Russian Strikes On Cities Across Ukraine Kill Child Ahead Of New Round Of Peace Talks
KYIV — Russian air strikes targeted several Ukrainian cities early on July 22, leaving one child dead and at least two dozen injured a day ahead of a fresh round of peace talks expected in Turkey.
President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said in his nightly address late on July 21 that preparations for another prisoner exchange with Russia, along with the peace talks planned for July 23, were under way.
Two days earlier, Zelenskyy said he had sent Moscow an offer to hold a new round of talks in the coming week after negotiations between the countries last month made no progress toward ending the ongoing war.
The Kremlin has yet to confirm the date or location for the next round of talks, saying only that it was waiting for more details while adding that the two sides still held 'diametrically opposed' positions on ways to end the long, deadly conflict.
If the sides do meet in Turkey, it would be the first face-to-face gathering in seven weeks. The Turkish government said the talks will be held in Istanbul.
'There is our draft memorandum — there is a draft memorandum that has been handed over by the Ukrainian side. There is to be an exchange of views and talks on these two drafts, which are diametrically opposed so far,' Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said on July 21.
The Kremlin has said it welcomes new talks but that the 'most important thing for us is to achieve our goals. Our goals are clear, obvious. They have not changed.'
It also has insisted that any peace agreement sees Ukraine cede control and withdraw from four regions that Russia illegally annexed in September 2022 but never fully captured.
Kyiv must also renounce its bid to join NATO and accept strict limits on its armed forces — demands Ukraine and its Western allies have flatly rejected.
Russian state news agency TASS quoted an unnamed source as acknowledging the next round of talks was likely to be in Turkey but could be held on July 24 or 25.
US President Donald Trump in recent weeks has voiced frustration over the lack of progress on a cease-fire and last week gave Moscow a 50-day deadline to agree to a deal or face tougher sanctions.
Russian President Vladimir Putin has turned down calls from Zelenskyy to meet him in person and has often questioned the elected Ukrainian leader's legitimacy.
Previous rounds of talks were held in Istanbul, on May 16 and June 2. Those talks led to prisoner swaps and the exchange of remains of fallen soldiers but no apparent movement on a potential cease-fire.
Meanwhile, during the night of July 21-22, Russia struck the Ukrainian regions of Sumy in the northeast, Odesa in the south, and Kramatorsk in the east.
According to Oleksandr Honcharenko, the head of the Kramatorsk military administration, a boy born in 2015 was killed and five others wounded when a Russian glide bomb struck an apartment building.
The city of Sumy also saw several wounded when five apartment buildings caught fire during an air attack, while more than 20 drones attacked the coastal city of Odesa, leaving more than a dozen casualties, including a child.
Despite mounting evidence to the contrary, Russia claims it is not targeting civilian infrastructure with its air strikes.
Ukrainian authorities and international agencies, such as the United Nations and the European Union, have accused Russia of intentionally targeting civilians, in what they say amounts to war crimes.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
24 minutes ago
- CBS News
CIA Director Ratcliffe "strongly supports" Gabbard declassification of sensitive documents, agency says
CIA Director John Ratcliffe "strongly supports the public release" this week of highly sensitive documents by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, according to a CIA spokesperson, who said Ratcliffe "initiated" the declassification process after he took the helm at the agency this year. Gabbard's office publicly released a report drafted in 2017 by Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee on Russian activity during the 2016 election, sparking concerns about risks to sensitive sources and methods. She said Wednesday that the document contained additional evidence that Obama administration officials "manufactured" a narrative about Russia's actions that was designed to undercut President Trump. Gabbard also declassified a swath of documents related to the 2016 election last Friday. "CIA Director Ratcliffe strongly supports the public release of HPSCI's report, which was the result of a process initiated by CIA and led by DNI Gabbard," the CIA spokesperson said, using an abbreviation for the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. "This effort reflects Director Ratcliffe's continued commitment to elevating the truth and bringing transparency to the American people and would not have been possible without his directive to return it to the committee," the spokesperson added. The House report, which the committee's Republican staff finalized in December 2017 but updated through 2020, was so highly classified that it was stored at CIA headquarters before Ratcliffe sent it back to the House panel and ultimately toward public release, CBS News has learned. The committee made it available to the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, or ODNI, according to an ODNI official with knowledge of the declassification process. Gabbard would normally have been required to consult with the intelligence agencies that had contributed sensitive information to the report before declassifying it, but Mr. Trump — who made the decision to declassify the document with relatively few redactions — was not under the same obligations, the official said. The report was written in large part by then-committee staffer Kash Patel, now the FBI