Some singles secretly test dates to dodge ‘gold diggers' — but there are other ways to gauge compatibility
First dates already come with unspoken tests, but one new trend — the so-called 'gold digger test' — is turning dinner into a financial trap, leaving some singles blindsided and offended.
Imagine this: You're on a date set up by a mutual friend. You're financially independent, settled in your career, own your home and you aren't looking for someone to complete your life — just someone to add joy to it.
Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how
I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 5 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast)
Nervous about the stock market in 2025? Find out how you can access this $1B private real estate fund (with as little as $10)
The date starts strong. Conversation flows easily, you bond over your shared love of hiking and weirdly niche documentaries, and for a moment, you think: This might go somewhere. Then the $200 bill arrives, and your date slides it across the table to you. There's no offer to split it, no wallet shuffle — just silence.
Confused but not wanting to kill the vibe, you pick up the tab. That's when your date grins and says, 'Congrats, you passed! You're not a gold digger.'
Welcome to the latest viral (and dubious) way some singles are trying to weed out dates they think are only in it for the free meal. But is it a smart check for sincerity or just a manipulative money move?
Maybe your date doesn't even try to justify the test. Or perhaps they say they've been burned before by someone who only saw them as a walking credit card. But dragging that baggage into a new connection with a 'gold digger test' isn't exactly the healthiest way to start something new.
Conversations about money can feel vulnerable, especially if past experiences made you cautious. And yet, it's easy to see where the fear comes from. According to recent data from Experian, nearly 1 in 3 young adults have discovered that their partner made a major financial purchase behind their back.
On an episode of Experian's Cost of Loving podcast, James Jones, Head of Consumer Affairs at Experian, talked about how the rise in mistrust between partners raises a concerning issue.
'Whilst joint finances aren't an essential part of a relationship, it's worrying that many people have such a lack of financial confidence in their partner,' he said. 'The only way to create change here is to encourage financial transparency.'
Of course, there's a time and place for money talk. First dates can be a good moment for light chats about values, but dropping a financial loyalty test at the table isn't it. If anything, it says more about someone's unhealed wounds than your willingness to cover dinner.
Read more: Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says — and that 'anyone' can do it
Trying to gauge how someone handles money doesn't have to be off the table. Money conversations are a key part of any healthy relationship.
According to a LendingTree study, 98% of Americans in exclusive relationships say financial compatibility matters, and 67% say it's very important. Still, that doesn't mean you need to dive into budget spreadsheets over your first round of drinks. Financial expert Ramit Sethi told Moneywise he's not a fan of jumping into finance chat too soon.
'Some people in the financial community encourage talking about money on the first date,' he said. 'I find that a little nerdy. Like, who wants to be on a first date talking about your asset allocation? You know, it's like, get a life.'
Instead of starting with the hard numbers, look for the soft signs: how someone spends, saves and thinks about value. If one person prefers fancy dinners out and the other's more into budget-friendly home-cooked meals, talk about how to strike a balance.
And be clear about the basics — like who's paying. Whether you take turns, split the bill or each cover certain expenses, agreeing on expectations early can help avoid awkward moments later.
If things get serious, it's time to get financially naked. Be open about debt, savings goals or any financial responsibilities you're managing. Transparency builds trust. Sneaky tests? Not so much.
Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you?
Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead
Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now
This is how American car dealers use the '4-square method' to make big profits off you — and how you can ensure you pay a fair price for all your vehicle costs
Like what you read? Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise straight to your inbox every week.
This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNN
2 hours ago
- CNN
The Washington Post has a new Opinion editor four months after Bezos touted ‘significant shift'
The Washington Post on Wednesday announced it has a new Opinion editor. The move comes four months after it announced a 'significant shift' to the Opinion page and the departure of its embattled section chief. Adam O'Neal, who currently serves as The Economist's Washington correspondent, will take over as the Post's top Opinion editor, the outlet announced in an X post that includes an introductory video from O'Neal. 'We're also going to be stalwart advocates of free markets and personal liberties. We'll be unapologetically patriotic, too,' O'Neal said in the video. 'Our philosophy will be rooted in fundamental optimism about the future of this country.' The Opinion section won't 'lecture' readers about ideologies or 'demand you think certain ways about policy,' O'Neal said. The stance falls in line with the vision articulated four months prior by the Post's owner, billionaire Amazon founder Jeff Bezos. Bezos also mentioned free markets and personal liberties when describing the section's new mandate, which drew backlash from some staffers — including from Marty Baron, the Post's revered former executive editor under whom the outlet won 11 Pulitzer Prizes — and praise from some conservatives. 'We are going to be writing every day in support and defense of two pillars: personal liberties and free markets,' Bezos wrote in a February X post. 'We'll cover other topics too of course, but viewpoints opposing those pillars will be left to be published by others.' As part of the February announcement, Bezos noted that David Shipley, O'Neal's predecessor, had been offered the opportunity to continue leading the section under the new directive but that Shipley had 'decided to step away.' Shipley's departure from the Post followed four months of mounting criticism from Post staffers and readers. The storied newspaper drew criticism for its eleventh-hour choice not to endorse then-Vice President Kamala Harris' presidential bid, which led to several editorial board members resigning and more than 200,000 subscribers canceling their digital subscriptions. Shipley also decided not to run a cartoon satirizing the relationship between Bezos and US President Donald Trump from Ann Telnaes, leading to the Pulitzer Prize-winning cartoonist's resignation. Since Shipley's departure, deputy Opinion editor Mary Duenwald has served as interim section chief. No start date has been announced for O'Neal. In a Wednesday email to staffers obtained by CNN, Will Lewis, the Post's chief executive and publisher, noted that O'Neal 'recognizes the importance of ensuring our opinion coverage is relevant, accessible, and consequential for readers who feel underserved.' 'His appointment is about more than just filling a role; it is about connecting our editorial voice to the real concerns and conversations happening across America,' Lewis said. Get Reliable Sources newsletter Sign up here to receive Reliable Sources with Brian Stelter in your inbox. In the email, Lewis similarly championed Bezos' mandate for the Opinion section: He said its new direction is not 'aligned to any political party' but instead presents 'an opportunity for our Opinion section to share the best of American values.' O'Neal's hiring comes just over two weeks after the Post offered voluntary buyouts to Opinion staffers, the Post's video and copy desks and any news employees who have been at the paper for 10 years or more. The buyout offers run through the end of July.


