logo
RJ's on-time performance achieves 3rd rank in Middle East, Africa in 2024

RJ's on-time performance achieves 3rd rank in Middle East, Africa in 2024

Jordan Times19-02-2025
RJ's in-house analysis indicates that it ranked among the global top 10 airlines in 2024 (RJ photo)
AMMAN — The Royal Jordanian (RJ) achieved the third rank in punctuality in 2024 among the Middle Eastern and African carriers, according to the CIRIUM data, the global aviation analytics leader.
Also, RJ's in-house analysis indicated that it ranked among the global top 10 airlines in 2024, according to a RJ statement.
CIRIUM's punctuality report covered full flight data from a broad range of airlines, including RJ, over the course of 12 months was taken into consideration to produce the list of most on-time airlines, airports and low-cost carriers for 2024.
RJ Vice Chairman and CEO Samer Majali said: 'The airline is pleased at kick starting 2025 by securing its place among the Middle East's and Africa's top three airlines. This strong performance, as validated by CIRIUM, combined with the internal benchmarks, reinforces the airline's position in the aviation industry worldwide.'
Majali affirmed RJ's dedication to maintaining this competitive advantage, meeting the expectations of the airline and its passengers while continuing to deliver the best air and ground services possible.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

An economic perspective on the Jordanian–Egyptian partnership agreements
An economic perspective on the Jordanian–Egyptian partnership agreements

Ammon

timea day ago

  • Ammon

An economic perspective on the Jordanian–Egyptian partnership agreements

Raad Mahmoud Al-Tal The recent signing of nine agreements and memoranda of understanding between Jordan and Egypt, at the conclusion of the Joint Higher Committee meetings, represents more than a routine step in bilateral relations. It is a strategic repositioning of the two economies within a highly volatile regional landscape. Both countries recognize that future growth cannot rely solely on traditional trade flows; it requires deeper integration in sectors capable of generating higher value-added, enhancing competitiveness, and expanding access to regional and global markets. In the energy sector, the emphasis on electricity interconnection and gas supply reflects a deliberate move toward establishing a regional energy market. Such a market would enable flexible, two-way exchange of power and fuel, mitigating risks from global price volatility or sudden supply disruptions. For Jordan -facing challenges in its energy mix and a reliance on imports- interconnection with Egypt offers a pathway to greater energy security and lower industrial production costs. For Egypt—now a major regional gas exporter following the development of its Mediterranean fields—these links create new export channels, boosting foreign currency earnings and advancing its ambition to become a regional energy hub. This initiative is aligned with global trends toward diversification of energy sources and greater regional cooperation as insurance against geopolitical shocks. The transport and transit agreements form another pillar of strategic integration, aimed at knitting together regional trade corridors. Jordan, serving as a key land bridge between the Gulf and the Levant, can leverage improved connectivity with Egyptian ports—particularly Aqaba and Suez—to offer competitive alternatives to longer or risk-prone maritime routes. This enhanced logistical network will strengthen supply chain resilience, lower transport costs, and open broader markets for both countries' producers. Such connectivity gains are particularly valuable in light of the structural disruptions to global trade caused by recent crises. On the industrial and investment front, the agreements create a framework for complementary production rather than duplicative competition. Jordan's strengths in pharmaceuticals, fertilizers, and select light industries can dovetail with Egypt's capabilities in heavy manufacturing, textiles, and petrochemicals. Joint industrial zones or distributed production chains could give both countries preferential access to European and African markets under existing trade agreements, improving competitiveness while lowering tariff and logistical barriers. Tourism offers another avenue for synergy. By integrating their diverse tourism assets—Jordan's historical and religious sites with Egypt's coastal and leisure attractions—the two countries can create joint packages for long-haul markets in Asia and Latin America. Supported by coordinated marketing and affordable air connectivity, this approach could transform tourism from a competitive to a complementary sector, expanding total market share. At the macroeconomic level, the close political alignment between Amman and Cairo provides a rare element of institutional stability in the region. This enhances the likelihood of translating agreements into concrete outcomes. Yet real economic impact will depend on moving from protocol-level commitments to measurable implementation such as agreed targets for trade growth over the next three years, or defined increases in joint investment over the medium term. The agreements also resonate strongly with Jordan's Economic Modernization Vision, particularly its capital expenditure priorities in infrastructure, energy, transport, tourism, and industry. Initiatives like electricity interconnection, expanded logistics corridors, and industrial partnerships align directly with the Vision's goal of raising economic efficiency and productive capacity. Allocating a portion of public capital spending to activate these agreements could amplify their returns, using public funds as leverage to attract joint private investment from both countries. This multiplier effect would not only stimulate growth and job creation but also accelerate progress toward the Vision's quantitative targets whether in GDP expansion or in strengthening Jordan's regional and global competitiveness. If managed with precision and follow through, the Jordanian–Egyptian partnership could evolve into a leading model of regional economic integration leveraging geographic position, existing infrastructure, and political stability to reduce external vulnerabilities and enhance competitiveness in an increasingly volatile global economy.

