
Hezbollah watches on as Iran and Israel battle, for now
Nearly seven months after the November ceasefire between Israel and the armed Lebanese group Hezbollah – an agreement Lebanon says Israel has repeatedly violated – rockets are lighting up the night sky once again. But this time, Hezbollah is not involved. Instead, Israel and Iran are exchanging direct military attacks.
'We don't know how this will all end, so we are undoubtedly tense,' Kandil, now back in Lebanon, told Al Jazeera. However, she added that she had a feeling of satisfaction seeing missiles rain down on Israel. 'Our revenge is being taken,' she said.
While Kandil's sentiment is shared by some in Lebanon, others – those who see Iran's support for Hezbollah, a group that has dominated Lebanon militarily and politically for two decades, as nefarious – cheered on the Israeli attacks against Iran. Many people in Lebanon told Al Jazeera they hoped that stability would prevail and that their country wouldn't be dragged back into a prolonged conflict or subjected to the ferocity and frequency of the Israeli attacks it suffered last year.
'People are taking precautions,' Karim Safieddine, a Lebanese political writer and academic, told Al Jazeera. 'Some are readying their bags.'
Early Friday, Israel struck Iran and assassinated several top commanders in the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) along with top nuclear scientists. Numerous civilians were also killed, including children, according to Iranian state media.
Hours later, Hezbollah released a statement condemning the Israeli attacks and offering condolences for the slain Iranian officers. But analysts say the statement was a clear sign that Hezbollah would not be entering the battle in support of Iran.
'Currently, there is no need for Hezbollah to intervene, as Iranian missiles are capable of confronting the Israeli occupation,' said Qassem Kassir, a Lebanese political analyst supportive of the group. 'However, if the situation escalates into a full-scale war, nothing prevents the situation from changing.'
Hezbollah, founded amid the Lebanese civil war in 1982 with Iranian backing and funding, draws much of its support from Lebanon's Shia Muslim community. The group began firing rockets at Israel on October 8, 2023, after the start of Israel's war on Gaza.
Israeli attacks in Lebanon between October 2023 and November 2024 largely targeted areas where Shia live, killing around 4,000 civilians and fighters, according to Lebanon's Ministry of Public Health.
Many Lebanese are still reeling from the damage left by Israel's attacks. Some remain displaced from their villages in southern Lebanon, which was razed. Hezbollah's priority is to ensure that homes and towns are built in the area.
While Israel is still hitting targets around the country, mostly in southern Lebanon but occasionally in the Beirut suburbs as well, any resumption of military activity by Hezbollah would likely draw an even more intense Israeli response and further disrupt reconstruction efforts.
Much of Hezbollah's military arsenal was reportedly destroyed during the Israeli attacks, though analysts believe they have retained some arms, including ballistic missiles.
Still, Hezbollah's lack of intervention in the current Israel-Iran conflict is 'evidence of their lack of capacity', Safieddine said. Hezbollah may not have the means to intervene militarily.
The Israeli campaign on Lebanon also left Hezbollah's political leadership battered. Many of the group's most senior military figures, including longtime leader Hassan Nasrallah, were assassinated. The group's political hegemony is now being challenged by the Lebanese state, with pressure from the United States and Israel, as it moves to disarm Hezbollah and bring the use of force under the state's exclusive authority.
For now, analysts believe there is a consensus and understanding between Tehran and Hezbollah that the group will not intervene.
'Domestic political circumstances make it extremely difficult for Hezbollah to join in Iranian retaliation,' Nicholas Blanford, a nonresident senior fellow with the US-based think tank Atlantic Council, told Al Jazeera. 'And the Iranians recognise they can't call on them.'
While Hezbollah is sometimes referred to as an Iranian proxy, many experts say the group is more accurately described as a close ally of the IRGC and the Iranian government with shared interests and a similar ideology.
During Israel's heavy bombardment of Lebanon between September and November 2024, Iran's intervention was relatively limited. Israel invaded southern Lebanon, and while Israeli troops have pulled out of most of the Lebanese territory they entered during the war, they still occupy five points.
'There's resentment and unhappiness toward Iran by Hezbollah because they feel Iran let them down in the recent conflict,' Blanford said. Iran reportedly asked Hezbollah not to use some of its more lethal weapons, which analysts linked to fears of an Israeli response on Iranian territory.
As for Israel's attacks on Iran, there's no indication that Tehran has asked Hezbollah to get involved yet, according to Kassir, the analyst thought to be close to Hezbollah. But that might change if a protracted war draws in actors from around the region.
Blanford said he doesn't expect to 'see Hezbollah joining in full scale', but noted that if Israel starts to struggle in its fight against Iran, it could lead to 'some activity along the Blue Line', the line traversing Lebanon's southern border. If that happens, Blanford said, Hezbollah may look to carry out operations in the Israeli-occupied areas of Lebanon.
