logo
Devon campaigners call for ‘right to riverbank' after finding Dart has 108 owners

Devon campaigners call for ‘right to riverbank' after finding Dart has 108 owners

The Guardian9 hours ago
Campaigners in Devon are calling for a right to the riverbank after finding their local river, the Dart, has 108 separate owners, with an eighth of it owned via offshore companies.
Locals used site visits, angling maps, Companies House records and Land Registry data to find out who owns the River Dart.
The government in its election manifesto last year promised to implement nine new 'river walks' in England to extend public access to the countryside, after it U-turned on a previous policy to enshrine a right to roam in law.
No plans have yet been laid out for the river walks, neither where they will be nor how the government proposes to implement them. Ministers would have to work with local landowners to gain permission for the riverbanks to be used by the public, and the research by Devon campaigners shows how difficult this can be.
Aristocrats own large swathes of the Dart. The Duchy of Cornwall owns the largest slice of riverbank at 28 miles (45km). The Dart is 47 miles long, so has nearly 100 miles of bank altogether. The next largest owner, the Spitchwick estate, owns 12 miles, and the Duke of Somerset has about 1.25 miles. The research also found that 11.6 miles is owned via offshore companies.
Right to roam campaigners have long asked for aristocrats to open up their land for the public to walk across. In 2022, dozens of campaigners descended upon the Duke of Somerset's estate to picnic and play music, ignoring the 'keep out' signs. In Scotland, there is a right to walk across the entirety of the countryside as long as ramblers are respectful and leave no trace behind.
Research by British Canoeing has previously found that fewer than 4% of English rivers are open to the public. A patchwork of landowners have rights over tiny lengths of river, which makes it almost impossible to create routes for swimming and boating without land reform, campaigners have said.
Lewis Winks, who compiled the River Dart research, said: 'The River Dart is rightly a much-celebrated part of the Devon landscape, yet the rights to the river – and those who own them – largely remain a mystery. The more time I spend with the Dart, the more urgent the question becomes: who gets to decide whether we are able to know and love this river?'
He said he embarked on the daunting task of mapping land ownership along the Dart 'to understand who holds power over access here'. He added that 'what quickly became clear was how little transparency exists – even those working closely with the river often don't know who owns the banks'.
The Dart rises high on Dartmoor and flows to the sea at Dartmouth. Though it is a significant river in the area, it is relatively short compared with others in the UK. For example, the Severn is 220 miles long, and the Thames is 215 miles long.
Sign up to Down to Earth
The planet's most important stories. Get all the week's environment news - the good, the bad and the essential
after newsletter promotion
Winks said: 'The situation along other, longer rivers is likely to be even more complex. Achieving increased access to rivers based on a permissive approach would present a logistical nightmare. Each stretch would require time-consuming negotiations with dozens – if not hundreds – of large landowners and corporate bodies, many of whom are difficult to identify.
'That's why we're calling for a rights-based approach to river access – similar to the system in Scotland, where the public has the right to responsibly walk, swim, paddle and canoe along most rivers and lochs, with sensible exceptions.'
A Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs spokesperson said: 'Britain is a proud nation of nature lovers, and this government is committed to turning the tide on its decline after years of neglect. We are progressing plans to designate nine new national river walks, one in each region of England.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Farage labels Kyle's comments ‘below the belt' and reiterates call for apology
Farage labels Kyle's comments ‘below the belt' and reiterates call for apology

