Waitangi Tribunal hears new stratergy on improving Māori Health
Photo:
Supplied / Murdoch Ngahau
Māori health leaders want the Waitangi Tribunal to recommend establishing a "new whare" to replace the short-lived, Te Aka Whai Ora, Māori Health Authortiy.
Māori health stalwarts and inquiry claimants Lady Tureiti Moxon and Janice Kuka presented evidence to the Tribunal as part of its weeklong inquiry into what will replace the now Te Aka Whai Ora.
On Wednesday, Deputy Director General of Health Māori John Whaanga
presented evidence
on behalf of the Crown but could not tell the Tribunal what would replace it.
However, he defended the Ministry of Health's on-going work to improve Māori health and said that work would continue, irrespective of the Māori Health Authority's existence.
Roimata Smail, who represents Lady Tureiti Moxon and Janice Kuka, told the Tribunal that based on the evidence submitted, the Crown had no plan to replace the Te Aka Whai Ora.
Counsel also argued the ongoing claim that a single document, the Hauora Māori Strategy, could make a difference and be relevant as the alternative to Te Aka Whai Ora was indefensible and disrespectful.
In their closing submission document given to the Tribunal, Smail said Māori health providers deliver excellent services despite limited support and that Māori want to control the funding of a system designed by and for Māori, the "new whare".
"The claimants are saying 'we'll look after ourselves first, we're tired of propping up the Crown in trying to meet its Treaty obligations… we will be independent, and we will make sure that we're doing our job right, we will monitor.'" Smail told the Tribunal.
The document outlines how the "new whare" would be completely designed and monitored by Māori, in contrast to Te Aka Whai Ora and the Iwi Māori Partnership Boards, which were designed by the Crown.
It also outlines how the funds "hoarded" by the Crown to administer Māori health should be given to Māori.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
19 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Push to declassify Amelia Earhart files gains momentum in CNMI
Amelia Earhart standing under the nose of her Lockheed Mode 10-E Electra Photo: Wikipedia The decades-old mystery surrounding the fate of pioneering aviator Amelia Earhart may be one step closer to resolution. This is after the Commonwealth of Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI) delegate to the United States Congress, Kimberlyn King-Hinds, formally requesting President Donald Trump to declassify federal documents related to her disappearance. "In my district, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, the story of Amelia Earhart carries particular weight," King-Hinds wrote in her letter to Trump. "A number of elderly residents still recall her presence in the Pacific, with some sharing credible, firsthand accounts of having seen her on the island of Saipan. These memories…continue to fuel interest in uncovering the full story of her fate." Earhart vanished in 1937 during an attempt to circumnavigate the globe, sparking one of the most enduring mysteries in aviation history. While the prevailing US narrative places her disappearance near Howland Island, oral histories in the CNMI have long suggested that she and navigator Fred Noonan may have been captured by Japanese forces and brought to Saipan. Earhart vanished in 1937 during an attempt to circumnavigate the globe. Photo: Wikicommons Saipan Amelia Earhart Monument Association's Remi Sablan thanked King-Hinds for elevating the issue to the White House. "A lot of people still here in Saipan don't believe that Amelia Earhart was here," Sablan said. "But there were eyewitnesses when there was an investigation going on. And in court, they honour eyewitnesses. I don't know why we still have people that question our association…but let it rest." King-Hinds assured Sablan and other advocates that she intends to keep pushing until any relevant records are released. "We are really excited about that," she told Sablan. "We will continue to follow up until you get that information, because I think it's important for everybody." In her letter, the congresswoman urged Trump to apply the same transparency he previously championed when releasing government files on the assassinations of President John F Kennedy, Senator Robert F Kennedy, and Dr Martin Luther King Jr. For Earhart, researchers and believers in the Saipan connection, a presidential declassification order could mark a turning point-potentially closing the book on one of the world's greatest unsolved mysteries, or adding an explosive new chapter.
