logo
Hegseth's high-profile staff departures: a timeline

Hegseth's high-profile staff departures: a timeline

The Hill21 hours ago
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's tenure has seen a series of high-profile staff departures, leaving the Pentagon head without a chief of staff and other key advisers.
Hegseth's inner circle saw another shakeup on Saturday with the departure of senior adviser Justin Fulcher. Fulcher said in a statement to NewsNation Saturday that he had only planned to work six months in government.
The exit came three months after four top officials departed in quick succession amid infighting and an investigation into leaks. Hegseth's chief of staff was moved elsewhere within the Pentagon days later.
Here are the top advisers to Hegseth who have left so far.
April 15
Dan Caldwell, one of Hegseth's senior advisers, was escorted out of the Pentagon on April 15 and put on administrative leave amid a probe into information leaks at the department.
Darin Selnick, the department's deputy chief of staff, was suspended the same day, and Colin Caroll, the chief of staff to Deputy Defense Secretary Stephen Feinberg, was also placed on leave the next day.
All three were fired on April 18. after being placed on administrative leave earlier that week. Caldwell, a senior adviser to Hegseth, and Selnick, the department's chief of staff, had been out of the building over a leak probe.
The leaks under investigation included a visit by Elon Musk to the Pentagon and military operational plans in Panama, Politico reported at the time.
The three ousted officials later said in a joint statement that they were 'incredibly disappointed' in the way they had been forced out of the Pentagon.
'At this time, we still have not been told what exactly we were investigated for, if there is still an active investigation, or if there was even a real investigation of 'leaks' to begin with,' they wrote. They said they had been subject to 'baseless attacks' by anonymous Pentagon officials.
April 17
Following the suspensions of Caldwell, Selnick and Carroll, John Ullyot, a press assistant to Hegseth, said on April 17 that he had been asked to resign.
Ullyot characterized the situation at the Pentagon as a 'full-blown meltdown' in an opinion piece for Politico and contested claims that the three men had been ousted for leaking information.
'In the aftermath, Defense Department officials working for Hegseth tried to smear the aides anonymously to reporters, claiming they were fired for leaking sensitive information as part of an investigation ordered earlier this month,' he wrote.
Ullyot said at the time it was 'hard to see' Hegseth remaining in his position long-term after repeated scandals.
The Atlantic reported that the secretary had shared secret plans to strike Houthi rebels in Yemen in a Signal chat that included the magazine's editor-in-chief. Then, reports emerged that Elon Musk had been invited to a top-secret Pentagon briefing on China, which was later canceled. Reports also circulated of Hegseth inviting his wife to sensitive briefings.
President Trump has continued to back Hegseth, saying in late April that he thought the defense secretary would 'get it together.'
April 22
Hegseth said in an April 22 interview that Joe Kasper, his chief of staff, would move to a different role. News of the shift was first reported by Politico on April 18, the same day that Caldwell, Selnick and Carroll were fired.
At the time, a senior U.S. defense official told The Hill that Kasper would stay at the Department of Defense as a special government employee, a position that lasts a maximum of 130 days. Kasper would handle 'special projects,' the official said.
In March, Kasper had reportedly kick-started the probe into leaks of classified and sensitive information.
Politico reported on April 22 that Kasper was seen as playing a key role in pushing out Caldwell, Selnick and Carroll. Kasper said in an interview with the outlet that he had been following Hegseth's directive to investigate leaks.
July 19
Fulcher, who announced his departure from the Pentagon on Saturday, was appointed in late April as part of a wave of new aides.
He was later promoted to senior advisor to Hegseth, and in April was named to a new Pentagon leadership team.
Fulcher had previously worked for the Department of Government Efficiency on defense matters. A March Forbes article raised questions about his business credentials, with one business partner claiming Fulcher owed him hundreds of thousands of dollars.
Fulcher said Saturday that he had completed six months of government work 'as planned.'
The Washington Post reported Saturday that Fulcher's desk had been relocated from outside Hegseth's office to further down the hall. The Pentagon has cast his departure as amicable.
'The Department of Defense is grateful to Justin Fulcher for his work on behalf of President Trump and Secretary Hegseth. We wish him well in his future endeavors,' Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell told NewsNation, the Hill's sister network.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump news at a glance: immigration agents to ‘flood' US sanctuary cities as marines withdraw from LA
Trump news at a glance: immigration agents to ‘flood' US sanctuary cities as marines withdraw from LA

