logo
The truth about Britain's taxpayer cash-soaked wind farm industry laid bare in scandalous detail in court papers

The truth about Britain's taxpayer cash-soaked wind farm industry laid bare in scandalous detail in court papers

Daily Mail​4 days ago
The Cabrach and Glenfiddich Estates cover almost 50,000 scenic acres of Morayshire at the north-eastern end of the Grampian Mountains.
Owned by Christopher Moran, a colourful Tory donor who made his fortune in the City of London, they take in grouse moors, a salmon river, a pheasant shoot and some of the finest stalking ground in all of Scotland.
There are also some 18 tenanted farms, endless estate cottages, and a grand 17-bedroom lodge, which once belonged to the Dukes of Richmond and Gordon and boasts a ping-pong room decorated with oil paintings by Thomas Gainsborough.
Moran, who is 77, acquired this pile via two transactions, in 1979 and 1982.
A keen shot, he describes his hobbies in Who's Who as 'architecture, opera, art, politics and country pursuits', and once told an interviewer that Cabrach and Glenfiddich gave him 'sanity', saying: 'In London I can work 24 hours a day. But here, I unwind.'
Lately, the wealthy laird's perks have been more than just sporting. For recent events have turned his picturesque Highland seat into one of rural Britain's most prolific cash machines.
Historically, this was one of the finest unspoiled views in Scotland. But today, the skyline is broken by 59 gargantuan steel turbines of the Dorenell Wind Farm.
Each of them stands 126 metres tall and sits on land that has been leased by Moran to the French energy giant EDF.
They were installed in 2019, and – assuming the wind is blowing – can feed 177 megawatts of clean, green electricity (enough to power 106,000 homes) into Britain's National Grid.
Given the stunning location, its construction was highly controversial. Locals filed around 600 complaints, saying it would despoil the landscape, hurt tourism and provide little tangible economic benefit.
EDF argued it would play an essential role in helping Britain meet 'net zero' targets. In an effort to silence critics, they offered to set up a 'Community Benefit Fund' that would distribute some of the profits to charities that help residents.
Although an initial planning application was opposed by Moray Council, development was approved on appeal by the Scottish government.
That, broadly, is the history of the place. And there's nothing so very unusual about it. Thanks to our deepening political love affair with wind turbines – Energy Secretary Ed Miliband recently unveiled plans to double our onshore wind capacity by 2030 – similar schemes are being rolled out, against local opposition, across the land.
Yet there is something that makes Dorenell not just remarkable, but very newsworthy indeed. And it involves the thorny topic of money.
First, though, a brief lesson in wind farm economics. In common with all British facilities, Dorenell generates insufficient power to make back the cost of its construction by simply selling electricity on the open market.
Instead, its owners receive generous subsidies, paid for by consumers via levies on energy bills, which are supposed to help them to turn a small profit.
Supporting the UK's wind, solar and other renewable power in this manner costs the grand total of £25billion a year, according to the Renewable Energy Foundation (REF) charity.
That's more than £850 for every household and equates to around 40 per cent of the electricity costs you are currently paying every month.
So far, so eco-friendly. But what few bill-payers properly understand is where the mountain of cash they shell out each month is ending up.
For while Mr Miliband's subsidy system is supposed to help developers wash their face, it's increasingly enriching a class of 'wind farm vultures', who are exploiting the rules to cream off profits at the British public's expense.
Energy firms have for years kept bill-payers in the dark about this mounting scandal, filing accounts that (perhaps deliberately) keep the finances of individual projects opaque, and hiding behind NDAs and other confidentiality agreements to conceal how much cash is being diverted to already wealthy landowners via lease payments.
All of which leads us back to Dorenell. Because its finances were last week laid bare, in scandalous detail, during a remarkable case at the Court of Session in Edinburgh. The proceedings, which revolved around a contractual dispute, provided an insight into what is going on under the bonnet of Britain's cash-soaked wind farm industry.
Take the question of profits. At one point, it emerged that Dorenell Windfarm Limited, the company that operates the whole thing, now makes almost as much money (in some years a whacking £40million) from switching its turbines off as it does from generating green energy.
Later, it became clear that the firm makes millions more during these periods of downtime, via a loophole in the subsidy system that allows it to 'trade' the electricity it's not actually producing – more on which later.
Take also the question of cash that Christopher Moran, who is already worth £658million, according to the Sunday Times Rich List, is creaming off from all this. Court papers revealed that he's being paid in the region of £10million a year in rent by Dorenall.
That's the equivalent of around £170,000 per turbine, per year. What's more, it's ten times more than locals were led to believe he'd earn from the scheme.
To quote one disgruntled campaigner, it makes the £2million funnelled to the 'Community Benefit Fund' since 2020 to compensate locals for despoiling their landscape 'look like chicken feed'.
Some of the other dizzying numbers cited in the litigation show how the 'green' subsidy regime every Briton is financing has created a perverse property bubble.
In effect, Christopher Moran's remote hilltops, which have for centuries only been useful for farming sheep and shooting, have been turned into some of the most valuable pieces of real estate in the country.
'People sometimes wonder why a landowner would want to host a wind farm. The answer, as this court case shows, is they are being offered rents that would tempt a saint,' is how Dr John Constable, director of the REF charity, puts it.
'As a result, the green subsidies that make these high returns possible are now at an unsustainable level.'
Constable points out that what happens at Dorenell is likely to be happening across Britain. For this particular wind farm accounts for little more than 1 per cent of the UK's entire onshore capacity.
