'Hardline' BMA blocks emergency pleas for strike doctors to work
However, NHS England accused the doctors' union of putting safety at risk, criticising a "remote BMA panel" for "second-guessing" doctors on the ground who were trying to look after patients.A central committee of senior BMA doctors makes decisions on each derogation request.NHS England said it was particularly worried about a number of requests relating to cancer care being turned down.And it said the BMA was sitting on some requests for hours, with some rejected because hospitals would not pay striking doctors premium rates to come back in.Before this strike started, the BMA had only agreed to five derogations during the whole dispute.
'Rigorous'
Among the requests agreed was a doctor to work at Nottingham City Hospital's neonatal intensive care unit over the weekend.Three BMA members were also brought in to work a night shift at the Northern General in Sheffield.But the BMA rejected a request by Milton Keynes Hospital for a doctor to carry out prostate cancer checks. In that case the BBC understands a doctor did return to work under their own volition.A BMA spokesman added: "It remains our position that this agreement will be available for the NHS to rely upon should a safety-critical, urgent event occur."That process is there day and night throughout industrial action, and we remain ready to respond to any emergency requests."However, we need to be clear that the purpose of this agreement is not to facilitate the continued delivery of non-urgent care at the same time as senior doctors are covering for residents taking industrial action, as trusts simply do not have enough senior doctors to do that safely."NHS England sources said it was particularly disappointed with the rejections as the national organisation was now vetting every request from hospitals to ensure a consistency in approach between different places.Every request, they said, was based on "rigorous assessment"."We absolutely recognise the legal right for people to strike, but we also recognise that it's essential to maintain as many services for patients as possible," they added.The five-day strike by resident doctors is due to run until 07:00 on Wednesday morning.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ITV News
40 minutes ago
- ITV News
Coroner's concerns over ambulance service after girl's drug overdose at Dreamland in Kent
A coroner has highlighted concerns over a private ambulance provider's staff training and vehicle equipment after a 17-year-old girl died from a drug overdose at a drum and bass event in Kent. Emily Stokes died in hospital after attending the Worried About Henry day festival at Dreamland amusement park in Margate on 29 June last year. An inquest found Emily died from MDMA toxicity. 21 other teenagers were also taken to hospital with drug-related symptoms following the gig. A report has been published following the inquest which called on Kent Central Ambulance Service to take action to prevent future deaths. According to the report, Emily's friends said she had possibly taken MDMA not long before she entered the festival, but she was also seen taking a tablet shortly after getting there. She was taken to a medical tent at the event at around 3.20pm and left the site in an ambulance an hour later with a high temperature and heart rate and in a state of distress and confusion. The teenager arrived at Queen Elizabeth The Queen Mother Hospital around five minutes later where she suffered a cardiac arrest and was pronounced dead shortly after 6pm. Catherine Wood, assistant coroner for north-east Kent, said training of the Kent Central Ambulance Service staff involved was 'minimal' and that they had 'little experience or training in relation to management of patients having taken drugs'. 'Given that the teams on site were present and ambulances available at a music event where the risk of drug taking was deemed to be high, more training should have been provided to assist the staff in how to safely manage those under the influence of illicit substances,' the coroner added. Ms Wood also raised concerns that the ambulance was not as equipped as an NHS vehicle would be. 'The ambulance did not have the same equipment which an NHS ambulance would have on board and was in essence very little more than a means of transport from the venue to the hospital and may have given a false sense of reassurance,' she said. The coroner further criticised the fact that the hospital was not called ahead of the crew arriving there with Emily. 'There was a lack of clarity regarding who had responsibility for making a pre-alert call to the hospital and given this young girl was significantly unwell this should have been done,' she said. 'This, in part, may have been due to the lack of recognition of the seriousness of her symptoms and, therefore, potentially linked with training of staff.' Responding to the coroner's concerns, Kent Central Ambulance Service said in its own report: 'The findings of the coroner have been taken with the utmost seriousness. 'As a healthcare provider, Kent Central Ambulance Service is committed to continuous learning, service improvement and ensuring the highest standards of patient safety, comfort and care.' The company said it recognises staff at an event such as the Worried About Henry day festival 'where there was an increased likelihood of young persons in attendance coupled with the potential for illicit substance use' required a 'higher level of specific and scenario-based training'. Crews sent to cover such events will now receive training covering recognition of drug and alcohol intoxication, clinical red flags, signs of deterioration and communication and escalation protocols. The service said on-site paramedics directed on the day of the incident that a pre-alert call to the hospital was not needed but that its internal protocols have now been clarified to say 'crews are now explicitly empowered to pre alert independently if in doubt'. Of the equipment available in its vehicles, the private ambulance provider said it has implemented a 'pre-event vehicle checklist' and that a 'clinical inventory standard is being developed and benchmarked against NHS specifications to ensure parity wherever possible'.
Daily Mail
40 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Pharmacist issues urgent warning to UK holidaymakers travelling with weight-loss injections
With millions of Brits on weight-loss injections, those taking them have been urged to consider how they will travel with the medication this summer. A trip to a tropical island or a European city break, whatever the destination, there's often lots to plan for. Pharmacist Jason Murphy has warned travellers on weight-loss jabs against storing them in the hotel fridge. He explained how such appliance is not 'medically safe'. The expert advised: 'If you're staying in a hotel, the mini bars in rooms are often more mildly cool than medically safe. 'And you don't want your jab snuggling up next to someone else's sparkling rosé. Instead, contact the hotel in advance and ask to store your medication in a staff fridge.' Murphy recommends travellers not to 'just toss it in your suitcase and hope for the best'. Instead, he encourages people to think about intricacies such as the temperature it needs to be kept at and customs rules. Pharmacist Jason Murphy has warned travellers on weight-loss jabs against storing them in the hotel fridge Murphy said: 'Travelling with weight-loss medication isn't out of the question, but it does require some forward planning. 'You can't just toss it in your suitcase and hope for the best. Between time zone changes, storage issues, and customs restrictions, it's more of a 'carry-on mission' than most people realise.' He explained how weight-loss injections need to be kept in a refrigerator, but that some can be stored at room temperature for a limited time. 'These medications are designed to be kept refrigerated between 2°C and 8°C before use, but both Wegovy and Mounjaro can be stored at room temperature – below 30°C – for a limited period,' Murphy said. 'That gives patients more flexibility when travelling, but it's still important to keep pens out of direct sunlight and away from excessive heat. 'I always advise using a medical-grade travel cool bag with ice packs, especially if you're flying to a hot destination.' The pharmacist also advised against packing medication in hold luggage in case it was lost, as well as the added complication of the lack of temperature control. 'Never pack injections in checked baggage. 'Luggage holds aren't temperature-controlled, and there's a risk of delays or loss,' he explained. Murphy continued: 'Carry your medication in your hand luggage, in its original packaging, along with a copy of your prescription or a signed letter from your prescriber or pharmacist - something we provide routinely for patients.' Travellers carrying medication also need to be aware of customs rules and what is allowed to enter certain destinations. The pharmacist said: 'Some countries (such as, Japan, UAE, and Singapore) are strict about what medication crosses their border. 'In some cases, your jab may be considered a controlled substance, so you should always check embassy rules before you fly to save you a heap of holiday hassle.' He also explained how people may experience 'jet-lagged jabs' when the local time varies with the medication schedule the traveller may usually follow at home. Murphy said: 'If you're hopping multiple time zones, your injection routine may need a refresh. 'Weight-loss injections are typically once weekly, but timing still matters.' He advised using techniques such as setting an alarm in line to ensure the medication is taken in line with the typical routine. The pharmacist added: 'I'd always suggest setting an alarm for your injection based on your original UK schedule, then gradually shift it to local time over a few days. 'You'll feel more in sync and avoid what we call "jet-lagged jabs".'
