logo
Pay Rs 1 lakh fine for using books from pvt publishers, forcing students to buy them from specific shops: Sambhal admin to 33 schools

Pay Rs 1 lakh fine for using books from pvt publishers, forcing students to buy them from specific shops: Sambhal admin to 33 schools

Indian Express05-05-2025

The Sambhal district administration has imposed a fine of Rs 1 lakh each on 33 private schools affiliated with the CBSE and ICSE boards for allegedly using books from private publishers and 'compelling' students to purchase them from designated shops.
The action follows an inquiry conducted by the district administration after receiving complaints from parents. The inquiry team found that the schools were not only bypassing the recommended NCERT textbooks but were also putting pressure on parents to buy books from specific vendors — violating norms set by the state government.
In addition to the book-related violations, the administration is also investigating complaints regarding a 'surge' in school fees and further action may be taken based on the findings.
'It is clearly instructed that only National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) books should be used. However, we received complaints that several schools were prescribing books from private publishers and directing parents to buy them from specific shops,' said Shyama Kumar, District Inspector of Schools (DIOS), Sambhal.
He added that an inquiry found that out of the 34 private schools operating in the district, 33 were found to be violating the guidelines of Uttar Pradesh Self-Financed Independent Schools (Fee Regulation) Act. We found one school in the Chandausi area of Sambhal where NCERT books were being used for teaching.' These schools are from nursery to Class 10 and 12.
District Magistrate (DM), Sambhal, Dr Rajender Pensiya, confirmed that a fine of Rs 1 lakh each has been imposed on 33 schools violating the norms. He added that their main objective is that schools should follow norms and use NCERT books, as prescribed.
If school authorities again found violating the rules, more stringent action would be taken against them, said the DM.
DIOS said the 33 schools authorities have been directed to deposit the fine within a week.
According to officials, a group of parents recently submitted a complaint to the District Inspector of Schools (DIOS) and the District Magistrate, alleging that private schools were forcing them to buy books from private publishers available only at specific shops. Several parents also accused the schools of significantly increasing their fee structures without justification.
In response to the complaints, the district administration convened a meeting last month with representatives of private schools and told them that they are violating the Act. During the meeting, school authorities were directed to refrain from imposing excessive fees and to strictly follow the mandate of using only NCERT textbooks.
However, when no significant changes were observed, the administration called another meeting of its officials and decided to conduct a detailed survey of each school to verify whether they are violating the rules. District officials were assigned to each school to carry out physical inspections and submit comprehensive reports on the basis of the findings.
Source said it was found that at a few places, parents of students were asked to purchase from bookstores on or near the school campus.
After the inquiry, the district administration convened a meeting to review the probe report. The findings confirmed that 33 schools were in violation of established norms.
On the issue of alleged fee hikes, Shyama Kumar said the administration had issued a detailed format to all private schools, asking them to provide their fee structures for the past three years. 'All schools have submitted the required data and an audit is underway. We are examining the percentage increase in fees by each school during the past three academic years,' he said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Police file 3000-page chargesheet in Vadodara car crash case
Police file 3000-page chargesheet in Vadodara car crash case

Indian Express

time7 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Police file 3000-page chargesheet in Vadodara car crash case

The Vadodara city police on Tuesday filed a 3000-page chargesheet in the March 13 Karelibaug car crash involving an MS University law student Rakshit Chaurasiya that killed one woman and left seven others injured, detailing that the car was being driven at the speed of 140 kmph and the driver did not attempt to bring the vehicle to a halt. Apart from Chaurasiya, his friend Pranshu Chauhan was also present in the car at the time of the accident. Relying on forensic reports, eye witness accounts as well as data shared by German car maker Volkswagen, the police filed the chargesheet in the 90-day window of the case on Tuesday. The chargesheet, comprising statements — most of which were recorded before a magistrate — of over 100 eye witnesses also emphasises on the report received by the Vadodara city police from Volkswagen from the analysis of the Incident Data Recorder (IDR) of the high-end car. The police have emphasised that Chaurasiya was driving the car between 100-140 kmph throughout the stretch and following the crash, the car continued to speed ahead at 140 kmph leading to more damage until the automatic brakes of the car brought it to a halt. Vadodara city Commissioner of Police Narasimha Komar, told The Indian Express, 'We have detailed the report of the FSL, which has confirmed that Chaurasiya and his co-passenger Pranshu Chauhan were under the influence of drugs. They were aware that driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol is a crime, yet they took out the car'. 'Although they have been booked in a separate case under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, they knowingly endangered the lives of people…' Komar said. Komar added that the police have also detailed the findings of Volkswagen, the maker of the car involved in the crash — a Volkswagen Virtus — as the Incident Data Recorder or the black box of the vehicle had confirmed the car speed. Komar said, 'The vehicle was a high-end one and the incident data recorder confirmed that the speed was grossly in excess of 100, even at 140 kmph at some spots. We also have eye witness accounts to fortify the case against them…' The Vadodara Sessions court on Tuesday rejected the Vadodara city police revision petition, filed against the order of a Judicial Magistrate First Class (JMFC) court, which had, on April 6 directed 'immediate release from illegal detention' of Praanshu Chauhan, after he moved the court contending 'illegal detention' at Karelibaug police station in the NDPS case filed against him. Additional Sessions Judge MA Tailor, on Tuesday, upheld the order of the JMFC court and dismissed the revision petition of the police, in which District Government Pleader, Vadodara, Anil Desai made submissions before the district sessions court, contending that the JMFC court had 'no jurisdiction' to issue the orders in the case. Chauhan, who was arrested and granted bail in the NDPS case lodged against him at the Warasiya police station, had moved the court stating that Karelibaug police station 'illegally detained' him within minutes of being granted bail in the NDPS case on April 5, 2025, purportedly in connection with' Chaurasiya's accident case but he had been 'illegally detained in custody at Karelibaug Police Station since April 3 and was further illegally detained in police custody for the whole night on April 3, without informing him for the reasons of such detention.' Chauhan has been made a co-accused in the accident. CP Komar said that the city police will explore legal options after examining the order. Komar said, 'We will go through the order in detail and seek legal opinion to see if we can appeal in a higher court… or if we should accept the order as it is.'

Two arrested in Dibrugarh for hunting egrets
Two arrested in Dibrugarh for hunting egrets

Time of India

time17 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Two arrested in Dibrugarh for hunting egrets

Dibrugarh: The Dibrugarh forest department on Tuesday arrested two individuals for hunting egrets, a protected bird species under the Indian wildlife laws, after videos surfaced on social media platforms. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The accused, Vijay Majhi and Rajesh Karmakar, were apprehended from Milan Nagar following widespread circulation of videos, showing them hunting. "The two individuals were arrested after videos of their hunting went viral on social media. Hunting egrets is a serious offence and we will ensure strict legal action is taken," DFO Nandha Kumar said. Egrets are classified under Schedule IV of the Indian Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, which strictly prohibits their hunting, providing comprehensive protection to specific species of flora and fauna. The legal framework surrounding their protection is particularly robust, with specific species receiving even higher levels of protection. The Little Egret and Cattle Egret, commonly found in wetland areas across Assam, are listed under Schedule II of the Act, which makes hunting them a non-bailable offence. The arrest comes at a time when wildlife conservation efforts in Assam have intensified, particularly in districts like Dibrugarh. "Egrets play a crucial role in maintaining ecological balance and their indiscriminate hunting not only threatens biodiversity, but also violates wildlife protection laws. Awareness is crucial among the public regarding wildlife conservation. We need citizens to understand not just its legal implications, but also their ecological importance. We are working closely with local communities to gather intelligence and prevent such activities," Kumar said.

Bank fraud case: Court rejects plea of accused to take part in trial without bail
Bank fraud case: Court rejects plea of accused to take part in trial without bail

Time of India

time17 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Bank fraud case: Court rejects plea of accused to take part in trial without bail

Kanpur: Special Judge Companies Act Azad Singh on Tuesday rejected the plea of two accused who sought permission to appear and participate in the trial of Rs 7,820 crore bank fraud case without seeking bail. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The judicial official not only dismissed their application but also ordered that a date be fixed every week in the case. June 17 has been fixed as the next date of hearing. The accused applicants, Sunil Verma and Anoop Kumar Verma, had submitted an application before the court to allow their participation in the trial. Kaushal Kishore Sharma, special prosecutor for the case, strongly opposed the plea, stating that without obtaining bail they can not be allowed to participate in the proceedings. The Companies Act contains special provisions regarding bail, which override those in the Cr PC. Consequently, the judicial official dismissed the application and fixed June 17 as the next date of hearing. Sharma stated that the Serious Fraud Investigation Office had lodged a complaint against 69 accused on behalf of several banks in bank fraud amounting to Rs 7,820 crore. Some name and famed persons of the city were also implicated in the case while as many as 20 accused were residing abroad and their files had been separated from the main case. Sharma mentioned that the court had already issued a non-bailable warrant against the accused, Satish Chandra Gupta, who is living abroad. The two accused Sunil Verma and Anoop Kumar Badhera had approached the apex court, where an order was passed that no coercive action should be taken against them, although their application is still pending. On Monday last, they moved an application before the court, which was dismissed. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now One of the accused, Vikram Kothari, has died, while others such as Rahul Kothari, builder Vishwanath Gupta, industrialist Suyash Desari and others have obtained bail orders in their favour from the apex court. The special prosecutor added that both accused have also applied for permission to travel abroad, and the court has reserved its order on that prayer. Speaking with TOI, the special prosecutor stated that the accused had formed a company for mercantile trading. They acquired a letter of credit from a bank, claiming that the company would purchase rice from one country and sell it in another. However, they used the funds for personal gains and only displayed sales and purchases on paper. The corporate ministry detected the nexus and ordered the Serious Fraud Investigation Office to lodge a complaint in the Companies Act court in 2020. Kanpur has the Companies Act court, which is the only one in Uttar Pradesh.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store