logo
US and Europe See Putin Reining In Russia's Unruly Hybrid War

US and Europe See Putin Reining In Russia's Unruly Hybrid War

Mint3 hours ago
US and European officials say they're seeing a decline in suspected Russian state-backed sabotage acts this year, evidence that President Vladimir Putin's security services may be reining in a hybrid warfare campaign that's been blamed for attacks across Europe.
The drop-off in operations, which have involved Russian intelligence agents paying proxies to target civilian infrastructure and individuals, has been attributed to a range of factors, according to the officials, who asked not to be identified discussing sensitive issues. A leading explanation is that Moscow may be tightening its grip on attacks entrusted to unreliable local criminals, some of which had got out of control and risked a major miscalculation, the people said.
There were 11 suspected Russia-backed hybrid incidents in Europe between January and May this year, including the attempted sabotage of fiber-optic cables and cell towers in Sweden, a report by the International Institute for Strategic Studies think tank concluded. That compares to a record high of more than 30 in the whole of 2024, according to the IISS's dataset of attacks on energy, communications, transport, military, water and undersea targets.
Western officials believe one factor may be that Putin wanted to avoid further antagonizing Donald Trump in the early months of his second term as the US president sought to reach a rapid peace deal in Ukraine. Other possible reasons include potential recruits being deterred from involvement by high-profile trials of saboteurs caught by law enforcement, forcing Moscow to adapt its tactics, and Russia's GRU military intelligence service redirecting resources to Ukraine in recent months, they said.
Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov didn't respond to a request to comment. He has previously dismissed reports that Russia carries out sabotage in Europe as 'unfounded accusations.'
US officials at the White House and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence didn't respond to requests for comment.
Western officials say hybrid operations became a key part of Russia's playbook in the wake of its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, as the US and Europe sent Kyiv billions of dollars of weapons to defend itself. With much of Europe expelling Russian spies tied to its embassies in recent years, the people say that Moscow shifted to paying local proxies to carry out acts of violence, sabotage and arson in a campaign of disruption.
The Russian campaign has been viewed as an effort to target western nations over their support of Ukraine. In contrast to his predecessor Joe Biden, Trump's military aid for Kyiv has been less reliable. The US recently agreed to continue sending weapons to Ukraine as long as European allies pay for them.
The officials cautioned that the apparent waning of the campaign wasn't an indication that hybrid attacks had stopped completely or wouldn't escalate again in future. Sabotage plots remain higher in eastern European countries than in western nations, they said.
The decline in incidents may have started in fall 2024 after high-level US officials reached out to their Russian counterparts to warn them against conducting future operations, people familiar with the conversations said, asking not to be identified because the issue is sensitive. The contacts took place amid American fears that Russia would put incendiary devices on cargo planes bound for the US, following a fire at a DHL facility in Britain in July 2024.
Hybrid attacks are defined as hostile state-backed threats using both conventional and unconventional military methods, designed to destabilize opponents while blurring the threshold of a declared act of war.
Three UK residents were convicted in July of carrying out a March 2024 Russia-backed arson attack on a London warehouse of a firm that supplied goods, including Starlink satellite equipment, to Ukraine. Ken McCallum, head of Britain's domestic security service MI5, said last year that Russia was on a mission to generate 'sustained mayhem on British and European streets.'
In May, Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk accused Russian intelligence services of orchestrating a 2024 arson attack that almost completely destroyed a shopping center in Warsaw.
Other incidents attributed to Moscow include vandalism, the jamming of GPS signals and a foiled plot to assassinate the CEO of a German arms company.
'Russia is currently waging two wars,' Finnish President Alexander Stubb said last year. 'One is a kinetic, conventional war in Ukraine. The other is a hybrid war in Europe and the West with the aim of influencing the tone of public discourse or in some way shake our sense of security.'
Russia may be struggling to maintain strict control over operations, with some cases of sabotage and arson going beyond the aims of those who commissioned them, some of the officials said. That may be due in part to the incompetence and unreliability of petty criminals hired to carry out the actions, they said.
There's also evidence that some individuals, described as self-starters, have acted on their own initiative in hopes of impressing potential Russian paymasters, again risking erratic outcomes, the people said.
In response, Russia has increasingly ordered local proxies to film themselves carrying out attacks to try to ensure plots unfold as planned, the people said.
The diverting of Russian intelligence resources to Ukraine was revealing of the Kremlin's struggles to secure breakthroughs on the ground this year, despite Putin's public narrative that he's winning the war, the people said. It also suggested Russian resources are stretched.
Changes to the law in countries like the UK have increased prison sentences for involvement in such incidents. That has raised the risk for potential recruits, who are often paid only a few hundred euros or pounds by Russian intelligence and have no diplomatic protection if they're caught.
While plots have declined this year, European governments continue to record regular and serious cases of Russian cyber attacks and more traditional espionage attempts, some of the officials said.
With assistance from Alberto Nardelli.
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

