Gas project extension will need to meet net-zero
Woodside will be required under the safeguard mechanism to ensure a gas project extension meets net-zero emissions by 2050.
The energy giant's North West Shelf project, which hosts Australia's biggest gas export plant, was last week given approval by the Albanese government to keep operating until 2070.
The safeguard mechanism is a policy designed to limit emissions at Australia's largest industrial facilities in line with the nation's climate targets of 43 per cent below 2005 levels by 2030 and net-zero by 2050.
Asked if Woodside had to get the project down to net-zero emissions, Energy Minister Chris Bowen replied "yes".
"This will be legally obliged and required under our safeguard mechanism to meet net-zero by 2050," he told ABC's Insiders on Sunday.
"In effect, all the facilities covered, the more than 200 facilities covered by the safeguard mechanism are obliged to have a pathway to net-zero."
Asked if approving gas projects would make it harder for Australia to win a global climate summit it is bidding to co-host with Pacific Island nations next year, Mr Bowen said these decisions would always be controversial.
"I don't deny that, but we'll always set Australia's domestic policy in Australia's domestic best interest," he said.
"There's a great opportunity for our country, (it) restores Australia's leadership in climate against the bad years of the decade of denial and delay, (and) shows we're back in a very meaningful way".
Turkey is also bidding for the climate talks, with the energy minister hopeful the issue is resolved soon.
Mr Bowen said Australia remains on track to reduce emissions by 43 per cent by 2030, despite a small increase in emissions last year.
He also ruled out a retrospective domestic gas reservation policy to existing fields.
During the federal election campaign, the coalition promised to redirect gas to domestic users.
Woodside will be required under the safeguard mechanism to ensure a gas project extension meets net-zero emissions by 2050.
The energy giant's North West Shelf project, which hosts Australia's biggest gas export plant, was last week given approval by the Albanese government to keep operating until 2070.
The safeguard mechanism is a policy designed to limit emissions at Australia's largest industrial facilities in line with the nation's climate targets of 43 per cent below 2005 levels by 2030 and net-zero by 2050.
Asked if Woodside had to get the project down to net-zero emissions, Energy Minister Chris Bowen replied "yes".
"This will be legally obliged and required under our safeguard mechanism to meet net-zero by 2050," he told ABC's Insiders on Sunday.
"In effect, all the facilities covered, the more than 200 facilities covered by the safeguard mechanism are obliged to have a pathway to net-zero."
Asked if approving gas projects would make it harder for Australia to win a global climate summit it is bidding to co-host with Pacific Island nations next year, Mr Bowen said these decisions would always be controversial.
"I don't deny that, but we'll always set Australia's domestic policy in Australia's domestic best interest," he said.
"There's a great opportunity for our country, (it) restores Australia's leadership in climate against the bad years of the decade of denial and delay, (and) shows we're back in a very meaningful way".
Turkey is also bidding for the climate talks, with the energy minister hopeful the issue is resolved soon.
Mr Bowen said Australia remains on track to reduce emissions by 43 per cent by 2030, despite a small increase in emissions last year.
He also ruled out a retrospective domestic gas reservation policy to existing fields.
During the federal election campaign, the coalition promised to redirect gas to domestic users.
Woodside will be required under the safeguard mechanism to ensure a gas project extension meets net-zero emissions by 2050.
The energy giant's North West Shelf project, which hosts Australia's biggest gas export plant, was last week given approval by the Albanese government to keep operating until 2070.
The safeguard mechanism is a policy designed to limit emissions at Australia's largest industrial facilities in line with the nation's climate targets of 43 per cent below 2005 levels by 2030 and net-zero by 2050.
Asked if Woodside had to get the project down to net-zero emissions, Energy Minister Chris Bowen replied "yes".
"This will be legally obliged and required under our safeguard mechanism to meet net-zero by 2050," he told ABC's Insiders on Sunday.
"In effect, all the facilities covered, the more than 200 facilities covered by the safeguard mechanism are obliged to have a pathway to net-zero."
Asked if approving gas projects would make it harder for Australia to win a global climate summit it is bidding to co-host with Pacific Island nations next year, Mr Bowen said these decisions would always be controversial.
