logo
Pay Rs 1 lakh fine for using books from pvt publishers, forcing students to buy them from specific shops: Sambhal admin to 33 schools

Pay Rs 1 lakh fine for using books from pvt publishers, forcing students to buy them from specific shops: Sambhal admin to 33 schools

Indian Express05-05-2025

The Sambhal district administration has imposed a fine of Rs 1 lakh each on 33 private schools affiliated with the CBSE and ICSE boards for allegedly using books from private publishers and 'compelling' students to purchase them from designated shops.
The action follows an inquiry conducted by the district administration after receiving complaints from parents. The inquiry team found that the schools were not only bypassing the recommended NCERT textbooks but were also putting pressure on parents to buy books from specific vendors — violating norms set by the state government.
In addition to the book-related violations, the administration is also investigating complaints regarding a 'surge' in school fees and further action may be taken based on the findings.
'It is clearly instructed that only National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) books should be used. However, we received complaints that several schools were prescribing books from private publishers and directing parents to buy them from specific shops,' said Shyama Kumar, District Inspector of Schools (DIOS), Sambhal.
He added that an inquiry found that out of the 34 private schools operating in the district, 33 were found to be violating the guidelines of Uttar Pradesh Self-Financed Independent Schools (Fee Regulation) Act. We found one school in the Chandausi area of Sambhal where NCERT books were being used for teaching.' These schools are from nursery to Class 10 and 12.
District Magistrate (DM), Sambhal, Dr Rajender Pensiya, confirmed that a fine of Rs 1 lakh each has been imposed on 33 schools violating the norms. He added that their main objective is that schools should follow norms and use NCERT books, as prescribed.
If school authorities again found violating the rules, more stringent action would be taken against them, said the DM.
DIOS said the 33 schools authorities have been directed to deposit the fine within a week.
According to officials, a group of parents recently submitted a complaint to the District Inspector of Schools (DIOS) and the District Magistrate, alleging that private schools were forcing them to buy books from private publishers available only at specific shops. Several parents also accused the schools of significantly increasing their fee structures without justification.
In response to the complaints, the district administration convened a meeting last month with representatives of private schools and told them that they are violating the Act. During the meeting, school authorities were directed to refrain from imposing excessive fees and to strictly follow the mandate of using only NCERT textbooks.
However, when no significant changes were observed, the administration called another meeting of its officials and decided to conduct a detailed survey of each school to verify whether they are violating the rules. District officials were assigned to each school to carry out physical inspections and submit comprehensive reports on the basis of the findings.
Source said it was found that at a few places, parents of students were asked to purchase from bookstores on or near the school campus.
After the inquiry, the district administration convened a meeting to review the probe report. The findings confirmed that 33 schools were in violation of established norms.
On the issue of alleged fee hikes, Shyama Kumar said the administration had issued a detailed format to all private schools, asking them to provide their fee structures for the past three years. 'All schools have submitted the required data and an audit is underway. We are examining the percentage increase in fees by each school during the past three academic years,' he said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hours after renting flat, youths call man, shoot him over Rs 10 lakh
Hours after renting flat, youths call man, shoot him over Rs 10 lakh

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Hours after renting flat, youths call man, shoot him over Rs 10 lakh

Noida: Two youths, who took up a house on rent in Sector 12 on Wednesday, allegedly killed a 40-year-old man at the same place hours later. Two people called Ompal Bhati — hailing from Bulandshahr and a resident of Sector 94 — to Sector 12 on Wednesday afternoon. Bhati, who ran a currency exchange in Sector 18, allegedly took Rs 10 lakh with him, Ompal's brother Jitendra Solanki said. Solanki believed that his brother was murdered by people who stole the money from him. An ironer who worked opposite the building claimed that she was at her shop when the bullet was fired. A few seconds after the firing, two people came out of the house and tried to snatch the bag from each other. There was a fight between the two. Both of them fled within a few seconds, she said. DCP Yamuna Prasad said the incident took place in Sector 24 police station area, adding, police are scanning CCTV footage. The DCP said, "The youths took the flat on rent on Wednesday by paying the token amount. In the evening, the landlord heard the sound of a gunshot and later went to check. He found the deceased in the house. The youths fled, leaving their scooter behind," the DCP said, adding that footage has revealed that Ompal wasn't carrying any bag. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Memperdagangkan CFD Emas dengan salah satu spread terendah? IC Markets Mendaftar Undo The house is on the first floor of the building, while the landlord, Pradeep Kumar Kashyap, and his family occupy the other two floors above and below it. According to Kashyap, a young man named Pawan and his friend visited the locality on Tuesday to find a house on rent. They returned around 12.30pm on Wednesday and paid Kashyap a token amount of Rs 1,000, with the promise to provide the rent amount of Rs 12,000 and their Aadhaar cards by the evening. The youths then began to clean the house. Around 2pm, the youths called Bhati to meet them at the house and the three stayed inside for about 90 minutes. Around 4pm, the gunshot was heard and Kashyap called out to the youths to find out what happened. They allegedly told him their air cooler fell that made the noise. However, a crowd gathered, prompting Kashyap to check the house. Upon finding Bhati's body, Kashyap informed the police.

