"Transformative steps have been taken for food providers": Uttarakhand CM Dhami highlights farmer welfare schemes at Haridwar rally
Haridwar (Uttarakhand) [India], June 8 (ANI): Uttarakhand Chief Minister Pushkar Singh Dhami addressed farmers during a rally in Haridwar on Sunday, highlighting various welfare schemes aimed at boosting agricultural development.
'Today, numerous welfare schemes are being implemented for the benefit of farmers. Recognizing agriculture as the backbone of development, the Kisan Credit Card limit has been raised to Rs 5 lakh,' CM Dhami said.
During the rally, he also emphasized the government's commitment to the progress of the farmers.
'For 60 years, no significant decisions were made for farmers, but since Prime Minister Narendra Modi took charge, transformative steps have been taken for our food providers. Through the Farm Machinery Bank Scheme, up to 80 percent subsidy is being provided, and Rs 200 crore has been allocated for polyhouse construction,' he further said.
Criticizing previous governments, he said, 'Earlier, a rupee sent from Delhi would shrink to 15 paise by the time it reached the ground. Today, not a single paisa is lost to commission.'
On the Uniform Civil Code (UCC), CM Dhami clarified, 'UCC is not against any religion or sect; it is a constitutional step to ensure equality among citizens by eliminating social evils. A party that ruled for six decades prioritized its vote bank, but UCC is already in place in major Muslim countries worldwide.'
Praising Prime Minister Narendra Modi's leadership and efforts in maintaining Sikhs legacy, the Chief Minister added, 'The Prime Minister has made the entire world aware of the history of Sahibzadas of Guru Gobind Singh Ji. The country is moving ahead under the leadership of the respected Prime Minister. Work is being done to fulfil many demands of the Sikh community'.
During the event, CM Dhami drove a tractor in a roadshow in Libberheri, Haridwar, engaging directly with the farming community. Adding a unique touch to the rally, flowers were showered on farmers from a helicopter, appreciating their contributions.
He also participated in the 'Hind Di Chadar' drama staging program at Doon Medical College Auditorium, Dehradun, under the joint aegis of Uttarakhand Sikh Coordination Committee and Shri Guru Teg Bahadur Charitable Hospital. (ANI)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
24 minutes ago
- Time of India
Karnataka's new IT policy to be finalised around July: Priyank Kharge
Live Events Karnataka's new information technology policy may be finalised around July, state IT minister Priyank Kharge told will succeed the 2020-2025 policy, which focused on IT-enabled services and is due to expire this State IT Vision Group comprising IT companies, chambers of commerce and think tanks is working on the new policy, which, once completed at the secretariat level, will reach the ministerial level.'The policy is currently a draft. The old policy will lapse this year. We're hopeful that the drafting of the new policy will happen before the CEO meet in July that we traditionally hold once a year. It is going through the IT Vision Group and larger consultations. Once it is finished at the secretariat level, it will come to me,' Kharge told last consultation on the matter was held among IT secretary Ekroop Caur, industry body Nasscom and others on May 23. They discussed strategies to reskill Karnataka's digital workforce, emphasised extending IT infrastructure beyond Bengaluru into tier-2 and tier-3 cities, and reviewed regulatory reforms to enhance ease of doing business in the state.'The IT policy will focus on creating new economic accelerators beyond Bengaluru. Infrastructure is a problem with any growing city and that was quite naturally raised by stakeholders,' the minister further said, 'The IT policy that had come out then (2020-2025) was with respect to IT-enabled services. Now it is going to be a light-house policy that leads to other policies. Once the feedback comes in, the budgetary outlay will be allocated. There are IT companies and think tanks that we consult.'Since technology has seeped into various sectors, the state has new policies on cybersecurity, engineering and research and development, global capability centres and data budget proposed setting up a Centre for Applied AI for Tech Solutions with an investment of Rs 50 crore over five years. A Rs 300 crore Fund-of-Funds has been established to support startups, along with a Rs 100 crore corpus for deep tech government is also expanding its startup ecosystem beyond Bengaluru, encouraging growth in Mysuru, Mangaluru, Hubbali-Dharwad and which was part of the consultation, said in a blog that the main points of discussion were identifying policy interventions to unlock emerging technologies' potential, strategies to reskill and future-proof Karnataka's digital workforce, extending IT infrastructure beyond Bengaluru and reviewing regulatory reforms to enhance ease of doing business in the was also a discussion at this meeting on the need for more structured and effective awareness of state's initiatives including the policy measures so that all sections of the IT industry, particularly SMEs can fully leverage the policies.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