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Trump news at a glance: immigration agents to ‘flood' US sanctuary cities as marines withdraw from LA

The Trump administration is targeting US sanctuary cities in the next phase of its deportation drive, after an off-duty law enforcement officer was allegedly shot in New York City by an undocumented person with a criminal record. Tom Homan, Donald Trump's hardline border tsar, vowed to 'flood the zone' with Immigration, Customs and Enforcement (Ice) agents, saying: 'Every sanctuary city is unsafe. Sanctuary cities are sanctuaries for criminals and President Trump's not going to tolerate it.' In Los Angeles, meanwhile, 700 active-duty US marines was being withdrawn, the Pentagon confirmed, more than a month after Trump deployed them to the city against the objections of local leaders. Here's more on these and the day's other key Trump administration stories at a glance. Trump's border tsar to target US sanctuary cities Tom Homan has vowed to 'flood the zone' of sanctuary cities with Immigration, Customs and Enforcement (Ice) agents in an all-out bid to overcome the lack of cooperation he said the government faced from Democrat-run municipalities in its quest to arrest and detain undocumented people. The pledge from Donald Trump's hardline border tsar followed the arrest of two undocumented men from the Dominican Republic after an off-duty Customs and Border Protection officer suffered gunshot wounds in an apparent robbery attempt in New York City on Saturday night. Read the full story 700 active-duty marines withdrawn from LA The Pentagon confirmed to the Guardian on Monday that the full deployment of 700 active-duty US marines was being withdrawn from Los Angeles more than a month after Donald Trump deployed them to the city in a move state and city officials called unnecessary and provocative. Read the full story Trump tax bill to add $3.4tn to US debt over next decade The president's signature tax and spending bill will add $3.4tn to the national debt over the next decade, according to new analysis from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office released on Monday. Major cuts to Medicaid and the national food stamps program are estimated to save the country $1.1tn – only a chunk of the $4.5tn in lost revenue that will come from the bill's tax cuts. Read the full story Legal group asks DoJ to look into 'illegal DEI practices' at Johns Hopkins A legal group founded by Trump adviser Stephen Miller has requested the justice department investigate 'illegal DEI practices' at the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine. In a letter to the justice department's civil rights division, America First Legal asked an assistant attorney general to investigate and issue enforcement actions against the prestigious medical university for embracing 'a discriminatory DEI regime as a core institutional mandate'. Read the full story Hundreds of Nasa workers rebuke 'arbitrary' Trump cuts Almost 300 current and former US Nasa employees – including at least four astronauts – have issued a scathing dissent opposing the Trump administration's sweeping and indiscriminate cuts to the agency, which they say threaten safety, innovation and national security. Read the full story Trump officials release FBI records on MLK Jr The Trump administration has released records of the FBI's surveillance of Martin Luther King Jr, despite opposition from the slain Nobel laureate's family and the civil rights group that he led until his 1968 assassination. Read the full story Epstein accuser urged FBI to investigate Trump decades ago – report An artist who first accused Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell of sexual assault almost three decades ago has told the New York Times that she had urged law enforcement officials back then to investigate powerful people in their orbit – including Donald Trump. The artist, Maria Farmer, was among the first women to report Epstein and his partner Maxwell of sexual crimes in 1996 when, according to the new interview with the Times, she also identified Trump among others close to Epstein as worthy of attention. Read the full story Harvard argues Trump's $2.6bn cuts are illegal Harvard University appeared in federal court on Monday to make the case that the Trump administration illegally cut $2.6bn from the college – a major test of the administration's efforts to reshape higher education institutions by threatening their financial viability. Read the full story What else happened today: Michael Bloomberg is calling on Senate Republicans to oust Robert F Kennedy Jr from his post as Trump's health secretary. The US Federal Reserve is pushing back against claims from the White House that it is undergoing extravagant renovations with a video tour showing the central bank's ongoing construction. Hunter Biden gave a profanity-laced interview during which he attacked George Clooney, denied owning the cocaine found in the White House and spoke about his father's last efforts in the 2024 race before dropping out. Catching up? Here's what happened on .

