
Minister accused of being too close to big tech after analysis of meetings
A senior cabinet minister has been accused of being too close to big tech after analysis showed a surge in his department's meetings with companies such as Google, Amazon, Apple and Meta since Labour came to power.
According to a Guardian analysis of publicly available data, Peter Kyle met people close to or representing the sector 28 times in a six-month period.
That's more than one meeting every week on average, and nearly 70% more often than his predecessor as science and technology secretary, Michelle Donelan.
The findings have brought renewed criticism from those who believe he has used his position to push the sector's agenda even in the face of concerns about online safety and protections for the creative industries.
UKAI, a trade body representing the UK's artificial intelligence industry, said smaller players were being squeezed out as a consequence of the government's focus on big tech.
'Our concern is that there is a huge imbalance between a handful of global players who are able to influence directly what No 10 is thinking about on policy, and the thousands of other businesses that make up the AI industry across the UK,' said Tim Flagg, the UKAI chief executive.
'Our voice is not being heard, but the economic growth that the government seeks will come from these companies.'
Labour has put the technology sector at the heart of much of what it is promising to do in government. Keir Starmer said in a speech earlier this year that artificial intelligence could 'turbocharge growth', and the prime minister is now pursuing a tech-focused trade deal with the US, having last week agreed a range of tariff reductions.
Kyle has been at the centre of the government's outreach to the sector, calling those who work in it 'the bold people building a new future for Britain'.
Some in the creative sector blame Kyle for piloting controversial proposals to allow AI companies to circumvent copyright protections and use creative material to train their tools. The Guardian revealed last month that ministers have drawn up concessions to those plans after a backlash from some of the UK's best-known artists, including Elton John and Paul McCartney.
On Wednesday ministers sought to block a Lords amendment to the data bill that would have required AI companies to disclose their use of copyright-protected content.
Some in Labour circles now believe the technology secretary has become so close to the industry he is supposed to monitor that he will be moved in the next reshuffle, possibly to replace Bridget Phillipson as education secretary.
Victoria Collins, the Liberal Democrat science and technology spokesperson, said: 'Peter Kyle has rightly got a reputation for being too close to big tech – unable to defy his friends at Meta and X when it comes to standing up for our kids' online safety or the rights of British creatives.
'Kyle rubbing shoulders with so many big US tech bros, instead of our great UK startups trying to get their foot in the door, shows he's missing a trick.'
Caroline Dinenage, the Conservative chair of the culture, media and sport select committee, said: 'It's great that [Kyle] is taking a keen interest in the growth of this sector. But he needs to ensure he's hearing balanced voices from across the high-performance business sectors the UK economy depends upon, to avoid irrevocable unintended consequences of advancing at the expense of others.'
A spokesperson for the science and technology department said: 'As the department for technology, we make no apologies for regularly engaging with the sector – one that employs nearly 2 million people in the UK. Regular engagement with technology companies of all sizes is fundamental to delivering economic growth and transforming our public services.'
Information published by the government shows that from July 2024 until December 2024 – the most recent period for which there is data – Kyle held meetings with people representing or advocating for technology companies 28 times.
Google, Amazon and Microsoft were present at five of those meetings, the data shows, while Meta attended four.
Five of Kyle's meetings, all in early August, were to discuss online disinformation and how it had contributed to the spread of violence during that summer's riots. But apart from that, almost every single one was to discuss 'investment', 'opportunities', or both.
Last August Kyle met all four of those companies, including others from the industry, to discuss AI regulation.
This year, he has met AI companies several times, according to documents obtained under freedom of information rules by the website eu.tech. Those meetings include three with the US AI company Anthropic, as well as a two-day flurry of meetings in February during which he saw executives from OpenAI, the chip designer Arm, Google DeepMind, ElevenLabs and Synthesia.
Many of those meetings were also attended by Matt Clifford, the prime minister's adviser on AI, who has also been criticised for carrying out his role while also holding shares in dozens of AI companies.
Earlier this year the Guardian revealed the government was delaying its plans to regulate the AI sector.
Last September, Kyle met Tony Blair in a meeting designed to 'discuss [his department's] priorities'. However, information obtained by Politico last week under freedom of information laws shows Blair used that meeting to suggest Kyle meet the Ellison Institute of Technology, which is funded by Larry Ellison, the billionaire tech mogul who also funds the Tony Blair Institute.
