Investors brace for oil price spike, rush to havens after US bombs Iran nuclear sites
The U.S. attack on Iranian nuclear sites is expected to cause market reactions, potentially increasing oil prices and strengthening the U.S. dollar.
Increased oil prices could lead to higher inflation and reduced consumer confidence, potentially impacting interest rate cuts.
Market uncertainty remains high due to limited information regarding the extent of damage and future developments in the conflict.
NEW YORK - A U.S. attack on Iranian nuclear sites on Saturday could lead to a knee-jerk reaction in global markets when they reopen, sending oil prices higher and triggering a rush to safety, investors said, as they assessed how the latest escalation of tensions would ripple through the global economy.
The attack, which was announced by President Donald Trump on social media site Truth Social, deepens U.S. involvement in the Middle East conflict. That was the question going into the weekend, when investors were mulling a host of different market scenarios.
In the immediate aftermath of the announcement, they expected the U.S. involvement was likely to cause a selloff in equities and a possible bid for the dollar and other safe-haven assets when trading begins, but also said much uncertainty about the course of the conflict remained.
While Trump called the attack "successful", few details were known. He was expected to address the nation later on Saturday.
"I think the markets are going to be initially alarmed, and I think oil will open higher," said Mark Spindel, chief investment officer at Potomac River Capital.
"We don't have any damage assessment and that will take some time. Even though he has described this as 'done', we're engaged. What comes next?" Spindel said.
"I think the uncertainty is going to blanket the markets, as now Americans everywhere are going to be exposed. It's going to raise uncertainty and volatility, particularly in oil," he added.
Spindel, however, said there was time to digest the news before markets open and said he was making arrangements to talk to other market participants.
How will oil prices and inflation be affected?
A key concern for markets would center around the potential impact of the developments in the Middle East on oil prices and thus on inflation. A rise in inflation could dampen consumer confidence and lessen the chance of near-term interest rate cuts.
"This adds a complicated new layer of risk that we'll have to consider and pay attention to," said Jack Ablin, chief investment officer of Cresset Capital. "This is definitely going to have an impact on energy prices and potentially on inflation as well."
While global benchmark Brent crude futures have risen as much as 18% since June 10, hitting a near five-month high of $79.04 on Thursday, the S&P 500 has been little changed, following an initial drop when Israel launched its attacks on Iran on June 13.
Before the U.S. attack on Saturday, analysts at Oxford Economics modeled three scenarios, including a de-escalation of the conflict, a complete shutdown in Iranian oil production and a closure of the Strait of Hormuz, "each with increasingly large impacts on global oil prices."
In the most severe case, global oil prices jump to around $130 per barrel, driving U.S. inflation near 6% by the end of this year, Oxford said in the note.
"Although the price shock inevitably dampens consumer spending because of the hit to real incomes, the scale of the rise in inflation and concerns about the potential for second-round inflation effects likely ruin any chance of rate cuts in the U.S. this year," Oxford said in the note, which was published before the U.S. strikes.
In comments after the announcement on Saturday, Jamie Cox, managing partner at Harris Financial Group, agreed oil prices would likely spike on the initial news. But Cox said he expected prices to likely level in a few days as the attacks could lead Iran to seek a peace deal with Israel and the United States.
"With this demonstration of force and total annihilation of its nuclear capabilities, they've lost all of their leverage and will likely hit the escape button to a peace deal," Cox said.
Economists warn that a dramatic rise in oil prices could damage a global economy already strained by Trump's tariffs.
Still, any pullback in equities might be fleeting, history suggests. During past prominent instances of Middle East tensions coming to a boil, including the 2003 Iraq invasion and the 2019 attacks on Saudi oil facilities, stocks initially languished but soon recovered to trade higher in the months ahead.
On average, the S&P 500 slipped 0.3% in the three weeks following the start of conflict, but was 2.3% higher on average two months following the conflict, according to data from Wedbush Securities and CapIQ Pro.
What will this mean for the US dollar?
An escalation in the conflict could have mixed implications for the U.S. dollar, which has tumbled this year amid worries over diminished U.S. exceptionalism.
In the event of U.S. direct engagement in the Iran-Israel war, the dollar could initially benefit from a safety bid, analysts said.
