Telling the American Story: Public Diplomacy in the Trump Era
On Friday, Congress passed the Continuing Budget Resolution, which included funding USAGM for another year. Nonetheless, on Saturday, Kari Lake - who is serving as a special White House adviser to USAGM - suspended some 1,300 VOA reporters, producers, and other public diplomacy professionals and canceled the charter of those independent agencies controlled by the board. (On Monday, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty filed a lawsuit against Lake and USAGM acting CEOVictor Moralesseeking to restore the news organizations federal funding.)
It is my fervent hope that the administration sees this not as a final chapter, but as an opportunity for a new beginning.
All but the agencys harshest critics see some need for public diplomacy - or "soft power" as it is sometimes called. Gunboats, tanks, and pinstriped ambassadors are important, but in a world inundated with instant communications, the idea that the U.S. government should stop trying to tell our side of the story to a global audience is shortsighted and counterproductive. Our adversaries have already doubled down on the information wars. We should not cede the field, least of all at this critical moment.
Further, our story - the American story - is a powerful diplomatic tool that is uniquely our own. There are reasons that American movies, music, books, and television captivate audiences worldwide. As a nation of immigrants from across the globe, ours is a culture that is as close to universal in its appeal as any in history. It is no wonder that two of the post-war presidents we consider great communicators - Franklin Roosevelt and Ronald Reagan - both embraced public diplomacy. They understood the power of a great story and the need to deliver it to a world they wanted to change.
This is our chance to reimagine how we tell Americas story abroad. Here are a few modest suggestions:
-- Streamline the bureaucracy. On the Eastern Shore of Maryland where I live, we have what we call "telescope houses." These are dwellings that may have started in the 18th century as humble lean-tos, with rooms, wings, and outbuildings added by ensuing generations. The result can be architecturally charming, but impractical. Our current public diplomacy apparatus is the bureaucratic equivalent, minus the charm: an improvised ramshackle assembly of acronyms, boards, missions, and budgets that need to be gutted and built anew. To that end: The White House could name a new public diplomacy czar who reports directly to the Secretary of State, give him or her clear direction and authority, and redesign the organization from the ground up to serve the mission.
-- Speaking of mission, there has always been a headache-inducing debate at the root of our conduct of public diplomacy. One side argues that we succeed best by modeling for foreign audiences the independence enjoyed by our own fourth estate. For that reason, some public diplomacy practitioners - including most of the reporters, producers, and editors at Voice of America - consider themselves journalists and subscribe to a code of objectivity. They believe that by placing truth-telling above advancing the State Departments immediate (and sometimes transitory) objectives, they in fact serve Americas greater cause.
Others argue that, inasmuch as we have a profusion of wire services, networks, newspapers, and online outlets that already cover America "warts and all," the primary role of any initiative should be to hone and deliver content that supports Americas global agenda. Message first; journalism second.
It is time to decide. I come down on the side of the latter argument. This doesnt mean blatant propaganda, disinformation, or lies - but the guiding principle for managers, editors, and reporters should be: Does what we write, produce, and broadcast increase Americas chances for foreign policy success? Clarifying the mission would help attract individuals who - like our military and state department personnel - understand and honor the greater goal for which they labor. We need the best people all rowing in the same direction, especially given the growing sophistication of our adversaries and the state of the current media landscape.
-- Speaking of the current media landscape, it is time to reevaluate some of the most fundamental aspects of the public diplomacy apparatus in light of what has happened - and is about to happen - to global communications. There is no crystal ball, but a few high-level trends are already clear, and we have to adjust.
For one, a Cold War culture still infuses much of our activities. By that I mean we still think in terms of messaging in an environment of "media scarcity" - that is, reaching audiences whose governments ruthlessly suppress outside voices. That challenge continues in some countries and remains important. But when it comes to reaching a large portion of the global population, the challenge now is the just the opposite: There is an abundance of communication options assaulting the audience on a 24/7 basis - streaming from radio, satellite television, and the Internet. The task at hand isnt always to pierce an iron curtain with a single beam of information; rather, it is to harness the power of those fast-multiplying platforms across the globe that have already amassed audiences and are thirsty for content.
