logo
Column: State gladly accepts federal funds to curb carp

Column: State gladly accepts federal funds to curb carp

Chicago Tribune14-05-2025
There was nothing fishy about President Donald Trump unleashing federal money last week to combat the threat of invasive carp entering Lake Michigan.
After fears the administration would withhold the funding to punish Illinois, the president showed his bark is maybe worse than his bite. At least when it comes to this ecosystem issue.
Illinois Department of Natural Resources officials had expected to begin the Brandon Road Interbasin Project on the Des Plaines River in Joliet in Will County back in February. That date was delayed after officials were afraid funding might be postponed since the president and Gov. JB Pritzker have been sniping at each other, according to a News-Sun story earlier this week by Olivia Olander of the Chicago Tribune.
First phase of the work, pegged at about $340 million, is proposed to stop the so-called Asian carp — silver, bighead, grass and black carp — from entering the Big Lake fishery, where they could spread to the other four Great Lakes. Two more phases of the project, in the planning stage for more than five years, including an electric-shock barrier, are proposed in the coming years. The overall pricetag is an estimated $1.2 billion.
That's a hefty cost, yet at stake is the future of the Great Lakes recreational fishing, boating and tourism industry, estimated at $16 billion, as well as the lakes' $7 billion commercial fishing industry.
Charter boat captains, from Northpoint Marina in Winthrop Harbor to Waukegan Harbor to Chicago, along with weekend anglers, have already been successfully plying Lake Michigan this spring seeking various trout and salmonoid species with great luck. Reports indicate that there have been many days of limit catches.
The Brandon Road Lock and Dam barrier plans offered by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers are considered the last stand in stemming the expected push by the invasive species into the Great Lakes, which are the largest freshwater system in the world. Downstream from the lake along the Illinois River, the voracious fish have taken over waterways.
Indeed, one study has determined that up to 50 million pounds of carp a year could be taken in the river, and even more from waterways south to the Gulf Coast. The state has attempted to 'rebrand' the fish as the affordable 'seafood' they now call copi.
Nobody has swallowed that despite some Chicago chefs crafting dishes using the plentiful copi, a nod to how 'copious' the fish are. Apparently, the fish is tasty, but still carp is carp.
Other uses for the fish are exporting them to Asian markets and for fertilizer. Like other invasives, the carp were introduced in the 1960s to help aquaculture in the South, but have since spread to 31 states.
There's plenty of video on social media showing hundreds of carp jumping into boats on various rivers, including the mighty Mississippi. The devastation the species could cause to the Great Lakes would be an environmental disaster.
There's no guarantee the barrier plans will keep the carp from lakes, which already have some freshwater common European carp, also an invasive species, swimming free. As in the case of other invasives — lamprey eels, zebra mussels or gobies — they have a way of getting where they want to go.
Perhaps capitalist Trump sees the financial damage the invasives could wreak on Midwestern states, as he's promised the feds will write a check for their fair share. Or he's repaying the sportsmen in Michigan, Ohio and Wisconsin who helped him to victory last fall in battleground states.
Whatever the reason, Illinois officials and others are pleased to see the money forthcoming. Unlike another $2 billion in federal funds for some 70 other projects across the state, destined for Illinois but hanging fire.
Pritzker said Trump 'heard our calls about the importance of delivering federal funds,' according to Olander's story. He added that the administration 'decided to finally meet their obligations to the state of Illinois and the Great Lakes region.'
The National Wildlife Federation, too, praised the full-funding measure, calling it 'the most effective solution to protect the Great Lakes from invasive carp.'
If the fish make their way to Lake Michigan, from what we've seen on the Illinois River, it will be near-impossible to get rid of their presence. The Brandon Road barrier may keep them out of our precious resource.
When that happens, the Trump administration will receive an overdue 'thank you' from environmentalists and fishers across the region.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

As partisan redistricting battles flare, Maine constitutional officers weigh in
As partisan redistricting battles flare, Maine constitutional officers weigh in

