributes the money it receives automatically to the participant level accounts who in turn distribute your dividend into your individual account.
If we were to implement a reverse split and instruct our transfer agent to only cash out fractional shares at the participant level (which is what has been recommended to us), then we would materially limit the number of accounts impacted by the reverse split. Let's walk through an example. Let's assume there are 100 participant level accounts (we won't know the exact amount until we make the inquiry with the DTC) as well as the ~4,000 individual accounts held at our transfer agent. Given that any single account can only have one fractional share, that means only a maximum of 100 fractional shares would be impacted for all the millions of our shares held at financial institutions and from the ~4,000 individual accounts held at our transfer agent, only those accounts holding less than one share would be closed out. By doing it this way, we specifically address this legacy cost burden without wiping out thousands of retail investors who bought shares through their brokerage account.
As soon as the process of eliminating fractional shares is completed (we have been informed it could potentially take several days), we would then implement a forward split to bring our share price back to a more appropriate, non-elevated, stock price. The ending result would be a normal stock price, the elimination of the administrative burden of maintaining thousands of seemingly dormant accounts, and the annual cost savings that would ensue.
I want to point out that even if the proposal is approved by all of you, that does not mean we would implement it. Our goal would be to make another final push to get as many of those seemingly dormant accounts moved over to brokerage firms (heck, maybe this press release will help that cause). Only after that last effort would we then consider implementing the reverse stock split, hence having until the end of next year to potentially implement this administrative function.
Phew, that was a lot of stuff to write (and to digest). In a nutshell, if the reverse split is approved (and we are ok if you don't want it), then the final ending result would be a normal stock price, less dormant accounts at our transfer agent, and more money saved.
Grit, grind, get it done!' Aaron Halfacre, CEO of Modiv Industrial.
About Modiv Industrial
Modiv Industrial, Inc. is an internally managed REIT that is focused on single-tenant net-lease industrial manufacturing real estate. The Company actively acquires critical industrial manufacturing properties with long-term leases to tenants that fuel the national economy and strengthen the nation's supply chains. For more information, please visit: www.modiv.com.
Forward-looking Statements
Certain statements contained in this press release, other than historical facts, may be considered forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These statements include, but are not limited to, statements related to the reverse stock split, the forward stock split, annualized dividend rates, future distributions and distributions declared by the Company's board of directors. Such forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to those described under the section entitled 'Risk Factors' in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the 'SEC') on March 4, 2025. Accordingly, there are or will be important factors that could cause actual outcomes or results to differ materially from those indicated in these statements. These factors should not be construed as exhaustive and should be read in conjunction with the other cautionary statements that are included in this press release and in the Company's other filings with the SEC. Any forward-looking statements herein speak only as of the time when made and are based on information available to the Company as of such date and are qualified in their entirety by this cautionary statement. The Company assumes no obligation to revise or update any such statement now or in the future, unless required by law.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why Spotify's Latest Results Look Worse Than They Are
Spotify Technology (NYSE:SPOT) saw its stock drop sharply on Tuesday after it released its second-quarter 2025 results. Despite strong user growth, the company missed earnings and revenue expectations and issued a cautious forecast, which shook investor confidence. Wall Street analysts rerated the stock after the quarterly results. JP Morgan analyst Doug Anmuth reiterated an Overweight rating on Spotify, suggesting continued confidence in the company's long-term prospects despite the near-term headwinds. Similarly, Goldman Sachs analyst Eric Sheridan maintained a Buy rating, underscoring his positive outlook with a reaffirmed price forecast of $ these endorsements from analysts indicate underlying belief in Spotify's business model, the immediate market reaction highlights the Street's sensitivity to financial performance deviations. JP Morgan's Perspective Anmuth