World reacts to shock development in Antarctica: ‘Oh my god!'
Social media has erupted into debate after stunning findings revealed that the Antarctic Ice Sheet had gone through record-breaking growth after decades of loss.
In what seems like music to the ears of climate sceptics who have long derided doom-and-gloom predictions, a study published in Science China Earth Sciences found that between 2021 and 2023 the Antarctic Ice Sheet (AIS) grew by an unprecedented amount.
The report says that between 2021 and 2023, the ice sheet grew by almost 108 gigatons (or 108 billion metric tons) of ice per year.
The reason for the rise is reportedly due to an unusual increase in precipitation, particularly in East Antarctica, leading to an accumulation of snow and ice.
To put it in perspective, between 2002 and 2010, the AIS lost mass at a rate of almost 74 gigatons a year, resulting in a 0.2mm per year global sea-level rise. Between 2011 and 2020, that rose to more than 142 gigatons a year, a sea-level rise of 0.39mm per year.
But the recent increase in ice has seen a 0.30mm offset between 2021-2023.
In the Wilkes Land–Queen Mary Land region of Antarctica, four major glaciers — Totten, Moscow University, Denman and Vincennes Bay — had been losing the most mass.
Cosmos reported that Vincennes Bay and Denham had suffered 'intense' losses, suffering about 72.5 per cent surface melt and 27.5 per cent ice loss according Dr Wei Wang of Shanghai's Tonji University.
But between 2021 and 2023, this area had received the most mass gain.
This is important considering those glaciers are among the most vulnerable on the continent and that Antarctica holds around half of the freshwater on Earth.
However, for those believing it may be the end of global warming, scientist warn that this may not signal a long-term trend.
Internet runs wild with finding: 'Oh my god'
Despite there being a bit more to the story, the promising headline was enough for the internet to run with the findings.
X user Collin Rugg, who has 1.8m followers on the platform, shared the news on his account, writing that it was 'crazy'.
He also included a line tempering the findings, saying: 'Scientists say much of the gains are linked to precipitation patterns, which could be temporary.'
But his comments quickly went nuts.
Self-described 'populist Republican' and founder of The Loud Majority podcast Kevin Smith replied: 'So Al Gore was wrong again??? Is climate change over?'
Canadian-American venture capitalist Chamath Palihapitiya commented: 'Oh my god! All the protests and virtue signalling worked!!!'
January 6 rioter Derrick Evans added: 'Poor Greta will have to come up with a new scam.'
Founder and Executive Director of Power The Future Daniel Turner claimed the story was proof you should 'never believe a climate alarmist'.
And this is just the tip of the metaphorical iceberg.
There were plenty more who hit out at the news, but others put it in context.
Crypto journalist Laura Shin suggested: 'Wouldn't it be because of Covid? People were flying and driving less, so emissions were down?'
Others pointed out that it was a 'temporary' and 'anomalous' precipitation accumulation and that it had been trending down for over 20 years.
Professor at the University of Ottawa Ryan Katz-Rosene, PhD also tried to put it in context, showing a graph of how the ice sheet had fared since the 1980s.
Yes, there was a record -breaking mass gain for the Antarctic ice sheet from 2021 to 2023, thanks to increased precipitation in East Antarctica. This is what it looks like in contextðŸ'‡
(h/t @Marcusgibson) pic.twitter.com/KCw3RNar49
— Ryan Katz-Rosene, PhD (@ryankatzrosene) May 5, 2025
Two-thirds of the world's freshwater is held between Antarctica and Greenland, with NASA finding that Greenland is declining at twice the rate of Antarctica — and there was no bounce back Greenland, which has been losing ice at a reasonably steady rate since 2002.
This data is from NASA's GRACE (Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment) mission — which ended in June 2017 — and GRACE Follow-On mission — which began in June 2018.
Both missions have flown spacecraft around the Earth to study changes to the planet's waters, ice sheets and solid Earth.
On average between 2002 and now, the Antarctic has lost an average of 136 gigatons per year, while Greenland is losing approximately 267 gigatons per year.