Yahoo

time12 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

As partisan redistricting battles flare, Maine constitutional officers weigh in

Voters cast their ballots at the Quimby School gymnasium in Bingham, Maine on Tuesday, November 5, 2024. (Photo by Michael G. Seamans/ Maine Morning Star) Since President Donald Trump asked Texas to redraw its congressional maps to find five more Republican seats ahead of next year's elections, some Democratic states are considering redistricting to counter the effort. Maine is not, at least according to Gov. Janet Mills, though an anonymous group tried to encourage the Pine Tree State to intervene earlier this month by flying planes over Augusta with banners that read 'Mess with Texas.' The state's constitutional officers, Attorney General Aaron Frey and Secretary of State Shenna Bellows, both Democrats, condemned Texas' move, and Trump instigating it, as a blatant abuse of power. But, they said Democratic states exploring the avenues legally available to them to redistrict outside the regular schedule is understandable. Bellows refrained from any judgement of those counter efforts, while Frey was more critical, particularly due to what he sees as a likely snowball effect. 'I am lamenting what this might mean for how our politics will continue, in terms of people trying to do the one-upsmanship,' Frey said in a sit-down with Maine Morning Star. 'As much as it probably sounds like it's a critique, it really is more of a concern about this being the evolution of where the politics is going.' The Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee, the official party committee dedicated to electing Democrats to statehouses, called on Democrats on Aug. 4 to pursue redistricting opportunities to respond to possible changes to Texas' congressional map. Last week, California was the first state to release a proposal to that aim. Such ideas have also been floated by officials in New York, Maryland, and Illinois — whose governor has already waded into the redistricting battle by welcoming Texas Democrats who fled the state to block a vote on the Republican proposal. They've since returned. But, Republicans control more state legislatures than Democrats and Vice President JD Vance is touring those states to encourage more gerrymandering. Several, including Missouri, Florida and Indiana, are now considering redrawing their maps to counter the Democrats' countering. 'It should be a concern for all of us about what this means for the next time that the next majority is in power,' Frey said. 'I am hoping that I would have just as much concern if California would have been the first state to say that they were going to do this as I have about Texas saying that they're going to do this, even though it may be perfectly appropriate legally.' Redistricting procedures vary state by state but largely happen every ten years following new census data. Under the Maine Constitution, the state Legislature must establish a bipartisan advisory commission to draw its congressional and legislative districts every ten years. These maps are then sent to the Legislature for approval, though lawmakers aren't bound to those recommendations. Approval requires a two-thirds vote, and because neither party has held a supermajority in the last decade, this has typically required bipartisan support. The map is then subject to the governor's approval. Maine last went through this process in 2021. Mills did not respond to multiple requests for comment about whether she supports the actions other Democratic states are considering to redraw their maps in response to Texas Republicans' attempts. A spokesperson told the Portland Press Herald in early August that she was not considering any actions related to redistricting in Maine. If the Legislature is unable to reach the two-thirds threshold, the Maine Supreme Court would draw the maps instead. 