CNN
2 hours ago
- CNN
The Washington Post has a new Opinion editor four months after Bezos touted ‘significant shift'
The Washington Post on Wednesday announced it has a new Opinion editor. The move comes four months after it announced a 'significant shift' to the Opinion page and the departure of its embattled section chief. Adam O'Neal, who currently serves as The Economist's Washington correspondent, will take over as the Post's top Opinion editor, the outlet announced in an X post that includes an introductory video from O'Neal. 'We're also going to be stalwart advocates of free markets and personal liberties. We'll be unapologetically patriotic, too,' O'Neal said in the video. 'Our philosophy will be rooted in fundamental optimism about the future of this country.' The Opinion section won't 'lecture' readers about ideologies or 'demand you think certain ways about policy,' O'Neal said. The stance falls in line with the vision articulated four months prior by the Post's owner, billionaire Amazon founder Jeff Bezos. Bezos also mentioned free markets and personal liberties when describing the section's new mandate, which drew backlash from some staffers — including from Marty Baron, the Post's revered former executive editor under whom the outlet won 11 Pulitzer Prizes — and praise from some conservatives. 'We are going to be writing every day in support and defense of two pillars: personal liberties and free markets,' Bezos wrote in a February X post. 'We'll cover other topics too of course, but viewpoints opposing those pillars will be left to be published by others.' As part of the February announcement, Bezos noted that David Shipley, O'Neal's predecessor, had been offered the opportunity to continue leading the section under the new directive but that Shipley had 'decided to step away.' Shipley's departure from the Post followed four months of mounting criticism from Post staffers and readers. The storied newspaper drew criticism for its eleventh-hour choice not to endorse then-Vice President Kamala Harris' presidential bid, which led to several editorial board members resigning and more than 200,000 subscribers canceling their digital subscriptions. Shipley also decided not to run a cartoon satirizing the relationship between Bezos and US President Donald Trump from Ann Telnaes, leading to the Pulitzer Prize-winning cartoonist's resignation. Get Reliable Sources newsletter Sign up here to receive Reliable Sources with Brian Stelter in your inbox. Since Shipley's departure, deputy Opinion editor Mary Duenwald has served as interim section chief. No start date has been announced for O'Neal. In a Wednesday email to staffers obtained by CNN, Will Lewis, the Post's chief executive and publisher, noted that O'Neal 'recognizes the importance of ensuring our opinion coverage is relevant, accessible, and consequential for readers who feel underserved.' 'His appointment is about more than just filling a role; it is about connecting our editorial voice to the real concerns and conversations happening across America,' Lewis said. In the email, Lewis similarly championed Bezos' mandate for the Opinion section: He said its new direction is not 'aligned to any political party' but instead presents 'an opportunity for our Opinion section to share the best of American values.' O'Neal's hiring comes just over two weeks after the Post offered voluntary buyouts to Opinion staffers, the Post's video and copy desks and any news employees who have been at the paper for 10 years or more. The buyout offers run through the end of July.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
If You Invested $10K In CBRE Group Stock 10 Years Ago, How Much Would You Have Now?
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. CBRE Group Inc. (NYSE:CBRE) is a commercial real estate services and investment company in the U.S., the U.K., and internationally. The company's stock traded at approximately $36.85 per share 10 years ago. If you had invested $10,000, you could have bought roughly 271 shares. Currently, shares trade at $127.64, meaning your investment's value could have grown to $34,638 from stock price appreciation. That's a total return of 246.38%, outpacing the S&P 500's return of 241.36% over the same period. Don't Miss: Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing — If there was a new fund backed by Jeff Bezos offering a ? CBRE has a consensus rating of "Buy" and a price target of $143.30 based on the ratings of 10 analysts. The price target implies a more than 12% potential upside from the current stock price. On April 24, the company announced its Q1 2025 earnings, posting adjusted EPS of $0.86, above the consensus estimate of $0.77, while revenues of $8.91 billion matched Street expectations, as reported by Benzinga. Trending: Maximize saving for your retirement and cut down on taxes: . "CBRE had a strong start to 2025 across our lines of business and around the world. Notably, as the first quarter ended, most of our businesses were performing better than expected and our new business pipelines were strong. This was equally true for both our Resilient and Transactional businesses," said CEO Bob Sulentic. Check out this article by Benzinga for seven analysts' insights on CBRE. Given the historical stock price appreciation and expected upside potential, growth-focused investors may find CBRE stock attractive. Read Next: Invest Where It Hurts — And Help Millions Heal: , which provides access to a pool of short-term loans backed by residential real estate with just a $100 minimum. Image: Shutterstock This article If You Invested $10K In CBRE Group Stock 10 Years Ago, How Much Would You Have Now? originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data