The Independent

time5 hours ago

  • The Independent

Farage labels Kyle's comments ‘below the belt' and reiterates call for apology

Nigel Farage has reiterated his demands for a Cabinet minister to apologise for accusing him of being on the side of 'extreme pornographers'. A row broke out on Tuesday morning after Peter Kyle said the Reform UK leader is on the side of 'people like Jimmy Savile' over the party's pledge to scrap the Online Safety Act. Mr Farage labelled Technology Secretary Mr Kyle's remarks as 'below the belt' and 'so absolutely disgusting that it's almost beyond belief', and urged people to sign a petition calling for the legislation to be repealed. Former Reform chair Zia Yusuf said on Monday that the party would repeal the legislation if they got into Government. 'I see that Nigel Farage is already saying that he's going to overturn these laws,' Mr Kyle told Sky News. 'So you know, we have people out there who are extreme pornographers, peddling hate, peddling violence. Nigel Farage is on their side. 'Make no mistake about it, if people like Jimmy Savile were alive today, he'd be perpetrating his crimes online. And Nigel Farage is saying that he's on their side.' Responding to Mr Kyle on a live stream on Tuesday morning, Mr Farage said: 'Just how low can the Labour Government sink in its desperation? 'Yes, of course they're in trouble. They're well behind us in the opinion polls. But frankly, to say that I would do anything that would in any way aid and abet people like Jimmy Savile, it's so below the belt it's almost not true.' He also reiterated his demand for an apology and added: 'We're not going to get one. I think perhaps the best thing we can do is to sign the petition to repeal the Online Safety Act. That's what I'm going to do today. I think it makes sense. I'm deeply worried about the implications for free speech.' Under rules that came into effect on July 25, online platforms such as social media sites and search engines must take steps to prevent children accessing harmful content such as pornography or material that encourages suicide. Mr Yusuf has said that the laws work to 'suppress freedom of speech' and 'force social media companies to censor anti-Government speech'. After being asked by Mr Farage to apologise on social media, Mr Kyle doubled down on his comments, claiming that wanting to 'overturn' the Act puts somebody 'on the side of predators'. Mr Yusuf has claimed that Mr Kyle's remarks showed 'how deeply unserious' the Government was about child safety, adding: 'Talking about Jimmy Savile in that way does nothing other than denigrate the victims of Jimmy Savile.' He told Sky News that the comments are 'one of the most outrageous and disgusting things a politician has said in the political arena that I can remember. And that's quite a high bar, frankly.' Sir Keir Starmer jumped to defend the legislation from its critics when he met Donald Trump on Monday, telling reporters: 'We're not censoring anyone. 'We've got some measures which are there to protect children, in particular, from sites like suicide sites.' The Prime Minister added: 'I personally feel very strongly that we should protect our young teenagers, and that's what it usually is, from things like suicide sites. I don't see that as a free speech issue, I see that as child protection.'

A year after anti-immigrant riots in Britain, many worry it could happen again
A year after anti-immigrant riots in Britain, many worry it could happen again

The Independent

time5 hours ago

  • The Independent

A year after anti-immigrant riots in Britain, many worry it could happen again

The killing of three girls at a summer dance class in England a year ago Tuesday, by a teenager misidentified as a migrant, triggered days of street violence directed at newcomers and minorities. In the aftermath, communities came together to clear up the physical damage — but repairing the country's social fabric is harder. Experts and community groups warn that the mix of anger, fear, misinformation and political agitating that fueled the violence remains. In recent weeks it has bubbled over again on the streets of Epping, near London. 'Given a trigger event, none of the conditions of what happened last year have gone away,' said Sunder Katwala of British Future, a think tank that looks at issues including integration and national identity. He said there is a 'tense and quite febrile atmosphere' in some parts of the country. A solemn anniversary Three minutes of silence will be held Tuesday in the seaside town of Southport in northwest England, where the stabbing attack left three girls under 10 dead and eight children and two adults wounded. Over the following days, violence erupted in Southport and across England, driven partly by online misinformation saying the attacker was a migrant who had arrived in the U.K. by small boat. Because of British contempt of court and privacy laws, authorities were initially slow to disclose the suspect's identity: Axel Rudakubana, a British-born 17-year-old obsessed with violence. He later pleaded guilty to murder and is serving a life sentence. In the week after the attack, crowds in more than two dozen towns attacked hotels housing migrants, as well as mosques, police stations and a library. Some rioters targeted non-white people and threw bricks and fireworks at police. With a few days, larger numbers of people took to the streets to reclaim their communities, sweeping up broken glass and sending a message of welcome to newcomers. Tinderbox Britain A year on, the sight of migrants crossing the English Channel in dinghies — more than 22,000 so far this year — provides a focus for those concerned about the impact of immigration. Those concerns are often amplified by online rumor, scapegoating and misinformation, some of it deliberate. Add a sluggish economy, high housing costs, frayed public services and widespread distrust in politicians, and Britain, in the view of many commentators, has become a 'tinderbox.' Nigel Farage, leader of hard-right political party Reform UK, said last week that the country is close to 'civil disobedience on a vast scale.' The left-of-center Labour government agrees there is a problem. At a Cabinet meeting last week, Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner noted that 17 of the 18 places that saw the worst disorder last year were among the most deprived in the country. She said that Britain is 'a successful multi-ethnic, multi-faith country,' but the government must show it has 'a plan to address people's concerns and provide opportunities for everyone to flourish.' The government has pledged to stop migrants trying to reach Britain across the Channel and to end the practice of lodging asylum-seekers in hotels, which have become flashpoints for tension. Critics say the government risks legitimizing protesters who in many cases are driven by intolerance and want to drive immigrants from their homes. In Ballymena, Northern Ireland, last month, rioters threw bricks, bottles, petrol bombs and fireworks and firebombed immigrants' houses after two Romanian-speaking 14-year-old boys were charged with sexual assault. Hundreds of people have protested this month outside a hotel housing asylum-seekers in Epping, a town on the edge of London, after a recently arrived migrant from Ethiopia was charged with sexual assault. He denies the charge. Scattered protests Protesters in Epping and a handful of other communities this summer have included local people, but also members of organized far-right groups who hope to capitalize on discord. Tiff Lynch, who heads the Police Federation officers union, wrote in the Daily Telegraph newspaper that the Epping disorder was 'a reminder of how little it takes for tensions to erupt and how ill-prepared we remain to deal with it.' Learning from last summer's violence, where the police and courts responded quickly to detain and charge hundreds of suspects, police have charged more than a dozen people over violence in Epping. A protest and antiracist counter-demonstration in the town on the weekend were peaceful. The online realm is harder to police. The British government, like others around the world, has struggled with how to stop toxic content on sites including X. Under the ownership of self-styled free-speech champion Elon Musk, X has gutted teams that once fought misinformation and restored the accounts of banned conspiracy theories and extremists. The government has cited the amount of time people spend alone online as a factor behind polarization and fraying social bonds. Grounds for optimism Families of the three girls who died in Southport — Alice da Silva Aguiar, 9, Elsie Dot Stancombe, 7, and 6-year-old Bebe King — have called for quiet and respectful commemorations. Local authorities have asked people not to lay flowers, but to consider donating to causes set up in the victim's memories. The team behind Elsie's Story, a children's charity set up by Stancombe's family, posted on Instagram: 'Our girls, our town, will not be remembered for the events of that day, but for everything we are building together.' Katwala said that despite a 'sense of disconnection and frustration at national politics and national institutions,' there are grounds for optimism. 'Britain is less heated and less polarized than the United States, by quite a long way,' he said. 'People's interpersonal trust remains quite high. Seven out of 10 people think their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well. They're just worried about the state of the nation.'

