logo
California man's 378-year sentence overturned after judge rules accuser may have made up charges

California man's 378-year sentence overturned after judge rules accuser may have made up charges

WOODLAND, Calif. (AP) — A Northern California man's 378-year sentence for sexual assault has been overturned by a judge who said there was strong evidence that his adopted daughter made up the accusations to punish him and improve her prospects of remaining in the U.S.
Ajay Dev, 58, was released May 23 after 16 years in prison for 76 convictions of sexual assault on a minor and related charges, the San Francisco Chronicle reported Tuesday.
Superior Court Judge Janene Beronio scheduled a hearing for June 13 for Yolo County District Attorney Jeff Reisig to decide whether to retry Dev. Prosecutors could also appeal the ruling. Reisig's office declined to comment on the case.
Dev, an immigrant from Nepal who worked as a water engineer, was visiting the South Asian nation with his wife in 1998 when they decided to adopt 15-year-old Sapna Dev, part of their extended family, and bring her to live with them in Davis, California.
In early 2004, Sapna Dev's boyfriend broke up with her, and she accused Ajay Dev of causing the breakup, Beronio said in her ruling. Later she told police that Ajay Dev had had sex with her two or three times a week for three or four years until she moved out of his home, the judge said.
Four witnesses who had not been contacted by Dev's trial lawyers testified at a recent hearing that Sapna Dev had told them that her accusations against him were lies or were motivated by her anger at him, the Chronicle reported.
One of the witnesses said Sapna Dev told him she made the accusations because she 'was determined to return to the United States and needed to use the criminal charges to do that,' Beronio said.
The judge's decision 'dismantles the DA's case,' said Patricia Purcell, a member of advocacy group that has held demonstrations in support of Dev.
'We have known from the beginning that Ajay Dev was wrongfully convicted,' Purcell told the Chronicle. 'Judge Beronio was the first judge to really look closely at the evidence and read every document.'
Attorney Jennifer Mouzis, who represented Ajay Dev in his appeal, said much of the prosecution's evidence was based on racial and ethnic bias that would be illegal today under California's Racial Justice Act, a 2021 law barring testimony that appeals to prejudice.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Advocates cry foul as Stockton police cite day laborers for loitering
Advocates cry foul as Stockton police cite day laborers for loitering

CBS News

time6 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Advocates cry foul as Stockton police cite day laborers for loitering

A video circulating on social media shows Stockton police bicycle officers ticketing day laborers for loitering. "Just because we're standing here waiting for work," said one of the day laborers in Spanish. The video was taken by laborer advocate Luis Magaña. "They were in different areas of the corridor, giving tickets," Magaña said. "They were workers waiting for their ride to work, or waiting to see if anyone will hire them." However, a manager with the Marathon Gas Station on Center Street told CBS News Sacramento they've been working for over a year now to try and keep their parking lot clear of homeless people and people waiting around for work. They put up signs saying no loitering, no trespassing, and no soliciting so Stockton police can enforce those rules. The Stockton Police Department says, last week, bicycle officers on a routine patrol "provided an education on loitering and other municipal violations," but no tickets were issued. This week, those who didn't leave voluntarily were ticketed. Magaña believes that, with the recent immigration enforcement operations across California and the country, these tickets are targeted. "Because in other cities like Sacramento, Los Angeles, or Bakersfield, the day laborers are seen as the targets of those raids," said Magaña. Magaña is now calling on the city to find a solution for those who just want to work. "We can't forget we're in a city where there's a mayor who understands there's a lot of diversity. So why don't we work out a solution to this problem that isn't really that big?" he said. Stockton Councilmember Brando Villapudua said in a statement that they were aware of the situation. "I am profoundly troubled by these allegations and take them very seriously. It is imperative that we ensure fairness and equity in our city's enforcement practices. To that end, I have already reached out to our Police Chief and City Manager to investigate these claims thoroughly and transparently," Villapudua wrote. Along with loitering, police say one man was also cited for public urination. Magaña says the day laborers cited now fear, if they cannot pay their ticket, they will have a criminal record and therefore be a target for immigration raids.

