Woman who planned armed robbery avoids 501 deportation from Australia, partly due to children
Photo:
RNZ
A New Zealand woman with a history of abuse and addiction who helped plan an armed robbery in Melbourne will not be deported from Australia, partly because of the impact on her three young children there.
The woman was sentenced to three years and four months in prison in 2023 on one count of armed robbery, making her liable for a "501″ deportation from Australia.
But three of her six children in Australia are still minors, and their interests were taken into account when a tribunal considered whether her visa should be revoked.
The Administrative Review Tribunal of Australia was told that the woman, who was born in New Zealand, was a ward of state before she was a year old, but was returned to her violent and alcoholic father at the age of 5.
At the age of 7, she was sexually abused by a person known to the family.
The woman, whose name is suppressed, moved to Australia with her first partner and their three children in 2006 and has not returned to New Zealand.
Her three oldest children are now adults and live independently.
When the couple separated, the woman began a relationship with another man, who had gang ties and who has since died.
With that partner, the woman had children who are currently aged 11, 9 and 7 and were placed in the care of a grandparent when she was charged with the robbery.
The tribunal was told the woman experienced "horrific" domestic violence from her second partner, and that she and the children were homeless at times.
When she was sentenced, the court was told the woman had PTSD from her childhood abuse and the violence in her relationships.
She also had symptoms of depression and anxiety, and her drug abuse was partly to numb memories of past trauma, emotional disconnection, feelings of hopelessness, sleep disturbance, difficulty concentrating, irritability and "reckless and self-destructive behaviour".
In 2019, the woman helped a co-offender plan an armed robbery at her former workplace.
She allowed the co-offender to use her car to drive to the place being robbed, and shared in the financial proceeds.
The woman was not directly involved in the execution of the crime itself, but the tribunal said it was satisfied it was a "serious armed robbery".
It involved a forced entry, use of a firearm or imitation firearm, and direct confrontation with two staff members.
However, the tribunal said the woman had no criminal history, and did not reoffend during the four years she was on bail before being sent to prison.
The tribunal also accepted that the woman had undergone "intense" rehabilitation to address her mental health and addiction issues involving methamphetamine and cannabis.
"The tribunal accepts the evidence of the applicant that she has overcome her drug addiction and is committed to remaining drug-free," tribunal senior member Margaret Bourke said.
Bourke said that deportation would cause "hardship and emotional harm" to all of the woman's children, not just the three who were still minors and Australian citizens.
The younger children have visited the woman fortnightly while she has been in prison.
"The tribunal accepts that the three children love and miss their mother ... when the applicant is able, and has proven she is capable, they plan that the three children will live with her again," Bourke said.
The woman also feared if she was sent back to New Zealand, she would be harmed by her co-offender in the robbery, who has already been deported, and members of the gang with which her second partner was affiliated.
The tribunal found the woman failed the "character test" under Section 501 of the Australian Migration Act - the legal provision that gave its name to the thousands of New Zealanders who have been deported, who are known as "501s".
However, Bourke found the combined weight of the younger children's interests, along with the strength and nature of the woman's ties to Australia, weighed in favour of revoking the cancellation of her visa.
"The tribunal has assessed that the applicant has strong family and social ties to the Australian community and there are three minor children whose best interests would be affected by the decision to cancel the applicant's visa," the decision said.
If it is an emergency and you feel like you or someone else is at risk, call 111.