Moment Donald Trump ‘throws shade' at Meghan and Prince Harry during tense press conference with Keir Starmer
Moment Donald Trump ‘throws shade' at Meghan and Prince Harry during tense press conference with Keir Starmer

The Sun

time5 hours ago

  • The Sun

Moment Donald Trump ‘throws shade' at Meghan and Prince Harry during tense press conference with Keir Starmer

PRESIDENT Donald Trump has been accused by royal watchers of taking a swipe at Harry and Meghan during his press conference with the Prime Minister. Trump spoke about his love of the royal family before making a remark about "not great people" outside the UK. 5 5 Fans immediately clocked the wording and claimed the US president was "throwing shade" at the Sussexes. Prime Minister Keir Starmer remained quiet during the exchange unlike when Trump slammed London Mayor Sadiq Khan. Trump said: "Being with Charles, Camilla and everybody, I've got to know a lot of the family members. "They are great people. They are really great people." He went on to seemingly have a dig at Harry and Meghan and their decision to emigrate, saying: "And in that sense I think the UK is very lucky, you could have people that weren't great people. "I don't know if I can say that, but you could have people that weren't." Social media users and royals fans immediately noticed the apparent meaning behind the president's words. They took to social media in a flurry with one user saying: "I love the shade President Trump throws at Prince Harry & Meghan Markle." Another wrote they were sure that Trump was "calling them out." It comes after the Duke of Sussex took an apparent swipe at the president in February. Trump had called his wife "terrible" and Harry responded by subtly referencing Trump in a speech given to 40,000 people. Awkward moment Trump blasts 'nasty' Sadiq Khan for 'terrible job'… before Starmer interrupts: 'He's a friend of mine!' At the opening ceremony of the Invictus Games in Canada Harry took the opportunity to mention "weak moral character in the world" a comment viewed as a jibe aimed at president Trump. It follows Mr Trump ignoring calls for Harry's deportation amid controversy over his visa and his historical drug use. Harry and Meghan have also reportedly donated $500,000 to Democrat rivals of Trump. Trump has previously claimed that he is "not a fan" of Meghan, claiming that " Harry is whipped" and "is being led around by his nose." 5 5 Trump's comments yesterday came after he told the Prime Minister to cut taxes and stop the boats if he wants to beat Farage. The president also slammed London Mayor Sadiq Khan calling him a "nasty person." During the joint press conference Trump took aim at the Mayor of London saying: " Confirming he will travel to London during his state visit in September, Trump blasted: "I'm not a fan of your Mayor. "I think he's done a terrible job, the Mayor of London. "He's a nasty person." After hearing Trump's barbed comments about Sadiq, Sir Keir Starmer stuck up for his "friend."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store