Thanks to the growth between 2021-2023, current levels in 2025 are not as low as they were in January 2021, but also not by much.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
2 days ago
- ABC News
Badly built housing propels the heat pandemic in Asia's cities
It is a typical summer's afternoon in Gujarat, India. Women and children are listless as they swelter in their homes in the 34-degree Celsius heat. It's even hotter outside. Families that have moved into affordable housing units built in the last few years are finding their comfort and health have not been sufficiently considered in the design and construction of the new dwellings. There are similar issues in Indonesia — where one study showed most household energy use was dedicated to trying unsuccessfully to stay cool — and Australia, where tenants in rental properties were regularly experiencing indoor temperatures above 30C in summer. We are experiencing a heat pandemic, and it's exacerbated by lousy buildings. Tens of thousands of people were made ill during India's heatwave. ( AP: Manish Swarup ) Changing the way we build homes For that to happen it requires changing the way we build, so homes are suited for future climates. India recorded more than 40,000 suspected heat stroke cases and at least 110 confirmed deaths between March 1 and June 18 2024, when its north-western and eastern parts recorded more than twice the usual number of heatwave days. Increasing average and extreme temperatures, urbanisation, accelerating cooling energy demand, and an ageing population are increasing the vulnerability of millions to heat-related health risks globally. For most people in Gujarat, supplementing the poor thermal performance of their homes with air-conditioning is unaffordable. Cooling is a top priority when finances allow. But this demand for cooling is accelerating growth in demand for electricity, which is still predominantly generated with fossil fuels, thus increasing greenhouse gas emissions, and global warming. India has approved the construction of 8 million new affordable housing units by the end of 2025. If these buildings are not designed to enable people to stay cool and healthy without air-conditioning, then millions of people will become more vulnerable to the health and social impacts of climate change. India is building millions of new residential apartments across the country. ( AP: Amit Dave ) Simple, low-cost solutions Simple low-cost design changes can make a big difference. Using more insulating wall materials, ensuring windows have appropriate shading, providing ventilation louvres above doors and insect screens so windows can be opened without letting in mosquitoes, can reduce annual cooling loads by around 25 per cent compared to standard practice, research by Monash University and the Global Buildings Performance Network shows. Research into energy use in Indian and Indonesian homes is showing that this is not unique to India. As global warming progresses, people in already warm climates around the world are becoming increasingly vulnerable to overheating in their homes. A study in the Indonesian city of Samarinda showed that most household energy use was dedicated to trying to stay cool. Yet, the poor design of houses led to average indoor temperature and humidity being about the same as outdoor conditions — above 27C and 70 per cent humidity – even when air conditioner thermostats were set to 20C. Lack of shading and natural ventilation coupled with poorly insulated and constructed walls and roofs means buildings heat up quickly and let cooled air leak out. Demand for air coolers always rises when India is hit with heatwaves. ( AP: Amit Dave ) Changing the debate Despite some Australian state governments and municipalities declaring a 'climate emergency' and producing action plans to achieve net-zero emissions by 2030, these have had a limited impact on the climatic adequacy of new housing and renovations. Planning controls applicable to new townhouses for example, are not able to be modified to ensure buildings provide thermal comfort and zero-net emissions without state government approval. Councils also seldom have influence over the performance of single dwelling proposals or renovations beyond enforcing the National Construction Code. If climate change benefits don't convince governments and industry, the health and economic benefits might. Yet this is not a narrative currently framing the debate about policy reforms in the buildings sector. A global evidence review showed the benefits of implementing policy for zero-emissions buildings go beyond keeping global warming well below 2C. A key finding was that sustainable building practices — those that reduce carbon emissions across all phases of the building cycle from design and material choice to supply chains and waste management — deliver substantial physical and mental health benefits. There is also evidence that up to one fifth of the value of energy savings from well designed and implemented energy efficiency building retrofitting and renovation policies relate to direct health benefits such as lower rates of respiratory illness and heart disease. Researchers say sustainable building practices can deliver substantial physical and mental health benefits. ( ABC Central West: Hugh Hogan ) There are health benefits In the European Union, direct health benefits of energy efficiency building renovation was estimated at 2.86 billion euros by 2020. Indirect benefits include better physical and mental health. There were also significant job creation and economic benefits. Each $US1 million invested in energy efficient buildings creates about 14 job-years of net employment with as much as 16 million jobs per annum possible in the green building market globally. It also drives improvement in productivity of the construction value chain. Policies such as mandating net-zero energy performance in building codes leads to a positive return on investment to public finances over time. For example, direct and co-benefits of energy efficiency measures have the potential to add 1 per cent growth in GDP in Germany. Higher energy efficiency performance also leads to lower home operating costs. Energy efficiency measures to eliminate fuel poverty in 2.5 million homes in the UK provided a net economic benefit of 1.2 billion British pounds in 2008. Other non-health benefits reported included cost savings to households, educational benefits of enhanced lighting and increased energy security. As part of the review, the research team conducted interviews with policy influencers in Indonesia and India, and shot video of people at home to determine whether the lived experience of people living in more sustainable housing matched the evidence base. Householders talked about cost savings and the health benefits from moving into affordable sustainable housing in Jakarta. Which begs the question: if sustainable building delivers so many 'win-wins' and could end our 'heat pandemic' why aren't all new buildings sustainable? It turns out the health and other benefits of sustainable building which have been reported in research are either not well known in practice, or not often used to promote sustainable building. Because sustainable building has been viewed primarily through the lens of climate change, other sectors that could benefit such as health, transport, energy and real estate have not been effectively brought into the conversation. Doing so could help convince more people that sustainable building is the ultimate 'win-win'. Peter Graham is an Associate Professor in Architecture at Monash University and Executive Director of the Global Buildings Performance Network. Professor Peter Bragge is Director of Monash Sustainable Development Institute's Evidence Review Service.
