logo
Thousands join anti-austerity march in London to protest against Labour's cuts

Thousands join anti-austerity march in London to protest against Labour's cuts

The Guardian07-06-2025
Thousands of people marched through central London on Saturday calling for an end to public service and welfare cuts, in the first big anti-austerity march under Keir Starmer's Labour government.
The campaign group People's Assembly, which organised the demonstration, called on the government to 'tax the rich and their hidden wealth to fund public services'.
The People's Assembly said it was bringing together trade unionists, health, disability, housing and welfare campaigners with community organisations under the slogan: No More Austerity 2.0.
Writer Kate Hardie, 57, was among those marching to Whitehall. She had voted for Labour in every election since she was 18, including last year, but said she will no longer support the party under Starmer.
'I worry about the fact that this government is making cuts that are unnecessary. People are really suffering because of it,' she said.
She has friends who are disabled, who were 'devastated' when cuts to personal independence payments (Pip) were announced. 'It isn't just about my friends, because if we only vote for the people that we know, we're in trouble,' she added.
Hardie was also dismayed over the prime minister's widely criticised 'island of strangers' speech, which was likened to the rhetoric of Enoch Powell.
'There's the problem of cuts and a problem with rising hate in this country and around the world,' she said. 'It's not just financial, it's also ideological and about how we treat each other.'
She thinks the government's current approach will bear little fruit electorally. 'Why would you go and see a tribute band if you can get the real thing? It's not gonna work, it's ridiculous.'
Daniel Kebede, the general secretary of the National Education Union, said: 'People are very disappointed in this government. Whether it has been cuts to winter fuel, the two-child benefit cap still being in place, we haven't seen enough investment.
'We appreciate that the government have a tight fiscal window to operate in, but we think they need to tax the wealthy more and start investing in communities.'
He said the 'commitment to roll out free school meals to all families in receipt of universal credit' was welcome but called on the government to 'go much further much faster because the only person who is benefiting from cuts to communities is Nigel Farage'.
Holding a sign calling for landlords to be taxed – including herself, Corinne Richeux, 57, who runs an NGO based in China, said: 'I'm really worried about the state of the country and I don't think British people can take austerity any more. We need a real radical change of direction and we need to tax the rich to make it happen.
'I think that many rich people would support more taxation. I think it's cowardly of the Labour government to pander to the rich when the people are really struggling.'
She said she 'was shocked when the first thing they did was to start slashing benefits'.
'I kind of hoped that he was keeping his cards close his chest and that he was planning on taxing the rich when he got into office. I wasn't expecting it to be quite so bad.'
Labour-run councils were also a target of criticism. Helen Davies, 59, a social worker, chanted in support of bin workers in Birmingham, who have been striking since January.
On central government, she said: 'It's not what we expect from a Labour government. The social inequalities are being driven harder, there has to be a positive alternative to that.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What next for social media ‘martyr' Lucy Connolly after leaving prison?
What next for social media ‘martyr' Lucy Connolly after leaving prison?

The Independent

time8 minutes ago

  • The Independent

What next for social media ‘martyr' Lucy Connolly after leaving prison?

