logo
Russia only 12 km from key Ukraine city, its troops outnumber Kyiv forces 3-to-1

Russia only 12 km from key Ukraine city, its troops outnumber Kyiv forces 3-to-1

First Post30-06-2025
After clearing out Ukrainian positions in Russia's Kursk region earlier this year, Moscow has shifted its focus across the border, with an estimated 50,000 troops pushing toward Sumy, according to a report read more
In this photo taken from video distributed by Russian Defence Ministry Press Service on Tuesday, June 24, 2025, a Russian soldier prepares Giatsint-B 152 mm field gun to fire towards Ukrainian position on an undisclosed location in Ukraine. AP File
Russian forces are now just 12 kilometers from the key northeastern Ukrainian city of Sumy, using their roughly 3-to-1 manpower advantage to ramp up attacks along the front.
According to The Wall Street Journal report, after clearing out Ukrainian positions in Russia's Kursk region earlier this year, Moscow has shifted its focus across the border, with an estimated 50,000 troops pushing toward Sumy.
Ukrainian soldiers on the ground say they are being heavily outnumbered as the Kremlin continues to press its numerical edge in multiple sectors, added the report.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'Their main strategy is to wear us down with their numbers.' The Wall Street Journal quoted Ukraine's top military commander Gen. Oleksandr Syrskiy as saying.
The Russian push toward Sumy comes amid rising frustration from President Donald Trump over the Kremlin's refusal to pursue a cease-fire. Despite ongoing talks between Ukrainian and Russian officials in Turkey in recent weeks, Moscow has escalated its missile and drone strikes on Ukrainian cities.
In the latest barrage, described as the largest of the war in terms of munitions fired, Ukraine lost an F-16 fighter jet and its pilot overnight Sunday.
Gen. Syrskiy told The Wall Street Journal that over the past year, the front line has extended by more than 100 miles and now spans over 750 miles from northeast to south, .
Russian forces have been probing for weak spots, then striking hard when they find one, as they did in Sumy last month.
In response, Ukrainian commanders have scrambled to plug gaps, often deploying elite units. Earlier this month, Ukraine sent in HUR commandos to stabilise the front. Since then, Russian gains in Sumy have largely stalled, and Ukrainian forces have retaken some ground.
'Now we're looking for ways to conduct our own assaults and push the enemy back,' WSJ quoted Timur, commander of the Timur Special Forces Unit, an elite unit of HUR that has been fighting in the region for several weeks, as saying.
It isn't an easy task for Ukrainian forces, which are outnumbered nearly everywhere across the front.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'Their numbers are a big problem for us, though not enough to overrun us,' Kappa, commander of the Chimera unit of the Timur Special Forces Unit, told WSJ.
'The enemy is losing 300 to 400 people per day across the region. But they can deal with that level of casualties…They keep bringing in reserves.'
Earlier this month, a dozen fighters from the Timur Special Forces Unit set out to assault a Russian-held village north of Sumy. But halfway there, in a tree-line trench, they collided with a Russian assault team moving in from the opposite direction.
Outnumbered, they were pinned down for seven hours as Russian forces tried to encircle them, reported WSJ.
'It was the cruelest fight I've ever been in,' Mark, the Ukrainian team's 25-year-old platoon commander, was quoted as saying.
'They were attacking with infantry, drones, grenade launchers, machine guns, artillery, cluster munitions. Everything…We never had more than a five-minute break while they were regrouping,' Mark added.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Mark said his team killed five Russian soldiers during the clash, usually enough to force a platoon to retreat. But these troops were better trained than others he'd faced, and they kept advancing, determined to take the trench.
According to The Wall Street Journal, Helmet-cam footage shows a relentless firefight, gunfire crackling like popping corn. Mark called in mortar strikes while hugging the trench edge as artillery whistled overhead. One machine-gunner fired 5,500 rounds during the battle.
Eventually, the team withdrew, crawling back through brush under mortar fire and drone strikes. All made it out, though three were shot and everyone suffered concussions, added the report.
'I'm really glad we got everyone out alive,' Mark said. 'We were in a really tough situation.'
Still, soldiers in the area say holding Sumy is costing more lives than it should.
During the six months Ukraine held ground in Russia's Kursk region, troops assumed defences were being fortified on the Ukrainian side of the border. But after a chaotic and costly retreat, they returned to find outdated trenches with no overhead cover from drones. In some cases, they're now digging fresh positions under enemy fire.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
They also report that key areas now under Russian advance were left unmined.
'It's like they prepared for tank columns, not a battlefield where dozens of drones strike daily,' WSJ quoted one infantry commander named Kyrylo, who fought in Kursk and is now fighting in Sumy, as saying.
'Every single day a position isn't ready is a day someone might not come back.'
Asked about fortifications last week, Defence Minister Rustem Umerov said that the defensive lines in Sumy were being improved in threatened areas.
'Fortification is not just about concrete and trenches—it is an adaptive engineering system that takes the enemy's tactics into account and always serves one purpose: protecting our warriors,' he was quoted as saying.
With inputs from agencies
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Navigating Trump's tariffs is no child's play. Indian toymakers are losing out on orders, enquiries
Navigating Trump's tariffs is no child's play. Indian toymakers are losing out on orders, enquiries