Jordan, Uzbekistan discuss expanding economic cooperation
Jordan, Uzbekistan discuss expanding economic cooperation

Ammon

time4 days ago

  • Ammon

Jordan, Uzbekistan discuss expanding economic cooperation

Ammon News - Minister of Industry, Trade, and Supply Yarub Qudah on Monday discussed with Uzbek Minister of Investment, Industry, and Trade Laziz Kudratov ways to enhance bilateral cooperation, particularly in the economic field. According to a Ministry statement, the two sides underscored the depth of historical relations between Jordan and Uzbekistan and stressed the importance of building upon them to broaden cooperation in various sectors, especially non-traditional ones, to diversify trade partnerships and strengthen private sector ties in both countries. The two ministers agreed to establish a joint committee to explore cooperation opportunities, coordinate efforts, and follow up on joint projects. Qudah highlighted Jordan's investment advantages, its access to regional and international markets, and its potential role as a gateway for the reconstruction of Syria and the expansion into regional markets, supported by bilateral and multilateral free trade agreements. He pointed to prospects in pharmaceuticals, clothing and textiles, exports to the US market, and industrial integration in extractive industries such as phosphates, potash, and fertilizers, as well as tourism, sports, digital services, and video game development. He stressed the need to pursue rapid gains through integrated projects, particularly in clothing, jewelry, and fertilizers, leveraging the industrial base and natural resources of both countries. For his part, Kudratov underlined Uzbekistan's interest in deepening economic cooperation with Jordan, noting that the Kingdom could be a gateway to Middle Eastern and African markets, while Uzbekistan could serve as a hub for the Eurasian Union. He outlined potential cooperation in pharmaceuticals, apparel for European and American markets, automotive and home appliances, information technology, and agriculture, emphasizing the need to ease visa procedures and boost tourism exchange.

The World Needs a New Economics of Water
The World Needs a New Economics of Water