Details of how the public's cash is being splurged are laid bare in an 'opinion' on the litigation that was published by Lord Sandison, one of Scotland's most senior judges, on July 10.
It reveals that Moran's company Glenfiddich Wind Limited, which runs his estate's wind farming operations, is suing EDF's operating firm Dorenell Windfarm Limited for 'sums allegedly underpaid' under the terms of its lease.
The claim covers a three-year period from 2022 to 2024. During that time, the contract between the two stipulated that Moran's firm would be paid either a 'gross income rent' based on a proportion of revenues generated by the turbines, or a 'minimum annual rent' of £6million, depending on which was higher.
In 2022, he received £8,496,981. The following year, the figure was £9,480,725, and in 2024 it reached £10,406,641.
To put things another way, Moran made more than £28million by doing very little aside from owning a remote bit of moorland.
But at some point, he decided the figure was around £6,196,518 less than it ought to have been under the terms of the contract, and took EDF to court.
At the heart of the dispute is an argument over so-called 'constraint payments'. This term describes cash that is paid to wind farms to compensate them for either switching off their turbines, or reducing capacity, when the grid has become too full to take on more electricity.
The system is designed to cope with power surges during times of high wind speeds. Initially, it was rarely used.
In 2010, the first year of its existence, 'constraint' fees cost consumers £174,000. But as more wind farms have been built in remote areas bottlenecks in the grid have become more commonplace.
As a result, upwards of £300million a year is now being spent under the 'constraint' scheme, which has now cost bill-payers the grand total of £1.8billion, according to the REF.
What's more, critics believe wind farm operators can sometimes make more, under the rules, by switching off their turbines than from making electricity.
This has created a perverse incentive to build new facilities in isolated regions such as Moray, where the strained infrastructure means 'constraint payments' are likely to be more common.
Dorenell is a case in point. For according to court papers, in 2023 it received £37million in 'constraint payments', equating to half its gross income of £74million. The following year, the figure was £40million.
These sums were then included in figures used to calculate Moran's rent– but Dorenell Windfarm Limited was also making extra cash from shutting down its turbines by exploiting a loophole in the subsidy system via which farms receiving 'constraint payments' are provided with 'credited energy' they can then sell on the open market.
A highly-complex trading arrangement then allowed them to make millions in extra profits by selling the 'credited energy' that they'd never actually generated when prices were high.
Moran thought that a portion of this extra income ought to have then found its way into his rent payments.
EDF disagreed, sparking a contract dispute. In his opinion Lord Sandison appears to have largely sided with Moran, and both sides in the dispute are now considering their next steps.
'The exposure of such scale of financial returns and infighting, all whilst this wind farm development has one of the most derisory community benefit packages in the country, should be subject to the highest level of scrutiny by the Scottish government,' is how Jonathan Christie, the Chief Executive of The Cabrach Trust, a local charity dedicated to regeneration, puts it.
Colin Mackenzie, a whisky historian who has holiday lets near the Cabrach and Glenfiddich Estates, describes the roll out of wind turbines across the Highlands as a 'national scandal' saying: 'The figures in the court case are astonishing and make the £2million awarded to local projects since the Community Benefit Fund opened look like chicken feed.'
Moran isn't the only one to have smelled a rat about Dorenell's 'constraint payments'. Last year, Ofgem forced the operator to pay £5million into a 'redress fund' after finding that it had charged 'excessive' amounts to switch off turbines under the scheme.
To critics, the grubby affair only serves to highlight how energy subsidies represent one of the most regressive wealth transfers in history, funnelling cash from poor people to some of the wealthiest in society.
Christopher Moran is perhaps the very last person who might be in need of extra cash. A grammar schoolboy from a modest background, he joined Lloyd's of London in the 1960s as a 17-year-old insurance broker's assistant and within five years had acquired his first million.
By the 1990s he had a car collection that extended to three Rolls-Royces and a Lagonda, plus one of largest homes in London: Crosby Hall, a medieval pile in Chelsea that was once home to King Richard III.
There was also a beauty queen wife, named Helen, with whom he had two sons before divorcing in the late 1990s, a vast collection of antiques and Old Master paintings, and a contacts book that would see him host everyone from Tony Blair, Boris Johnson and David Cameron, to Prince Harry, Queen Elizabeth, and an array of celebrities at his palatial residence next to the Thames.
Life has not been without the occasional scandal. His City career suffered a setback in 1982 when he became the first Lloyd's broker to be expelled in 300 years for 'discreditable conduct'.
A few years later, he was censured by the Stock Exchange Council and fined $2million in the US for alleged insider dealing.
And in the 2000s, Moran was reported to be one of several individuals the Tories had returned donations to so as to prevent their identities from becoming public under new disclosure rules.
In 2018, a newspaper probe found that one of his properties, a serviced apartment block named Chelsea Cloisters, was home to more than 100 prostitutes, earning the building the nickname 'ten floors of whores' (Moran denied having any knowledge of their presence).
And in 2023, it emerged that he'd fathered a daughter named Iva via his girlfriend Emily Rae.
Not that Moran is running away from controversy. To the horror of locals, he's announced plans to build 22 new wind turbines on his estate via a joint venture with a Canadian company.
Given recent revelations at the Court of Sessions, we can assume they will earn lots of money from being switched off.
And so the Laird of Cabrach and Glenfiddich will get even richer, Scotland's Highlands will become less beautiful, and you and I will be forced to pay for it.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UN chief urges tech sector to power data centers with renewables
UN chief urges tech sector to power data centers with renewables

