Rival leaders in Cyprus will meet informally with UN chief this month
Stéphane Dujarric said the informal meeting on July 16-17 at U.N. headquarters in New York 'will provide an opportunity to continue the dialogue and exchange views on the progress made since March.'
At that meeting, Greek Cypriot President Nikos Christodoulides and Turkish Cypriot leader Ersin Tatar agreed to trust-building measures on issues like energy, environment, opening four new crossing points along a U.N.-controlled buffer zone, youth affairs and demining.
The Mediterranean island was divided in 1974 when Turkey invaded following a coup by Athens junta-backed supporters of uniting the island with Greece. Only Turkey recognizes a Turkish Cypriot declaration of independence, and it maintains more than 35,000 troops in the island's northern third.
Negotiations between the rivals have been stalled since 2017 .
Maria Angela Holguin, a new envoy Guterres appointed, said at the end of her first weeklong visit to Cyprus in late May that Guterres 'continues to push' for a resumption of peace talks.
But no breakthrough is expected at the meeting this month because Turkey and Turkish Cypriot insist on a two-state accord that Greek Cypriots flatly reject.
The agreed-upon, U.N.-endorsed framework for a peace deal has been a reunified Cyprus as a federation composed of Greek Cypriot and Turkish Cypriot zones.
Ever since his 2020 election, Tatar has been demanding a two-state deal. He faces reelection in October and says he's running on the same two-state platform with Ankara's full backing.
Greek Cypriots say they won't agree to any accord that formally partitions the island, allows for a permanent Turkish troop presence, gives Turkey rights to militarily intervene or offers the minority Turkish Cypriots a veto right on all government decisions.
Despite these differences, the rivals have made some progress on trust-building measures, which also include work on a photovoltaic park inside the buffer zone and restoration work on cemeteries on both sides of the divide.
___
AP writer Menelaos Hadjicostis contributed from Nicosia, Cyprus.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
13 hours ago
- Forbes
How Internal Strength Can Protect Nonprofits In Turbulent Times
Leila Saad is the Founder & CEO of Catalyst Lane, which advises CEOs, founders, and mission-driven leaders navigating change. There is a long historical tradition of looking inward in times of political or social turmoil. This goes as far back as the Stoics. The Greek philosopher Epictetus has often been attributed to saying, 'It's not what happens to you but how you react to it that matters.' The central theory here is that no matter how much uncertainty you are facing, you have control over your reactions and decisions. It's a quietly revolutionary idea, and while at the individual level it applies to one's inner life, this ancient wisdom provides lessons for society and for institutions, including nonprofit organizations. In today's volatile political and social climate, nonprofit leaders are often caught in a whirlwind. Policy shifts, unpredictable funding and polarized public discourse demand constant external advocacy and rapid response. It's easy to feel that all your energy must be directed outward, fighting for your mission and resources. Yet, here's an unpopular opinion: While external engagement is vital, an overlooked but powerful strategy for impact is internal. It's about embracing the less glamorous, sometimes painstaking work of shoring up your internal operations and even strategically right-sizing. For many, this might sound like a drain on precious resources or even a step backward. But it can be life-giving for sustained resilience. I'm not here to argue that the nonprofit sector should 'roll over and play dead,' like James Carville has provocatively urged the Democrats to do, but balancing the value of external advocacy and rapid response with serious internal review and revision can provide long-lasting benefits. External Chaos Magnifies Operational Weaknesses The constant pressures nonprofits face don't just exist externally; they seep in and exacerbate existing organizational weaknesses. Consider finances. When funding streams become uncertain, a messy financial system can be a liability. A leader may be struggling to get clear, top-line reports with relevant details to inform decisions. Financial insights may be a scattered puzzle, with pieces held across an organization. If there is no clear, unified picture, it is impossible to make swift, data-driven decisions. I have heard more than one nonprofit leader say that while the trains were all running on time, it felt like it was all held together with duct tape. This ad-hoc approach can lead to over-reactivity, too. When infrastructure is lacking, an organization is more likely to operate reactively when shifts, interruptions or challenges occur. This can create friction and inconsistency across even small, dedicated teams. It is more than an inconvenience; it can drain energy, undermine morale and ultimately limit your ability to deliver on your mission from a position of strength. An Unglamorous But Essential Path To Resilience How do you initiate internal infrastructural change when it feels like taking resources away from your core mission? It begins by acknowledging that this internal