‘Color is neither a poison nor a crime': Judge rips Kristi Noem's ‘racial animus' in latest ruling protecting migrants
‘Color is neither a poison nor a crime': Judge rips Kristi Noem's ‘racial animus' in latest ruling protecting migrants

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

‘Color is neither a poison nor a crime': Judge rips Kristi Noem's ‘racial animus' in latest ruling protecting migrants

A federal judge in California has temporarily blocked Donald Trump's administration from revoking deportation protections for tens of thousands of immigrants from Honduras, Nepal and Nicaragua. A searing 37-page ruling argued that a decision by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem to cancel those temporary humanitarian protections appeared partially rooted in 'racial and discriminatory animus.' 'Color is neither a poison nor a crime,' stated the ruling from District Judge Trina Thompson, who was appointed by former President Joe Biden. Her decision is a reprieve for more than 60,000 immigrants who were allowed to legally live and work in the United States under the Temporary Protected Status program. Immigrants from Nepal who are enrolled in the program were set to lose their status August 5, and TPS was set to expire for Honduras and Nicaragua in September. Thursday's decision postpones those deadlines until at least November 18 as the legal challenge continues. In her decision, Thompson listed a series of statements from Noem and the president amplifying 'the discriminatory belief that certain immigrant populations will replace the white population.' 'By stereotyping the TPS program and immigrants as invaders that are criminal, and by highlighting the need for migration management, Secretary Noem's statements perpetuate the discriminatory belief that certain immigrant populations will replace the white population,' Thompson wrote. In several lawsuits, immigrants' advocacy groups and TPS holders have argued that the Trump administration explicitly relied on false and discriminatory stereotypes — including the president's claims that foreign prisons were emptying out jails to send criminals to the U.S., and that immigrants are 'poisoning the blood' of the country — to justify the end of the program. 'The freedom to live fearlessly, the opportunity of liberty, and the American dream. That is all Plaintiffs seek,' Thompson wrote in her ruling. 'Instead, they are told to atone for their race, leave because of their names, and purify their blood. The Court disagrees.' The Independent has requested comment from Homeland Security. Congress created the program in 1990 to provide temporary immigration protections for people fleeing war, natural disasters and 'extraordinary and temporary' conditions in their home countries. Beneficiaries are allowed to apply for renewable work permits and protections against deportation. To carry out its plans for mass deportations, the administration has pushed to 'de-legalize' tens of thousands of immigrants who were granted humanitarian protections to legally live and work in the U.S. In February, Noem announced the administration was ending TPS designations for Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela. In May, the Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration to cancel TPS for roughly 350,000 Venezuelans while legal challenges continue. In a separate ruling, the nation's highest court paved the way for the administration to revoke TPS for another 532,000 immigrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela. Taken together, the rulings gave Trump permission to begin stripping legal status for nearly 900,000 people who are now vulnerable to deportation. Noem's past statements reflect her 'animus against immigrants and the TPS program even though individuals with TPS hold lawful status — a protected status that was expressly conferred by Congress with the purpose of providing humanitarian relief,' Judge Thompson wrote. 'Their presence is not a crime,' the judge added. 'Rather, TPS holders already live in the United States and have contributed billions to the economy by legally working in jobs, paying taxes, and paying contributions into Medicare and Social Security.' Thompson is at least the second judge to directly suggest that Noem's decision-making was rooted in racism. In March, California District Judge Edward Chen said the Trump administration's 'generalization of criminality to the Venezuelan TPS population as a whole is baseless and smacks of racism predicated on generalized false stereotypes.' Arguments from the Trump administration defending the move, including claims that TPS holders are members of the gang Tren de Aragua, are 'entirely lacking in evidentiary support,' Chen wrote. Instead, the move to cancel those protections appears 'predicated on negative stereotypes casting class-wide aspersions on their character,' including 'insinuating they were released from Venezuelan prisons and mental health facilities and imposed huge financial burdens on local communities,' according to the judge.

Who is Gilbert Arenas? Former NBA guard with unserious persona now in serious scenario
Who is Gilbert Arenas? Former NBA guard with unserious persona now in serious scenario

New York Times

time36 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Who is Gilbert Arenas? Former NBA guard with unserious persona now in serious scenario