Lucy Connolly is out of jail. She was one of about 1,800 arrested for offences during riots last summer in the wake of the Southport murders. Connolly, from Northampton, was convicted and jailed for publishing 'threatening or abusive' material on social media including an incitement to 'set fire to all the f****** hotels full of the bastards for all I care.' Hers is one of the more high-profile cases and some activists have taken up her cause, claiming she has been a victim of 'two tier' policing, harsh sentencing, and restricted free speech. Her sentence was 31 months; a bid to reduce it was rejected by the Court of Appeal in May. Under current early release rules, she is allowed out on licence for the remainder of her sentence, having served 40 per cent. What did Connolly do wrong? Her supporters mostly concede that what she said was wrong, but many also minimise it as mere 'hurty words' for which nobody should be given a custodial sentence. There is also the suspicion in some quarters that the punishment was heavier because of political pressure; the prime minister said at the time that the full force of the law should be brought down on offenders. But her case was carefully examined at Birmingham Crown Court and at the Court of Appeal. The facts were not in dispute, she pled guilty, and the judges have considered the context and acted within the guidelines approved by ministers. What did she post on social media? The mother-of-three, who was working as a childminder at the time and is the wife of a Tory councillor, wrote a number of messages but attention focused on this X post that was later deleted: ''Mass deportation now. Set fire to all the fucking hotels full of the bastards for all I care. While you're at it, take the treacherous government and politicians with them. I feel physically sick knowing what these families will now have to endure. If that makes me racist, so be it.' While visible, it had been viewed 310,000 times and reposted 940 times. Four days earlier, Connolly had responded to a video shared online by Tommy Robinson, showing a black male being tackled to the ground for allegedly masturbating in public. 'Somalian, I guess. Loads of them,' she wrote, adding a vomiting emoji. Five days after the Southport murders Connolly stated on social media, referencing an anti-racism demo: 'Oh good. I take it they will all be in line to sign up to house an illegal boat invader then. Oh sorry, refugee. Maybe sign a waiver to say they don't mind if it's one of their family that gets attacked, butchered, raped etc, by unvetted criminals. Not all heroes wear capes.' Another message, on WhatsApp, read: 'The raging tweet about burning down hotels has bit me on the arse lol.' Another message, sent later, was in response to the furore she'd caused. According to the Court of Appeal, in another message she said she intended to tell authorities she had been the victim of doxing and went on to say that if she got arrested she would 'play the mental health card'. Did she have a defence? According to the Court of Appeal: 'The stabbings of the children in Southport had put her into a rage. She said she felt hatred about the incident and the circumstances, not about race. She said she had taken the post down because she realised it was wrong. Later in the interview she said her tweets were not racial and she had no intention to cause hate or racial issues.' Is she a hero? To some, she is akin to Emmeline Pankhurst or Joan of Arc. Senior members of the Trump administration have raised questions about freedom of speech in the UK as a result of the treatment of those who sent messages and were subsequently convicted of public order offences. Nigel Farage, leader of Reform UK, has lauded her in these terms: 'Welcome to freedom, Lucy Connolly. You are now a symbol of Keir Starmer's authoritarian, broken, two-tier Britain.' Kemi Badenoch has attacked the way the courts treated Connolly, going in hard on the two-tier charge: 'Lucy Connolly finally returns home to her family today. At last. Her punishment was harsher than the sentences handed down for bricks thrown at police or actual rioting… meanwhile, former Labour councillor Ricky Jones called for protestors to have their throats slit. Charged with encouraging violent disorder, he pleaded not guilty and was acquitted by a jury who saw his words as a disgusting remark made in the heat of the moment, not a call to action.' Connolly will have no shortage of media outlets, some highly sympathetic, on which to appear should she wish. What does Keir Starmer think? He thinks politicians should stay out of the courtroom, and has no regrets. He told the Commons in May: 'Sentencing is a matter for our courts, and I celebrate the fact that we have independent courts in this country. I am strongly in favour of free speech … but I am equally against incitement to violence against other people.' What will happen next? Another extended skirmish in Britain's endless and debilitating culture wars. Maybe that chap who took a brick to his testes during the disturbances will be the next contender for martyrdom.

Warning far-right has ‘hijacked' women's safety for political gain
Warning far-right has ‘hijacked' women's safety for political gain

The Independent

time8 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Warning far-right has ‘hijacked' women's safety for political gain