Weve modeled too many of our current public diplomacy institutions after traditional radio, cable, and television networks in the belief that we need to control the pipes to deliver the message. We should be also be thinking like producers and create "VOA STUDIOS" - a distribution-agnostic entity with the goal of creating a range of high quality content with the power to appeal to the largest audience possible on as many platforms as possible. This opens the door to co-productions and novel distribution arrangements and provides a multiplying effect for money and resources. There are now a thousand conduits through which America can push content - we should acknowledge this reality and pursue those opportunities with a brand new entity, purpose-built for the modern era.
Past generations of public diplomacy practitioners embraced change. They harnessed the best of American ideals and translated them into programming that resonated with global audiences and changed the world for the better. They adjusted as communications technology advanced.
President Trump certainly understands the importance of messaging, media, and storytelling. I find it hard to believe that he is going to discard such a valuable diplomatic tool, just when we need it most. Lets take this opportunity to reinvigorate public diplomacy and tell our story to the world.
Andrew Walworth is co-host of RealClearPolitics on SiriusXM radio/POTUS 124 (M-F, 6-7 p.m. ET) and executive producer of the new documentary series 'The Unauthorized History of Political Parties' on Fox Nation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
a few seconds ago
- Boston Globe
Trump says Smithsonian focuses too much on ‘how bad slavery was'
Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up 'It's the epitome of dumbness to criticize the Smithsonian for dealing with the reality of slavery in America,' said Douglas Brinkley, a presidential historian. 'It's what led to our Civil War and is a defining aspect of our national history. And the Smithsonian deals in a robust way with what slavery was, but it also deals with human rights and civil rights in equal abundance.' Advertisement Since taking office, Trump has led an effort to purge diversity, equity and inclusion policies from the federal government and threatened to investigate companies and schools that adopt such policies. He has tried to reframe the country's past involving racism and discrimination by de-emphasizing that history, preferring to instead spotlight a sanitized, rosy depiction of America. Advertisement The administration has worked to scrub or minimize government references to the contributions of Black heroes, from the Tuskegee Airmen, who fought in World War II, to Harriet Tubman, who guided enslaved people along the Underground Railroad. Trump commemorated Juneteenth, the celebration of the end of slavery in the United States that became a federal holiday in 2021, by complaining that there were too many non-working holidays in America. He has called for the return of Confederate insignia and statues honoring those who fought to preserve slavery. And he has previously attacked the exhibits on race at the Smithsonian, which has traditionally operated as an independent institution that regards itself as outside the purview of the executive branch, as 'divisive, race-centered ideology.' Trump's comments also ignore the breadth of the displays in Smithsonian museums. While the National Museum of African American History and Culture, for example, does include exhibits on the Middle Passage and slavery, it also showcases civil rights and cultural icons in Black history. The director of that museum, Kevin Young, stepped down this spring as Trump increasingly targeted the Smithsonian and its museum intended to tell the African American story for all Americans. Trump has often stoked divisions in the United States by tapping into white grievance and framing himself as a protector of white people both in the United States and overseas. Quentin James, a co-founder of the Collective, which aims to elect Black officials in America, said Trump's comments about the museums were an attempt to protect 'white fragility.' Advertisement 'For all of us, it's an assault on our history and an assault on what we know to be true,' James said, while for Trump it is about 'white grievance and him exerting his authority.' The White House did not respond to requests for comment. Trump added in the social media post that he had instructed his lawyers 'to go through the Museums, and start the exact same process that has been done with Colleges and Universities.' His administration has pursued an effort to investigate universities that have adopted diversity, equity and inclusion programs, leading to court fights, funding battles and, in many cases, the removal of diversity initiatives. This article originally appeared in .