noted Spotify is executing well on its medium-term financial targets of achieving 30-40% gross margins and 10%+ operating margin. The analyst credited product optimizations and effective marketing for driving solid growth in both users and premium subscribers, while Spotify continues to invest in its core offerings, including audiobooks, video podcasts, and music. However, second-quarter results and third-quarter guidance were mixed, he noted. Spotify delivered stronger-than-expected MAUs and premium subscriber growth, but foreign exchange (FX) headwinds and social charges weighed on revenue, gross margin, and operating income, Anmuth said. The analyst said the company posted a second-quarter gross margin of 31.5%, which was in line with both guidance and consensus. But he noted that its third-quarter gross margin forecast of 31.1% came in slightly below JPMorgan's 31.3% estimate, factoring in a ~40bps regulatory charge. Spotify guided for third-quarter FX-neutral revenue growth of 10%, signaling a ~500bps deceleration, though that figure may not reflect potential price increases, Anmuth noted. Notably, Spotify doubled its share buyback authorization to $2 billion. He will watch to see whether this marks a shift toward more consistent capital returns or remains opportunistic. In the second quarter, Spotify generated 700 million euros in free cash flow, beating JPMorgan's 641 million euros estimate, and delivered operating income of 406 million euros. This included 116 million euros in social charges but still fell short of management's 539 million euros forecast. JPMorgan and consensus estimates stood at 457 million euros and 490 million euros, respectively. On the user side, Spotify added 18 million MAUs in the second quarter, bringing the total to 696 million, above the 689 million guidance. Strong marketing campaigns and favorable competitive dynamics supported this growth across all regions. Premium subscribers rose to 276 million, 8 million net additions, beating the company's guidance of 273 million. Revenue for the quarter came in at 4.19 billion euros, up 15% FX-neutral year-over-year, but below both management's guidance of 4.3 billion euros and JPMorgan's 4.27 billion euros estimate. FX headwinds were much stronger than expected, around 440bps compared to the 170bps the company had projected. Premium revenue grew 16% FX-neutral, driven by a 12% increase in subscribers and a 3% rise in ARPU. Advertising revenue increased 5% FX-neutral, slightly below the 6% JPMorgan had expected. Spotify guided for third-quarter MAUs of 710 million and premium subscribers of 281 million, ahead of JPMorgan and consensus estimates. However, revenue guidance of 4.2 billion euros fell short of the 4.5 billion euros estimate, again reflecting significant FX pressure (~490bps) and indicating another ~500bps slowdown in FX-neutral revenue growth. Spotify expects a third-quarter gross margin of 31.1% and operating income of 485 million euros, below JPMorgan's forecasts of 31.3% and 524 million euros, respectively. The outlook embeds another 25 million euros of headwind from social charges. Overall, while user growth remains a strength, Anmuth closely watched for improvements in revenue momentum, cost structure, and long-term margin execution. Goldman Sachs' Take Sheridan expects a mixed to slightly negative market reaction to Spotify's second-quarter 2025 results. The analyst noted that the company reported revenue and operating profit below its prior guidance, while gross margin landed in line with expectations. He attributed the shortfall to an unfavorable revenue mix, higher-than-expected FX headwinds, and elevated social charges, driven in part by stock price appreciation. Despite these headwinds, Spotify continued to show strong user growth, signaling that external factors had more impact than weak business fundamentals, Sheridan noted. The analyst noted that this quarter's results reflect a continuation of Spotify's 2025 strategy, prioritizing long-term growth investments over margin expansion after a strong margin performance in 2024. He also highlighted Spotify's newly authorized $1 billion share buyback, on top of the remaining $896 million from a previous program. On the earnings call, Sheridan will watch for clarity on pricing strategy, gross margin outlook, and Spotify's ability to balance growth investments with operating efficiency. Price Action: SPOT stock is trading lower by 11.6% to $619.96 at last check Tuesday. Photo via Shutterstock Latest Ratings for SPOT Date Firm Action From To Mar 2022 Deutsche Bank Initiates Coverage On Hold Feb 2022 B of A Securities Maintains Buy Feb 2022 Wells Fargo Maintains Underweight View More Analyst Ratings for SPOT View the Latest Analyst Ratings Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? This article Why Spotify's Latest Results Look Worse Than They Are originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Kevin O'Leary Says The 'Tariff Drama' Is Settling And The Market's Calming Because Trump 'Found The Loophole'
