OpenAI's advisory board calls for continued and strengthened nonprofit oversight
That is the message from an advisory board convened by OpenAI to give it recommendations about its nonprofit structure — delivered in a report released Thursday, along with a sweeping vision for democratising AI and reforming philanthropy.
'We think it's too important to entrust to any one sector, the private sector or even the government sector,' said Daniel Zingale, the convener of OpenAI's nonprofit commission and a former adviser to three California governors. 'The nonprofit model allows for what we call a common sector,' that facilitates democratic participation.
The recommendations are not binding on OpenAI, but the advisory commission, which includes the labor organiser Dolores Huerta, offers a framework that may be used to judge OpenAI in the future, whether or not they adopt it.
In the commission's view, communities that are already feeling the impacts of AI technologies should have input on how they are developed, including how data about them is used. But there are currently few avenues for people to influence tech companies who control much of the development of AI.
OpenAI, the maker of ChatGPT, started in 2015 as a nonprofit research laboratory and has since incorporated a for-profit company with a valuation that has grown to $300 billion. The company has tried to change its structure since the nonprofit board ousted its CEO Sam Altman in November 2023. He was reinstated days later and continues to lead OpenAI.
It has run into hurdles escaping its nonprofit roots, including scrutiny from the attorney generals in California and Delaware, who have oversight of nonprofits, and a lawsuit by Elon Musk, an early donor to and founder of OpenAI.
Most recently, OpenAI has said it will turn its for-profit company into a public benefit corporation, which must balance the interests of shareholders and its mission. Its nonprofit will hold shares in that new corporation, but OpenAI has not said how much.
Zingale said Huerta told the commission their challenge was to help make sure AI is a blessing and not a curse. To grapple with those stakes, they envision a nonprofit with an expansive mandate to help everyone participate in the development and trajectory of AI.
'The measure of this nonprofit will be in what it builds, who it includes, and how faithfully it endures to mission and impact," they wrote.
The commission toured California communities and solicited feedback online. They heard that many were inspired by OpenAI's mission to create artificial intelligence to benefit humanity and ensure those benefits are felt widely and evenly.
But, Zingale said many people feel they are in the dark about how it's happening.
'They know this is profoundly important what's happening in this 'Age of Intelligence,' but they want to understand better what it is, how it's developed, where are the important choices being made and who's making them?' he said.
Zingale said the commission chose early on not to interact with Altman in any way in order to maintain their independence, though they quote him in their report. However, they did speak with the company's senior engineers, who they said, 'entered our space with humility, seriousness, and a genuine desire to understand how their work might translate into democratic legitimacy.'
The commission proposed OpenAI immediately provide significant resources to the nonprofit for use in the public interest. For context, the nonprofit reported $23 million in assets in 2023, the most recent year that its tax filing is available.
The commission recommend focusing on closing gaps in economic opportunity, investing in AI literacy and creating an organisation that is accessible to and governed by everyday people.
'For OpenAI's nonprofit to fulfill its mandate, it should commit to more than just doing good - it should commit to being known, seen, and shaped by the people it claims to serve,' they wrote.
The commission suggested opening a rapid response fund to help reduce economic strains now. Zingale said they specifically recommended funding theatre, art and health.
'We're trying to make the point that they need to dedicate some of their resources to human to human activities,' he said.
The commission also recommended setting up a requirement that a human lead the nonprofit, which Zingale said is a serious recommendation and 'a sign of the times."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
Forget coding: Autodesk CEO pitches 'total systems thinking' as your ultimate shield against the AI takeover
The Rise of the Creative Orchestrator Coding Isn't Dead, But It's No Longer Elite From Four Roles to Two The Soft Skills AI Still Can't Touch A Leadership Wake-Up Call You Might Also Like: AI can't steal this one human skill, and it could be your ticket to career success before it catches up In a world racing to keep up with artificial intelligence , simply knowing how to code might no longer be the edge it once was. According to Autodesk CEO Andrew Anagnost, the skill that may truly help future-proof your career is something deeper, broader, and far more human: total systems thinking In an interview with Business Insider, Anagnost emphasized that as AI models become increasingly capable of writing code independently, the most valuable human contributions will come not from technical repetition, but from interdisciplinary insight. 'If the coding models are going to be doing the code for you, what's more important is that you understand this whole notion of systems-level and interdisciplinary thinking,' he who holds a Ph.D. in aeronautical engineering and computer science, is a strong advocate of breaking out of traditional disciplinary silos. He believes future job roles won't necessarily go to those who go deep into one niche area, unless they're aiming for research careers. Instead, the next big value-add will come from individuals who can connect the dots across different fields — and creatively manage the output of AI systems.'Humans will need to take the role of creative orchestrators,' Anagnost said, adding that it's not just about what is made but how it all fits together. In other words, those who can understand the broader picture of how a product is designed, built, and delivered — and how AI fits into that lifecycle — will be in shift in thinking is already playing out in workplaces as tools like GitHub Copilot and OpenAI's Codex automate increasingly complex coding tasks. 'There will be more people generating code than ever before,' Anagnost said. 