This story was first published by the
New Zealand Herald
.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
3 hours ago
- RNZ News
Dunedin City Council warned of 'slumlords' exploiting students
Photo: RNZ / Nate McKinnon A Dunedin student flat horror story is prompting a call to action to prevent others from falling prey to bad landlords and filthy flats. The Dunedin City Council was warned about 'slumlords' exploiting students and vulnerable people and presented with a possible solution to the perpetual problem during a meeting on Wednesday. The council also voted to ask the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE) to share how it planned to monitor and enforce the Healthy Home rules in Dunedin to ensure rentals were fully compliant. Zoe Eckhoff was hoping to have a classic Otago flatting experience with her two friends this year, instead it turned into a horror story. The second year student shared her story during public forum, saying that when she and her friends inspected the flat last year, people were living there and it was messy. But she thought it would be clean by the time they moved in so they signed the lease and paid rent for a month. "We found the house in a pretty shocking state, it was mouldy, filthy and completely unprepared," she said. "The landlord refused to engage with us, entered without permission continuously and ignored our concerns." They then discovered their landlord had gone to the Tenancy Tribunal more than 20 times. Things quickly escalated and eventually the police became involved, she said. They went to the tribunal to challenge the unsafe conditions and serious incidents including the landlord screaming at them. Despite this, the students were unable to get out of their lease. But they did not give up. "Only after hiring a lawyer and installing cameras and recording her entering 85 times in 10 days at all hours of the day and night, including about three in the morning while we were still paying rent, were we able to get out of the lease," Eckhoff said. It was lucky they were all locals and had somewhere else to go but it took a big toll on them and their families, she said. "We paid over $5000 for a house we never lived in. We lost study time and faced serious stress and trauma. "All we wanted was a safe, lawful and respectful tenancy and instead we were exploited by a landlord and let down by a system that's supposed to protect us, and we're just one of many student groups that this has happened to and continues to happen to." Zoe's mum Pip Eckhoff said it was stressful going through the Tenancy Tribunal process. "We had an abusive landlord ... and a property that we couldn't move into and the adjudicator made no mention of how to allow us to move in and have the property ready so it really set us up to fail," she said. They did receive $5000 as part of the process. But it was not just one landlord, it was a much wider problem, she said. "Dunedin's housing is declining and unsafe. We have a broken enforcement system and slumlords are exploiting vulnerable people. The impact of ratepayers includes, but is not limited to, fewer students, businesses and families choosing Dunedin as a place to study and live," Eckhoff said. Parent and ratepayer Amanda Dyer said they sought help from nearly every support group across the city, but none could hold the landlord accountable or genuinely help them. The Tenancy Tribunal was not fit for purpose, Dyer said. "It's inaccessible, it's emotionally exhausting and inconsistent. Our case was riddled with factual errors and contradictions. The adjudicator appeared frustrated, even blaming our young adults for submitting the wrong kind of application," she said. The fines for landlords were minimal and did not deter bad behaviour, Dyer said. "Why spend $20,000 fixing up a property when the risk is just a $2000 fine? The fines determined case-by-case by the local Tribunal demonstrate how the system's enabling the slumlords and others repeat offending." Pip Eckhoff asked the council to be part of the solution by boosting its capacity to provide independent housing condition reports. "These reports would help tenants inspect properties like you'd do before buying a house, help tenants in disputes, support MBIE and Tribunal cases and build a report card history on problem landlords," she said. Earlier this year, MBIE's tenancy compliance and investigations teams inspected more than 50 Dunedin rentals, finding that students often discovered problems with the properties soon after moving in. Councillor Marie Laufiso put forward the motion asking the ministry to share how it planned to ensure rentals met the Healthy Homes rules. The Healthy Homes standards - which became law in 2019 and kicked in earlier this month - introduced a new benchmark for heating, insulation, ventilation, moisture barriers and drainage, and draught stopping in rental properties. Laufiso said she saw the toll it took on the tenants and their families to take action against this landlord and this was a way to take action and represent their residents. Councillor David Benson-Pope said it was a sensible decision as the city had a real problem with cold, damp housing. "This isn't just about one appalling landlord, there's a nest of them and they're not just in the campus area," he said. When his son was a student, he lived with his mates in an "ice box" with a little bit of insulation around the manhole but nothing anywhere else, Benson-Pope said. Now that the rules were in place, he wanted to see them enforced. Councillor Christine Garey said she was sadly