In an era of wellbeing obsessions, I've become deeply sober un-curious
Is the purpose of life to survive the longest or enjoy it the most? Right now, society has become so obsessed with optimal health that I fear it's making us unwell or, at the very least, entirely joyless. And personally, I'd prefer to experience rich, brilliant years as opposed to regimented virtuous ones.
A decade ago, the gold standard of a Sunday morning used to be a luxurious sleep in after too many drinks the night before, followed by a hearty breakfast with friends. Then maybe a movie, reading a book, pottering in the garden, or a boozy long lunch. And, sure, maybe some exercise.
These days, we're told to rise before the sun, journal, take an ice bath, fast until after lunch, and avoid having a glass of wine with dinner. Some people are even abstaining from sex – all with the goal of improving their health and living longer. Honestly, you couldn't pay me to live 80-plus years of that.
Many of these new 'healthy hacks' are self-flagellation in disguise; a weird and mysterious test of discipline in the hope of getting an extra couple of years out of life. But it's worth questioning if perhaps something less admirable than healthy choices could be lurking below the surface, something US psychologist Jonathan Haidt raised in an interview with actor Dax Shepard on Shepard's podcast, Armchair Expert.
When Shepard said that the so-called 'anxious generation' is struggling with poor mental health but 'thriving in other departments', Haidt took issue.
'On a lot of the self-destructive metrics, their behaviour is better – that's all true,' he said.
'Does that mean they're thriving? Why are they not drinking? Why are they not driving cars? Why are they not dating? Why are they not getting pregnant? Why do you think it is? Because they're so wise? No. Because they're not with other people. They're not doing anything. If you're just on your bed all day long, scrolling through social media, then you're not going to be doing any of those things.'
A 2023 report by Ending Loneliness Together found that 41.1 per cent of Australians aged 18 to 24 suffer from persistent loneliness. And according to the ABC's 2019 Australia Talks survey, 40 per cent of people aged 18 to 24 are still virgins. They're also drinking less, with 16 per cent of Australians in the same age bracket having never tried alcohol, up from 7 per cent in 2001.
As Haidt points out, they're not just abstaining from these things because they're sensible, they're also petrified of humiliation. Having grown up with their entire lives being documented, they don't want to embarrass themselves.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
4 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Brett Sutton made it through a pandemic. Now he's fighting a new war
Sutton has been quietly doing the groundwork for nearly a year now; the CSIRO held a design workshop in May. The design is not yet set, or the name, but Sutton wants a 'paddock to plate' approach: ensuring the science itself is robust, the way universities promote studies is accurate, and that scientists are resourced to fight for the truth on social media. This week, his idea won in-principle support from the Australian Academy of Science and the Academy of Health and Medical Science, as well as from the Australian Science Media Centre (Nine, owner of this masthead, is a paying member of the centre). 'In an increasingly fragmented information environment, bringing the right voices together in a co-ordinated way has never been more important,' said Professor Louise Baur, president of the Australian Academy of Health and Medical Sciences. Australian Academy of Science president Professor Chennupati Jagadish said he was concerned evidence-based information was being 'drowned out by disinformation, and reliable and independent sources of knowledge are increasingly rare'. Globally, Australians retain an extremely high trust in scientists – ranked fifth in a survey of 68 countries published in Nature Human Behaviour earlier this year. And misinformation has always been a part of society; much of it, like astrology, is tolerated as harmless. The problem we now face seems instead to be driven by a global collapse in trust in institutions, combined with a media and social media environment that empowers people to choose the version of the truth they want to watch, said Associate Professor Will Grant from the Australian National Centre for the Public Awareness of Science. 'It's a pull away from competing over what is true to instead saying we can have our own truths, our own world,' he said. Some 61 per cent of Australians worry about political meddling in science, per Edelman research released this year. Nearly half of people globally distrust government to care for their health. Trust in media to accurately report health information fell by 16 per cent in Australia since 2019; 35 per cent of people now say they can be as knowledgeable as a doctor if they have done their own research. In 2019, Australians' trust in government fell to its lowest level since 1969, according to a tracking survey run by the Australian National University. Society has three institutions for finding out the truth: science, journalism and the courts, said Grant. 'All those are under attack. 'We are decaying our central institutions. We are losing our central social ability to adjudicate truth.' Sutton's coalition was welcome, said Dr Susannah Eliott, CEO of the Australian Science Media Centre, but faced a tricky task, as people might actually find a coalition of science institutions less trustworthy than individual scientists. A similar effort in the US, the Coalition for Trust in Health and Science, floundered because it tried to simply compete directly with misinformation, rather than engaging people in genuine dialogue, said Tina Purnat, a misinformation researcher at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. 'It can feel pretty paternalistic if you are on the receiving end,' she said. 'I think the positioning of any coalitions as 'defenders of science' and using combative language can massively backfire in any effort to de-escalate polarised discussions.' Sutton is not yet clear on what shape his coalition will take or how it will be funded, but he wants it to be separate from government. 