Investor Kevin O'Leary, better known as 'Mr. Wonderful' from the 'Shark Tank' TV show, believes the U.S. market is stabilizing despite recent trade tensions because President Donald Trump has figured out a workaround on tariffs. Trump's Strategy: Tariffs As A Value-Added Tax Substitute 'This tariff drama? It's settling,' O'Leary wrote on X on Thursday. 'The market's calming because Trump found the loophole. He can't add a value-added tax like other countries, so he calls it a tariff and gets the same result.' Don't Miss: 7,000+ investors have joined Timeplast's mission to eliminate microplastics—now it's your turn to $100k+ in investable assets? – no cost, no obligation. O'Leary told Fox Business the same day that global markets are beginning to understand how Trump's reciprocal tariff system works. What they care about now is predictability. 'The market wants a headline number,' he said. 'What do you got, 10? You got 15? ... The rest of the stuff, that's sausage being made. Nobody gives a damn.' O'Leary pointed to General Motors (NYSE:GM) as an example of how U.S. companies are adapting. He said that GM reportedly lost 45% on margins due to tariffs, but the auto maker's finance chief, Paul Jacobson, laid out a plan: absorb one-third of the cost, pass one-third to consumers, and rely on artificial intelligence to cover the rest. He argued that while the U.S. cannot impose consumer taxes like those in Europe or Japan, Trump's use of tariffs acts as a substitute. 'Poof, 'Puff the Magic Dragon.' He's getting his dollars from tariffs the same way the Japanese, the Canadians are with value-added taxes.' Trending: 'Scrolling To UBI' — Deloitte's #1 fastest-growing software company allows users to earn money on their phones. You can Detroit Automakers Raise Red Flags However, not everyone is cheering. The American Automotive Policy Council, which represents Ford (NYSE:F), GM, and Stellantis (NYSE:STLA), is pushing back on a recent trade deal with Japan. The agreement would lower tariffs on Japanese auto imports to 15%, while imports from Canada and Mexico still face a 25% rate. 'Any deal that charges a lower tariff for Japanese imports with virtually no U.S. content than the tariff imposed on North American built vehicles with high U.S. content is a bad deal for U.S. industry and U.S. auto workers,' AAPC President Matt Blunt told Reuters on Wednesday. The criticism comes as GM announced a $1.1 billion hit from tariffs in the second quarter, with more expected. Stellantis reported $350 million in losses over the first half of the year tied to tariffs and said it had to reduce shipments and cut the concerns, the White House spokesman Kush Desai defended the Japan deal as 'a historic win for American automakers' that will remove long-standing trade barriers. But similar criticism was raised by AAPC over a U.K. deal that allows 100,000 British cars to enter the U.S. at a 10% tariff, nearly the entire volume Britain exported last year. For now, O'Leary said the market is showing signs of confidence, especially since the chaos seen in early April has subsided. 'Proof is in the pudding. Let's wait, you know, another quarter or whatever. So far, so good.' Read Next: Warren Buffett once said, "If you don't find a way to make money while you sleep, you will work until you die."Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? APPLE (AAPL): Free Stock Analysis Report TESLA (TSLA): Free Stock Analysis Report This article Kevin O'Leary Says The 'Tariff Drama' Is Settling And The Market's Calming Because Trump 'Found The Loophole' originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why Investors View Bristol‑Myers Squibb (BMY) as a Safe Dividend Stock for Income
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (NYSE:BMY) is included among the 10 Best and Safe Dividend Stocks to Buy Now. A pharmacy shelves stocked with pharmaceutical drugs awaiting distribution. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (NYSE:BMY) presents a strong case for investors looking for both value and reliable income. While the company has faced challenges in the past, it has recently gained approval for several important new drugs, strengthening its outlook. For dividend-focused investors, free cash flow is often a more meaningful indicator than earnings, as it excludes non-cash items that can distort the picture. In the previous year, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (NYSE:BMY) generated $13.9 billion in free cash flow, well above the $4.9 billion it distributed in dividends. This substantial cushion suggests the company is well-positioned to maintain its dividend even in tougher times and gives it flexibility to reduce long-term debt if needed. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (NYSE:BMY) is one of the best dividend stocks, as the company has raised its payouts for 16 consecutive years. The company offers a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share for a dividend yield of 5.12%, as of July 27. While we acknowledge the potential of BMY as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: and . Disclosure: None.