director, according to one current and one former official. It contained discussions about raw intelligence from a CIA source the agency had recruited in Russia, and questioned whether analysts had sufficiently taken into account the source's motivations, proximity to Putin or potential bias towards Mr. Trump. The CIA source's information helped inform the January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment, or ICA, which concluded in part that Russian President Vladimir Putin and the Russian government aspired to help then-candidate Donald Trump's election chances by discrediting Secretary Clinton and publicly contrasting her unfavorably to him. The U.S. exfiltrated a CIA asset from Russia in 2017, CBS News previously confirmed. That judgment within the ICA has vexed Mr. Trump for years and has been a key focus of Gabbard's recent declassifications. Gabbard has claimed the documents released by her office reveal a "treasonous conspiracy" by Obama-era officials to undermine Mr. Trump during his first term by alleging Russian efforts to help him win in 2016. Gabbard says she has forwarded the records to the Justice Department as part of a criminal referral. Obama's spokesperson Patrick Rodenbush called Gabbard's accusations "bizarre" and "ridiculous" earlier this week. The ICA's judgement about Russian actions in 2016 was also the focus of a recent CIA internal review under Ratcliffe. Released earlier this month, that review contained far fewer of the sensitive details included in the House Republicans' report and said the judgment on Putin's preference for Trump should have been issued with moderate rather than high confidence. But it said it did not dispute the "quality and credibility" of the information. The top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, Sen. Mark Warner, called the release of the House committee's report by Gabbard "desperate and irresponsible." He said it put highly sensitive sources at risk and could disincentivize potential spies from working for the U.S. government. "Tell me how you're going to recruit somebody to, in one of our adversarial nations, maybe work with us, if that information is carelessly thrown around," Warner said to reporters on Wednesday. Ratcliffe, who previously served on the House Intelligence Committee as a congressman from Texas, has said one of his primary objectives as CIA director would be to reinvigorate intelligence collection from human sources. Current and former national security officials have said intelligence provided by human sources, known as HUMINT, has dropped off in recent years, as surveillance technologies have become more sophisticated and ubiquitous. Human sources — especially those with proximity to world leaders in adversarial countries like Russia, China and North Korea — are especially prized and especially rare, given how risky, if not life-threatening, it can be for them to provide information to a foreign intelligence agency. Information provided by human sources typically remains classified for decades, often up to 75 years, according to government classification rules. At his Senate confirmation hearing in January, Ratcliffe said the recruitment of human spies by the CIA is "not where it needs to be." "I do want to spend time looking at that," he said. The CIA has recently released recruitment videos in multiple languages with the aim of enticing potential human sources in Iran, China and Russia to come He and James LaPorta contributed to this report.
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tulsi Gabbard Smears Hillary Clinton as Secret Drug User in Deranged Rant
The Trump administration's intelligence chief says Russia had dirt on Hillary Clinton that it suppressed in the final stretch of the 2016 election—including claims she was on a daily diet of heavy tranquilizers and suffering 'intensified psycho-emotional problems.' The wild and entirely unproven details were outlined by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard during a White House briefing on Wednesday—without a shred of evidence being presented. Gabbard cited the findings of a newly declassified report that she says showed Obama officials engaged in a conspiracy to subvert Donald Trump's first election victory. 'There is irrefutable evidence that details how President Obama and his national security team directed the creation of an intelligence community assessment that they knew was false,' Gabbard said. 'They knew it would promote this contrived narrative that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help President Trump win, selling it to the American people as though it were true; it wasn't.' The document released by Gabbard on Wednesday was based on an intelligence community assessment into Russia's influence campaign on the 2016 election. It suggests that Russian intelligence obtained damaging information about Clinton, a former secretary of state who was campaigning to win the White House against Trump in 2016, but chose not to release it. The plan was to instead release the material after the election 'to weaken what Moscow viewed as an inevitable Clinton presidency.' Among the Russian intelligence was what Gabbard described as 'high-level Democratic National Committee emails that detailed evidence of Hillary's, quote: 'psycho emotional problems, uncontrolled fits of anger, aggression and cheerfulness' and that then Secretary Clinton was allegedly on a daily regimen of heavy tranquilizers. 'Then CIA Director (John) Brennan and the intelligence community mischaracterized intelligence and relied on dubious, substandard sources to create a contrived false narrative that Putin developed a quote, unquote 'clear preference for Trump',' Gabbard added. The Daily Beast has reached out to Clinton's office for a response. But former president Barack Obama has strongly rebuked the claims of a conspiracy more broadly, branding the allegations a weak attempt to distract from the Epstein files. Other critics have also accused Gabbard of conflating Russian 'hacking' with Russian 'influence' campaigns, in a bid to get in Trump's good graces. 