not surprised to see photos of Eckhoff's flat. Students had raised concerns about speaking up and "rocking the boat" part way through a lease and possibly missing out on the next flat, she said. Migrants and refugees were also vulnerable, Garey said. She had heard of a property manager asking a tenant to sign that their property had the Healthy Home standards in place, only for one of the tenants to find that one of the standards had not been met. The tenant had refused to sign until it was completed, but she said that took courage and could be a difficult step to take. Councillor Jim O'Malley said he previously had to clean spiderwebs off the outside of a house and clean the carpet to get a deposit back. He was then told the carpet was not clean enough - despite cleaning it twice - and did not get his deposit back, he said. He also had to intervene after landlords tried to charge his daughter and her flatmates for damages done long before they moved in, and it was only after he threatened to take them to court that they paid the deposit back, O'Malley said. "Landlord abuse of tenants is around." Councillor Andrew Whiley, who is a landlord, said anything that improved healthy homes in Dunedin was important to do and it would only make good landlords look better. There were five ministry inspectors who were already in town and had started doing inspections, he said. Landlords had their "heads in the sand" if they only started preparing to follow the rules just before the deadline, he said. Deputy mayor Cherry Lucas said they needed to signal that they wanted a city of good, healthy rentals. Councillor Lee Vandervis said the Tenancy Tribunal's job was to ensure properties were fully compliant when there was an issue and they were already doing it. He did not support the motion. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Otago Daily Times
10 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Man jailed for assaulting girl went on to abuse preschooler
By Al Williams, Open Justice reporter Warning: This story contains details of sexual offending against a child and may be upsetting. A man who was jailed for three and a half years for indecently assaulting a 10-year-old girl went on to commit similar offences against a 4-year-old girl a decade later. The victim of Michael Brendon Buck's latest offending described the trauma as something she could not comprehend. 'I have lived with it for many years, I don't think I had ever had a reaction, not until the day I came forward to my family about what happened when I was 4 years old.' Her victim statement was read out in the Christchurch District Court by Crown prosecutor Jade Lancaster when Buck appeared for sentencing on multiple charges of sexual conduct with a child aged under 12. The victim said the hardest thing to do was telling her family about Buck's offending. 'I didn't really think anything of it, the damage it might cause, the guilt, talking about it, I still get a sore throat, my heart caves into the pit of my stomach. 'It is heartbreaking, gut-wrenching, it makes me sick now; I have stopped trying to understand why someone like that would take advantage of me, not realising that things like that shouldn't happen to you.' She wanted Buck to acknowledge what he had done. The court heard the victim was often in Buck's care, and that when she was 4 or 5 years old, he had committed an indecent act on her. When the victim was aged between 8 and 9 years old, he again committed an indecent act on her. He went on to deny the offending before saying he didn't have a direct recall of the events, but accepted the summary of facts if that was what the victim had recalled. While defence lawyer Rupert Ward said Buck had shown remorse and taken responsibility for the situation, Judge Gerard Lynch didn't accept his claim of remorse. 'Any remorse was about the fix you found yourself in rather than any heartfelt remorse for this child,' Judge Lynch told him. Judge Lynch said the thought of going back to jail had 'terrified' Buck. Lancaster submitted an uplift in the sentence for Buck's criminal history. 'Obviously this is offending of a type where prison is appropriate.' The Crown also sought to have Buck placed on the Child Sex Offender Register. Judge Lynch said Buck, now 65, had been sentenced to three and half years' jail in 1991 for indecent acts on a girl aged under 12. While there had been more than 30 years between the convictions, it was only 12 years between the offending, the judge said. 'That you have offended again like this is worrying. 'She was very young, you exploited her for your own gratification, it is plain the harm he caused, it will be with her for some time.' Judge Lynch told Buck he did not accept his claim of remorse after Buck had entered not guilty pleas and sought a sentencing indication. From a starting point of 24 months' jail, Judge Lynch sentenced him to 10 months and two weeks' home detention and placed Buck on the Child Sex Offender Register. 'This is the sort of case when an order is needed to protect any children or any other person, the risk is real and genuine.' SEXUAL HARM Where to get help: If it's an emergency and you feel that you or someone else is at risk, call 111. If you've ever experienced sexual assault or abuse and need to talk to someone, contact Safe to Talk confidentially, any time 24/7:• Call 0800 044 334• Text 4334 • Email support@ • For more info or to web chat visit Alternatively contact your local police station - click here for a list. If you have been sexually assaulted, remember it's not your fault.
