Reprieve for Scots RAAC campaigners seeking justice
But it has been confirmed that they will have another chance to enlist public support for their cause. This time, campaigners hope to reach 100,000 signatures, which would spark a parliamentary debate.
'We were down but not out,' said Wilson Chowdhry, the group's chairman. 'This scandal is too big, too devastating, and too cruel to be ignored.
'The government has now given us a second chance to make our voices heard. We will not stop until homeowners get the justice, financial support, and recognition they deserve.
RAAC, or reinforced autoclaved aerated concrete, was used in thousands of public buildings across the UK between the 1960s and 1990s.
Houses in Tillicoultry were evacuated after being found to contain the material. (Image: Scott Barron) Now, those who own properties containing the brittle material, which resembles the composition of an Aero Bar, have been left scrambling for answers.
Chowdry told The Herald last month: 'Over the years, each council that has renovated roofs containing RAAC has said repairs were due to insulation, not structural integrity. Yet, it was known this material was dangerous.'
'Anyone who has lost their home due to safety defects must be awarded first time home buyer status,' the campaigner added. 'They should also be able to renegotiate the terms of their mortgage. Some will have to pay off a 30 year mortgage for a pile of rubble.
Read more:
Ewan McGregor mansion plans thrown out by Perthshire and Kinross Council
How Nigel Farage could turn the North East turquoise in 2026
£150m Aberdeen incinerator temporarily shuttered over structural faults
'The government bailed out the banks using taxpayer money and now we want the banks to bail out the people.'
The new petition, which has been signed 341 times in two days, reads: 'We are concerned that many families across the UK face homelessness, bankruptcy, and trauma after being forced from homes made unsafe by RAAC.
'These homeowners did nothing wrong — yet are left to shoulder the burden of institutional failure and unsafe construction practices.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
3 hours ago
- BBC News
Man re-arrested and charged over Aberdeen death of Austion Ironside
A man has been re-arrested and charged over the death of a 25-year-old man in Ironside was taken to Aberdeen Royal Infirmary after emergency services were called to Skene Street last Sunday. He died last Tuesday.A 46-year-old man was arrested in connection with the death on Monday but was later released "pending further inquiries".Police confirmed the same man has now been arrested again and charged, and will appear at Aberdeen Sheriff Court on Thursday.
The Herald Scotland
3 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Kate Forbes, Nicola Sturgeon, and the case for Free Speech
Whether it's Kate Forbes appearing at a live event hosted by The Herald or Nicola Sturgeon writing in her memoirs, both women are entitled to have their takes on the world and politics heard. In an age where public discourse is becoming faster and more polarised than ever, the principle of free speech is being tested from all sides. We've been here before, and history should have taught us a lesson. In 2023, the comedy club The Stand announced it had cancelled Joanna Cherry's appearance because staff were not comfortable with her views on transgender issues. The appearance went ahead after the threat of legal action, with the venue accepting the decision was 'unfair and constituted unlawful discrimination against Ms Cherry.' They discovered that disagreement is not a legitimate excuse to shutter someone's voice. Appearing at Matt Forde's s Political Party show at the Fringe on Wednesday, Joanna Cherry said there are currently threats to free speech in Scotland which she believes are "coming from" political parties. Asked about free speech by the political commentator, Ms Cherry said: "there is a real problem in our politics in Scotland that has seeped into our public life." If we go further back to 2020, we can look at Franklin Graham's planned event at Glasgow's Scottish Event Campus (SEC) which was cancelled due to pressure from Glasgow City Council and religious groups. The cancellation followed criticism of Graham's views on homosexuality, Islam, and Donald Trump but the SEC was later ordered to pay almost £100,000 in damages to the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association for breach of contract and discrimination. More recently, the National Library of Scotland faced criticism after it emerged that a collection of essays by gender-critical women had been cut from an exhibition because the national librarian was worried it would lose support from stakeholders. And the same is true across the board. Take Nicola Sturgeon, whose recent memoir Frankly some say they cannot bear to read. Her political perspectives, personal experiences, and interpretations of events may resonate with some and repulse others. Some might not even belong to Camp 'Good Sturgeon' or Camp 'Bad Sturgeon'. Some might see her as a complicated individual who has made both good and bad decisions — complex, a term often afforded to men and not to women. READ MORE: Joanna Cherry: 'Shocking' Free Speech threat at Edinburgh Fringe WATCH: The Herald's Unspun Live takes over the Fringe Disagreement is the nature of politics — and indeed of life. But the fact we disagree is not, and should never be, a reason to muzzle others. Somewhere along the way, some of us started treating free speech as a reward for being 'right' in the eyes of some. But that's not how it works. Safeguards of free speech in the Human Rights Act weren't built to shield palatable chatter — they're there to protect, at times, the controversial, the awkward, even the infuriating. The alternative is dangerous. If only 'acceptable' opinions are allowed airtime, who determines what's acceptable? You? Me? The most trending social media take? I'm sick to death of echo chambers of opinion narrating our public discourse — our world cannot be shaped by that. Criticism of each other's views is absolutely vital. Disagree with Forbes? Lay out your counterargument. Think Cherry's views are a backward step? Argue intelligently. See Nicola Sturgeon's memoirs as self-indulgent nonsense? Fine, just be prepared for people to argue against you. But trying to de-platform, shout down, or digitally erase people isn't moral virtue — it's intellectual cowardice. Let them speak. Listen. Argue. Or just walk away. But if your first instinct is to shut them down, don't call it progress. Call it for what it is: fear of the conversation.
The Herald Scotland
3 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Joanna Cherry: 'Shocking' Free Speech threat at Edinburgh Fringe
Asked by Forde whether free speech is under threat in Scotland, Ms Cherry said: 'I think there are…threats to freedom of speech in Scotland and, regrettably, they have come not wholly from my political party. The Greens are certainly enthusiastically on board, the Lib Dems as well, and some people in the Labour party.' She placed part of the blame on former First Minister Nicola Sturgeon, adding that the current First Minister 'does not have the courage to speak against it.' READ MORE: WATCH: The Herald's Unspun Live takes over the Fringe How Kate Forbes managed to avoid 'good riddance' comments Kate Forbes: I am not a quitter - this is why I'm leaving Holyrood Ms Cherry criticised Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar as 'missing in action' on issues of free speech, while praising Scottish Conservative leader Russell Findlay as 'pretty good' on the topic. She described Liberal Democrat leader Alex Cole-Hamilton as 'absolutely appalling' and said the Greens were 'unspeakable.' 'There is a real problem in our politics in Scotland that has seeped into our public life,' she said. Ms Cherry condemned the National Library of Scotland for censoring a book written by feminists, lesbians, and sex abuse survivors who opposed what she called Sturgeon's 'identity politics.' She accused the librarian and board chairman of bowing to pressure from a small staff group representing an LGBT network, saying: 'I think that's shocking.' She also criticised Summerhall, the venue that hosted The Herald's Unspun Live Fringe show featuring Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes. Last week, the venue apologised for 'the understandable upset' caused by Forbes' appearance and offered a 'designated relaxed space' for artists, promising to implement new inclusion and wellbeing policies. Ms Cherry, who attended the event, described the situation as 'shocking' and said it was symptomatic of a wider problem at the festival: 'It is also shocking that a venue in this city has effectively said that the deputy first minister of the country is not welcome there…and that staff are so coddled that they need to have a safe room provided for them when Kate did come to speak.' Discussing the broader threat to free speech, Ms Cherry concluded: 'There is a real problem here that we are seeing at the festival.'