SC dropped probe on Allahabad HC judge Shekhar Kumar Yadav after Rajya Sabha alert
The Supreme Court was preparing to initiate an in-house inquiry into Allahabad high court judge Shekhar Kumar Yadav's controversial speech at a VHP event last year, but dropped the plan after receiving a categorical letter from the Rajya Sabha secretariat that asserted exclusive jurisdiction over the matter, people aware of the matter said. The people cited above confirmed that then Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sanjiv Khanna had set the process in motion to assess whether the judge's conduct warranted scrutiny in the wake of an adverse report from the Allahabad High Court chief justice. However, the move was halted after the Rajya Sabha secretariat's letter in March underlined that the constitutional mandate for any such proceeding lies solely with the chairman of the Rajya Sabha, and ultimately with Parliament and the President. This letter effectively stalled the judiciary's plan to initiate an in-house inquiry – an internal mechanism laid down through judicial precedents to examine complaints of misconduct against sitting judges of the superior judiciary, against Justice Yadav, whose comments at the VHP's December 8, 2024, event in Prayagraj drew widespread condemnation for violating the principles of secularism and judicial impartiality. HT reached out to the Rajya secretariat for a response on the next course of action but did not get one immediately. In February, Rajya Sabha chairman and vice president Jagdeep Dhankhar said that only Parliament and President have the jurisdiction over the matter 'The jurisdiction for the stated subject matter constitutionally lies in exclusivity with the chairman Rajya Sabha and in an eventuality with the Parliament and honourable President. Taking note of public domain information and inputs available, it is expedient that the Secretary General, Rajya Sabha shares this information with the Secretary General, Supreme Court of India,' he said in Parliament on February 13. Justice Yadav, addressing a gathering organised by the legal cell of the VHP within the Allahabad High Court Bar Association premises, made a series of incendiary statements that targeted the Muslim community and invoked majoritarian themes. In his speech, he reportedly asserted that 'India should function according to the wishes of the majority,' claimed 'only a Hindu can make this country a 'Vishwa Guru',' and linked practices such as triple talaq and halala to societal backwardness, calling for their abolition under the proposed Uniform Civil Code (UCC). Video clips of the speech, which went viral on social media, show him allegedly using derogatory communal remarks framed the UCC as a Hindu-Muslim binary, stating that while Hindu customs had evolved to address historical wrongs, Muslims had resisted reform. The speech triggered outrage among political leaders, jurists and civil society, with senior advocate Kapil Sibal leading a group of 55 opposition MPs in filing a notice in the Rajya Sabha seeking Justice Yadav's impeachment for 'grave violation of judicial ethics.' The Campaign for Judicial Accountability and Reforms (CJAR) also demanded an in-house inquiry and his immediate suspension, citing a clear breach of the Restatement of Values of Judicial Life adopted by the Supreme Court in 1997. Amid mounting criticism, the Supreme Court swiftly sought a report from the Allahabad High Court chief justice on December 10, 2024. A week later, on December 17, the apex court collegium, comprising CJI Khanna and Justices Bhushan R Gavai, Surya Kant, Hrishikesh Roy and Abhay S Oka, summoned Justice Yadav for a 30-minute closed-door meeting to ascertain whether his public comments violated the Bangalore Principles of Judicial Conduct or judicial ethics outlined in internal codes. While Justice Yadav reportedly assured the collegium judges he would apologise publicly, he failed to do so in the weeks that followed. Instead, in a January 2025 letter to the chief justice of the Allahabad High Court, the judge doubled down on his remarks, claiming they had been misrepresented by vested interests and asserting that his speech reflected societal concerns 'consistent with constitutional values.' Appointed in 2019, Justice Yadav is set to retire on April 15, 2026. People cited above said that CJI Khanna subsequently sought a fresh report from the Allahabad High Court chief justice, referring to additional complaints against Justice Yadav from a law student and a retired IPS officer. But by then, an unexpected development complicated matters. In March 2025, the Supreme Court administration received a formal communication from the Rajya Sabha secretariat, informing it that the matter of Justice Yadav's conduct, arising out of the December 13 impeachment motion signed by 55 MPs, was already under active consideration. 