Boston Globe
a few seconds ago
- Boston Globe
‘The city is dead': D.C. restaurant reservations drop amid federal crackdown
This August has been particularly tough on D.C. restaurants, numerous operators told The Washington Post. They were already dealing with a number of destabilizing issues — rising labor and ingredient costs, soaring rents, federal worker layoffs, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement audits — when the president announced last week that he was sending in troops and federal agents to deal with a city where crime is 'totally out of control,' despite local and federal statistics showing otherwise. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up 'It's like drowning and then someone throws a 100 lb weight to you,' texted one D.C. restaurateur who asked that his name not be used because, he said, he was 'just focused on keeping my businesses alive (this week).' Advertisement Agents from Homeland Security and the FBI patrolled along U Street in northwest Washington, on Friday. Alex Brandon/Associated Press It's difficult to get an exact read on the state of D.C. dining since the federalization of local police. On the day of Trump's announcement, the number of online reservations in Washington dining rooms dropped by 16 percent from the same date the previous year, according to OpenTable. Since then, reservations have dipped almost every day, falling as much as 31 percent in a single day compared to the same period in 2024. But on Monday, the first day of Restaurant Week, OpenTable reservations were up 29 percent compared to the same day the previous year. Some of the decline in reservations could be attributed to timing: The first week of the takeover, Aug. 11 to 17, ended one day before Restaurant Week began. Those same dates in 2024 fell during Restaurant Week, when presumably reservations were increasing as diners scrambled to secure the discounted three-course meals. Townsend with RAMW, which organizes the biannual promotion, says that none of the 380 restaurants involved in this year's event — a record number — have reported a drop in reservations for the seven-day run. But at least two participating restaurant proprietors told The Washington Post that their numbers are well below last year's bookings. 'Reservations are low, low, low' compared to last year, said Mauricio Fraga-Rosenfeld, co-owner of El Secreto de Rosita on U Street near 16th Street NW, across the street from a police station where he said federal troops have often assembled before fanning out across the city. 'The city is dead,' Fraga-Rosenseld said. " If you walk on the street, there's no feeling. People are scared … You don't see any Latinos on the street." Advertisement Nick Pimentel, co-founder of Elle in the Mount Pleasant neighborhood, said he's seen a significant drop in walk-in traffic and reservations since January. But the bottom fell out this month. 'Compared to last year's Summer Restaurant Week reservations — and even Winter Restaurant Week in January — it's looking like we dropped more than 50 percent,' Pimentel said. Washington Metropolitan Police officers and military police soldiers with the District of Columbia National Guard, as activists protested President Trump's federal takeover of policing in D.C. on Saturday. Alex Brandon/Associated Press The numbers suggest, he added, that this will be the slowest August in Elle's seven-year history, including during the pandemic-affected summer of 2020. 'Seeing law enforcement — armored and plainclothed — in the neighborhood, casing our building and looking into our windows definitely put guests and staff on edge,' Pimentel said. Mount Pleasant and The president and White House are disputing the numbers. During a Tuesday call in to the 'Fox & Friends' morning television show, Trump said his orders have transformed Washington into 'just an incredible place in literally four days.' 'Did you see what's happening with the restaurants? They're bursting,' Trump said. 'They were all closing and going bankrupt.' On Monday, Trump disputed local and federal statistics that show crime is declining in the city, claiming in a social media post that 'D.C. gave Fake Crime numbers in order to create a false illusion of safety.' A White House spokeswoman sent a statement to The Post, along with a Fox News story indicating that 52 restaurants closed in Washington in 2023, in part due to crime. Advertisement 'Dozens of DC small businesses, restaurants, and local shops have closed their doors due to the violent crime that has plagued the city. President Trump's bold leadership will restore our nation's capital by creating opportunities for businesses to flourish without fear of criminals looting and destroying their property. President Trump is delivering on his promise to make DC safer, which will inherently make D.C, more prosperous,' spokeswoman Taylor Rogers said in a statement. Members of the National Guard were delivered lunch at an entrance to the Smithsonian Metro station in Washington, on Tuesday. TIERNEY L. CROSS/NYT Busboys and Poets, a chain of community-oriented cafes, has seen a small collective drop in August sales among the five locations in Washington while its three suburban outposts are enjoying an uptick, said founder Andy Shallal. 