Ammon

time4 days ago

  • Ammon

The World Needs a New Economics of Water

CAPE TOWN – As African leaders gather in Cape Town for the African Water Investment Summit, there can be no equivocation: the world faces an unprecedented water crisis that demands a paradigm shift in how we value and govern our most precious resource. The scale of the challenge is staggering. Over half the world's food production now comes from areas experiencing declining freshwater supplies. Two-thirds of the global population faces water scarcity at least one month per year. More than 1,000 children under five die every day, on average, from water-related diseases. And if current trends continue, high-income countries could see their GDP shrink by 8% by 2050, while lower-income countries (many in Africa) face losses of 10-15%. Yet this crisis also presents an extraordinary opportunity. As South Africa assumes the G20 presidency (for which I have been appointed special adviser to President Cyril Ramaphosa), it can champion a new economics of water that treats the hydrological cycle as a global common good, rather than as the source of a commodity to be hoarded or traded. The economic case for action is compelling. The International High-Level Panel on Water Investments for Africa shows that every $1 invested in climate-resilient water and sanitation delivers a return of $7. With Africa requiring an additional $30 billion annually to meet the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) on water security and sustainable sanitation, the financing gap is significant; but it is surmountable with the right strategy. The Global Commission on the Economics of Water (which I co-chaired with Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, the director-general of the World Trade Organization, Johan Rockström, the director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, and Singaporian President Tharman Shanmugaratnam) recently called for such a strategy. Treating water as a global common good and adopting mission-oriented approaches to transform the crisis into an opportunity requires that we recognize three critical facts. First, water connects us all – not just through visible rivers and lakes, but through atmospheric moisture flows that travel across continents. Second, the water crisis is inseparable from climate change and biodiversity loss, each of which accelerates the others in a vicious cycle. And, third, water runs through every SDG, from food security and health to economic growth. Yet too often, water investments follow the failed playbook of climate and development finance. There is a tendency to derisk private capital without ensuring public returns; to fund projects without strategic direction; and to treat water as a technical problem, rather than a systemic challenge. Such approaches risk creating water infrastructure that serves investors more than communities, exacerbates existing inequalities, and fails to address the interconnected nature of the water, climate, and biodiversity crises. This interconnectedness demands a new economic framework that aims to shape markets proactively rather than simply fixing failures after the fact. We need to move from short-term cost-benefit thinking to long-term value creation, and that calls for mission-oriented investments that shape markets for the common good. Missions require clear goals – like ensuring that no child dies from unsafe water by 2030. Once goals are established, all financing can be aligned with them through cross-sectoral approaches spanning agriculture, energy, manufacturing, and digital infrastructure. Rather than picking sectors or technologies, the point is to find willing partners across all industries to tackle shared challenges. Such mission-oriented investments can also lead to economic diversification, creating new export opportunities and development pathways. Consider Bolivia's approach to lithium extraction. Rather than simply exporting raw materials, the country is developing strategies to avoid the traditional 'resource curse' by building domestic battery-production capabilities and participating directly in the energy transition. In doing so, it is converting its resource wealth into innovation capacity, strengthening value chains, and creating new export markets for higher-value activities. As matters stand, more than $700 billion per year is channeled into water and agriculture subsidies that often incentivize overuse and pollution. By redirecting these resources toward water-efficient agriculture and ecosystem restoration, with clear conditions attached, we could transform the economics of water overnight. To that end, public development banks can provide patient capital for water infrastructure, while requiring private partners to reinvest profits in watershed protection. Africa is uniquely positioned to lead this transformation. Its vast supply of groundwater remains largely untapped, with 255 million urban inhabitants living above known supplies. Combined with affordable solar power, these supplies present an opportunity to revolutionize agriculture. By focusing on efficiency and reuse, as well as on capacity building, data-sharing, and monitoring and evaluation, this relatively stable groundwater resource, accessed by solar-powered pumps, can be a decentralized alternative minimizing the emissions, waste, and other environmental costs implied by larger infrastructure projects that disrupt natural waterflows. Through Just Water Partnerships – collaborative frameworks that pool such solar-groundwater projects for increased bankability while ensuring community ownership – international finance can be channeled toward water infrastructure that serves both national development goals and the global common good. South Africa's G20 presidency – the first ever for an African country – offers a historic platform to advance this agenda globally. Just as Brazil has used its G20 leadership and role as host of the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP30) to drive climate action, South Africa can make water security central to the global economic agenda. With the 2026 UN Water Conference on the horizon, and with the international community recognizing that climate change cannot be tackled without also addressing the water crisis, the time is right for bold leadership. The African Water Investment Summit is not just another gathering, but should be a watershed. This is the moment when we should shift from treating water as a local resource to governing it as a global common good, moving from crisis management to proactive market shaping and from viewing mission-oriented investment as a cost to recognizing it as the foundation of sustainable growth. Water security underpins Africa's aspirations for health, climate resilience, prosperity, and peace. With young Africans set to constitute 42% of global youth by 2030, investing in water is tantamount to investing in the world's future. The question isn't whether we can afford to act, but whether we can afford not to. Mariana Mazzucato, Professor in the Economics of Innovation and Public Value at University College London, is Founding Director of the UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose, Co-Chair of the Global Commission on the Economics of Water, and Co-Chair of the Group of Experts to the G20 Taskforce for a Global Mobilization Against Climate Change.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store