'Government can be the reason why people lack trust in where information comes from,' he said. AI: a growing misinformation threat Even as Sutton works to pull together his coalition, Australian researchers are tracking a new and growing misinformation threat: artificial intelligence-enabled bots. Automated accounts have long plagued social media. But they have generally been fairly easy to spot. Not any more. Bot developers have linked Twitter and Facebook accounts to AI models like ChatGPT, giving the bots the ability to post like humans – and even respond or retweet. 'The bot is pretty much mimicking human behaviour,' said Dr Muhammad Javed. His team at Melbourne's Centre for Health Analytics has tracked these bots as they made a major impact on social media discussions of vaccination. In preliminary data presented to the Communicable Diseases & Immunisation Conference earlier this month, they found nearly a quarter of social media content around the new RSV vaccine was generated by bots – most of it around safety concerns. Loading Social media companies have made efforts to limit anti-vaccination content – but the bots were getting around this by behaving as though they were real humans posting adverse effects they had received from a jab, Javed said.
The Age
4 hours ago
- The Age
Brett Sutton made it through a pandemic. Now he's fighting a new war
Sutton has been quietly doing the groundwork for nearly a year now; the CSIRO held a design workshop in May. The design is not yet set, or the name, but Sutton wants a 'paddock to plate' approach: ensuring the science itself is robust, the way universities promote studies is accurate, and that scientists are resourced to fight for the truth on social media. This week, his idea won in-principle support from the Australian Academy of Science and the Academy of Health and Medical Science, as well as from the Australian Science Media Centre (Nine, owner of this masthead, is a paying member of the centre). 'In an increasingly fragmented information environment, bringing the right voices together in a co-ordinated way has never been more important,' said Professor Louise Baur, president of the Australian Academy of Health and Medical Sciences. Australian Academy of Science president Professor Chennupati Jagadish said he was concerned evidence-based information was being 'drowned out by disinformation, and reliable and independent sources of knowledge are increasingly rare'. Globally, Australians retain an extremely high trust in scientists – ranked fifth in a survey of 68 countries published in Nature Human Behaviour earlier this year. And misinformation has always been a part of society; much of it, like astrology, is tolerated as harmless. The problem we now face seems instead to be driven by a global collapse in trust in institutions, combined with a media and social media environment that empowers people to choose the version of the truth they want to watch, said Associate Professor Will Grant from the Australian National Centre for the Public Awareness of Science. 'It's a pull away from competing over what is true to instead saying we can have our own truths, our own world,' he said. Some 61 per cent of Australians worry about political meddling in science, per Edelman research released this year. Nearly half of people globally distrust government to care for their health. Trust in media to accurately report health information fell by 16 per cent in Australia since 2019; 35 per cent of people now say they can be as knowledgeable as a doctor if they have done their own research. In 2019, Australians' trust in government fell to its lowest level since 1969, according to a tracking survey run by the Australian National University. Society has three institutions for finding out the truth: science, journalism and the courts, said Grant. 'All those are under attack. 'We are decaying our central institutions. We are losing our central social ability to adjudicate truth.' Sutton's coalition was welcome, said Dr Susannah Eliott, CEO of the Australian Science Media Centre, but faced a tricky task, as people might actually find a coalition of science institutions less trustworthy than individual scientists. A similar effort in the US, the Coalition for Trust in Health and Science, floundered because it tried to simply compete directly with misinformation, rather than engaging people in genuine dialogue, said Tina Purnat, a misinformation researcher at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. 'It can feel pretty paternalistic if you are on the receiving end,' she said. 'I think the positioning of any coalitions as 'defenders of science' and using combative language can massively backfire in any effort to de-escalate polarised discussions.' Sutton is not yet clear on what shape his coalition will take or how it will be funded, but he wants it to be separate from government. 'Government can be the reason why people lack trust in where information comes from,' he said. AI: a growing misinformation threat Even as Sutton works to pull together his coalition, Australian researchers are tracking a new and growing misinformation threat: artificial intelligence-enabled bots. Automated accounts have long plagued social media. But they have generally been fairly easy to spot. Not any more. Bot developers have linked Twitter and Facebook accounts to AI models like ChatGPT, giving the bots the ability to post like humans – and even respond or retweet. 'The bot is pretty much mimicking human behaviour,' said Dr Muhammad Javed. His team at Melbourne's Centre for Health Analytics has tracked these bots as they made a major impact on social media discussions of vaccination. In preliminary data presented to the Communicable Diseases & Immunisation Conference earlier this month, they found nearly a quarter of social media content around the new RSV vaccine was generated by bots – most of it around safety concerns. Loading Social media companies have made efforts to limit anti-vaccination content – but the bots were getting around this by behaving as though they were real humans posting adverse effects they had received from a jab, Javed said.