Musk's xAI was a late addition to the Pentagon's set of $200 million AI contracts, former Defense employee says
Musk's xAI was a late addition to the Pentagon's set of $200 million AI contracts, former Defense employee says

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Musk's xAI was a late addition to the Pentagon's set of $200 million AI contracts, former Defense employee says

The Pentagon last week announced multimillion-dollar contracts with four artificial intelligence companies intended to 'address critical national security challenges,' including Anthropic, Google and OpenAI. But the fourth raised questions among artificial intelligence experts: Elon Musk's xAI. Now, a former Pentagon employee who worked on the early stages of the AI initiative told NBC News that including xAI was a late-in-the-game addition under the Trump administration. The contracts had been in the works for months, with planning dating to the Biden administration. 'There had not been a single discussion with anyone from X or xAI, up until the time I left,' said Glenn Parham, who took a government buyout in March. 'It kind of came out of nowhere.' Parham was a generative artificial intelligence technical lead at the Pentagon's Chief Digital and Artificial Intelligence Office and helped negotiate deals and integrate AI into Defense Department initiatives. Up until his departure, he said, planning for the contracts hadn't included xAI. Each awarded contract has a floor of $2 million and a ceiling of $200 million, with the amount of the payout depending on how each partnership goes. (The OpenAI contract was initially announced last month.) Days before the announcement, Grok, xAI's chatbot, had gone on an antisemitic tirade that the company struggled to control. The company was also launching controversial animated AI 'companions' that can be sexually suggestive and violent. Musk said he merged X and xAI in March. In short, xAI didn't have the kind of reputation or track record that typically leads to lucrative government contracts, even as Musk had a long history of working with the government. Critics wondered whether xAI's models were reliable enough for government work. Last Tuesday, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., called the contract 'wrong' and 'dangerous' on the Senate floor, bringing up Grok's antisemitic incident, in which it called itself 'MechaHitler.' He insisted that 'the Trump administration must explain how this happened, the parameters of the deal and why they think our national security isn't worth meeting a higher standard.' Parham said the program, which is billed as a partnership between the Defense Department and the U.S. tech companies that are on the frontier of artificial intelligence development, originally focused on more established AI firms, including OpenAI and Anthropic, which, in addition to being older than xAI, also have long-term deals with major cloud computing firms and established relationships with the military. It's not clear what prompted Pentagon officials to add xAI to the mix of contractors since March. The department's Chief Digital and Artificial Intelligence Office, which announced the contracts, didn't answer written questions about why it chose xAI, but the Pentagon said in a statement that the antisemitism episode wasn't enough to disqualify it. 'Several frontier AI models have produced questionable outputs over the course of their ongoing development and the Department will manage risks associated with this emerging technology area throughout the prototype process,' the Defense Department told NBC News in a statement Friday. 'These risks did not warrant excluding use of these capabilities as part of DoD's prototyping efforts,' it said. The department said 'frontier AI models,' by their nature, are at the cutting edge and so offer both opportunity and risk. xAI didn't respond to requests for comment Friday and Monday. Including xAI adds a wrinkle to Musk's complicated relationship with the federal government. Even before Musk's time as a White House adviser this year to President Donald Trump, his business empire already had deep ties inside the government, including contracts for Musk's rocket company, SpaceX. Musk and Trump are now locked in an on-again, off-again feud, and Musk has vowed to launch a third political party focused on reducing the federal debt. He repeated the vow as recently as July 6, though he doesn't appear to have taken concrete public steps to set it up. Trump has threatened Musk's government contracts during the dispute. Some experts said they could see why the Defense Department might want to include xAI as a partner, despite its flaws. 'I think the department benefits when it's engaged with as many organizations as possible,' said Morgan Plummer, the policy director for Americans for Responsible Innovation, an advocacy group that generally favors a middle ground on regulating AI. Parham said that the idea for the $800 million program predates the Trump administration and that work on it began in October after President Joe Biden issued an executive order on AI and national security. He said that he worked on it for about five months before he left and that, in all, he spent nearly three years at the Defense Department working on AI. The contracts with the four AI companies also significantly deepen the military's relationship with the buzziest of emerging technologies. In exchange for the millions of dollars, the military will get use of each company's large language model (LLM), which for many users often takes the form of a chatbot. Experts said they expect the military to use the LLMs for a variety of purposes, from more mundane tasks like summarizing emails to more complicated uses like translating languages or analyzing intelligence. Other AI projects spearheaded by the Defense Department include Project Maven, a system that integrates a large amount of data and data sources with machine learning, for display and use during conflict. Within the AI industry, xAI's capabilities are hotly debated. Grok scores highly on some benchmarks of artificial intelligence, such as one named 'Humanity's Last Exam,' which consists of questions submitted by subject matter experts. But its recent dalliance with neo-Nazism — and, before that, with race relations in Musk's native South Africa — made the chatbot an object of derision in the industry and among the broader public. 'Grok is probably the least safe of these systems. It's doing some really weird stuff,' said AI critic Gary Marcus, an emeritus professor of psychology at New York University. Marcus pointed out Grok's ideological diatribes and xAI's decision not to release safety reports that have become industry standards for leading AI models. Parham said he believes xAI may need more time than the three other Pentagon contractors to have its technology fully available to the military. He said other companies, including Anthropic and OpenAI, have already gone through a lengthy government review and compliance process to have their software — including their application programming interfaces, which coders use to build on top of LLMs — authorized for use. He said that, up through March when he left, xAI hadn't done the same. 'It's going to take them much longer, I think, to actually [get] their models rolled out in government environments,' he said. 'It's not impossible. It's just they're far, far, far, far behind from everybody else.' Parham said the approval process for Anthropic and OpenAI took over a year from paperwork submitted to authorization granted. The Pentagon's use of commercial LLMs has drawn some criticism, in part because AI models are generally trained on enormous sets of data that may include personal information on the open web. Mixing that information with military applications is too risky, said Sarah Myers West, a co-executive director of the AI Now Institute, a research organization. 'It introduces security and privacy vulnerabilities into our critical infrastructure,' she said. xAI is a relatively young startup. Musk started it in 2023 after having co-founded OpenAI years earlier and then had a falling-out with its CEO, Sam Altman. Some experts in AI and defense systems said they were shocked by Grok's recent antisemitic meltdown and wondered whether something similar might recur as part of government use. 'I would have some safety-associated concerns based on the release of their most recent model,' said Josh Wallin, who researches the intersection of AI and the military at the Center for a New American Security, a Democratic-leaning think tank. Wallin said Grok's antisemitism tirades demonstrate a potential for unpredictable or risky behavior, such as presenting false or misleading information as fact, known as hallucinations. 'Let's say you're automatically generating reports from different intelligence sources or you're producing a daily report for a commander. There'd be concern about whether what you're getting is a hallucination,' he said. This article was originally published on Solve the daily Crossword

Israel intercepts missile fired from Yemen
Israel intercepts missile fired from Yemen

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Israel intercepts missile fired from Yemen

(Reuters) -Yemen's Houthi militant group said on Tuesday it had launched a ballistic missile at Israel's Ben Gurion Airport near Tel Aviv. The Israeli military said it had intercepted a missile launched from Yemen following the activation of air raid sirens in multiple regions across the country. The launch from Yemen follows an Israeli military attack on Houthi targets in Yemen's Hodeidah port on Monday in its latest assault on the Iran-backed militants, who have been striking ships bound for Israel and launching missiles against it.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store