If India were to stop buying Russian oil, global crude prices could jump to 200 dollars a barrel: Report
If India were to stop buying Russian oil, global crude prices could jump to 200 dollars a barrel: Report

Mint

time26 minutes ago

  • Mint

If India were to stop buying Russian oil, global crude prices could jump to 200 dollars a barrel: Report

Global crude prices could jump to 200 US Dollars a barrel if India were to stop buying Russian Oil thus severely harming consumers worldwide, sources told ANI. Russian oil has never been sanctioned and is still not sanctioned by either the United States or the European Union. Providing context for India's energy security policy, sources explained that Russia, the world's second-largest crude oil producer with about 9.5 million barrels per day output – nearly 10% of global demand – is also the second-largest exporter, shipping roughly 4.5 million barrels per day of crude and 2.3 million barrels per day of refined products. Past fears of Russian oil being squeezed out of global markets had driven Brent crude prices to a high of $137 per barrel in March 2022. "In this challenging environment, India, as the world's third-largest energy consumer with 85% import dependence, strategically adapted its sourcing to secure affordable energy while fully adhering to international norms," sources added. Earlier, United States President Donald Trump on Friday ( EST) claimed that India may cease purchasing Russian oil, calling it "a good step" if confirmed, while India has defended its sovereign right to pursue an energy policy in its own national interest. News agency Reuters reported on July 31st that Indian state-run refiners suspended purchases of Russian oil amid tariff threats from President Trump and narrowing price discounts. However, Indian sources have now rebutted these reports, clarifying that Indian refiners have continued to buy Russian crude based on commercial viability. Sources further told ANI that Russian oil has never been sanctioned, but rather subjected to a G7/EU price-cap mechanism to limit Russian revenues while keeping global supplies flowing. India oil refiners' purchases have remained fully legitimate under international frameworks. "Had Indian oil refiners not absorbed discounted Russian crude, combined with OPEC production cuts of 5.86 million barrels per day, global oil prices could have surged well beyond the March 2022 peak of 137 dollars per barrel, intensifying inflation globally," sources explained. It was also highlighted that Indian oil marketing companies (OMCs) have refrained from buying Iranian or Venezuelan crude, which is actually sanctioned by the US, and have complied with the $60 per barrel price cap recommended for Russian oil by the US. The European Union has recently recommended a lower price cap of $47.6 per barrel for Russian oil, to take effect in September. Commenting on Europe's continued Russian energy imports, sources noted the EU was the largest importer of Russian-origin liquefied natural gas (LNG), buying 51% of Russia's LNG exports, followed by China at 21% and Japan at 18%. For pipeline gas, the EU remained the top buyer with a 37% share, followed by China at 30% and Turkey at 27%. Backing India oil refiners' decision to continue sourcing Russian oil, sources reiterated that India's energy choices are guided by its national interest, while also contributing to global energy stability. "India's pragmatic approach has kept oil flowing, prices stable, and markets balanced, while fully respecting international frameworks," they added.

All eyes on Putin's voice Medvedev as Trump sends nuclear subs to Russia - is a tense standoff on the cards?
All eyes on Putin's voice Medvedev as Trump sends nuclear subs to Russia - is a tense standoff on the cards?

Time of India

time36 minutes ago

  • Time of India

All eyes on Putin's voice Medvedev as Trump sends nuclear subs to Russia - is a tense standoff on the cards?