'It's understandable that other states are seeking to fight fire with fire,' Bellows said, echoing California Gov. Gavin Newsom, 'but none of what's happening outside of Maine would change unless the Legislature and the people of Maine decided to pursue a constitutional amendment.' A constitutional amendment in Maine requires a two-thirds vote, plus approval by the voters, so such a change, especially before the 2026 midterms, is not likely. When asked if Maine should get involved in the nationwide redistricting fight, Frey said, 'No, not at this point.' As the officer representing the state on legal matters, Frey said he doesn't see an opportunity for legal recourse given that other states drawing congressional districts is a state-level process pertaining to their residents and it doesn't have a direct harm to Maine. However, how these maps ultimately shape Congress will inevitably impact Maine, he said, looking at a list on his desk of lawsuits Maine has filed or joined against the Trump administration. Particularly if Trump gets his way in Texas, Frey said it could result in a continuation of a Congress that doesn't serve as an adequate check to the executive branch. Some politicians are seeking to choose their voters instead of their voters choosing them. – Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows Like other Democrats across the country, Frey and Bellows walked a line to frame their party's use of redistricting differently than Republicans'. 'The Trump administration is trampling all over the norms in our democracy, and it is really important that people stand strong for our values in this moment,' Bellows said. 'What's concerning about what Texas is trying to do is they are basically trying to cheat their way into electoral success in 2026 and 2028, so it's understandable that some of the larger states that are blue states are thinking about how they might respond.' Of those clear political aims, Frey similarly said, 'There's no mask to it,' arguing it would be different if Texas had come to a conclusion that redistricting mid-cycle was needed because its districts were no longer representative due to population shifts or another clear reason. 'Let's say this was Joe Biden who in 2023 was like, 'California, Gavin Newsom, you like us, California does a lot of stuff that supports the administration, I need you to go redistrict and get me five more seats in Congress,'' Frey said. 'What would people say?' But while Frey said Democratic states may be legally within their right to explore counter measures, he doesn't see it as a productive way to resolve political discord nor address the priority issues of everyday Americans, such as the cost of living. 'If anything, it's creating a system that is going to be more unable to meet what it is that, I think, Mainers and the American people are asking for,' Frey said. As Trump eyes election changes, Secretary Bellows warns of fallout Earlier this month Bellows officially responded to the U.S. Department of Justice's request for sweeping voter data, questioning the federal agency's intentions and asking that the request be withdrawn. She sees a throughline with that effort, Trump's executive orders and his push for Texas Republicans to redistrict. 'Some politicians are seeking to choose their voters instead of their voters choosing them,' Bellows said. 'Many of these initiatives seem designed to shrink the population of people who are participating in elections, to spread fear and deter people from participating, or to create artificial barriers to participation.' Frey also sees connections. The day before speaking with Maine Morning Star, Frey had returned from a trip to Washington, D.C., where he saw National Guard troops and FBI agents gathered on the mall. 'They are pushing boundaries to see how far they can get,' Frey said of the administration. Pulling up the president's post on Truth Social ordering the U.S. Commerce Department to start working on a new U.S. Census that does not count people in the country illegally, Frey asked, 'What's the end?' He sees all of these moves as a test of the democratic foundation of the country, the U.S. Constitution. 'If enough citizens out there who are protected by this contract decide that they are unwilling to hold the president to the limitations that the constitution places on government action, I mean, at a certain point that contract by both parties is just going to dissolve,' Frey said. The book 'The Storm Before the Calm' sat on his desk as he added a hopeful nod, explaining the current moment could provide an opportunity to be reminded of the importance of those protections. The book, by geopolitical forecaster George Friedman, views American history through cycles, enduring upheaval and conflict but, ultimately, increasing in strength and stability. With 2026 on the horizon — when Maine's governorship, U.S. Senate seat, two U.S. House seats and Legislature are all up for reelection — Frey said, 'Maybe there will be an opportunity for renewal.' Time will tell how redistricting may play a part in that. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Nato defence chiefs hold virtual meeting on Ukraine security guarantees
Nato defence chiefs hold virtual meeting on Ukraine security guarantees

