Donald Trump Jr-led online gun store known on Wall Street as ‘PEW' launches stock offerings
Don Jr. joined the board of GrabAGun Tuesday, ahead of the online gun retailer's debut on the NYSE. GrabAGun, which sells firearms and accessories online, is backed by 1789 Capital, a private equity firm where Trump Jr. is a partner.
The venture capital firm has a focus on investing in conservative, MAGA-aligned companies, including the Tucker Carlson Network, XA, and SpaceX.
GrabAGun's shares will trade on the NYSE under the symbol 'PEW,' which Trump Jr. says represents the sound of shooting a gun, according to NBC News.
1789 Capital founder and President Omeed Malik's company, Colombier II, acquired GrabAGun, and after a SPAC merger, the company expects more than $179 million in gross proceeds at the closing bell Wednesday, Malik and Trump Jr. told Fox News' Maria Bartiromo.
'To be able to come back to the New York Stock Exchange and actually take a gun company public, feels like such a vindication of all the insanity, all the woke nonsense that we've been watching and facing for the last decade in America,' Trump Jr. said.
Trump Jr. said the company intends to use the technology platform to open up the firearm space and allow more people to gain access to firearms.
'It's a $25 billion TAM (Total Addressable Market) and it's been suppressed. So what we're doing here with this transaction is unleashing the desire for people that already exists,' Malik said.
'You have one out of every two households in America that has a firearm. We have a Second Amendment right. You have private actors, often at the behest of the federal government, have been suppressing that right,' he continued.
'So what Don and I have done is circumvented those gatekeepers, who are self-appointed, and allowed an industry to grow the way it should be able to.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Geeky Gadgets
12 minutes ago
- Geeky Gadgets
How Context Engineering Can Make Any AI 100x Smarter
What if the AI tools you rely on could become not just smarter, but exponentially more effective? Imagine an AI assistant that doesn't just follow instructions but intuitively understands your needs, pulling in the right data at the right time to deliver results that feel almost human. Bold claim? Perhaps. But the secret lies in a innovative approach called context engineering—a method that goes beyond traditional prompt engineering to create dynamic, context-rich environments where AI thrives. This isn't just a tweak; it's a paradigm shift that can make any AI system 100x more useful in your daily workflows. Rick Mulready explores how context engineering transforms AI from a tool that merely responds to commands into a proactive, personalized assistant. You'll discover how integrating dynamic data sources, APIs, and real-time feedback can elevate your AI's performance, whether it's crafting tailored customer emails, analyzing complex datasets, or automating tedious tasks. More than just a technical guide, this is your roadmap to unlocking the full potential of artificial intelligence—one that promises not just efficiency but genuine innovation. The possibilities are vast, and the key to unlocking them might be simpler than you think. Understanding Context Engineering What is Context Engineering? Context engineering involves creating workflows that provide AI systems with the right information at the right time. Unlike prompt engineering, which focuses on crafting specific instructions, context engineering integrates dynamic data sources, APIs, and knowledge bases into the AI's operational framework. This ensures that the AI can access and process relevant information, resulting in outputs that are more accurate, personalized, and actionable. For instance, consider an AI tasked with drafting customer emails. By integrating data from a CRM tool like HubSpot, the AI can access details about past interactions, customer preferences, and pain points. This dynamic approach enables the AI to produce tailored responses that go beyond generic templates, improving customer engagement and satisfaction. How Context Engineering Differs from Prompt Engineering While prompt engineering focuses on crafting precise instructions for an AI model, context engineering takes a broader and more holistic approach. It establishes an ecosystem where the AI operates, making sure that all necessary data and tools are readily available. Prompt engineering remains an essential component within this framework, as well-crafted prompts guide the AI within the context you establish. For example, if you're using an AI tool like MindPal to summarize reports, prompt engineering might involve asking the AI to 'summarize the key points of this document.' Context engineering, however, ensures the AI has access to related documents, historical data, and user preferences. This enables the AI to produce summaries that are not only concise but also nuanced and comprehensive, reflecting a deeper understanding of the task. How Context Engineering Transforms AI into Smarter Assistants Watch this video on YouTube. Learn more about Context Engineering with the help of our in-depth articles and helpful guides. Applications in Business Workflows Context engineering offers practical benefits across a wide range of business processes. By integrating AI with tools such as Google Sheets, Airtable, or N8N, you can automate workflows, enhance decision-making, and improve overall productivity. Here are some key applications: Customer Relationship Management (CRM): AI can analyze CRM data to craft personalized marketing campaigns, customer support responses, or sales strategies. AI can analyze CRM data to craft personalized marketing campaigns, customer support responses, or sales strategies. Data Analysis: By connecting to