'And many of them won't have backgrounds in computer science.'Rather than making coding obsolete, this democratization means that coding becomes just another tool — and not necessarily a distinguishing to Anagnost, a typical software company today employs a team that includes a product manager, designer, engineer, and quality assurance tester. But that's changing fast. In a near-future setup, he envisions a leaner model where a product designer collaborates directly with an AI coding assistant to handle both development and ties this streamlined workflow together? 'Total systems thinking,' he said. It's about knowing how the entire machine works — from vision to execution — and not just being a cog in the message aligns closely with Wharton professor Ethan Mollick, author of Co-Intelligence: Living and Working with AI. In a recent interview with CNBC Make It, Mollick argued that the safest roles in an AI-driven world aren't necessarily the most technical — they're the most complex.'AI may outperform you in one or two things,' Mollick said, 'but if your job requires five or six of them, it's a lot harder to replace.'He advises professionals to gravitate toward 'bundled roles' — jobs that blend empathy, judgment, creativity, and domain expertise. These roles are harder to automate, and more importantly, make room for humans to collaborate with AI rather than be replaced by unintended consequence of this shift could be the loss of traditional entry-level roles. As AI handles more of the repeatable grunt work, young professionals may have fewer chances to learn by doing. Without that foundational experience, Mollick warns, the pipeline for future leaders could be at and Anagnost agree on one thing: the real problem isn't AI — it's leadership lag. Companies must rethink hiring, training, and education models to adapt to this new world. The future belongs to those who can think broadly, manage complexity, and orchestrate outcomes with the help of intelligent you're planning your next career move — or even your college major — consider this: it's no longer just about learning to code. It's about understanding how systems connect, how humans and machines can co-create, and how creativity still holds the power to Anagnost's words, the future may hold fewer traditional computer science grads in software firms, 'but there'll probably be more people creating product than ever before.'
Economic Times
41 minutes ago
- Economic Times
AI startup by Columbia graduates raises $7 million to target midsize law firms
ETtech August, an AI startup founded by Columbia University alumni and that caters to midsize law firms, said on Tuesday it had raised $7 million in a seed funding round led by venture capital firms NEA and Pear VC. Why it matters AI's ability to handle routine, document-heavy tasks is unlocking new efficiencies for lawyers, particularly because the legal field is built on vast volumes of literature such as case law, contracts and filings. By automating time-consuming paperwork, AI platforms such as August are freeing up lawyers to focus on higher-value work. It also helps to cut costs, a crucial benefit for midsize law firms that lack the resources of their deep-pocketed rivals. Context August was founded in 2023 by Rutvik Rau, Thomas Bueler-Faudree and Joseph Parker, who met at Columbia University. Besides NEA and Pear VC, the startup secured backing from angel investor Gokul Rajaram, Ramp's vice president of product Geoff Charles, OpenAI's head of engineering David Azose and Bain Capital Ventures partner Kevin Zhang. The company is based in New York and currently has a team of 12. It expects to expand the workforce to 25 to 30 by the end of the year, Rau told Reuters in an interview. August operates in a competitive arena dominated by some established players, most notably Harvey, an OpenAI-backed legal AI startup, which caters to elite law firms and big professional services companies. "The future is one where AI partners with individuals to be a step further than where the industry is today," Rau said. "We're enabling lawyers to be more productive by eliminating some of the work, so they can actually spend a lot more time working with their clients, understanding their needs and being the strategic value partner for them." Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. Can Coforge's ambition to lead the IT Industry become a reality? BlackRock returns, this time with Ambani. Will it be lucky second time? Amazon is making stealthy moves in healthcare, here's why! The trader who blew the whistle on Jane Street Stock Radar: Globus Spirits breaks out from 9-month consolidation; check target & stop loss for long positions Weekly Top Picks: These stocks scored 10 on 10 on Stock Reports Plus These large-caps have 'strong buy' & 'buy' recos and an upside potential of more than 25% Stock picks of the week: 5 stocks with consistent score improvement and upside potential of up to 36% in 1 year
Time of India
41 minutes ago
- Time of India
AI startup by Columbia graduates raises $7 million to target midsize law firms
August, an AI startup founded by Columbia University alumni and that caters to midsize law firms , said on Tuesday it had raised $7 million in a seed funding round led by venture capital firms NEA and Pear ability to handle routine, document-heavy tasks is unlocking new efficiencies for lawyers, particularly because the legal field is built on vast volumes of literature such as case law, contracts and automating time-consuming paperwork, AI platforms such as August are freeing up lawyers to focus on higher-value also helps to cut costs, a crucial benefit for midsize law firms that lack the resources of their deep-pocketed was founded in 2023 by Rutvik Rau, Thomas Bueler-Faudree and Joseph Parker, who met at Columbia NEA and Pear VC, the startup secured backing from angel investor Gokul Rajaram, Ramp's vice president of product Geoff Charles, OpenAI's head of engineering David Azose and Bain Capital Ventures partner Kevin company is based in New York and currently has a team of 12. It expects to expand the workforce to 25 to 30 by the end of the year, Rau told Reuters in an operates in a competitive arena dominated by some established players, most notably Harvey, an OpenAI-backed legal AI startup, which caters to elite law firms and big professional services companies."The future is one where AI partners with individuals to be a step further than where the industry is today," Rau said."We're enabling lawyers to be more productive by eliminating some of the work, so they can actually spend a lot more time working with their clients, understanding their needs and being the strategic value partner for them."