Yahoo

time12 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Nato defence chiefs hold virtual meeting on Ukraine security guarantees

Nato defence chiefs are due to hold a virtual meeting, a senior alliance official said, as countries pushing for an end to Russia's war on Ukraine devise possible future security guarantees for Kyiv that could help forge a peace agreement. Italian admiral Giuseppe Cavo Dragone, chair of Nato's Military Committee, said that 32 defence chiefs from across the alliance would hold a video conference as a US-led diplomatic push seeks to end the fighting. US general Alexus Grynkewich, Nato's supreme allied commander in Europe, will take part in the talks, Mr Dragone said on social platform X. US president Donald Trump met last Friday with Russian leader Vladimir Putin in Alaska, and on Monday hosted Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky and prominent European leaders at the White House. Neither meeting delivered concrete progress. Mr Trump is trying to steer Mr Putin and Mr Zelensky towards a settlement more than three years after Russia invaded its neighbour, but there are major obstacles. They include Ukraine's demands for Western-backed military assurances to ensure Russia will not mount another invasion in coming years. 'We need strong security guarantees to ensure a truly secure and lasting peace,' Mr Zelensky said in a Telegram post on Wednesday after Russian missile and drone strikes hit six regions of Ukraine overnight. Kyiv's European allies are looking to set up a force that could backstop any peace agreement, and a coalition of 30 countries, including European nations, Japan and Australia, have signed up to support the initiative. Military chiefs are figuring out how that security force might work. The role that the US might play in is unclear. Mr Trump has ruled out sending US troops to help defend Ukraine against Russia. Russia has repeatedly said that it would not accept Nato troops in Ukraine. Attacks on civilian areas in Sumy and Odesa overnight into Wednesday injured 15 people, including a family with three small children, Ukrainian authorities said. Mr Zelensky said the strikes 'only confirm the need for pressure on Moscow, the need to introduce new sanctions and tariffs until diplomacy works to its full potential'.

Greenberg touts Louisville crime progress, would 'strongly oppose' federal deployment
Greenberg touts Louisville crime progress, would 'strongly oppose' federal deployment

Yahoo

time12 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Greenberg touts Louisville crime progress, would 'strongly oppose' federal deployment