Leading women's rights groups have warned that the far right movement has 'hijacked' the issue of women's safety for political gain. More than 100 organisations have written to prime minister Sir Keir Starmer to urge the government to stop far-right groups from 'weaponising' violence against women and girls (VAWG) for a 'racist, anti-migrant agenda'. It comes after weeks of far-right protests outside hotels housing asylum seekers across the country, with many participants claiming to be there under the banner of 'protecting' women and girls in their community. The letter states how in recent weeks, the organisations had seen 'vital conversations' about VAWG be 'hijacked by an anti-migrant agenda' that 'fuels division' and harms survivors. The groups have expressed concerns that the issue is being 'hijacked by people seeking to use women and girls' pain and trauma – and the threat of it – for political gain'. The letter, co-ordinated by End Violence Against Women Coalition, Women for Refugee Women, Hibiscus and Southall Black Sisters, read: 'Over recent weeks, people claiming to care about the 'safety of women and children' have left families, women and children living in temporary asylum accommodation afraid to leave their front door. 'They follow in the footsteps of the rioters who used the appalling murder of three young girls as an excuse to bring violence to our streets; with targeted attacks against migrant, minoritised and Muslim communities.' The statement was supported by frontline organisations including Rape Crisis England and Wales, Refuge and the Suzy Lamplugh Trust. The groups have joined to 'refuse to let women's safety be turned into hate speech' and have told the government to act urgently to prevent misinformation spreading. They warned that they had seen MPs share false statistics about the nationality of perpetrators, and warned that ministers saying protestors have 'legitimate concerns' risks 'normalising and enabling the spreading of racist narratives by the far-right'. The organisations warn that false narratives reinforce 'damaging myths' about gender-based violence, such as that it primarily comes from strangers. They say the false picture allows perpetrators who harm women and girls 'to hide behind racial stereotypes and scapegoating', while hostile immigration policies put marginalised women and survivors in the UK at an 'even greater risk of harm'. 'The far-right has long exploited the cause of ending violence against women and girls to promote a racist, white supremacist agenda,' Andrea Simon, director of the End Violence Against Women Coalition, said. 'These attacks against migrant and racialised communities are appalling and do nothing to improve women and girls' autonomy, rights and freedoms.' Andrea Vukovic, co-director of Women for Refugee Women, said the organisation had supported women in recent weeks that had fled war and persecution, and have been too afraid to leave their homes due to attacks on migrant and racialised communities. Selma Taha, executive director of Southall Black Sisters said: 'Attempts to weaponize VAWG through racist scapegoating of migrants not only distract from real solutions, but also deepen the marginalisation of Black, minoritised and migrant victim-survivors. 'The government, our public institutions, and the media must take responsibility for shaping an accurate, evidence-based narrative on immigration, and must end the normalisation of far-right misinformation in debates on immigration and VAWG.' A Home Office spokesperson said: 'All acts of violence against women and girls are intolerable, so our upcoming VAWG Strategy will set out how we will protect the most vulnerable and halve these crimes in a decade. "At the same time, we know that people are concerned about the impact of illegal migration. That's why we are changing the law to deny registered sex offenders' asylum and we will do everything in our power to deport them from the UK."

Ex-minister Liam Fox probes Chinook disaster over his 'deep concerns'
Ex-minister Liam Fox probes Chinook disaster over his 'deep concerns'

Daily Mail​

time8 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Ex-minister Liam Fox probes Chinook disaster over his 'deep concerns'

Former Defence Secretary Sir Liam Fox is carrying out an investigation into the 1994 RAF Chinook disaster on the Mull of Kintyre after voicing 'deep concerns' about the crash. He intervened as families of the victims accused the Ministry of Defence (MoD) of 'gaslighting' them by refusing to answer unresolved questions. Relatives of senior British intelligence personnel killed in the helicopter tragedy are suing the MoD in a bid to end what they describe as three decades of secrecy. As Defence Secretary back in 2011, Sir Liam published the results of an independent review which recommended that an earlier finding that the pilots were negligent to a gross degree should be 'set aside'. Now Sir Liam has spoken of 'very deep concerns' about the circumstances surrounding the crash which killed 25 senior intelligence experts and four Special Forces crew. Campaigners say the MoD's decision to seal the Chinook files for 100 years had 'further heightened suspicions of a cover-up'. Sir Liam has held a private meeting with some of the 47 children of those who were killed on June 2, 1994 in a Chinook Mk 2. Calls for a public inquiry have been rejected both by the Prime Minister and the MoD and the families are now pursuing a judicial review at the High Court under Article II of the Human Rights Act, which protects the right to life. Sir Liam said: 'It was my pleasure to meet some of the members of the Chinook Justice Campaign and to listen to their harrowing stories and their suspicions about what may have happened. 'I share their very deep concerns about the circumstances surrounding the crash and I have committed to a full investigation to ensure that the truth is laid before the British people. 'As the Defence Secretary who, after the conclusions of the Mull of Kintyre Review, cleared the two pilots of blame, I have assured the families that I will give this my full attention and help to establish the truth about what happened.' According to campaigners, evidence which has been leaked to the families – and is available on the Chinook Justice Campaign website – confirms that the aircraft was not airworthy and should never have taken off on that fateful flight. Andy Tobias, whose father, Lieutenant Colonel John Tobias, 41, was killed, said the 'support of Sir Liam Fox means a huge amount to all of the families'. He said: 'The MoD keeps telling us that no new inquiry is necessary, and points to the judge-led inquiry set up by Sir Liam which was established solely to discover whether the pilots were to blame. 'They were cleared; given Sir Liam supports our case – then the MoD's argument is void. 'They must stop trying to gaslight the families of the dead.' Flight Lieutenants Jonathan Tapper and Richard Cook were both UK Special Forces pilots with exemplary service records. Two RAF Air Marshals ruled the pair were 'grossly negligent', effectively overturning a previous inquiry. It took nearly 17 years for the pilots' families to clear their names. An MoD spokesman said: 'It's unlikely that a public inquiry would identify any new evidence or reach new conclusions on the basis of existing evidence.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store