RNZ News
a day ago
- RNZ News
Contractor fined $70k for safety breach after forestry worker loses fingers
By Shannon Pitman, Open Justice reporter of The hauler involved in the incident which left a forestry worker seriously injured. Photo / Worksafe Photo: Supplied / Worksafe A seasoned forestry worker lost four fingers in a workplace accident, which ended a 45-year career that was marked by pride, satisfaction and no intention to retire. Now, Kohurau Contracting has been ordered to pay $150,000 and must publish an educational article about the dangers of untangling cable snarls in forestry operations. In August 2021, the worker - who has name suppression - was at a forestry site near Waipu, south of Whangārei, helping clear a cable that had not been wound correctly on to the drum. The experienced crew were packing up to relocate to another location but the tail line had over-spooled on to the drum, creating a "bird's nest" similar to which can occur on a fishing reel. At least 1200m of cable had to be pulled out in order to clear the bird's nest. The victim was guiding the rope back on to the drum using a hammer while seated beneath the tower. Another worker was operating a grapple loader to keep the cable elevated. During the operation, the stabiliser ram supporting the tower fractured, and a broken section - known as the spear - fell on to the victim, seriously injuring him. As a result, the victim was hospitalised for six weeks and had to have four fingers amputated. Kohurau was charged by WorkSafe for failing to ensure the health and safety of its workers and pleaded not guilty. A five-day judge-alone trial was held in the Dargaville District Court in November 2024, where several witnesses gave evidence including the victim and industry experts. WorkSafe's mechanical engineer, John Mains, stated that winching without guy ropes was unacceptable and the accident would not have occurred had the tower been properly secured. Kohurau's expert argued that guy ropes were unnecessary for the task and the force involved was minimal - claims Judge Peter Davey found inconsistent. The court also heard that Kohurau lacked a specific safe system for clearing birds' nests and relied heavily on the experience of its crew. Judge Davey concluded Kohurau breached its duties under the Health and Safety Act and found the company guilty of exposing workers to serious risk. This week at the Whangārei District Court the company was sentenced in the presence of its owner, Hamish John Owen. Kohurau's lawyer Daniel Robinson argued the company was insolvent and had suffered a loss of $1.3 million because of the accident. "Where do you get that from?" Judge Davey questioned before noting the company still had assets of around $400,000 and $250,000 in its bank account. Judge Davey did not accept the losses were from the accident and stated the company had been downsizing prior to the accident. Judge Davey repeatedly expressed his concern around whether reparation would be paid, to which Robinson assured him any amount ordered would be met. "My instructions sir, is we will be able to be pay but that is limited to the reparation order," Robinson responded. Robinson also submitted the absence of any industry guidelines for winding cables was a mitigating factor that should be applied to the companies' overall sentence. Judge Davey noted the significant impact the accident had on the victim. "He hasn't been able to return to work, he enjoyed the work, he had no plans of retiring," Judge Davey said. "He clearly took great pride in his work, took great satisfaction in his work and he was good at his job. "Despite what's happened to him, he nevertheless tries to stay positive." Judge Davey said the price of an emotional harm reparation order was an intuitive exercise and there was no way to put a figure on the suffering caused. "No amount of money can compensate the emotional harm that he has suffered." Judge Davey said Kohurau should have had a process in place to clear birds' nests and there was "a real risk he could have been killed". Kohurau, which has already paid the victim $10,000, was ordered to pay him a further $50,000. The company was also fined $70,000 and ordered to pay legal costs of $30,000. The court also issued a project order with two key commitments to be completed within 12 months. Kohurau must work in collaboration with the Forestry Industry Safety Council (FISC) and Forestry Industry Contractors Association (FICA) to develop guidance on winding in non-working ropes. It must also publish an article in NZ Forestry magazine highlighting the case to raise awareness and promote safer practices across the industry. "This project order is a way for Kohurau to take the lead on delivering initiatives that create genuine sector-wide improvements in forestry. We look forward to seeing the benefits that this industry-led guidance produces," WorkSafe spokesperson Mark Horgan said. * This story originally appeared in the New Zealand Herald .