The Advertiser
5 hours ago
- The Advertiser
Nation's 'failing' mental health system needs overhaul
Australia's failing mental health and suicide prevention system needs reforms to fix problems including affordability and access, the government's independent advisory body says. The interim Productivity Commission report, released on Wednesday, found the National Mental Health and Suicide Prevention Agreement was "not fit for purpose" and had made little progress since taking effect in 2022. A particular area of failure was the system's inability to deliver on a pledge to develop nationwide arrangements to provide psychosocial supports outside the National Disability Insurance Scheme, it said. It comprised "a raft of outputs and initiatives that aren't connected to each other or to an overarching strategy", a productivity commissioner says. "In its current form, it cannot deliver the systemic, co-ordinated change it promises," Selwyn Button said in a statement. "Consumers, carers and service providers we spoke with told us of ongoing challenges accessing and affording care and of unco-ordinated services that do not respond to need." Treasurer Jim Chalmers commissioned the review in January, looking into the agreement signed between the federal government and states and territories, due to expire in 2026. The Albanese government, which has spent more than $2.4 billion on the area since taking office in May 2022, says the review is part of keeping services effective and affordable. National Mental Health Consumer Alliance CEO Priscilla Brice said the agreement had failed to meet expectations as it was not developed "hand in hand with people with lived experience of mental health challenges". "We were not included in the development or negotiations for the agreement, nor the ongoing governance or measurement of the agreement," Ms Brice told AAP. "People with lived expertise need to be involved in the next agreement at both the national level and the state and territory level. "This would ensure that the people who know the systems best - the people who use mental health services - are at the heart of decision-making." She urged extra funding for mental health services and advocacy bodies as well as stricter accountability to bolster the system. Some 22 per cent of Australians have experienced a mental illness in the past 12 months, while 43 per cent will have a mental illness during their lifetime, Australian Bureau of Statistics research shows. Lifeline 13 11 14 beyondblue 1300 22 4636 Australia's failing mental health and suicide prevention system needs reforms to fix problems including affordability and access, the government's independent advisory body says. The interim Productivity Commission report, released on Wednesday, found the National Mental Health and Suicide Prevention Agreement was "not fit for purpose" and had made little progress since taking effect in 2022. A particular area of failure was the system's inability to deliver on a pledge to develop nationwide arrangements to provide psychosocial supports outside the National Disability Insurance Scheme, it said. It comprised "a raft of outputs and initiatives that aren't connected to each other or to an overarching strategy", a productivity commissioner says. "In its current form, it cannot deliver the systemic, co-ordinated change it promises," Selwyn Button said in a statement. "Consumers, carers and service providers we spoke with told us of ongoing challenges accessing and affording care and of unco-ordinated services that do not respond to need." Treasurer Jim Chalmers commissioned the review in January, looking into the agreement signed between the federal government and states and territories, due to expire in 2026. The Albanese government, which has spent more than $2.4 billion on the area since taking office in May 2022, says the review is part of keeping services effective and affordable. National Mental Health Consumer Alliance CEO Priscilla Brice said the agreement had failed to meet expectations as it was not developed "hand in hand with people with lived experience of mental health challenges". "We were not included in the development or negotiations for the agreement, nor the ongoing governance or measurement of the agreement," Ms Brice told AAP. "People with lived expertise need to be involved in the next agreement at both the national level and the state and territory level. "This would ensure that the people who know the systems best - the people who use mental health services - are at the heart of decision-making." She urged extra funding for mental health services and advocacy bodies as well as stricter accountability to bolster the system. Some 22 per cent of Australians have experienced a mental illness in the past 12 months, while 43 per cent will have a mental illness during their lifetime, Australian Bureau of Statistics research