dynamic data sources like spreadsheets or databases, AI can provide real-time insights, trend analyses, and actionable recommendations. By connecting to dynamic data sources like spreadsheets or databases, AI can provide real-time insights, trend analyses, and actionable recommendations. Content Creation: AI tools can generate tailored content by accessing relevant knowledge bases, user feedback, and contextual data. For example, using you can create workflows where AI agents automatically update Google Docs with real-time data from Airtable or other sources. This streamlines collaboration, reduces manual effort, and ensures that team members always have access to the most up-to-date information. Balancing Context for Optimal Results Providing the right amount of context is critical for achieving optimal AI performance. Too much context can overwhelm the AI, increasing processing costs and leading to irrelevant or redundant outputs. Conversely, insufficient context results in generic and less effective responses. The REAL framework—Relevant, Efficient, Accessible, Logical—offers a practical guideline for striking the right balance: Relevant: Include only information directly related to the task at hand to avoid unnecessary complexity. Include only information directly related to the task at hand to avoid unnecessary complexity. Efficient: Ensure the context is concise and easy for the AI to process without overloading its capabilities. Ensure the context is concise and easy for the AI to process without overloading its capabilities. Accessible: Make data readily available through APIs, integrations, or structured workflows. Make data readily available through APIs, integrations, or structured workflows. Logical: Structure the context in a way that aligns with the AI's processing logic, making sure clarity and coherence. By adhering to these principles, you can ensure that your AI systems deliver precise, actionable, and meaningful results, regardless of the complexity of the task. Advanced Concepts in Context Engineering As workflows and business needs evolve, the context provided to AI systems must also adapt. This concept, known as context evolution, ensures that AI systems become smarter and more specific with each iteration. Learning systems play a pivotal role in this process, incorporating feedback to refine the context over time. For example, an AI feedback loop can analyze errors or inefficiencies in its outputs and adjust the context accordingly. This iterative process not only minimizes issues such as hallucinations or inaccuracies but also enhances the overall relevance and accuracy of the AI's outputs. Over time, this continuous refinement allows the AI to align more closely with your specific goals and requirements. Limitations of Context Engineering Despite its many advantages, context engineering is not without limitations. Issues such as hallucinations or factual inaccuracies can still occur, particularly if the underlying data is flawed or incomplete. Additionally, well-crafted prompts remain essential for guiding the AI within the context you provide. For instance, even with advanced tools like N8N or MindPal, ambiguous or poorly defined instructions can lead to misinterpretation. This highlights the importance of combining strong prompt engineering with robust context engineering to achieve reliable and effective results. A balanced approach ensures that the AI operates within a well-defined framework while maintaining the flexibility to adapt to dynamic inputs. Practical Tools for Context Engineering Several tools can help you implement context engineering effectively in your workflows. These include: Automates workflows by connecting AI systems to various apps and data sources, allowing seamless data integration. Automates workflows by connecting AI systems to various apps and data sources, allowing seamless data integration. MindPal: Enhances AI personalization by integrating dynamic knowledge bases and user-specific data. Enhances AI personalization by integrating dynamic knowledge bases and user-specific data. N8N: Assists workflow automation with customizable integrations, allowing for tailored solutions. Assists workflow automation with customizable integrations, allowing for tailored solutions. HubSpot: Provides CRM data for personalized customer interactions and marketing strategies. Provides CRM data for personalized customer interactions and marketing strategies. Airtable: Serves as a dynamic database for real-time AI updates and collaborative data management. Serves as a dynamic database for real-time AI updates and collaborative data management. Google Docs: Enables collaborative content creation with AI-generated inputs, streamlining team workflows. By using these tools, you can build a robust context engineering framework that enhances the capabilities of your AI systems, making sure they deliver high-quality, actionable outputs. Why Context Engineering Matters Incorporating context engineering into your AI workflows is essential for unlocking the full potential of artificial intelligence. By providing dynamic, relevant, and efficient context, you can improve the quality, personalization, and reliability of AI outputs. This approach not only enhances productivity but also gives your business a competitive edge in an increasingly AI-driven world. Whether you're automating routine tasks, analyzing complex data, or crafting personalized customer experiences, context engineering ensures that your AI tools deliver meaningful and impactful results. By adopting the right strategies and tools, you can transform your workflows and fully harness the power of artificial intelligence to drive innovation and success. Media Credit: Rick Mulready Filed Under: AI, Top News Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