ABC News
5 days ago
- ABC News
Winter is here, which means whales are back
Each winter, thousands of humpback whales migrate from Antarctic feeding grounds to tropical breeding areas along Australia's east and west coasts.
News.com.au
6 days ago
- News.com.au
In a hotter future, what comes after coral reefs die?
The fate of coral reefs has been written with a degree of certainty rare in climate science: at 1.5 degrees Celsius of global warming, most are expected to die. This is not a far-off scenario. Scientists predict that the rise of 1.5 Celsius (2.7 Fahrenheit) will be reached within a decade and that beyond that point, many coral simply cannot survive. It is important to accept this and ask what next "rather than trying to hold onto the past", said David Obura, chair of IPBES, the UN's expert scientific panel on biodiversity. "I wish it were different," Obura, a Kenyan reef scientist and founding director of CORDIO East Africa, a marine research organisation, told AFP. "We need to be pragmatic about it and ask those questions, and face up to what the likely future will be." And yet, it is a subject few marine scientists care to dwell on. "We are having a hard time imagining that all coral reefs really could die off," said Melanie McField, a Caribbean reef expert, who described a "sort of pre-traumatic stress syndrome" among her colleagues. "But it is likely in the two-degree world we are rapidly accelerating to," McField, founding director of the Healthy Reefs for Healthy People Initiative, told AFP. When stressed in hotter ocean waters, corals expel the microscopic algae that provides their characteristic colour and food source. Without respite, bleached corals slowly starve. At 1.5C of warming relative to pre-industrial times, between 70 and 90 percent of coral reefs are expected to perish, according to the IPCC, the global authority on climate science. At 2C, that number rises to 99 percent. Even with warming as it stands today -- about 1.4C -- mass coral death is occurring, and many scientists believe the global collapse of tropical reefs may already be underway. - What comes next - Obura said it was not pessimistic to imagine a world without coral reefs, but an urgent question that scientists were "only just starting to grapple with". "I see no reason to not be clear about where we are at this point in time," Obura said. "Let's be honest about that, and deal with the consequences." Rather than disappear completely, coral reefs as they exist today will likely evolve into something very different, marine scientists on four continents told AFP. This would happen as slow-growing hard corals -- the primary reef builders that underpin the ecosystem -- die off, leaving behind white skeletons without living tissue. Gradually, these would be covered by algae and colonised by simpler organisms better able to withstand hotter oceans, like sponges, mussels, and weedy soft corals like sea fans. "There will be less winners than there are losers," said Tom Dallison, a marine scientist and strategic advisor to the International Coral Reef Initiative. These species would dominate this new underwater world. The dead coral beneath -- weakened by ocean acidification, and buffeted by waves and storms -- would erode over time into rubble. "They will still exist, but they will just look very different. It is our responsibility to ensure the services they provide, and those that depend on them, are protected," Dallison said. - Dark horizon - One quarter of all ocean species live among the world's corals. Smaller, sparser, less biodiverse reefs simply means fewer fish and other marine life. The collapse of reefs threatens in particular the estimated one billion people who rely on them for food, tourism income, and protection from coastal erosion and storms. But if protected and managed properly, these post-coral reefs could still be healthy, productive, attractive ecosystems that provide some economic benefit, said Obura. So far, the picture is fuzzy -- research into this future has been very limited. Stretched resources have been prioritised for protecting coral and exploring novel ways to make reefs more climate resilient. But climate change is not the only thing threatening corals. Tackling pollution, harmful subsidies, overfishing and other drivers of coral demise would give "the remaining places the best possible chance of making it through whatever eventual warming we have", Obura said. Conservation and restoration efforts were "absolutely essential" but alone were like "pushing a really heavy ball up a hill, and that hill is getting steeper", he added. Trying to save coral reefs "is going to be extremely difficult" as long as we keep pouring carbon into the atmosphere, said Jean-Pierre Gattuso, an oceans expert from France's flagship scientific research institute, CNRS. But some coral had developed a level of thermal tolerance, he said, and research into restoring small reef areas with these resilient strains held promise. "How do we work in this space when you have this sort of big dark event on the horizon? It's to make that dark event a little brighter," said Dallison. np/mh/phz