"I don't deny that, but we'll always set Australia's domestic policy in Australia's domestic best interest," he said.
"There's a great opportunity for our country, (it) restores Australia's leadership in climate against the bad years of the decade of denial and delay, (and) shows we're back in a very meaningful way".
Turkey is also bidding for the climate talks, with the energy minister hopeful the issue is resolved soon.
Mr Bowen said Australia remains on track to reduce emissions by 43 per cent by 2030, despite a small increase in emissions last year.
He also ruled out a retrospective domestic gas reservation policy to existing fields.
During the federal election campaign, the coalition promised to redirect gas to domestic users.
Woodside will be required under the safeguard mechanism to ensure a gas project extension meets net-zero emissions by 2050.
The energy giant's North West Shelf project, which hosts Australia's biggest gas export plant, was last week given approval by the Albanese government to keep operating until 2070.
The safeguard mechanism is a policy designed to limit emissions at Australia's largest industrial facilities in line with the nation's climate targets of 43 per cent below 2005 levels by 2030 and net-zero by 2050.
Asked if Woodside had to get the project down to net-zero emissions, Energy Minister Chris Bowen replied "yes".
"This will be legally obliged and required under our safeguard mechanism to meet net-zero by 2050," he told ABC's Insiders on Sunday.
"In effect, all the facilities covered, the more than 200 facilities covered by the safeguard mechanism are obliged to have a pathway to net-zero."
Asked if approving gas projects would make it harder for Australia to win a global climate summit it is bidding to co-host with Pacific Island nations next year, Mr Bowen said these decisions would always be controversial.
"I don't deny that, but we'll always set Australia's domestic policy in Australia's domestic best interest," he said.
"There's a great opportunity for our country, (it) restores Australia's leadership in climate against the bad years of the decade of denial and delay, (and) shows we're back in a very meaningful way".
Turkey is also bidding for the climate talks, with the energy minister hopeful the issue is resolved soon.
Mr Bowen said Australia remains on track to reduce emissions by 43 per cent by 2030, despite a small increase in emissions last year.
He also ruled out a retrospective domestic gas reservation policy to existing fields.
During the federal election campaign, the coalition promised to redirect gas to domestic users.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
West Australian
41 minutes ago
- West Australian
Aged care sector backs delay for major reform to the industry
The Albanese government is delaying its 'once-in-a-generation' aged care reforms to give providers more time to prepare. Bolstering regulation, simplifying in-home care services and increasing how much wealthier retirees pay toward non-clinical services were among the key changes set to kick in on July 1. But after months of warnings from the sector, Health Minister Mark Butler announced on Wednesday Labor was pushing the start date back by four months. 'We have been clear that we want to successfully deliver these reforms in the right way,' Mr Butler said in a joint statement with Aged Care Minister Sam Rae. 'We have received advice from the sector and experts that more time will improve the delivery of these reforms and minimise disruption. 'Following careful consideration, the government will recommend to the Governor-General ... that she proclaim the commencement of the new Aged Care Act to be 1 November 2025. 'This will allow more time for aged care providers to prepare their clients, support their workers and get their systems ready for the changes. 'It will also give us more time to finalise key operational and digital processes, and for parliament to consider supporting legislation that will enable the new act to operate effectively.' Treasurer Jim Chalmers told reporters the delay would have a 'modest' $900m impact on Commonwealth coffers over the next four years. The sector has welcomed the delay, with the Older Persons Advocacy Network (OPAN) saying it switched its position in recent weeks due to concerns 'older people don't have the necessary information to make informed choices'. 'Until now, OPAN has been steadfast in its call for the Act to be implemented, as promised, on 1 July 2025, because older people can't get the aged care they need without it,' OPAN chief executive Craig Gear said. 'However, over the past weeks it has become increasingly apparent that, while the macro design of the reform is solid, older people don't have the necessary information to make informed choices at an individual level, particularly around the new Support at Home program. 'We are also concerned that the appropriate systems aren't yet in place to ensure continuity of care and services for older people during the transition.' The Council on the Ageing (COTA) also welcomed the move. 'We wanted a 1 July start date so people didn't have to wait any longer for their rights than they already have, but ultimately, we concluded it's far more important to get it right and ensure that older people understand what will happen for them,' COTA chief executive Patricia Sparrow said. Ms Sparrow called on the Albanese government to continue releasing 'extra packages of support for people living at home and reduce the home care package wait list even with the delayed start for the new Support at Home program'. Meanwhile, the Coalition has blasted the delay as 'a clear admission of failure'. 'The government was warned,' opposition health spokeswoman Anne Ruston said in a statement. 'We put forward a responsible, measured amendment to ensure that their reforms could be rolled out safely and effectively, and Labor opposed it. 'The aged care sector has been crying out that the 1 July deadline was not deliverable without causing serious negative consequences. 'Why has it taken the government until five minutes to midnight to alleviate the stress and uncertainty they have inflicted?'
Perth Now
42 minutes ago
- Perth Now
Major delay to Albo's agenda
The Albanese government is delaying its 'once-in-a-generation' aged care reforms to give providers more time to prepare. Bolstering regulation, simplifying in-home care services and increasing how much wealthier retirees pay toward non-clinical services were among the key changes set to kick in on July 1. But after months of warnings from the sector, Health Minister Mark Butler announced on Wednesday Labor was pushing the start date back by four months. 'We have been clear that we want to successfully deliver these reforms in the right way,' Mr Butler said in a joint statement with Aged Care Minister Sam Rae. 'We have received advice from the sector and experts that more time will improve the delivery of these reforms and minimise disruption. 'Following careful consideration, the government will recommend to the Governor-General ... that she proclaim the commencement of the new Aged Care Act to be 1 November 2025. 'This will allow more time for aged care providers to prepare their clients, support their workers and get their systems ready for the changes. 'It will also give us more time to finalise key operational and digital processes, and for parliament to consider supporting legislation that will enable the new act to operate effectively.' The Albanese government is delaying its 'once-in-a-generation' aged care reforms. NewsWire / Martin Ollman Credit: News Corp Australia Treasurer Jim Chalmers told reporters the delay would have a 'modest' $900m impact on Commonwealth coffers over the next four years. The sector has welcomed the delay, with the Older Persons Advocacy Network (OPAN) saying it switched its position in recent weeks due to concerns 'older people don't have the necessary information to make informed choices'. 'Until now, OPAN has been steadfast in its call for the Act to be implemented, as promised, on 1 July 2025, because older people can't get the aged care they need without it,' OPAN chief executive Craig Gear said. 'However, over the past weeks it has become increasingly apparent that, while the macro design of the reform is solid, older people don't have the necessary information to make informed choices at an individual level, particularly around the new Support at Home program. 'We are also concerned that the appropriate systems aren't yet in place to ensure continuity of care and services for older people during the transition.' Aged care providers have been warning for months they need more time to prepare their clients for the reforms. Supplied Credit: Supplied The Council on the Ageing (COTA) also welcomed the move. 'We wanted a 1 July start date so people didn't have to wait any longer for their rights than they already have, but ultimately, we concluded it's far more important to get it right and ensure that older people understand what will happen for them,' COTA chief executive Patricia Sparrow said. Ms Sparrow called on the Albanese government to continue releasing 'extra packages of support for people living at home and reduce the home care package wait list even with the delayed start for the new Support at Home program'. Meanwhile, the Coalition has blasted the delay as 'a clear admission of failure'. 'The government was warned,' opposition health spokeswoman Anne Ruston said in a statement. 'We put forward a responsible, measured amendment to ensure that their reforms could be rolled out safely and effectively, and Labor opposed it. 'The aged care sector has been crying out that the 1 July deadline was not deliverable without causing serious negative consequences. 'Why has it taken the government until five minutes to midnight to alleviate the stress and uncertainty they have inflicted?'
The Advertiser
2 hours ago
- The Advertiser
Wage rise not enough for lowest-paid workers: union
An increase to the minimum wage won't be enough for the nation's lowest-paid workers to live on, the Australian Council of Trade Unions says. The Fair Work Commission announced its decision to lift the minimum wage by 3.5 per cent on Tuesday, with almost three million low-paid workers set to earn an extra $32 a week. The rise will come into effect from July, with the minimum wage rising to $24.95 an hour, benefiting more than one-fifth of the workforce. Sally McManus, the secretary of the ACTU, said workers had gone backwards in real terms and needed to catch up to where they were before the COVID-19 pandemic. "We used to have this idea in Australia that a full-time wage should be a living wage, like one you can live on, and we don't anymore, because it's slipped back," she told ABC radio on Wednesday. "So we will be sort of setting our sights in the future about making sure that the very bottom number of the minimum wage, which is less than 50 grand, is actually a livable wage." Federal Employment Minister Amanda Rishworth said she was disappointed the coalition had labelled the decision another expense for small business. "I'm not sure that the argument that we pay people less and we don't see our lowest paid workers get a wage increase, is actually the answer to what is broadly the discussion in this country, which is how do we improve productivity," she told ABC's RN. While the boost in pay packets is set to lead to small growth in the wage price index, economists say the change won't be substantial enough to alter the likelihood of the Reserve Bank cutting interest rates later this year. National Australia Bank senior markets economist Taylor Nugent said there would be little impact on the wage price index, which is examined by the central bank when deciding whether or not to alter the cash interest rate. "We don't see any implications of (the Fair Work Commission's) decision for our own or official wages growth forecasts," he said. CreditorWatch chief economist Ivan Colhoun said the commission's decision is set to put a lower limit on inflation. "(The) decision of a real wage increase will tend to put something of a floor under inflation without an improvement in productivity performance," he said. The business sector has hit out at the wage decision, saying the increased labour costs would result in many employers having to lay off staff. The Council of Small Business Organisations had argued for a wage rise of between two and 2.5 per cent. Mr Colhoun said the commission's decision sought to strike a balance between a wage rise for workers alongside uncertainty in the global economy. An increase to the minimum wage won't be enough for the nation's lowest-paid workers to live on, the Australian Council of Trade Unions says. The Fair Work Commission announced its decision to lift the minimum wage by 3.5 per cent on Tuesday, with almost three million low-paid workers set to earn an extra $32 a week. The rise will come into effect from July, with the minimum wage rising to $24.95 an hour, benefiting more than one-fifth of the workforce. Sally McManus, the secretary of the ACTU, said workers had gone backwards in real terms and needed to catch up to where they were before the COVID-19 pandemic. "We used to have this idea in Australia that a full-time wage should be a living wage, like one you can live on, and we don't anymore, because it's slipped back," she told ABC radio on Wednesday. "So we will be sort of setting our sights in the future about making sure that the very bottom number of the minimum wage, which is less than 50 grand, is actually a livable wage." Federal Employment Minister Amanda Rishworth said she was disappointed the coalition had labelled the decision another expense for small business. "I'm not sure that the argument that we pay people less and we don't see our lowest paid workers get a wage increase, is actually the answer to what is broadly the discussion in this country, which is how do we improve productivity," she told ABC's RN. While the boost in pay packets is set to lead to small growth in the wage price index, economists say the change won't be substantial enough to alter the likelihood of the Reserve Bank cutting interest rates later this year. National Australia Bank senior markets economist Taylor Nugent said there would be little impact on the wage price index, which is examined by the central bank when deciding whether or not to alter the cash interest rate. "We don't see any implications of (the Fair Work Commission's) decision for our own or official wages growth forecasts," he said. CreditorWatch chief economist Ivan Colhoun said the commission's decision is set to put a lower limit on inflation. "(The) decision of a real wage increase will tend to put something of a floor under inflation without an improvement in productivity performance," he said. The business sector has hit out at the wage decision, saying the increased labour costs would result in many employers having to lay off staff. The Council of Small Business Organisations had argued for a wage rise of between two and 2.5 per cent. Mr Colhoun said the commission's decision sought to strike a balance between a wage rise for workers alongside uncertainty in the global economy. An increase to the minimum wage won't be enough for the nation's lowest-paid workers to live on, the Australian Council of Trade Unions says. The Fair Work Commission announced its decision to lift the minimum wage by 3.5 per cent on Tuesday, with almost three million low-paid workers set to earn an extra $32 a week. The rise will come into effect from July, with the minimum wage rising to $24.95 an hour, benefiting more than one-fifth of the workforce. Sally McManus, the secretary of the ACTU, said workers had gone backwards in real terms and needed to catch up to where they were before the COVID-19 pandemic. "We used to have this idea in Australia that a full-time wage should be a living wage, like one you can live on, and we don't anymore, because it's slipped back," she told ABC radio on Wednesday. "So we will be sort of setting our sights in the future about making sure that the very bottom number of the minimum wage, which is less than 50 grand, is actually a livable wage." Federal Employment Minister Amanda Rishworth said she was disappointed the coalition had labelled the decision another expense for small business. "I'm not sure that the argument that we pay people less and we don't see our lowest paid workers get a wage increase, is actually the answer to what is broadly the discussion in this country, which is how do we improve productivity," she told ABC's RN. While the boost in pay packets is set to lead to small growth in the wage price index, economists say the change won't be substantial enough to alter the likelihood of the Reserve Bank cutting interest rates later this year. National Australia Bank senior markets economist Taylor Nugent said there would be little impact on the wage price index, which is examined by the central bank when deciding whether or not to alter the cash interest rate. "We don't see any implications of (the Fair Work Commission's) decision for our own or official wages growth forecasts," he said. CreditorWatch chief economist Ivan Colhoun said the commission's decision is set to put a lower limit on inflation. "(The) decision of a real wage increase will tend to put something of a floor under inflation without an improvement in productivity performance," he said. The business sector has hit out at the wage decision, saying the increased labour costs would result in many employers having to lay off staff. The Council of Small Business Organisations had argued for a wage rise of between two and 2.5 per cent. Mr Colhoun said the commission's decision sought to strike a balance between a wage rise for workers alongside uncertainty in the global economy. An increase to the minimum wage won't be enough for the nation's lowest-paid workers to live on, the Australian Council of Trade Unions says. The Fair Work Commission announced its decision to lift the minimum wage by 3.5 per cent on Tuesday, with almost three million low-paid workers set to earn an extra $32 a week. The rise will come into effect from July, with the minimum wage rising to $24.95 an hour, benefiting more than one-fifth of the workforce. Sally McManus, the secretary of the ACTU, said workers had gone backwards in real terms and needed to catch up to where they were before the COVID-19 pandemic. "We used to have this idea in Australia that a full-time wage should be a living wage, like one you can live on, and we don't anymore, because it's slipped back," she told ABC radio on Wednesday. "So we will be sort of setting our sights in the future about making sure that the very bottom number of the minimum wage, which is less than 50 grand, is actually a livable wage." Federal Employment Minister Amanda Rishworth said she was disappointed the coalition had labelled the decision another expense for small business. "I'm not sure that the argument that we pay people less and we don't see our lowest paid workers get a wage increase, is actually the answer to what is broadly the discussion in this country, which is how do we improve productivity," she told ABC's RN. While the boost in pay packets is set to lead to small growth in the wage price index, economists say the change won't be substantial enough to alter the likelihood of the Reserve Bank cutting interest rates later this year. National Australia Bank senior markets economist Taylor Nugent said there would be little impact on the wage price index, which is examined by the central bank when deciding whether or not to alter the cash interest rate. "We don't see any implications of (the Fair Work Commission's) decision for our own or official wages growth forecasts," he said. CreditorWatch chief economist Ivan Colhoun said the commission's decision is set to put a lower limit on inflation. "(The) decision of a real wage increase will tend to put something of a floor under inflation without an improvement in productivity performance," he said. The business sector has hit out at the wage decision, saying the increased labour costs would result in many employers having to lay off staff. The Council of Small Business Organisations had argued for a wage rise of between two and 2.5 per cent. Mr Colhoun said the commission's decision sought to strike a balance between a wage rise for workers alongside uncertainty in the global economy.