The Independent
12 minutes ago
- The Independent
Beautician and dentist in 1.8m inheritance battle after both married same man in Las Vegas
A beautician and a dentist are locked in an inheritance battle over a dead accountant's £1.8m fortune after he married both of them in Las Vegas five years apart - but failed to get a divorce from his first bride. Wealthy accountant James Dinsdale died of cancer, aged 55, in October 2020, leaving a £1.8million estate to be fought over by the two women who called themselves his wives. After his death, his most recent partner, beautician Margaret Dinsdale, 41, began sorting out his affairs on the assumption that she would inherit his fortune as his next of kin. But she was left reeling when she discovered James was still legally married to his first wife when he whisked her off for a Las Vegas wedding in 2017 - making their marriage "void" and leaving her with no automatic right to inherit. Just five years earlier, James had married cosmetic dentist, Victoria Fowell, 53, at a Vegas wedding chapel on the same street and only 600 metres from where he wed Margaret, but never got round to divorcing her - making her James' heir alongside his adult son under intestacy laws. However, the two women are now locked in a High Court clash after Margaret launched a claim to a share of James' money on the basis she should be treated as a "spouse" because she married him in "good faith." In a short preliminary hearing, High Court judge Master James Brightwell heard accountant and Second World War history expert James Dinsdale built a thriving property development business, based around central London, before he died and left an estate now valued at around £1.8m. He wed Dr Victoria Fowell - a St Albans-based dentist with an expertise in 'cosmetic smile makeovers' - in 2012, but the pair never got divorced and he went on to marry Margaret Dinsdale in 2017. Margaret's barrister Jonathan Davey KC said his client and James had met in 2008 and become friends, before beginning a 'romantic relationship' in 2014, setting up home together the following year. However, she had no idea whatsoever that he was still married, only learning of it after his death. And because he had not made a will, James' money would be divided between Dr Fowell and his son, William Dinsdale, 28, under intestacy rules. 'Margaret believed that she was validly married to James Dinsdale and there is no evidence that she knew that the deceased was married to Dr Fowell as at 2017," he said. 'She understood the marriage between the deceased and Dr Fowell to have ended some time prior to the relationship between the deceased and the claimant beginning. "We have no idea what James' state of mind was, perhaps he didn't realise he wasn't divorced. "Margaret's assertion is that she believed the deceased to be unmarried and already divorced when she married him in good faith." Touching on their 2017 wedding in Las Vegas, he noted: 'The ceremony which took place between James and my client took place in almost the same location, and appears to have been of the same nature, as the earlier ceremony which took place between the deceased and Victoria Fowell in June 2012. 'The marriage ceremony between him and Dr Fowell took place in the Little White Wedding Chapel, Las Vegas Boulevard. The marriage ceremony between James and Margaret took place in the Chapel of the Flowers, Las Vegas Boulevard. 'But for the deceased's prior marriage to Dr Fowell, the latter ceremony would have been a valid marriage ceremony." The case reached court for a preliminary hearing after Margaret made a claim for "reasonable provision" from James' estate under the 1975 Inheritance Act, amounting to at least half of his £1.8m. The case is being brought against Dr Fowell and James' adult son William, who are currently due to share his fortune as his next of kin under intestacy rules. Mr Davey said Margaret had looked after James "24 hours per day" during his final struggles with terminal cancer and was his "primary carer." 'The evidence of his close friends is that James and Margaret had a loving relationship, and that he was very grateful for her care," he told the judge. He said the couple had been together for six years and planned to have children, with Margaret giving up work and becoming a housewife while he provided for her. "She and James had a relatively lavish lifestyle, which was funded by his wealth and she was entirely financially dependent on the deceased," he said. 'Dr Fowell and William Dinsdale were not being financially maintained by the deceased at the time of his death." There was no evidence of 'financial need' on the part of Dr Fowell, claimed Mr Davey, highlighting claims by Margaret that James once told her he had transferred to her a property and a £2million lump sum after their relationship ended. The court heard it is alleged that Margaret has already received £375,000 "from the estate or in sums derived from James," but Mr Davey said that is denied and that she has only received £20,000 from his pension. After a brief court hearing in which he was told it was "not disputed" that Margaret should be considered a "spouse" under the 1975 Act, Master Brightwell made a declaration to that effect for the purposes of her claim against the estate. He directed that there should now be a future hearing focusing on how James' estate should be divided up between his two wives and son. Under the Inheritance Act, payouts to those treated as a spouse or civil partner are higher than to unmarried partners of a deceased person. The judge also allocated cash-strapped Margaret £50,000 from the estate to help cover her bills and contribute towards hefty lawyers' bills as the case progresses - with the projected costs on her side estimated at around £175,000.