'Out of respect for the office of the presidency our office does not normally dignify the constant nonsense and misinformation flowing out of this White House with a response. But these claims are outrageous enough to merit one,' Obama said in a rare statement issued through his office on Tuesday. 'The bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction. Nothing in the document issued last week undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election but did not successfully manipulate any votes. 'These findings were affirmed in a 2020 report by the bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee, led by then-Chairman Marco Rubio,' they added. Trump, who has claimed for years that the investigation into Russian interference was a 'hoax', has embraced the documents Gabbard put out, and even posted a social media video of Obama in a jumpsuit. Asked on Wednesday if the president believes Obama should be jailed, White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt replied: 'The president believes that this matter needs to be thoroughly investigated, and anyone convicted of crimes should be held accountable in this country.' Trump himself was convicted of crimes last year, after a unanimous jury found him guilty of 34 counts of falsifying business records to silence a sex scandal with a porn star ahead of the 2016 election. However, the president was able to avoid punishment after the judge gave him an 'unconditional discharge', a sentence that affirms that he is a convicted felon, but one where he will face no further penalties, fines, or any time in jail. The decision came after the conservative-dominated Supreme Court ruled that presidents should have substantial immunity for acts committed in office. This ruling could now be used by Obama, should the administration seek to prosecute him. Asked about this on Wednesday, Leavitt said the president wanted the documents released in the interest of 'transparency' and 'he wants those who perpetuated these lies and this scandal to be held accountable.' 'As for what accountability looks like,' she said, 'it's in the Department of Justice's hands and we trust them to be successful.'
San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Lawyers from both sides of the aisle decry Trump attacks on judges at California conference
It's time for the legal community to speak up about the increasing threats to judges across the country, a diverse pair of legal scholars said Thursday at the conference of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. 'Lawyers have to stand up to this, stand up for judicial independence," said Paul Clement, who has argued for conservative causes and was the Justice Department's solicitor general under President George W. Bush. Erwin Chemerinsky, the law school dean at UC Berkeley who has argued cases in the Supreme Court in favor of racial diversity and other liberal causes, cited Republican calls to impeach judges who have ruled against President Donald Trump. 'Being a judge now is more important than it's ever been in American history,' Chemerinsky told the audience of hundreds of lawyers and judges at the court's conference in Monterey. 'This is a time when we need judicial courage. We need the lawyers to be courageous too.' And in a reference to Trump's apparent disregard of judges' orders to stop sending immigrants, some of them with legal status, to prisons in Latin America, Chemerinsky said, 'If any president can violate court orders, can lock any of us up, the word for that is dictatorship.' Clement, as a Justice Department lawyer, argued before the Supreme Court, unsuccessfully, to try to overturn President Barack Obama's national health insurance law, the Affordable Care Act, and in defense of a law banning federal benefits for same-sex married couples. As a private attorney, he was on the winning side of last year's ruling allowing judges to decide the meaning of contested federal regulations, overturning a 1984 decision that required courts to accept an agency's interpretation when the meaning of a law was unclear. 'I'm a big believer in executive power,' Clement told the conference. But 'if you have an administration that is trying to push the limits … you're in a period of extraordinary tension.' He criticized Trump's Justice Department for prosecuting a federal judge in Wisconsin who directed an undocumented immigrant to the back door of her courtroom when federal immigration agents were looking for him, and for recent statements by Attorney General Pam Bondi denouncing 'unelected' federal judges who have frustrated the administration's program. It's time to 'turn down the volume,' Clement said. They spoke three days after the latest Republican proposal to break up the 9th Circuit, the nation's largest federal appeals court. The court hears appeals of federal cases from California, eight other Western states and the territories of Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands. Its rulings are binding on federal judges in all of those states, including conservative dominions such as Idaho and Montana, and it has a 16-13 majority of judges appointed by Democratic presidents. The legislation by two Idaho Republicans, Sens. Mike Crapo and Jim Risch, would leave California, Hawaii and Guam in the 9th Circuit and create a new 12th Circuit court for the other states. It is the 60th such bill introduced since 1985, and would appear to have little chance of overcoming a Democratic filibuster in the Senate. The measure, Risch said in a statement, 'would split and modernize the 9th Circuit, allowing for more manageable caseloads and justice that aligns with the values of Idaho.'