Who uses being arrested on federal charges as a moment for comic relief? Gilbert Arenas. And whether it was ill-timed or timed on purpose, the public had something to talk about. The former NBA All-Star was among six people arrested Wednesday and charged with running an illegal gambling business from an Encino, Calif., home that Arenas owns. He was charged with one count of conspiracy to operate an illegal gambling business, one count of operating an illegal gambling business and one count of making false statements to federal investigators. He pleaded not guilty and was released Wednesday on $50,000 bond. Following his release, Arenas posted a social media video of himself trotting down a set of stairs saying, 'They can't hold me.' He also said in a post he only rented out the house and was not involved in any of the activity. A post shared by Gilbert Arenas (@nochillgil) Arenas was one of the best scorers in the NBA at his peak before he was slowed by knee injuries. During the 2000s, he was a big kid in the NBA who collected autographed jerseys, a fan of the game who couldn't believe he was on the same court as the likes of Kobe Bryant, Vince Carter and Tracy McGrady. Advertisement But he was also known for his mischievous nature with teammates. That mischief led to Arenas' original instance of being hit with charges — when his back and forth with Washington Wizards teammate Javaris Crittenton led to big trouble at the end of 2009. Arenas drew discipline from the NBA and the federal government after bringing guns to the Wizards' locker room following a disagreement with Crittenton. Arenas in 2010 pleaded guilty to felony gun possession, served two days in jail, spent time in a halfway house and was sentenced to two years of probation. The NBA suspended Arenas for 50 games. In the Netflix documentary 'Untold: Shooting Guards,' which was released in May, Arenas said he felt he had to fight the media with humor after the gun incident, which included him pretending to shoot his teammates before a game. Crittenton said in the film he knew Arenas' jokes would affect him. Arenas admitted the length of the suspensions was due partly to his behavior and deserved, but also added that Crittenton did not deserve the same punishment. The charges this time against Arenas are serious once again. Arenas is accused of working with Yevgeni Gershman, who the government claimed to be a member of an Israeli organized crime group, as part of illegal poker games. That association would appear to be more dangerous, not funny. Arenas is also accused of lying to investigators while trying to recover money seized by Homeland Security by saying he wasn't a part of the illegal gambling. He faces up to 15 years in federal prison if convicted on all charges. Arenas' nature is to turn every serious moment into something funny. And following his latest run-in with the law, Arenas turned being released from custody into something that has drawn more than 3 million views on X and more than 145,000 views on Instagram. Advertisement Some might ask why Arenas is like this. It's really his personality. He grew up around Hollywood because his father was an actor and a bodyguard. He watched actors study roles and was a fan of sketch comedy shows like 'In Living Color.' Arenas' sense of humor, perhaps an acquired taste, was displayed before he was drafted. He told an NBA executive in jest he wanted to be 'an international pimp' before the 2001 NBA Draft. He was considered by some to be a first-round talent, but he fell to the second round, the 31st pick, to the Golden State Warriors. I got to know who Arenas is in previous weeks before his arrest. I was working on a story about the 43-year-old's increasing presence as a media representative. His 'Gil's Arena' podcast streams live on YouTube four times a week, and its popularity continues to grow largely because of Arenas' knack for finding moments that grab attention. The immature moments are actually crafted by hours of research and understanding how to make his co-hosts and staff feel good. The show's YouTube channel has acquired more than 1.1 million subscribers and has grown to the point where there are plans for Arenas to start discussing sports beyond basketball, starting with football this fall. The fourth season is slated to start this month. Arenas said most won't see his mature side — which shows how he prepared to play in the NBA or the countless hours he puts into his podcast and creating content. The latest exit from custody is consistent with Arenas keeping the same unserious persona in the face of serious circumstances. After all, his social media handle is 'NoChillGil.' He's clearly not going to suddenly become meek and silent in the face of adversity. In working on the original story, I asked Arenas about him maturing. He'd been introspective in 'Untold: Shooting Guards.' He talked about not going out after 10 p.m. because it leads to trouble. And there was no way someone who lacked maturity could juggle a show with strong personalities like former NBA players Nick Young, Kenyon Martin, Rashad McCants and Brandon Jennings as panelists. Advertisement Being serious, however, is a matter of perspective, Arenas said. 'If you ask somebody what immature really means, it's, 'This person don't take serious stuff seriously,' right?' Arenas said. 'You only want somebody to be mature when there's something happening, and you want them to take it serious, right? That's the idea of being mature or immature, right? It's the personality during a certain time and during serious moments, I don't consider them serious. So … I'm just gonna keep the same energy.' It's worked in Arenas' career as a content creator. Many who work with Arenas cite his creative mind in allowing him to connect with a younger audience. He has consumers in their early 20s who aren't old enough to remember his on-court brilliance. Arenas also sees an opportunity in every situation, especially if it means a laugh and content creation, which he said makes him different from former athletes who have entered media. He adapts for whatever is needed in the moment. 'I'm a streamer first, then I'm a YouTuber, very different,' Arenas said. 'I can jump on any platform, and I can survive because I'm a creator first. I create content, you react to the content, very different than where you're reacting to certain things that's going on. I can take anything.' That apparently includes his legal troubles. And while the general public might not understand his antics, particularly after charges so severe, Arenas is serious about creating content — even it seems sensible to lay low. Arenas, however, does things his way. He declared he was 'fresh out and back on the sticks' on his Instagram story Thursday with a link to his live stream playing the latest EA Sports College Football video game. The charges are serious, but like he did 15 years ago, Arenas is choosing to combat the scrutiny in his own way. Most wouldn't consider it the mature approach, but it's what Arenas knows to do. 'I'm like the streamers now,' Arenas said. 'I'm that guy where you give me an idea, I can take off within that.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store