work, while not glamorous, is essential. If you have not done so yet, now is the time to invest in moving fragmented financial data to a singular, clear and accessible picture. Implement systems that allow you to easily track spending, generate regular reports and gain a comprehensive understanding of your budget. This goes beyond compliance. It is about empowering leaders to make confident decisions, pivot strategically when needed and transparently engage board members and funders in necessary and tough conversations about short-term decisions and long-term sustainability. Replace "duct tape" solutions with structured, repeatable processes. This means defining clear roles and responsibilities, streamlining workflows and adopting appropriate technology to support your work. Building a robust infrastructure can reduce operational friction, ensure consistency and ultimately free up valuable staff time to focus on your mission. In times of uncertainty, there can be a knee-jerk reaction to either resist any cuts or to cut indiscriminately. Instead, engage in strategic right-sizing. This involves a clear-headed evaluation of where your people, programs and technology are maximizing impact. You can be ruthless about aligning your capacity with your current mission and future vision, down to the dollar and hour, but you can never be ruthless about the human or mission impact of those decisions, so make them thoughtfully and intentionally. The result will be an ability to adapt quickly to future external changes. Investing Inward To Ensure Long-Term Impact I don't urge inward focus to replace or retreat from the necessary outward engagement, which can feel daunting. I recommend it because it will set you up for long-term success, where both your program delivery and your external advocacy can remain sustainable and strong. Only a resilient and efficient organization can withstand external shocks, attract and retain funding and ensure mission impact. The unsexy work of shoring up operations may not always be headline news, but it is the quiet, foundational effort that ensures your nonprofit can thrive, no matter the turbulence. Let's take inspiration from what another great Stoic, Marcus Aurelius, wrote: 'You have power over your mind—not outside events. Realize this, and you will find strength." Forbes Nonprofit Council is an invitation-only organization for chief executives in successful nonprofit organizations. Do I qualify?
New York Times
a day ago
- New York Times
For Trump, Flashy Summits Come First. Grunt Work Comes Next.
First, President Trump rolled out the red carpet for President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia for a high-stakes summit in Alaska. Then he brought the president of Ukraine and seven other European leaders to the White House for an extraordinary gathering to discuss an end to the war. Now comes the grunt work. Mr. Trump in the past week has effectively flipped the traditional diplomatic process on its head. After two critical meetings in four days aimed at ending the war in Ukraine, American and European diplomats scrambled to come up with detailed proposals for security guarantees and other sticking points that could upend any momentum to secure peace. Already, major gaps were becoming evident, including whether Russia would countenance U.S. security guarantees for Ukraine, and whether Mr. Putin was serious about meeting with Mr. Zelensky face to face. Ironing out the details typically happens between staffers and diplomats before leaders step in to finalize the agreement. But Mr. Trump, ever one to toss out norms and traditions, went big last week in Alaska with Mr. Putin, then again at the White House on Monday, without any breakthroughs to announce. Now, with Russia continuing to hammer Ukraine and no sign that Mr. Trump or Mr. Putin see a cease-fire as a precondition for a deal, the process risks devolving into a diplomatic version of trench warfare. So far, at least, Mr. Putin has a free hand to continue his war against his neighbor without immediate concern for further penalty. 'In a normal American administration you have all kinds of preparation,' said Steven Pifer, a former ambassador to Ukraine under President Bill Clinton. 'This is very unusual.' He added: 'The risk I see is that he doesn't prepare the details. My impression is that he wants a deal. He wants any deal so he can claim, 'I solved another war.' But the details matter.' Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Fox News
a day ago
- Fox News
All-Star Panel: A Possible Pathway to Peace in Ukraine
With President Trump meeting with leaders from both Ukraine and Russia, just days apart, the possibility of a peaceful outcome to the war seems close. But even as the prospect of a face-to-face meeting between President Putin and President Zelenskyy increases in likelihood, finding common ground between the two won't be any easier. Political Consultant and former Senior Counselor to President Trump, Kellyanne Conway, former Democratic Congressman and Co-Host of The Five, Harold Ford Jr., and Fox News Senior White House Correspondent Jacqui Heinrich discuss the latest developments in the Russia-Ukraine negotiations, later discussing President Trump's efforts to clean up the DC metropolitan area and 'de-woke' the Smithsonian. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit