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Why has trust in news fallen? The answer is more complicated than we thought
By Greg Treadwell, Merja Myllylahti of In April only one in three people said they trusted the media in general - a slight fall from last year. Photo: Supplied / Stuff / NZ Herald / Newsroom / ODT / TVNZ We live in an age of declining trust in public institutions: Parliament, the health and education systems, courts and police have all suffered over the past decade, both in New Zealand and internationally. And, of course, trust in the news has declined precipitously, according to regular surveys, including our own research. So, it might be tempting to roll declining trust in news media into this wider decline of trust in public institutions in general. But this is where our research disagrees . News isn't just another institution like the state, a corporation or a non-profit organisation. Ideally, it's the democratic expression of the public interest in these things. An institutional approach may help us explore the structural issues democracies face (for example, critiquing the nature of media ownership). But it also generalises, and risks obscuring the specifics of the trust problem public interest journalism faces. Nor does it recognise the distinctiveness of the " social contract of the press " - the necessary bond of trust between journalism and its audiences, which is key to the success of the wider social contract between the public and its institutions. Our research shows trust in news has plummeted from 58 percent of New Zealanders agreeing they can trust "most of the news most of the time" in 2020, to just 32 percent in 2025. Survey respondents tell us they perceive the news to be politically biased (both left and right), and because too much seems to be opinion masquerading as news. These seemed very different from the trust issues faced by government, business and non-governmental organisations (NGOs). Declining trust in those institutions has been driven more by wars, financial crises, the rise of populism and the Covid pandemic. To differentiate journalism's trust issues, we explored whether falling trust in news was (or wasn't) linked to declines in trust in other social institutions. We looked at research from the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism and the global Edelman Trust Barometer , as well as our own research. We found the trajectories of trust levels for other social institutions - governments, business, NGOs - showed clear links to each other as they rose and fell, more or less in sync, over time. Trust in news, however, has been in its own lane, perhaps influenced by the others, but clearly not tethered to them. A fall in trust in government and politics, in other words, is not a predictor of a fall in trust in news. Globally, we found trust in government, business and NGOs fell and then rose, roughly together, from 2020 to 2024. While not tracking each other exactly, there's a clear grouping of data points. From 2020, trust in all of them (including media in general - television, internet, radio and movies) fell rapidly and levelled out in 2021 before rising again slightly by 2024. Trust in news itself, however, behaved in almost exactly opposite ways, rising from 2020 to 2021 before falling again and levelling out in 2023. Global trust in media, news and social institutions has dropped since the Covid-19 pandemic. Photo: The Conversation Given its impact, the global pandemic is likely a cause for these changes in 2020. However, as trust in government fell, news media - to which the public has historically turned in a crisis - actually rose. In Aotearoa New Zealand, things were very different. While it fell globally, trust in institutions in New Zealand rose from 2020, before falling in 2022. Trust in news, however, was not rising in the early days of the pandemic as it was elsewhere. It was falling. And it continued to fall steadily until 2023. (In 2024, it would fall even more dramatically, but that data was not captured by this study.) A drop in trust in the media needs to be addressed separately from the drop in trust of government and non-government institutions. Photo: The Conversation Both sets of data - global and local - show trust in news doing largely the opposite of what trust in government and other institutions has been doing, rising when they were falling and vice versa. When journalism does its job well and exposes failings in government, we would indeed expect one to rise and the other to fall. So, we can see there may well be links between changes in levels of trust. But we can also see trust levels are not responding in unison to external socio-political pressures. In focus groups, we explored if there were connections between trust in news and trust in government. Older New Zealanders who didn't trust the news told us there were institutions they mistrusted: banks, insurance companies and universities, some to very high levels, and mostly born from personal experience. But they did not particularly mistrust government as an institution. And we found no direct link between their mistrust of news and their mistrust of other social institutions. Which supports the evidence we found in the global and local trust data trends. It seems the trust problems democracies have with their news services need to be addressed on their own terms, not as part of an overall picture. This story was originally published on The Conversation.