"Do we see a flight to safety? That would signal yields going lower and the dollar getting stronger," said Steve Sosnick, chief market strategist at IBKR in Greenwich, Connecticut. "It's hard to imagine stocks not reacting negatively and the question is how much. It will depend on Iranian reaction and whether oil prices spike."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNBC
33 minutes ago
- CNBC
Asia-Pacific markets set to open lower as U.S. bombing of Iran escalates Middle East crisis
Peter Adams | Stone | Getty Images Asia-Pacific markets are set to plunge Monday, after the United States' attack on three nuclear sites in Iran raised oil prices and investors' fears of an escalation in the Middle East conflict. Oil prices have spiked in recent weeks following the increased tensions in the Middle East. Brent Crude was trading at $78.88 per barrel after surging 2.48%, as of 7.30 a.m. Singapore time, while the West Texas Intermediate crude added 2.48% to $75.65. Japan's benchmark Nikkei 225 was set to open lower, with the futures contract in Chicago at 38,310, while its counterpart in Osaka last traded at 38,370, against the index's Friday close of 39,403.23. Futures for Hong Kong's Hang Seng index stood at 23,396, pointing to a weaker open compared to the HSI's last close of 23,530.48. Australia's S&P/ASX 200 is also slated to open lower, with futures tied to the benchmark at 8,469, compared to its last close of 8,505.50. U.S. equity futures fell in early Asia hours following the U.S. strikes in Iran. Futures tied to the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell by 109 points, or 0.3%. S&P 500 futures shed 0.3% and Nasdaq 100 futures lost 0.4%. Two of the three key benchmarks on Wall Street fell last Friday as investors kept watch on the Middle East conflict while contemplating the Federal Reserve's plans for interest rate cuts. The S&P 500 declined 0.22% to end at 5,967.84, making it the broad-based index's third consecutive losing session. The Nasdaq Composite dropped 0.51% and settled at 19,447.41, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average ticked up 35.16 points, or 0.08%, closing at 42,206.82. — CNBC's Lisa Kailan Han, Sean Conlon, Brian Evans contributed to this report.

Miami Herald
41 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Dave Ramsey sounds alarm for Americans on Social Security problem
American workers anticipating the arrival of Social Security monthly paychecks when they retire often express concerns about whether the program's trust funds will be in sufficient supply to meet their financial expectations. Dave Ramsey, radio host and bestselling personal finance author, sounds an alarm about what is needed to keep those notions alive - and what exactly it is for which Americans should be planning. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter According to the 2025 Social Security Trustees' Report, if lawmakers fail to intervene, Social Security beneficiaries could see a large reduction in payments starting in 2034. This looming cut stems from the projection that the Social Security trust fund will be exhausted by then. Simply put, the program would be taking in less revenue than it needs to fully cover all scheduled benefits for both current and future recipients. Historically, Congress has stepped in with last-minute reforms to prevent such scenarios - while often shielding lower-income individuals from the brunt of the changes. In 1983, for example, legislators passed a set of measures designed to stabilize Social Security in the short term and extend its financial health for what they hoped would be about 75 years. These measures combined increased revenue - through higher payroll taxes, taxing benefits, and expanding coverage - with modest spending cuts such as adjusting the cost-of-living formula and gradually raising the retirement age. Related: Jean Chatzky sends strong message to Americans on Social Security The latest annual trustees' report, published on June 18, estimates that the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) trust fund may run dry by 2033 - unchanged from last year's forecast. After that, only about 77% of promised benefits would be payable unless corrective action is taken. However, one notable update is that the combined trust funds - which include both the OASI and Disability Insurance (DI) programs - are now projected to remain solvent through 2034, one year earlier than previously expected, unfortunately. At that point, around 81% of scheduled combined benefits would still be paid out. Ramsey discusses some basic math involved in why the Social Security system needs adjustments. "As more and more boomers retire, the number of Americans 65 and older is expected to jump from roughly 61 million today to about 77 million in 2035," Ramsey wrote. "At the same time, there will be fewer workers supporting more retirees, which puts even more of a strain on the system." More on retirement: Dave Ramsey offers urgent thoughts about MedicareJean Chatzky shares major statement on Social SecurityTony Robbins has blunt words on IRAs,401(k)s Ramsey emphasizes the fact that Americans should not view Social Security as a main source of income during retirement. Rather, it should be a small but helpful part of one's retirement income that includes investments in tools such as 401(k) plans and IRAs. "Any money you get from Social Security should be considered icing on the cake," Ramsey wrote. Related: Dave Ramsey sends strong message to Americans on Medicare In a statement, the Social Security Board of Trustees made a few key observations. In 2024, the combined reserves of the OASI and DI trust funds saw a significant decline, dropping by $67 billion and bringing the total down to $2.72 trillion. This continued erosion of the funds is an indication of the program's mounting financial strain as benefit payments outpace income from dedicated payroll taxes and other sources. Looking ahead, the financial outlook remains challenging. Starting in 2025, Social Security's total annual expenditures are projected to exceed its total annual income for the foreseeable 75-year horizon. This imbalance isn't new - costs began surpassing income in 2021, and the gap has existed between costs and non-interest income even longer, stretching back to 2010. This growing disparity has contributed to the gradual depletion of trust fund reserves. The statement summarizes the key point for Americans discussed above: Without legislative action, projections show that by 2034 the combined trust fund reserves could be exhausted. If that happens, the program would not go bankrupt, but it would only have enough ongoing revenue to cover approximately 81% of scheduled benefits. This shortfall would significantly affect payments to retirees and other beneficiaries unless Congress enacts reforms to restore long-term solvency. Related: Tony Robbins sends strong message to Americans on 401(k)s, IRAs The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