Daily Mail
13 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Putin and Trump to meet 'in the coming days', Kremlin aide confirms as Zelenskyy calls for face-to-face with Russian tyrant to end the war in Ukraine
Russian President Vladimir Putin and U.S. President Donald Trump will meet in the coming days, Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov confirmed on Thursday. 'At the suggestion of the American side, an agreement was essentially reached to hold a bilateral meeting at the highest level in the coming days, that is, a meeting between President Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump,' Ushakov said. 'We are now beginning concrete preparations together with our American colleagues,' he added in televised comments. He did not say where the summit would take place. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Thursday called for a face-to-face meeting with Putin to end war, after Donald Trump's special envoy held talks with the Russian leader in Moscow. The pair have only met once before - in 2019, to discuss an end to the fighting in Ukraine 's Donbas region. Agreements were made to disengage troops in some regions and set out a roadmap for elections and the reintegration of territory into Ukraine. But Russia and Ukraine disagreed on key issues, including the withdrawal of Russian-backed troops. Representatives met again in January 2022, a month before Putin launched a full-scale invasion. Trump one day earlier hailed talks between his envoy Steve Witkoff and Putin as 'highly productive' but US officials still vowed to impose sanctions on Moscow's trading partners. Zelensky said later that he had spoken by phone with Trump, who said he could meet with Putin 'very soon,' and that European leaders had been on the call. 'We in Ukraine have repeatedly said that finding real solutions can be truly effective at the level of leaders,' Zelensky wrote on social media. 'It is necessary to determine the timing for such a format and the range of issues to be addressed,' he added. The Ukrainian leader said Thursday morning that he had planned to hold 'several' conversations throughout the course of the day including with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, as well as French and Italian officials. 'There will also be communication at the level of national security advisors,' Zelensky added. 'The main thing is for Russia, which started this war, to take real steps to end its aggression,' Zelensky added. After more than three years of war, Ukrainians are increasingly eager for a settlement that ends the fight against Russia's invasion, according to a new Gallup poll published Thursday - although only about a quarter of Ukrainians surveyed expect the guns to fall silent within the next 12 months. The enthusiasm for a negotiated deal is a sharp reversal from 2022 - the year the war began - when Gallup found that about three-quarters of Ukrainians wanted to keep fighting until victory. Now only about one-quarter hold that view, with support for continuing the war declining steadily across all regions and demographic groups. The findings were based on samples of 1,000 or more respondents ages 15 and older living in Ukraine. Some territories under entrenched Russian control, representing about 10% of the population, were excluded from surveys conducted after 2022 due to lack of access. Since the start of the full-scale war, Russia's relentless pounding of urban areas behind the front line has killed more than 12,000 Ukrainian civilians, according to the United Nations. On the 1,000-kilometer (620-mile) front line snaking from northeast to southeast Ukraine, where tens of thousands of troops on both sides have died, Russia's bigger army is slowly capturing more land. The poll came out on the eve of U.S. President Donald Trump's Friday deadline for Russia to stop the killing or face heavy economic sanctions.