Trump sends U.S. nuclear submarines toward Russia after Medvedev's threats escalate Ukraine war tensions- In a dramatic show of force, President Donald Trump announced the deployment of two U.S. nuclear submarines in response to what he called 'highly provocative statements' made by Dmitry Medvedev, Russia's former president and current Deputy Chair of its Security Council. The move has reignited fears of nuclear escalation amid the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war, drawing global attention and raising critical concerns over national security, diplomacy, and the fragility of deterrence strategies in the nuclear age. Trump orders nuclear submarines repositioned to counter Russia's nuclear threats On August 1, 2025, President Trump took to Truth Social to announce that two nuclear submarines had been repositioned to strategic locations near Russia. The decision followed a fiery statement by Dmitry Medvedev, who warned of worsening conflict and invoked Cold War-era nuclear rhetoric, referencing Russia's 'Dead Hand' automatic retaliation system—an ominous legacy from Soviet times designed to launch nuclear weapons even if leadership is destroyed. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category others Operations Management Technology Management Data Analytics Leadership Digital Marketing Data Science Product Management Finance Healthcare Project Management PGDM Public Policy Data Science MCA Design Thinking Artificial Intelligence MBA healthcare Others CXO Cybersecurity Degree Skills you'll gain: Duration: 16 Weeks Indian School of Business CERT - ISB Cybersecurity for Leaders Program India Starts on undefined Get Details Trump's post read: 'Based on the highly provocative statements of the Former President of Russia, Dmitry Medvedev, including threats involving nuclear weapons and the Dead Hand system, I have ordered two Nuclear Submarines to be positioned in strategic locations—just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that.' This marked one of the rare moments in modern history where the location of U.S. nuclear assets—typically classified—was referenced publicly by a sitting president. Why Trump's move is making headlines around the world What makes this announcement particularly shocking is not just its timing but also its method of communication and its strategic implications. Military experts, nuclear watchdogs, and diplomatic analysts all agree: U.S. nuclear submarine movements are never disclosed publicly for security and deterrence reasons. By confirming such a repositioning, even vaguely, Trump broke with decades of silent doctrine. Live Events Additionally, the escalation comes at a time when tensions in Eastern Europe are boiling over, with Ukraine fighting to hold off renewed Russian advances near Kharkiv and Zaporizhzhia. Trump's warning was widely seen as a way to assert American military dominance and issue a direct warning to the Kremlin. What Medvedev said that triggered Trump's nuclear response Trump's nuclear posture was triggered by an explosive online tirade from Dmitry Medvedev, who dismissed Trump's recent 10-day ultimatum to Russia as "childish," while warning that 'the next phase of this war could go nuclear.' He doubled down by invoking Russia's Cold War-era "Dead Hand" system—an automatic launch mechanism that activates nuclear missiles if Russian leadership is incapacitated in a first strike. In his statements, Medvedev called the United States 'arrogant and delusional,' and accused Trump of 'fantasy politics,' further escalating the diplomatic clash. The Kremlin has not officially endorsed Medvedev's remarks, but analysts believe his comments often reflect deeper currents in Moscow's security and defense circles. Understanding the strategic role of U.S. Ohio-class nuclear submarines President Trump's mention of repositioning nuclear submarines likely refers to Ohio-class ballistic missile submarines (SSBNs)—the cornerstone of America's nuclear triad. These stealth vessels are armed with Trident II D-5 missiles and are designed to remain hidden under the oceans, serving as a second-strike capability in case of nuclear attack. According to Hans Kristensen, Director of the Nuclear Information Project at the Federation of American Scientists, these submarines already operate globally, and no 'special deployment' may have occurred. 'The subs are always out there… they don't need to be moved into position. This is more about signaling than strategy,' Kristensen explained in a Reuters interview. Experts criticize Trump's nuclear threats on social media International security experts and arms control advocates have strongly criticized President Trump's public rhetoric, warning it could set a dangerous precedent. Daryl Kimball, Executive Director of the Arms Control Association, said: 'No leader should be threatening nuclear war in such a juvenile manner, especially on social media. Strategic ambiguity is key to deterrence, and this move erodes that.' Evelyn Farkas, former Pentagon official and now Director at the McCain Institute, said Trump's announcement is part of a larger geopolitical chess game aimed more at intimidating than initiating war: 'This isn't about an imminent nuclear strike. It's signaling. It's the equivalent of flipping the high beams to get someone's attention.' The bigger picture: Trump's 10-day Ukraine ultimatum and global fallout Just days before ordering the submarine repositioning, Trump issued a 10-day ultimatum demanding that Russia halt its aggression in Ukraine or face sweeping economic sanctions, including potential secondary sanctions on countries supporting Russia—such as India and China. This hardline stance marks a notable shift in Trump's foreign policy tone. Once seen as less confrontational with Putin, Trump has now branded Russia's war tactics as 'disgusting and cowardly,' calling for a 'global economic blockade' against Moscow if hostilities continue past August 8, 2025. This deadline has now become a focal point in international diplomacy, with global markets reacting and NATO allies bracing for potential escalations. Is this nuclear posturing or a real shift in defense strategy? While President Trump's public comments suggest immediate action, most experts agree that this is not a sudden strategic change. The U.S. Navy does not typically confirm or deny submarine movements, but it's widely understood that the Ohio-class fleet is always on silent patrol. Trump's language, however, is seen as a break from traditional nuclear protocol, with potentially serious consequences. Publicly referencing the use or movement of nuclear-capable forces can undermine deterrence and provoke unintended escalation, especially when adversaries feel the need to respond in kind. How other countries are reacting to Trump's submarine order Global reactions have been swift. European allies in NATO have urged restraint, with Germany and France calling for de-escalation. Meanwhile, Russia's Foreign Ministry accused Trump of 'reckless provocation,' warning of 'unpredictable consequences.' China, which has maintained a neutral stance on the Ukraine conflict, expressed 'grave concern' over the rhetoric from both the U.S. and Russia, calling for 'measured dialogue.' India, which Trump recently targeted with tariff threats if it continues trading with Moscow, has yet to make an official statement, but analysts expect it to tread carefully given its strategic partnerships with both Washington and Moscow. A dangerous moment in modern geopolitics President Trump's nuclear submarine announcement has undeniably raised the stakes in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, showing that the U.S. is willing to flex its military muscle in unconventional ways. Whether this move is a serious strategic step or a high-stakes political message remains to be seen—but what's clear is that the world has entered a new, uncertain phase of nuclear diplomacy. The coming days—especially as the August 8 deadline approaches—will be critical in determining whether these threats are the beginning of deeper confrontation or a calculated bluff in a tense geopolitical standoff. FAQs: Q1: Why did Trump send nuclear submarines toward Russia? Trump acted after Medvedev's nuclear threat and Russia's warnings escalated during the Ukraine war. Q2: What is Russia's 'Dead Hand' system mentioned by Medvedev? It's an old Cold War nuclear system that automatically launches missiles if Russia is attacked.