Israel's plans for Lebanon and Hezbollah remain unclear, but the sound of Israeli drones, an ever-present buzz during the most severe days of the war, has returned to Beirut's skies in the last few days.
'I wouldn't rule out [Hezbollah's intervention] entirely,' said Blanford. 'But for now, it looks like they will stand on the sidelines and keep an eagle eye on what is going on.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Al Jazeera
16 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Will Lebanon succeed in disarming Hezbollah?
Lebanon's government has announced a timeline for Hezbollah's disarmament, saying the military would set out a plan to bring all weapons under state authority before the end of 2025. This comes after months of pressure from the United States after Israel's war on Lebanon killed more than 4,000 people and culminated in a ceasefire in November. Israel has continuously violated the ceasefire and still occupies five points in Lebanon. Hezbollah's arms have long been a contentious issue in Lebanon, and attempts to interfere in Hezbollah's infrastructure or military capabilities have led to internal conflict. However, Hezbollah took heavy losses in Israeli attacks last year, which diminished its status as Lebanon's political and military hegemon. As the issue of disarming Hezbollah heats up, here's what you need to know about the government's announcement on Tuesday and the situation in Lebanon: What did Hezbollah say? It doesn't like the disarmament plan. In fact, Hezbollah said it would treat the decision as though it didn't exist. 'The government of Prime Minister Nawaf Salam committed a grave sin by taking a decision to strip Lebanon of its weapons to resist the Israeli enemy. … This decision fully serves Israel's interest,' the group said in a statement. Despite its flat-out rejection of the government's decision, Hezbollah has yet to respond with force. Under its late leader Hassan Nasrallah, the group threatened that any act taken against its arms could lead to civil war. This time, Hezbollah has not taken military action, possibly a result of a change in its strategy or because of its weakened capacity after the war. Rumours circulated during a cabinet session on Tuesday that Hezbollah supporters in black shirts were gathering along the highway in Khaldeh, just south of Beirut, but that turned out to be a restaurant celebrating reaching one million followers on Instagram. Pro-Hezbollah protesters did briefly block the airport road in Beirut after the government's decision, but little else has manifested despite heightened domestic concerns. What about Iran, Hezbollah's backer? Iran voiced support for Hezbollah but said it has no role in shaping the group's decisions or policy. The comments came from Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, who said the efforts to disarm Hezbollah wouldn't work. 'This is not the first time they've tried to strip Hezbollah of its weapons,' Araghchi said. 'The reason is clear: The power of resistance has proven itself in the field.' Iran played a formative role in founding Hezbollah in 1982 during the heat of the Lebanese Civil War and has been the group's main benefactor ever since. But since Israel's war on Lebanon, Iran's ability to support Hezbollah has taken a major hit. The Lebanese government has blocked flights from Tehran, and the fall of Bashar al-Assad's regime in neighbouring Syria has blocked the land route used to transport funding and weapons. How did Lebanon respond? Iran's comments angered some Lebanese officials. Foreign Minister Youssef Raggi said Araghchi's statement is 'firmly rejected and condemned'. 'Such statements undermine Lebanon's sovereignty, unity and stability and constitute an unacceptable interference in its internal matters and sovereign decisions,' Raggi said. Is disarmament going to happen? This remains to be seen. Salam said after a follow-up cabinet meeting on Thursday that his ministers approved the 'objectives' of a US proposal for 'ensuring that the possession of weapons is restricted solely to the state'. 'The government is now expected to formally commit to disarming Hezbollah, a decision that could … ignite a political crisis,' Al Jazeera's Beirut correspondent Zeina Khodr said. Hezbollah has yet to respond forcefully, and anti-Hezbollah politicians have used increasingly bold rhetoric. 'If there is a cost to be able to centralise the weapons with the … Lebanese armed forces, [it may be] better like that,' Elias Hankash, a Lebanese MP with the anti-Hezbollah Kataeb party, said. President Joseph Aoun and Salam will have to navigate US pressure and domestic support for disarming Hezbollah with opposition from the group and its supporters, who are reeling from Israel's war. The World Bank has said Lebanon needs $11bn for reconstruction and recovery, the vast majority of which is needed in southern Lebanon, the Bekaa Valley and Beirut's suburbs, where most of Hezbollah's support is based. Have any Hezbollah members expressed discontent with disarmament? Plenty of discontent has been expressed. Hezbollah leader Naim Qassem rejected the idea, saying the group's disarmament would make Lebanon vulnerable to attack and would serve only Israel. Ali Mokdad, a Hezbollah MP, also dismissed the decision, calling it 'ink on paper'. Another Hezbollah MP, Mohammad Raad, said the decision could never be implemented and compared Hezbollah giving up its weapons to 'suicide'. What are things like right now? Tensions were heightened on Saturday when six Lebanese soldiers were killed while inspecting an alleged Hezbollah weapons site. Hezbollah reportedly booby-trapped sites in southern Lebanon during the war in case invading Israeli soldiers came upon them. Many from Lebanon's south are antagonistic towards Beirut, feeling the government has not been able to defend the south, which continues to suffer from daily Israeli attacks. Residents also lament the lack of public statements about the deaths from those attacks.


Qatar Tribune
a day ago
- Qatar Tribune
At least six Lebanese soldiers killed in explosion at arms depot: Military
CairocTypeface:> At least six Lebanese soldiers were killed in an explosion while dismantling munitions at an arms depot, the Lebanese military said on Saturday. Other personnel were injured in the blast, which occurred as an army unit was inspecting and dismantling the depot's contents in the southern city of Tyre, the military added in an online statement. The Lebanese state news agency NNA reported the explosion happened while an army engineering team was dismantling munitions left over from Israeli attacks on southern Lebanon. Cross-border fighting has flared between Israel and Lebanon's Hezbollah movement since the eruption of the Gaza war in October 2023, with the Iran-backed militia attacking Israel in solidarity with the Palestinians. (DPA)


Al Jazeera
2 days ago
- Al Jazeera
Iran rejects planned transit corridor outlined in Armenia-Azerbaijan pact
Iran has said it will block a corridor planned in the Caucasus under a United States-brokered peace accord between Azerbaijan and Armenia, which has been hailed by other countries in the region as beneficial for achieving lasting peace. Ali Akbar Velayati, a top adviser to Iran's supreme leader, said on Saturday that Tehran would block the initiative 'with or without Russia', with which Iran has a strategic alliance alongside Armenia. US President Donald Trump 'thinks the Caucasus is a piece of real estate he can lease for 99 years', Velayati told state-affiliated Tasnim News, referring to the transport corridor included in the peace deal. 'This passage will not become a gateway for Trump's mercenaries — it will become their graveyard,' he added, describing the plan as 'political treachery' aimed at undermining Armenia's territorial integrity. The terms of the accord, which was unveiled at a signing ceremony at the White House on Friday, include exclusive US development rights to a route through Armenia that would link Azerbaijan to Nakhchivan, an Azerbaijani enclave that borders Baku's ally Turkiye. The corridor, which would pass close to the border with Iran, would be named the Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity, or TRIPP, and operate under Armenian law. Velayati argued that it would open the way for NATO to position itself 'like a viper' between Iran and Russia. Separately, Iran's foreign ministry issued a statement expressing concern about the negative consequences of any foreign intervention in the vicinity of its borders. While it welcomed the peace deal between Armenia and Azerbaijan, the ministry said any project near Iran's borders should be developed 'with respect for national sovereignty and territorial integrity, and without foreign interference'. For its part, Russia's Ministry of Foreign Affairs cautiously welcomed the deal, saying on Saturday that Moscow supported efforts to promote stability and prosperity in the region, including the Washington meeting. Similarly to Iran, however, it warned against outside intervention, arguing that lasting solutions should be developed by countries in the region. 'The involvement of non-regional players should strengthen the peace agenda, not create new divisions,' the ministry said, adding that it hoped to avoid the 'unfortunate experience' of Western-led conflict resolution in the Middle East. Meanwhile, Turkiye on Saturday said it hoped the planned transit corridor would boost exports of energy and other resources through the South Caucasus. A NATO member, Turkiye has strongly backed Azerbaijan in its conflicts with Armenia, but has pledged to restore ties with Yerevan after it signs a final peace deal with Baku. The Turkish presidency said President Recep Tayyip Erdogan discussed the peace agreement with Ilham Aliyev, his counterpart from Azerbaijan, and offered Ankara's support in achieving lasting peace in the region. Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan also addressed the planned corridor during a visit to Egypt, saying it could 'link Europe with the depths of Asia via Turkiye' and would be 'a very beneficial development'. Armenia and Azerbaijan have fought a series of wars since the late 1980s when Nagorno-Karabakh, a region in Azerbaijan that had a mostly ethnic Armenian population at the time, broke away from Azerbaijan with support from Armenia. Armenia last year agreed to return several villages to Azerbaijan in what Baku described as a 'long-awaited historic event'. Ahmad Shahidov, of the Azerbaijan Institute for Democracy and Human Rights, told Al Jazeera that he expected a final peace declaration between Armenia and Azerbaijan to be signed in the coming weeks. Shahidov said Friday's US-brokered deal constituted a 'roadmap' for the final agreement, which appears imminent given there are no unresolved territorial disputes between the two neighbours.