shows. Lifeline 13 11 14 beyondblue 1300 22 4636 Australia's failing mental health and suicide prevention system needs reforms to fix problems including affordability and access, the government's independent advisory body says. The interim Productivity Commission report, released on Wednesday, found the National Mental Health and Suicide Prevention Agreement was "not fit for purpose" and had made little progress since taking effect in 2022. A particular area of failure was the system's inability to deliver on a pledge to develop nationwide arrangements to provide psychosocial supports outside the National Disability Insurance Scheme, it said. It comprised "a raft of outputs and initiatives that aren't connected to each other or to an overarching strategy", a productivity commissioner says. "In its current form, it cannot deliver the systemic, co-ordinated change it promises," Selwyn Button said in a statement. "Consumers, carers and service providers we spoke with told us of ongoing challenges accessing and affording care and of unco-ordinated services that do not respond to need." Treasurer Jim Chalmers commissioned the review in January, looking into the agreement signed between the federal government and states and territories, due to expire in 2026. The Albanese government, which has spent more than $2.4 billion on the area since taking office in May 2022, says the review is part of keeping services effective and affordable. National Mental Health Consumer Alliance CEO Priscilla Brice said the agreement had failed to meet expectations as it was not developed "hand in hand with people with lived experience of mental health challenges". "We were not included in the development or negotiations for the agreement, nor the ongoing governance or measurement of the agreement," Ms Brice told AAP. "People with lived expertise need to be involved in the next agreement at both the national level and the state and territory level. "This would ensure that the people who know the systems best - the people who use mental health services - are at the heart of decision-making." She urged extra funding for mental health services and advocacy bodies as well as stricter accountability to bolster the system. Some 22 per cent of Australians have experienced a mental illness in the past 12 months, while 43 per cent will have a mental illness during their lifetime, Australian Bureau of Statistics research shows. Lifeline 13 11 14 beyondblue 1300 22 4636 Australia's failing mental health and suicide prevention system needs reforms to fix problems including affordability and access, the government's independent advisory body says. The interim Productivity Commission report, released on Wednesday, found the National Mental Health and Suicide Prevention Agreement was "not fit for purpose" and had made little progress since taking effect in 2022. A particular area of failure was the system's inability to deliver on a pledge to develop nationwide arrangements to provide psychosocial supports outside the National Disability Insurance Scheme, it said. It comprised "a raft of outputs and initiatives that aren't connected to each other or to an overarching strategy", a productivity commissioner says. "In its current form, it cannot deliver the systemic, co-ordinated change it promises," Selwyn Button said in a statement. "Consumers, carers and service providers we spoke with told us of ongoing challenges accessing and affording care and of unco-ordinated services that do not respond to need." Treasurer Jim Chalmers commissioned the review in January, looking into the agreement signed between the federal government and states and territories, due to expire in 2026. The Albanese government, which has spent more than $2.4 billion on the area since taking office in May 2022, says the review is part of keeping services effective and affordable. National Mental Health Consumer Alliance CEO Priscilla Brice said the agreement had failed to meet expectations as it was not developed "hand in hand with people with lived experience of mental health challenges". "We were not included in the development or negotiations for the agreement, nor the ongoing governance or measurement of the agreement," Ms Brice told AAP. "People with lived expertise need to be involved in the next agreement at both the national level and the state and territory level. "This would ensure that the people who know the systems best - the people who use mental health services - are at the heart of decision-making." She urged extra funding for mental health services and advocacy bodies as well as stricter accountability to bolster the system. Some 22 per cent of Australians have experienced a mental illness in the past 12 months, while 43 per cent will have a mental illness during their lifetime, Australian Bureau of Statistics research shows. Lifeline 13 11 14 beyondblue 1300 22 4636