Former Malian prime minister charged after criticising military rule online
Former Malian prime minister charged after criticising military rule online

First Post

timean hour ago

  • First Post

Former Malian prime minister charged after criticising military rule online

A Malian court has detained and charged former Prime Minister Moussa Mara over a social media post critical of the country's military-led government. read more A Malian court has detained and charged former Prime Minister Moussa Mara over a social media post criticising shrinking democratic space under military rule in the West African nation, his lawyer said late Friday. Mara is one of few public figures in the country who has been willing to openly question moves taken this year to dissolve political parties and grant the military government, led by Assimi Goita, a five-year mandate without elections. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Last month, authorities formally approved Goita's five-year term and said it could be renewed as many times as necessary as Mali struggles to respond to a long-running jihadist insurgency. More from World Trump new tariffs: How India stacks up against rest of Asia Goita assumed power after military coups in 2020 and 2021. Mara had been summoned several times for questioning this month over a social media post dated July 4 expressing solidarity with government critics who have been jailed. On July 21, his lawyer, Mountaga Tall, posted on social media site X that Mara had been barred from boarding a flight to Senegal to participate in a regional conference on peace and security. On Friday, Mara was summoned by a judicial cybercrimes unit, and a prosecutor charged him with offences including undermining the credibility of the state and spreading false information, Tall said in a statement. Mara's trial has been scheduled for September 29, Tall said. A government spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The case against Mara comes amid worsening insecurity in Mali. The past few months have seen a surge of deadly attacks by Jama'at Nusrat al-Islam wal-Muslimin (JNIM), an al-Qaeda-linked group that also operates in Burkina Faso and Niger. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Analysts say the group's battlefield tactics have grown increasingly sophisticated and that it has amassed substantial resources through raids on military posts, cattle rustling, hijacking of goods, kidnappings and taxes on local communities. On Friday, the group said it had ambushed a convoy of Malian soldiers and Russian mercenaries in the Tenenkou locality in central Mali. Mali's army confirmed the ambush in a statement on X. Neither statement gave a death toll.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store