HDFC Bank says it has commenced legal action against Lilavati Trust over loan default issue
HDFC Bank says it has commenced legal action against Lilavati Trust over loan default issue

Indian Express

timean hour ago

  • Indian Express

HDFC Bank says it has commenced legal action against Lilavati Trust over loan default issue

HDFC Bank on Wednesday said it 'has commenced the process of taking legal action permissible under law to vindicate its position' over allegations of a loan default by Lilavati Kirtilal Mehta Medical Trust (LKMM), which runs a leading medical institution. 'We are concerned about all our stakeholders and are on the verge of taking strong legal actions as per expert advice, against those who are initiating these baseless allegations with malafide and ulterior motives or involved in propagating the same,' an HDFC Bank spokesperson said in a statement. 'Despite repeated public claims and legal accusations, Sashidhar Jagdishan or HDFC Bank has never produced a single official loan ledger or agreement in court regarding its supposed transaction with LKMM Trust. Even more concerning, various documents from the bank reflect widely inconsistent loan amounts for instance, Rs 4.8 crore was cited initially, Rs 450 crore in another filing, and now Rs 65.22 crore which are just three examples of many of the company in question,' LKMM alleged in a statement, 'The allegations and insinuations made by the trustees are devoid of any iota of truth whatsoever. Neither the bank nor its CEO have engaged in any activity that is illegal, unethical or improper,' HDFC Bank spokesperson said. 'We are fully compliant with the laws of the land and follow the highest standards of governance and ethics. The content, timing and manner of allegations demonstrate the devious objective of preventing the Bank from carrying out its legal mandate of recovery and enforcement,' the bank spokesperson said. The Trust had last week called for the suspension and prosecution of HDFC Bank MD and CEO Sashidhar Jagdishan, accusing him of involvement in a series of financial frauds concerning the Trust. 'Despite all the noise, not a single official loan ledger has been presented in court of LKMM trust or Prashant Mehta,' said Prashant Mehta, Permanent Trustee of LKMM. 'How can one of India's largest banks make three different claims about a single loan, and not back it up with a basic loan agreement and ledger?' Mehta said. 'LKMM Trust and Prashant Mehta maintains it has never taken a loan from HDFC Bank, and these inconsistencies support that claim, rather than refute it,' the Trust said.

Claims made by HDFC Bank don't add up: Lilavati Trust; HDFC denies charges
Claims made by HDFC Bank don't add up: Lilavati Trust; HDFC denies charges

Economic Times

timean hour ago

  • Economic Times

Claims made by HDFC Bank don't add up: Lilavati Trust; HDFC denies charges

In a fresh attack on HDFC Bank MD and CEO Sashidhar Jagdishan, Lilavati Kirtilal Mehta Medical Trust (LKMM Trust) on Wednesday said the claims made by the bank about a single loan are not consistent and it has never produced any official loan ledger or agreement in court regarding its transaction with the Trust. Refuting allegations, an HDFC Bank spokesperson in a statement said the allegations and insinuations made by the trustees are devoid of any iota of truth whatsoever and neither the bank nor its CEO has engaged in any activity that is illegal, unethical or improper. The LKMM Trust manages and runs the prestigious Lilavati Hospital in Mumbai. Various documents from the bank reflect widely inconsistent loan amounts for instance, Rs 4.8 crore was cited initially, Rs 450 crore in another filing, and now Rs 65.22 crore, LKMM said in a statement. "How can one of India's largest banks make three different claims about a single loan, and not back it up with a basic loan agreement and ledger?" LKMM Prashant Mehta, Permanent Trustee wondered. The LKMM Trust and Prashant Mehta maintained that they had never taken a loan from HDFC Bank, and these inconsistencies support that claim, rather than refute it. The bank's refusal to present even basic documents in court undermines the credibility of the entire case and hints at deliberate narrative manipulation, it alleged. The Trust also alleged that the Rs 2.05 crore bribe money was paid to HDFC Bank MD and CEO Sashidhar Jagdishan to help Chetan Mehta group remain illegally in control of the LKMM Trust. However, the HDFC Bank's spokesperson said, "We reiterate our unequivocal, categorical and unambiguous denial and condemnation of these egregiously malicious, false and defamatory allegations and insinuations." The bank said it is concerned about its stakeholders and is on the verge of taking strong legal actions as per expert advice, against those who are initiating these baseless allegations with malafide and ulterior motives or involved in propagating the same. Members of the public and media are urged to exercise their critical judgement in reporting or amplifying the unsubstantiated allegations and insinuations, the spokesperson added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store