'The court's secretary general brought the letter to the notice of the then CJI, who was clear that an in-house inquiry, being a non-statutory and internal mechanism, should not run parallel to a statutory process under the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968,' a person familiar with the matter told HT. 'The Rajya Sabha's categorical assertion that it was seized of the matter prompted the judiciary to defer to the parliamentary process,' this person added. The Judges (Inquiry) Act mandates that a motion seeking removal of a High Court or Supreme Court judge for 'proved misbehaviour or incapacity' must be admitted by the presiding officer of the House concerned. To be sure, the Vice President and Rajya Sabha chairman, Jagdeep Dhankhar, has yet to decide on the admissibility of the motion and whether to constitute a formal inquiry committee. 'The idea was not to create constitutional friction or undermine parliamentary privilege…That's the sole reason why no in-house probe was set up despite the initial steps,' the person cited above added. Another person aware of the deliberations within the collegium said that all members were informed of the decision to halt the in-house inquiry after the receipt of the Rajya Sabha's letter. 'There was a kind of consensus that the matter, being under legislative scrutiny, should not be clouded by a simultaneous judicial process,' the person said. Opposition lawmakers, meanwhile, continue to push for clarity on the status of the impeachment motion. Speaking to HT on condition of anonymity, a senior MP said last month that his party planned to raise the matter during the monsoon session. 'During the budget session, the chairman had said that he was assessing the veracity of the signatures on the notice. We would like to know the status of that notice notices have been given in both the Houses and it is imperative it should be taken up,' the lawmaker said. In his formal reply to the complaints, Justice Yadav reportedly maintained in January that he has done no wrong. He described his speech as an articulation of issues affecting society and claimed that his references were misconstrued. On the criticism of his previous judicial orders related to cow protection, he is said to have responded that these reflected India's cultural ethos and legal recognition of cow protection, not any form of judicial bias. Notably, Justice Yadav did not tender an apology in his correspondence, reinforcing his stance that his speech was neither communal nor violative of judicial conduct. He rather asserted that judges, who often face unfair attacks, deserve protection and support from senior members of the judiciary.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
HC orders restoration ofpower at SP MP's house
Prayagraj: The Allahabad High Court has directed to restore the electricity connection at the residence of Samajwadi Party MP of Sambhal Zia Ur Rehman Barq which was disconnected in Dec 2024. Passing above directions to Paschimanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, the court also stayed the final assessment order imposing on him electricity charges of Rs. 1.91 crores for a period of 4,138 days upon the allegation of unauthorised use of electricity. Hearing a writ petition filed by Zia Ur Rehman, a division bench, comprising Justice Saumitra Dayal Singh and Justice Sandeep Jain fixed July 2 for the next hearing of the case. Barq had moved the HC against the assessment order on the ground that the same was passed entirely without jurisdiction as it imposed an assessment for over 12 years, when Section 126(5) of the Electricity Act only allowed imposition of charges for a maximum of 12 months in cases where the period of unauthorized usage was non-determinable. It was also contended that the final assessment order also demanded payment of electricity duty and compounding charges, which the authority had no jurisdiction to impose. Apart from above, it was also argued that by breaching the statutory period of assessment, an arbitrary demand of Rs 1.91 crore had been raised and that the petitioner cannot be made to deposit 50% of such illegal demand to maintain an appeal. Fixing July, 2, 2025, for next hearing, the court in its order dated June 4 stayed the final assessment subject to the petitioner depositing Rs 6 lakh within two weeks. It also directed the restoration of the electricity connection of the petitioner, subject to the timely payment of future bills. As per the statement of executive engineer, UPPCL in Sambhal, two meters at Barq's residence were found showing zero readings for the last six months and the units consumed did not exceed 100 in any of the remaining months last year. However, during the inspection, it was allegedly found that electricity consumption in his house exceeded 16 kilowatts daily, despite the sanctioned connection being only 4 kilowatts.