The Guardian
42 minutes ago
- The Guardian
The right wants to kill off the NHS. Striking doctors are playing into their hands
There were no pickets when I set out at the weekend to talk to striking doctors. Not even at St Thomas' hospital, a prime site opposite the Houses of Parliament, or at Guy's at London Bridge. 'It's a bit sparse,' said the duty officer from the British Medical Association, the doctors' union. The British Medical Journal (owned by the BMA but with editorial freedom) ran the headline: 'Striking resident doctors face heckling and support on picket line, amid mixed public response.' Public support has fallen, with 52% of people 'somewhat' or 'strongly' opposing the strikes and only 34% backing them. Alastair McLellan, the editor of the Health Service Journal, after ringing around hospitals told me fewer doctors were striking than last time, which isn't surprising given that only 55% voted in the BMA ballot. Managers told him these strikes were less disruptive than the last ones. But even a weaker strike harms patients and pains a government relying on falling waiting lists. 'When you're operating on the margins, it takes very little disruption to send waiting lists up again,' McLellan said. Strikes are costly, since consultants have to be paid to fill shifts, which is typically more expensive. One hospital manager asked me wryly: 'Have you tried paying for an out-of-hours emergency plumber or electrician?' This time Jim Mackey, the head of NHS England, is playing it tough. He told medical directors on Monday to warn doctors that anyone striking on one of their 12 compulsory training days would forfeit their qualification – and not to let strikers take up locum shifts on non-strike days to make up for the money they've lost. No more Mr Nice Guy. Everyone employed by the NHS will get an above-inflation pay rise this year, which is less than the 5.4% (comprising a 4% rise and a consolidated £750 payment) that resident doctors will receive. Nurses and ambulance crews have just voted overwhelmingly against a pay award of 3.6%. That was only a consultative ballot, leaving plenty of time for negotiations that might avoid holding a full strike ballot. Consultants are now balloting too. These looming demands make it vanishingly unlikely that Wes Streeting will give even more money to striking resident doctors, who have already received the top NHS offer. Mackey plays the hard man, but Streeting's emollience is over. He seems indignant and offended by the BMA. His first act as health secretary was to end the resident doctors' 44 days of strikes between March 2023 and July 2024 with a generous 22% pay rise, even while the rightwing press accused him of bowing to 'union paymasters'. Making peace was his welcome political signal that the party of the NHS was setting about repairing Tory damage. There was hope for goodwill and patience from healthcare workers. So the BMA coming back for more within a year was a shock, and a slap in the face for Streeting. The BMA is kicking a government that had been well-disposed towards it. With Tory and Liberal Democrat peers attempting to block the government's radical employment rights bill, Labour's enemies will relish this timely assistance from the strike. A piece on CapX, a comment site owned and produced by the Centre for Policy Studies, called the striking doctors 'Scargills in white coats' with 'blood on their hands', which is of course the literal truth, given what they do at work (Tom Dolphin, the new BMA chair, is a consultant anaesthetist who works in trauma surgery; his job involves 'a fair amount of stabbings, occasional shootings, assaults [and] falls from height'). Keir Starmer has warned that the strikes 'play into the hands' of those who do not want the NHS to 'succeed in its current form'. Vultures are circling: Nigel Farage talks of private insurance; the International Monetary Fund, in its great unwisdom, recently suggested the better-off should pay for NHS services; while the piece on CapX echoed the right's glee at the strike: 'The problem here isn't just that the BMA is populated by socialist thugs, it's that the NHS is a socialist system.' The NHS is ever ready to rescue us all, regardless of status – that is why doctors and nurses top public respect charts, and why they have much to lose as the public turns against them. 'When the BMA asks, 'What's the difference between a Labour government and a Conservative government?', I would say a 28.9% pay rise and a willingness to work together to improve the working conditions and lives of doctors,' Streeting said in vain last week. In a timely contrast, Kemi Badenoch has declared that the Tories would ban doctors' strikes, putting them under the same restrictions that apply to police officers and soldiers. Both sides in this strike are obdurate. 'This could be a marathon. We could be doing this until Christmas or maybe beyond,' the deputy chief executive of NHS England has glumly warned. Streeting says the negotiation door is always open, but the BMA says there's no point without cash on the table. Bad blood between them springs from the negotiations: talks were going well until the BMA resident doctors' committee told its co-chairs that it could not approve the government's deal because it did not address the BMA's demand that resident doctors receive a 29% pay rise over the next few years. Yet Streeting's offer tackled serious grievances: years of bad planning left 20,000 resident doctors without specialist training places, stuck in a bottleneck that he promised to resolve. The BMA damaged people's sympathy for the doctors by absurdly comparing their pay to that of a coffee barista. Resident doctors can expect to be on a steep annual trajectory, averaging £43,400 in year one and £51,600 in year two; as new consultants they will get £105,000, while GP partners earn as much as £160,000. The word in the corridors is that the BMA is losing support across the NHS and among its own members, Nick Hulme, the CEO of the East Suffolk and North Essex NHS foundation trust, told me. He said some of his consultants had this week resigned from the BMA. So has the fertility pioneer Robert Winston. History may reassure the BMA that the public will always trust doctors over politicians. This time, the public backs those trying to cut waiting lists more than the strikers who are adding to them. Polly Toynbee is a Guardian columnist