Louisville Mayor Craig Greenberg is quick to tout the city's improving crime rate — in two separate instances during a recent press conference, he noted homicides and nonfatal shootings this year have dropped by more than 30% compared to the same point in 2024. But that doesn't mean he isn't keeping a close eye on what's happening in Washington, D.C., where more than 2,000 National Guard members have been dispatched for several days on the orders of President Donald Trump. While the president has not announced plans to expand that push to other cities, Greenberg said he would 'strongly oppose' any deployment in Louisville. 'We are making great progress. We can, and we must, do more, but we are doing that here locally,' Greenberg said in response to a question at an Aug. 19 press conference. '… I do not believe there is any need for (the National Guard) in our city.' While reported crime rates included in D.C.'s Metropolitan Police data have declined — the department reported a 35% drop in violent crime from 2023 to 2024, and the 2025 murder rate is currently 11% lower than the same point last year — Trump has said he plans to ask Congress for required "long-term extensions" to keep him in charge of local police, citing "crime, bloodshed, bedlam and squalor and worse" in the region. That brings us to Louisville, a blue city with a Democratic mayor in a deep-red state also governed by a Democrat, and a city with that's reported more than 100 homicides annually each year since 2019. Trump has said he may expand his efforts to other major U.S. cities, singling out New York City, Los Angeles, Baltimore, Chicago and Oakland, California — five cities led by Democratic mayors in states with Democratic governors. To be clear, it's easier for a president to deploy the National Guard in Washington, D.C., as the U.S. government has unique city management powers because of its status as a federal city. Mayor Muriel Bowser has called the police takeover "unsettling and unprecedented" and has argued it shows the city "should be the 51st state." From USA TODAY: How DC's unique status let Trump take control of police, deploy National Guard Still, those rules didn't stop Trump from deploying California National Guard forces to Los Angeles earlier this year following protests over his administration's crackdown on immigration enforcement. Gov. Andy Beshear last sent the National Guard into the city during 2020 protests over the killing of Breonna Taylor in a Louisville Metro Police raid. West End barbecue stand owner David McAtee was shot and killed during a confrontation with members of the Guard and LMPD officers on the fourth night of demonstrations, sparking an outcry in the community and an eventual $725,000 settlement paid by the city. In response to a question at an Aug. 13 press conference, Beshear said a president 'shouldn't call the Guard into service without the agreement of the governor.' National Guard members are not trained for "everyday law enforcement activity," he said, and are meant to specialize in "logistical support, responding to natural disasters (and) assisting and helping active military." "To put our Guard — who, remember, are our neighbors — in places and spaces that they are not trained for, puts an American with a family in a potentially dangerous situation," Beshear said. "... My hope is that going forward, this will not be a tactic that the president continues to use, because the very people he is calling in to do different jobs may be put in harm's way.' Greenberg said in Louisville, by "working collaboratively with the community, we are seeing incredible progress in reducing violent crime in our city." "I think we're showing the country how you can reduce violent crime by working locally with your police department, in partnership with the community, in partnership with other government agencies, in partnership with nonprofit organizations that are all working together toward a unified goal," he said. Greenberg cited recent trends in local crime in his answer. At a Metro Council Public Safety Committee meeting earlier this month, a crime overview presented by LMPD Deputy Chief Emily McKinley showed homicides in 2025 have dropped by 33% compared to the same point last year (97 as of Aug. 6, 2024, compared to 64 in 2025), with 31% year-over-year decreases in nonfatal shootings (239 to 166) and carjackings (95 to 66). "Don't get me wrong — this is no reason to celebrate, because we have a lot of work to do. We just saw last week another tragedy that happened in our city," Greenberg said, a reference to a high-profile robbery, kidnapping and assault case with a previously convicted suspect out of jail on shock probation. "So, we will continue to do more. We will continue to focus on areas like juvenile violence that we want and need to go down even more, but we are making great progress here in Louisville working together as a city together." The mayor made waves earlier this summer when he announced Louisville would revive an older Department of Corrections policy to hold inmates in the U.S. unlawfully for up to an additional 48 hours, complying with a request from the Trump administration. He drew criticism from the ACLU of Kentucky and a number of other local activists. In an article this week, a New York Times headline called Greenberg's move "a risky bet" by a Democratic mayor. In that instance, Greenberg said the city has a significant immigrant population who could be threatened in a federal crackdown, and the "stakes are too high" to push back against the request. Days later, the U.S. Department of Justice removed Louisville from its "sanctuary jurisdictions" list. "We do not want to see highly coordinated and often violent federal enforcement action here, especially in workplaces, residential areas, schools, places of worship, parks and other areas where law-abiding people gather," Greenberg said on July 22. "We do not want the National Guard occupying the streets of Louisville. I will not risk the safety of our broader immigrant community." At an Aug. 19 groundbreaking for the planned 36-unit Roosevelt Senior Apartments complex in Louisville's Portland neighborhood, U.S. Rep. Morgan McGarvey dismissed the question of how he'd react to a federal National Guard deployment locally as a "hypothetical," though he said Trump is "politicizing" safety in the capital with his recent actions. "He's not trying to solve problems. I think he's trying to create them," McGarvey, a Louisville Democrat set to return to the nation's capital in coming weeks, said. U.S. Rep. James Comer, a Republican counterpart of McGarvey who represents much of Western Kentucky, said he hopes moves concerning the National Guard in D.C. aren't replicated here. And Louisville is a "different deal," he added last week at a law enforcement roundtable in Shepherdsville, alongside Kentucky Attorney General Russell Coleman. "I think we've got a great Metro Council and I think we've got a mayor that's serious about cracking down on crime," Comer, who's considering a 2027 gubernatorial run, told reporters. "... You have such a liberal metro D.C. Council there, and you have prosecutors and judges that are just so lenient. They've taken criminal justice reform so far to the extreme that the criminals, they're never held accountable.' Coleman, meanwhile, celebrated late last week after the Kentucky Court of Appeals blocked a lower court from striking down provisions in the 2024 General Assembly's Republican-backed House Bill 5, dubbed the "Safer Kentucky Act" by supporters, which stiffened penalties for convictions over many violent crimes. The bill's constitutionality is being challenged in Franklin Circuit Court. Coleman said about 175 people convicted of violent crimes that took place before the law's effective date who had not yet been sentenced could have been eligible for early release. "Our Office will continue to defend the Safer Kentucky Act and its benefits for our Commonwealth," the attorney general said in a news release. Reporters Caroline Neal and Hannah Pinski contributed. Reach Lucas Aulbach at laulbach@ This article originally appeared on Louisville Courier Journal: Why Craig Greenberg would strongly oppose National Guard in Louisville

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store