Kyle was also involved in watering down proposals from a Labour backbencher to ban addictive smartphone algorithms aimed at young teenagers.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scottish Sun
12 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Buoyant Sarwar pleads with PM to do more for Scots after by-election triumph
Scottish Labour leader Anas has urged Sir Keir to make the lives of Scots better to give him an 'easier' run into the 2026 Holyrood election. MUST DELIVER Buoyant Sarwar pleads with PM to do more for Scots after by-election triumph ANAS Sarwar has told Sir Keir Starmer he 'must do more' to help him convert the stunning Hamilton by-election win into kicking the SNP out of power. The Scottish Labour leader admitted the Prime Minister's rocky start to life in No10 had not been good enough on a number of fronts. 3 Anas Sarwar leader of Scottish Labour with by-election winner Davy Russell, right, and the party's deputy leader Jackie Baillie, left 3 Sir Keir Starmer And he urged Sir Keir to make the lives of Scots better to give him an 'easier' run into the 2026 Holyrood election. But Mr Sarwar — still 'buzzing' after Davy Russell's narrow victory in Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse — insisted: 'Scotland is one step closer to changing the SNP government, from booting them from office and electing a Scottish Labour government. But we still have got hard work to do. "Keir Starmer knows what he has to do as Prime Minister to improve the lives of people here in Scotland and across the UK, and he knows he has to do more, and demonstrably more, over the course of the next year. 'I want a UK Labour government to deliver for people in Scotland, and the context of that, of course, makes conversations and makes campaigns easier. 'And they recognise that they have to do more to improve people's lives.' His comments come after Scottish Labour — relegated to third place by the bookies and political commentators before last Thursday's vote — surged to victory over the SNP and Reform UK. And in an exclusive interview with The Scottish Sun on Sunday, Mr Sarwar said: 'I want to earn the right to be in government, earn the right to be First Minister. 'I want to earn the right to change the direction of our country. And that's what I'm going to try hard to do.' Mr Sarwar had cut a despondent figure in recent months after seeing his party plummet in the polls after being neck-and-neck with the Nats last year. Recent surveys before the by-election confirmed a slump from a high of 37 per cent in the constituency vote to 19 per cent, and from 34 per cent in the regional list stats to 18 per cent. Anas Sarwar reacts to Labour's shock win and reveals why voters backed the party Meanwhile the SNP has barely shifted from 33 per cent and 28 per cent support in the respective measures. The dip came after Labour trounced the Nats in last July's General Election, returning 37 MPs to Westminster after previous near wipeouts in Scotland in 2015 and 2019. Mr Sarwar struggled to defend the UK Labour government's decisions, including Chancellor Rachel Reeves axing winter fuel payments for pensioners and raising employer National Insurance contributions — which experts say heightened discontent. But he was visibly energised from the by-election win when he spoke to us after his party secured 31.6 per cent of the Hamilton vote compared to the SNP's 29.4 per cent. Mr Sarwar — who has clashed publicly and privately with Sir Keir — admitted it had been a 'challenging number of months'. He added: 'We have to have a clearer demonstration from a UK Labour government that we are improving the lives of people here in Scotland. I make no bones about that. In fairness to Keir Starmer, he makes no bones about that too. He accepts that that has to happen.' But Mr Sarwar now feels able to turn his fire on First Minister John Swinney — and also have a pop at political pundits. He said: 'I've never felt that the underlying fundamentals have changed. I've always believed they were still good for us and very bad for the SNP. 'What was deeply frustrating, and actually the by-election has helped in this, is there was this overlaying theory amongst the political commentariat and pollsters that everything was framed around a UK Labour government. What John Swinney has tried to do over the course of the last ten or 11 months is he has very deliberately retreated from the real public debate, just withdrawn anything meaningful from the government, so they just go quiet and hope the public only focus on a UK Labour government and therefore he sneaks in through the back door. 'I think that's his entire strategy. But it's burst. It's done. He's not got it. The SNP's finished. 'The question now is what replaces them. 'And ultimately that's only the Scottish Labour Party.'


Scottish Sun
12 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Staggering cost Labour has spent chartering boats to rescue migrants in Channel in just eight months revealed
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) NEARLY £4million has been spent under Sir Keir Starmer's government on chartering five privately owned boats to rescue migrants in the Channel over the last eight months. Border Force chiefs have used vessels from two private companies to patrol the English Channel and pick up migrants in dinghies making the treacherous journey from France to the UK. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 2 Migrants in dinghies making the treacherous journey from France to the UK Credit: PA 2 Nearly £4million has been spent under Sir Keir Starmer's government on chartering five privately owned boats to rescue migrants Credit: Getty Aeolian Offshore and CWind provide the boats, which are normally used to carry maintenance and repair crew between offshore wind farms. Home Office figures show Aeolian has been paid £2,093,800 since July last year and Cwind £1,786,199 in the same period. A Home Office spokesperson said: 'The catamarans leased under these contracts are considered more suitable for the task of rescuing migrants from small boats, than the larger vessels in the Border Force maritime fleet. "As a result, our fleet of cutters and coastal-patrol vessels are free to concentrate on tackling the wider threats around the UK coast. "This includes preventing the smuggling of drugs and firearms into our country.' This week Reform and the Conservatives accused the Government of 'blaming the weather' for record numbers of crossings in the 12 months since April 2024. Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp said: 'It is the border- security equivalent of a lazy student claiming 'the dog ate my homework'.' The Sun revealed yesterday that immigration was seen as the worst-handled issue under Labour. A staggering 74 per cent of Brits said the government was doing a bad job, with more than half – 52 per cent – said it's being handled very badly.


The Sun
12 minutes ago
- The Sun
Fury as fear of mass migration branded ‘terrorist ideology' in official govt training papers
CONCERN about mass migration is a 'terrorist ideology' that requires deradicalisation, official government training documents state. A course hosted by the anti-extremism programme Prevent lists 'cultural nationalism' as a belief that should trigger alarm. It includes a view that 'Western culture is under threat from mass mig-ration and lack of integration by certain ethnic or cultural groups'. The news has sparked fury with free speech activists, including Toby Young, head of the Free Speech Union. In a letter to Home Secretary Yvette Cooper, he writes: 'Now that 'cultural nationalism' has been classified as a subcategory of extreme right-wing terrorist ideology, even mainstream, right-of-centre beliefs risk being treated as ideologically suspect, despite falling well within the bounds of lawful expression.' The Home Office said: 'Prevent is not about restricting debate or free speech, but preventing those suscept-ible to radicalisation.' It comes after 1,194 illegal migrants arrived on small boats last Saturday. The leader of Labour's Red Wall faction said Sir Keir Starmer should consider reforming ECHR laws blamed for letting an Albanian criminal stay here due to his son not liking chicken nuggets abroad. Backbencher Jo White said: 'We need to be looking at things like ECHR article eight. "I don't think anything should be off the table. 13 migrants jumped from the back of a lorry at a Sainsbury's distribution centre in South East London 2