The Print

time20 minutes ago

  • The Print

Navigating Trump's tariffs is no child's play. Indian toymakers are losing out on orders, enquiries

'With Vietnam nearing production capacity, the shift in sourcing focus is likely to favour Indonesia, meaning India's loss could become Indonesia's gain,' he told ThePrint. K.A. Shabir, CEO of Chennai-headquartered Funskool India, said a 50 percent tariff 'would have a significant impact on Funskool's exports, as well as on overall Indian toy exports, and would stall the diversification plans that many global brands had for India'. New Delhi: For Indian toymakers, the US is their biggest export market, accounting for a 47 percent share in total exports in FY2024-25. But existing orders have been put on hold and enquiries have dried up since Trump imposed a 50 percent tariff on Indian goods, including a 25 percent penalty for purchase of Russian oil and defence systems. Other Indian toymakers who rely on exports to the US confirmed that the steep tariffs have made a dent. 'We export 80 percent, of which 55 percent is only to the US market,' said Amitabh Kharbanda, director of Sunlord Group, which manufactures soft toys and apparels. 'All new enquiries from the US have stopped and even the existing orders have been put on hold by our customers,' Kharbanda added. In 2020, the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT) introduced 'Quality Control Order' (QCO) for domestic manufacturers and importers of toys. The Toys (Quality Control) Order, 2020, mandated that toys for children under the age of 14 adhere to quality standards and bear the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) stamp. The next year, in 2021, the government hiked import duty on toys from 20 percent to 60 percent. In 2023, it was hiked further to 70 percent. This helped restrict low-quality imports from China, while elevating quality of Indian-made toys, making them more suitable for exports. Data from the commerce ministry shows India's imports of toys declined sharply to $73.9 million in FY2024-25 from $279.3 million in FY2019-20, while exports grew from $129.6 million to $169.5 million during the same period. As a result, the toy industry, which had a trade deficit of $150 million in FY2019-20, recorded a surplus of $95.5 million in FY2024-25. During this period, overall toy imports from China declined by 83 percent, from $235 million in FY2019-20 to 40.3 million in FY2024-25. However, even as government measures have restricted imports, data suggests that China is still the biggest exporter of toys to India with a 55 percent share in FY2024-25. Shabbir Gabajiwala, president of The All-India Toy Manufacturers' Association (TAITMA), told ThePrint, 'Earlier India was a dumping ground for low-quality toys from China but after introduction of BIS and QCO, imports of readymade toys from China have reduced substantially.' However, this might change. In the Finance Bill, 2025, the government lowered import duty from 70 percent to 20 percent on certain electronic toys with effect from 1 May, 2025. This is expected to run up the import bill in the current fiscal. Also Read: India's oldest toy store is a lens to view Delhi's history Pressure to cut costs & search for new markets With Trump's tariffs acting as barriers to exports to the US, Indian manufacturers are exploring new markets, but they want the government to negotiate a trade deal soon, and also introduce incentives and subsidies for the industry to make it more competitive. 'India needs to continue negotiating for favourable tariff structures, though this is easier said than done. Toys are a discretionary, low-margin, and price-sensitive category, and every link in the supply chain is under constant pressure to reduce costs,' said Funskool's Shabir. According to him, 'for every Rs 1 crore of revenue, the industry can generate employment for 8–10 people, most of them women'. 'Considering this, the government could explore targeted subsidies or incentives to make Indian toy manufacturing more cost-competitive globally,' he said. For Funskool, the largest toy manufacturing company in India, exports account for 70 percent of its business, 40 percent of which comes from the US. Other Indian toymakers, meanwhile, are now relying on markets other than the US for orders. Nidhi Agarwal, director of Afterskool Toys and Games that manufactures soft toys primarily for exports, told ThePrint, 'While the US is a big market for us, we can still make up the numbers from new markets like Australia that are showing interest.' 'Until restrictions on the US market are lifted, we are relying on markets like the UK, France, Switzerland, Denmark, and Australia that account for 45 percent of our exports,' said Kharbanda of Sunlord Group. Imports from China still finding way into India While the import of readymade toys from China has declined, manufacturers are still dependent on Chinese raw material, parts and machinery. 'Items like Felt which is a textile material used in stuffed toys are not readily available in India at competitive price, variety and quality,' said Agarwal of Afterskool Toys and Games. Due to limited options, toymakers have to depend on China for Felt, which offers competitive prices and varieties, she said, adding that the Indian toy industry lacks backward integration. 'We cannot manufacture each and every raw material used in toys ourselves.' For Funskool, dependency on China is limited to tools and machinery, since they source most of their raw materials from India. 'We are dependent on China for production-line tooling, injection moulds, automation machines, and emerging technology processes such as digital printing and prototyping,' said Funskool's Shabir. Adding, 'While India has capable toolrooms, they lack the competitiveness and quick turnaround times that are critical for the toy industry.' While some manufacturers are importing raw material and machinery from China, others are bypassing restrictions by importing semi-knocked down (SKD) and completely knocked down (CKD) parts. These are assembled in India without adding any value to the product. 'Importing CKD and SKD parts from China and assembling them in India to sell as a make-in-India product cannot be classified as manufacturing,' said Kartik Jain, owner of Noida-based Masoom Playmates, a manufacturer of electronic toys. Adding, 'We must not confuse assembling with manufacturing.' According to Shabir, Funskool is not involved in CKD operations as these are generally low-cost and the value addition from sub-assembly or final assembly is minimal. Jain of Masoom Playmates added that there is a need 'for minimum import price and enhancing inspection measures to bring down illegal imports from China'. (Edited by Amrtansh Arora) Also Read: Modi lauds toy hub Channapatna, but more than China this town is upset with rival at home

US Senators, including Chuck Schumer, slam Donald Trump over 15% cut on Nvidia, AMD AI chip sales to China in an open letter; say: Our national security and military readiness relies upon ...'
US Senators, including Chuck Schumer, slam Donald Trump over 15% cut on Nvidia, AMD AI chip sales to China in an open letter; say: Our national security and military readiness relies upon ...'

Time of India

time33 minutes ago

  • Time of India

US Senators, including Chuck Schumer, slam Donald Trump over 15% cut on Nvidia, AMD AI chip sales to China in an open letter; say: Our national security and military readiness relies upon ...'

Donald Trump Six Senate Democrats have sent an open letter to President Donald Trump , asking him to reconsider his decision to permit tech giants Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) to sell advanced AI semiconductor chips to China. The group of senators include Chuck Schumer , Mark Warner , Elizabeth Warren, Jack Reed , Jeanne Shaheen and Christopher Coons. They warned that the sale of specific chips—Nvidia's H20 and AMD 's MI308—could potentially bolster China's military capabilities. The senators' letter was a response to a recent announcement by Trump, which granted export licenses to the companies in exchange for a 15% share of the revenue from these sales. Here's Senators' full letter to Donald Trump on Nvidia, AMD chip sales to China Dear President Trump: by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Book Nikoo Homes from ₹1.2 Cr* Onwards Nikoo Homes Sadahalli Learn More Undo We write to urge you to reverse your decision to allow AMD and Nvidia to sell advanced AI semiconductor chips ('covered chips') to the People's Republic of China ('PRC'), in exchange for a fee. These sales to a leading adversary run counter to U.S. national security interests, and the collection of fees appear to violate U.S. statutes and may even be unconstitutional. Our export controls exist to ensure that American goods and technologies are protected from our adversaries. To ensure such protection, export laws explicitly state that, '[n]o fee may be charged in connection with the submission, processing, or consideration of any application for a license or other authorization or other request.' Yet on August 11, 2025, you stated that: 'I want 20 percent if I'm going to approve [these licenses] for [Nvidia (and AMD)] and '[Nvidia] said, 'Would you make it 15?' So we negotiate a little deal'. This 'negotiated deal,' allowing American semiconductor manufacturers to pay a 15 percent fee for the ability to sell critically sensitive technology to our adversary, blatantly violates the purpose of export control laws. Additionally, your spokesperson has indicated that your administration may be considering this form of 'deal making' for other exports. A cornerstone of U.S artificial intelligence strategy for years has been to protect America's advantage in AI computing capability and access to leading-edge hardware, compared to the PRC and other key adversaries. AI represents a crucial enabling technology that is critical to the future of everything from finance to healthcare, manufacturing, and national security. The PRC seeks to use AI to strengthen its military systems like hypersonics, as well as its communications, surveillance, battlefield decisionmaking processes. In April, your administration placed export controls on the flow of Nvidia's H20 and AMD's MI308 chips to the PRC, identifying the national security risk of the PRC's military having access to these advanced AI chips. However, only months later, following industry lobbying, you have flippantly reversed that decision with no coherent explanation for how the national security risks you had in April have been mitigated in August. Our national security and military readiness relies upon American innovators inventing and producing the best technology in the world, and in maintaining that qualitative advantage in sensitive domains. The United States has historically been successful in maintaining and building that advantage because of, in part, our ability to deny adversaries access to those technologies. The willingness displayed in this arrangement to 'negotiate' away America's competitive edge that is key to our national security in exchange for what is, in effect, a commission on a sale of AI-enabling technology to our main global competitor, is cause for serious alarm. We again urge your Administration to quickly reverse course and abandon this reckless plan to trade away U.S. technology leadership. In order to assist the public in its understanding of this proposed deal, we request the following information by August 22: 1. What entities or parties were involved in the 'negotiation' that resulted in the 15 percent payment requirement as a condition for granting a license to sell covered chips to the PRC? 2. What laws, regulations, or other factors were identified, raised, evaluated, and/or otherwise determined to be relevant in those negotiations, including any legal opinions provided by Administration attorneys used to inform the legality of various approached proposed during those deliberations? 3. Who was responsible for determining that this arrangement complies with United States laws, regulations, and international obligations? 4. Describe the manner in which the 15 percent fee will be determined and collected. 5. What individual(s) or entities are responsible for making the determination and collection identified in item 4? 6. List all purposes to which the 15 percent fee payments will be directed once collected. 7. What other companies are under consideration for this kind of deal utilizing export control laws? Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. What Nvidia has to say on its AI chips' alleged China military use An Nvidia spokesperson said that the company's H20 chips do not enhance anyone's military capabilities. 'The H20 would not enhance anyone's military capabilities, but would have helped America attract the support of developers worldwide and win the AI race. Banning the H20 cost American taxpayers billions of dollars, without any benefit,' a Nvidia spokesperson told CNBC. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Review: Changing The Game AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store