'The streets seem to be a little bit thinner in certain parts of town,' said Shallal. 'There's a little bit of a malaise in the city. I think people are just frustrated and just not in a good mood ." Shallal and others say federal checkpoints are scaring some people from visiting Washington, regardless of their legal status. The unexpected traffic stops may also be preventing workers — particularly back-of-the-house cooks and dishwashers who often hail from Latin American countries — from showing up to shifts. 'I think people would much rather stay where they are and not have to deal with this,' said Shallal. 'A lot of our customers are immigrants that have either newly immigrated to America or have been naturalized Americans. ... In general, they'd rather not expose people or expose themselves to those kinds of conditions or situations that may put them in harm's way ." Related : Council member Charles Allen (D-Ward 6) has spoken to nearly a dozen restaurant owners in his district, which includes Capitol Hill and the NoMa neighborhood, and said they're telling him the same thing: In the last week, they're seeing less foot traffic. Reservations are being canceled. Employees, especially back-of-house staff, are not showing up for work, leaving restaurants shorthanded for evening shifts. Some restaurant owners are hesitant to complain publicly for fear of being targeted by federal agents. Advertisement 'I haven't heard a single restaurant say 'this is great for business,'' Allen said. 'Our businesses are suffering by what they're doing here,' the council member added. 'It's an unwarranted, absolutely ridiculous, unnecessary step that federal government's doing. It sure is more than just immigration issues. This is impacting bread-and-butter local businesses.' Med Lahlou, founder of an eponymous hospitality group operating neighborhood restaurants throughout the city including Lupo Verde on 14th Street NW, said the police presence and public arrests have been demoralizing. Federal agents and local police placed a man under arrest in D.C. on Monday. ERIC LEE/NYT 'It has been heartbreaking to watch my hometown of 40 years feel like it's coming apart,' the restaurateur said. He said the takeover is 'devastating businesses to an unimaginable degree' — including the service industry. 'People are scared to go out, regardless of whether they are U.S. citizens or not. That fear alone is enough to damage restaurant week and the livelihood of countless workers,' Lahlou said. Oji Abbott had been expecting an uptick in sales at Oohh's and Aahh's, his soul food restaurant on U Street, as Howard University students returned to campus last week, preparing for the start of a new semester. But the uptick never arrived. Instead, Abbott says, he has experienced a decline — a small but noticeable one. He pinned some of the blame on the presence of federal law enforcement officers. Advertisement 'We got losses because some people are not coming out and dealing with that,' Abbott told The Post. 'They say, 'You know, I heard they were at 14th Street, they were in U Street. I'm not going.'' Abbott is fortunate compared to other businesses on the U Street corridor, he says. Oohh's and Aahh's has two other locations. If diners don't feel safe — or just don't want to deal with the hassle of navigating the neighborhood with all the extra vehicles on the streets — they can go to one of Abbott's outlets on Georgia Avenue NW or in Alexandria, Virginia. But the chef and owner also worries about the impact of 30 straight days of federal agents and officers on the streets. 'We have to operate within this 30 days, and do you have enough wherewithal to be able to have a week or month of short money coming?' Abbott says. 'Most small businesses, I'll say no. Small businesses, you don't have money to say, 'Oh, yeah, I'll just take the short money for 30 days and I'll still be able to pay the rent and my electric bill and my water bill and my gas bill.' Department of Homeland Security Investigation officers paused at the intersection of 14th and U Streets in northwest Washington, while on patrol on August 13. Pablo Martinez Monsivais/Associated Press Townsend with RAMW is more bullish on the restaurants that his group represents. They will make Restaurant Week work, regardless of how many staff no-show for a shift. Owners will roll up their sleeves and pitch in. But Townsend is also concerned about the federal takeover of Washington's streets as restaurant week revs up. 'There's a sense from the restaurant community in D.C. that folks who live in Maryland and Virginia will opt to dine in Bethesda or Tysons or Falls Church,' Townsend said, 'as opposed to trying out a new restaurant in D.C. this week.'