Politico
43 minutes ago
- Politico
Bank hacks, internet shutdowns and crypto heists: Here's how the war between Israel and Iran is playing out in cyberspace
The war between Iran and Israel has already expanded from the battlefield into cyberspace. The conflict between the two Middle East adversaries has so far largely played out in public view, with hundreds of missiles and drones causing mass casualties across major cities. But Iran and Israel have also been launching cyber attacks against one another from the shadows — which officials are now warning may soon spill over onto U.S. targets. Overnight strikes by the U.S. against Iranian nuclear facilities have heightened the threat environment, and Iran could retaliate by hacking into U.S. electrical grids, water plants, and other critical sectors. 'Cyber is one of the tools of Iran's asymmetric warfare,' said Alex Vatanka, senior fellow at the Middle East Institute. The National Terrorism Advisory System warned Sunday of a range of Iranian threats to the U.S., including attacks on 'poorly secured U.S. networks and Internet-connected devices.' 'Low-level cyber attacks against U.S. networks by pro-Iranian hacktivists are likely, and cyber actors affiliated with the Iranian government may conduct attacks against U.S. networks.' Joint Chiefs Chair Gen. Dan Caine told reporters on Sunday that U.S. Cyber Command was helping support the strikes, although he did not elaborate on its involvement. A spokesperson for U.S. Cyber Command did not respond to a request for comment. A spokesperson for the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, the main U.S. cyber defense agency, declined to comment. Critical infrastructure groups last week called on U.S. companies to proactively step up their defenses in anticipation of an attack. Former CISA Director Jen Easterly posted on LinkedIn on Sunday that U.S. critical infrastructure organizations should have their 'shields up' and be prepared for malicious cyber activity. 'While it's unclear whether its cyber capabilities were at all impacted by recent Israeli strikes, Iran has a track record of retaliatory cyber operations targeting civilian infrastructure, including: water systems; financial institutions; energy pipelines; government networks; and more,' she wrote. Both Iran and Israel are considered global cyber powers and have traded barbs online, particularly in the aftermath of the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas attacks on Israel. An Iranian gang claimed responsibility for hacking into an Israeli hospital and stealing patient data in 2023, and an Israeli hacking group followed by shutting down large swaths of Iran's gas stations. But Israel's cyber capabilities are widely considered more sophisticated. 'The Iranians … are good, they are emerging, but I don't think they're at the level of the Israelis or Americans,' Vatanka said. Some of the most aggressive efforts over the past week have been cyberattacks against major financial institutions in Iran and disinformation campaigns aimed at causing chaos and confusion in Israel. A pro-Israeli hacking group known as Predatory Sparrow claimed credit for a cyberattack last week on Iran's Bank Sepah, which caused widespread account issues for customers. The group also later claimed credit for draining around $90 million from Nobitex, Iran's largest cryptocurrency exchange, and for posting stolen Nobitex source code lists on the social media platform X. Hackers also targeted Iranian news stations. Videos circulated online appeared to show Iranian state TV broadcasting anti-regime messages last week. The Iranian government shut down the nation's internet in response to the attacks late last week, a blackout that was largely still ongoing on Sunday. 'Gaining control of the flow of information is certainly to be expected from the regime … they suspect that there is maybe an attempt to mobilize public attention,' Vatanka said. Top Iranian officials and their security teams were also advised last week to stop using internet-connected devices, in particular telecommunication devices, to protect against potential Israeli disruptions. Last year, thousands of pagers used by the Iranian proxy militant group Hezbollah exploded across Lebanon, leaving thousands injured. One reason Israel's cyberattacks may have been more effective in this round of fighting is that Israel struck Iranian facilities first, giving it more time to prepare its offensive and defensive options before Iran could retaliate. Iran and its proxy organizations are fighting back, albeit on a smaller scale. Israel's National Cyber Directorate warned Israelis abroad on Saturday not to fill out forms on malicious websites that are seeking to gather intelligence on these individuals. Gil Messing, chief of staff for Israeli cyber company Check Point Software, said Saturday just before the U.S. strikes that his company had tracked cyber and disinformation campaigns against Israel 'escalating a bit,' though no new major attacks had been reported. Messing said that there was a 'flood of disinformation' pouring onto social media last week, including messages discouraging Israelis from entering shelters during attacks and erroneous texts about gas and supply shortages. Israel's civilian cyber defense agency warned that Iran was renewing its efforts to hack into internet-connected cameras for espionage purposes. John Hultquist, chief analyst for Google Threat Intelligence Group, posted on X on Saturday shortly after the attacks that Iranian cyber forces usually use their 'cyberattack capability for psychological purposes.' 'I'm most concerned about cyber espionage against our leaders and surveillance aided by compromises in travel, hospitality, telecommunications, and other sectors where data could be used to identify and physically track persons of interest,' Hultquist wrote.