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Concerns the battle against wilding conifer pines is being lost, amid funding uncertainty
Pine seeds could travel tens of kilometres by wind and grew easily posing a difficult task for teams trying to stamp out infestations. Photo: Central Otago Wilding Conifer Group The fight to stop the remarkably rapid spread of wilding conifer pine trees continues, as Southland officials are warning the pines have caused a land-use and biosecurity crisis for the region . Around 2 million hectares of New Zealand were affected by wilding pines, like common offenders Pinus contorta and Douglas fir, and untreated areas expanded at a rate of about 5 percent each year. Pine seeds could travel tens of kilometres by wind and grew easily posing a difficult task for teams trying to stamp out infestations. A quarter of New Zealand would be covered in the unwanted pines without controls, according to the Ministry for Primary Industries website . In late July, the government announced an extra $3 million over three years for wilding pines controls in Molesworth and Mackenzie Basin areas, funded by the International Visitor Levy, adding to the $12m already allocated this financial year. Industry group Federated Farmers' pest animal and weed spokesperson, Richard Dawkins, said wilding pines posed an "ecological crisis" - and while the funding was welcomed, it fell short of what was needed. "The battle against wilding conifers is being lost," he said. "Some funding has been allocated over the years, but it's been patchy and nowhere near enough to tackle the problem properly." Around 2 million hectares of New Zealand were affected by wilding pines. Photo: Central Otago Wilding Conifer Group Southland Regional Council councillors were told this week the spread of Douglas fir in particular was accelerating across the region, and current investment and control methods were "inadequate" to keep pace with the scale of spread. Environment Southland's report author warned the cost of controls increased exponentially over time, once trees matured and seeded. "Without further intervention, vast areas of northern Southland could be overtaken within 30 years, resulting in irreversible environmental and economic loss," it said. "Wilding conifers are spreading at a scale and speed that outpaces current control budgets and operational efforts can contain." Biosecurity New Zealand coordinated the National Wilding Conifer Control Programme with landowners, industry groups and councils. Manager Sherman Smith said it was working to manage a dozen problematic species across 42 areas nationwide that threatened biodiversity. "They form a monoculture of these unwanted and pretty much useless trees," Smith said. "They shade out all the native plants and animals, they increase the fire risk warning because wilding pines are quite flammable and there are no fire breaks, so they can cause some significant increase in fire risk. "They can also reduce the amount of water that is going into streams, particularly in those drier areas of the country, which has some flow-on effects in terms of irrigation and hydro generation." Smith said they also had effects for tourism too. "Obviously it has quite a landscape impact, it cloaks a lot of the iconic New Zealand areas in these forests that are exotic, so collectively those impacts are worth billions to New Zealand if we allow these things to keep spreading." He said the programme prioritised areas, then developed plans with regional councils and landowners that contractors helped implement. "I think at peak, we had about 500 contractors on the ground. It's a little bit less than that at the moment, obviously with their funding being a little bit lower than it was at peak." Photo: Supplied/Whakatipu Wilding Control Group More than $150m of government money has been committed to the programme since it was launched in 2016, with another $33m from landowners and communities. The government established a baseline funding model of $10m in 2023/2024, excluding top-ups, which deferred some work and prompted concerns by Southland officials. Smith said there had been some success in control areas where seeding trees were removed, then seedlings were controlled in three-yearly cycles before they coned. "We've got some really good success stories that are getting to the end of the journey and really at a point that we can hand back the management, to the landowner to manage as part of their day-to-day farming operations or land management work." But he said there was more work to do. "There are still some big challenges in front of us," he said. "We've done the first round of control across about three-quarters of our known infestations, so there's a quarter out there that we haven't started into yet and obviously the gains that we have made, we've got to keep on that maintenance to lock in those benefits that we've achieved." Smith asked farmers to check there were no "problem tree species" in their shelter belts and small woodlots, which were two major sources of the trees. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