Los Angeles Times
a few seconds ago
- Los Angeles Times
Judge dismisses part of lawsuit over ‘Alligator Alcatraz' immigration detention center
MIAMI — A federal judge in Miami dismissed part of a lawsuit that claimed detainees were denied access to the legal system at the immigration detention center in the Florida Everglades known as 'Alligator Alcatraz' and moved the remaining counts of the case to another court. Claims that the detainees were denied hearings in immigration court were rendered moot when the Trump administration last weekend designated the Krome North Processing Center near Miami as a site for their cases to be heard, U.S. District Judge Rodolfo Ruiz said in a 47-page ruling Monday night dismissing a 5th Amendment count. The judge granted the state defendants a change of venue motion to the Middle District of Florida, where the remaining claims of 1st Amendment violations will be addressed. Those include allegations of delays in scheduling meetings between detainees and their attorneys and an inability for the detainees to talk privately with their attorneys by phone or videoconference at the facility whose official name is the South Detention Facility. ACLU lawyer Eunice Cho, the lead attorney for the detainees, said the federal government reversed course only last weekend and allowed the detainees to petition an immigration court because of the lawsuit. 'It should not take a lawsuit to force the government to abide by the law and the Constitution,' Cho said. 'We look forward to continuing the fight.' The judge heard arguments from both sides in a hearing earlier Monday in Miami. Civil rights attorneys were seeking a preliminary injunction to ensure detainees at the facility had access to their lawyers and could get a hearing. Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis' administration raced to build the facility on an isolated airstrip surrounded by swampland two months ago in order to aid President Trump's efforts to deport people who are in the U.S. illegally. The governor has said the location in the rugged and remote Everglades was meant as a deterrent against escape, much like the island prison in California that Republicans named it after. The detention center has an estimated annual cost of $450 million. The state and federal government had argued that even though the isolated airstrip where the facility is located is owned by Miami-Dade County, Florida's Southern District was the wrong venue since the detention center is located in neighboring Collier County, which is in the state's Middle District. Judge Ruiz had hinted during a hearing last week that he had some concerns over which jurisdiction was appropriate. Attorneys for the detainees had argued that Ruiz's court was appropriate since the detainees were under the oversight of federal officials in the Miami regional office. Any transfer to another venue would cause a delay in a court decision. Ruiz noted the facts in the case changed Saturday when the Trump administration designated the Krome facility as the immigration court with jurisdiction over all detainees at the detention center. The judge wrote that the case has 'a tortured procedural history' since it was filed July 16, weeks after the first group of detainees arrived at the facility. 'Nearly every aspect of the Plaintiffs' civil action — their causes of action, their facts in support, their theories of venue, their arguments on the merits and their requests for relief — have changed with each filing,' the judge wrote. The state and federal government defendants made an identical argument last week about jurisdiction for a second lawsuit in which environmental groups and the Miccosukee Tribe sued to stop further construction and operations at the Everglades detention center until it's in compliance with federal environmental laws. U.S. District Judge Kathleen Williams in Miami on Aug. 7 ordered a 14-day halt to additional construction at the site while witnesses testified at a hearing that wrapped up last week. She has said she plans to issue a ruling before the order expires later this week. She had yet to rule on the venue question. Detainees at the facility have said worms turn up in the food, toilets don't flush, flooding floors with fecal waste, and mosquitoes and other insects are everywhere. Civil rights attorneys also said officers were going cell to cell to pressure detainees into signing voluntary removal orders before they're allowed to consult their attorneys, and some detainees had been deported even though they didn't have final removal orders. Along with the spread of a respiratory infection and rainwater flooding in tents, the circumstances had fueled a feeling of desperation among detainees, the attorneys wrote in a court filing. Fischer, Schneider and Frisaro write for the Associated Press. Frisaro reported from Fort Lauderdale, Fla., and Schneider reported from Orlando, Fla.