Reuters

time19 minutes ago

  • Reuters

UN chief urges tech sector to power data centers with renewables

WASHINGTON, July 22 (Reuters) - U.N. Secretary General António Guterres on Tuesday called on tech companies to power the build out of data centers with 100% renewable energy by 2030, even as the industry turns to gas and coal-fired power plants to meet surging demand. The secretary general made his case for why he believes energy-hungry data centers should lock in a future of clean energy, saying the transition to renewable energy is inevitable, even as some countries and companies still embrace fossil fuels. "The future is being built in the cloud," Guterres said in a speech at the United Nations' headquarters in New York. "It must be powered by the sun, the wind, and the promise of a better world." His appeal to technology companies comes a day before U.S. President Donald Trump unveils his administration's AI Action Plan, which is expected to contain a number of executive actions aimed at easing restrictions on land use and energy production to unleash artificial intelligence development. Trump has declared a national energy emergency to address the vast amounts of energy needed by data centers to power AI to compete with China and enable him to ease environmental restrictions to build more power plants fueled by gas, coal and nuclear. Top economic rivals, the U.S. and China, are locked in a technological arms race over who can dominate AI. At the same time, Trump has issued executive orders and signed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act that curtails the use of incentives for wind and solar energy, which dominate the queue of new power generation waiting to connect to the electric grid. Guterres also appealed to governments to ready new national climate plans to deliver the goals of the Paris climate agreement by September that will lock-in a transition away from fossil fuels. He said this moment is an opportunity for governments to meet all new electricity demand with renewables and use water sustainably in cooling systems.

If one green energy plant costs £36bn, there's no hope for net zero
If one green energy plant costs £36bn, there's no hope for net zero

Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Telegraph

If one green energy plant costs £36bn, there's no hope for net zero

It is reliable, safe, and while it is not one hundred per cent carbon-free once you factor in the impact of mining for all the minerals, it is about as green as you can possibly get. There are plenty of strong arguments for increasing Britain's supply of nuclear energy, and the Energy Secretary Ed Miliband has made the right decision today in approving the Sizewell C power station. There is just one catch. The cost has doubled over the last five years, and will double again before its reactors are switched on. In reality, Miliband and the Green Commissars around him are allowing red tape and bureaucracy to drive the cost of the green transition to astronomical levels – and that will destroy the whole project. It will at least help make sure we have enough power to keep the lights on when the wind turbines aren't working. The Sizewell C nuclear power plant will generate enough power for about six million homes once it is finished. The Government will own a majority stake, but the British Gas-owned Centrica, France's EDF, along with some investment funds, have been strong-armed into taking stakes, while the taxpayer-financed National Wealth Fund will provide much of the finance. 'It is time to do big things and build big projects in this country again,' boasted Miliband as he announced the project. Here's the problem, however. The plant will cost £38bn, almost double the £20bn that was estimated when it was first under discussion five years ago. If anyone believes it will actually get delivered at anything close to that figure I have a 'pre-loved' windmill I would like to sell them. Given the atrocious cost overruns that plague every major infrastructure project in the UK the final cost will be well over £60bn and perhaps as high as £80bn. It is going to be an incredibly expensive piece of kit. It does not have to be this way. Nuclear power plants can be built at far lower cost. In France, a new plant costs an estimated €11-12bn euros, and even the Flamanville Plant, which suffered significant cost overruns, only came in at €13bn euros. Sure, costs vary according to their size, and type of reactor. But Britain Remade, a think tank, estimated Britain has the second highest costs in the world behind only the United States (which prefers to focus on its abundant fracking industry). In this country, nuclear costs an estimated £9.4bn per megawatt to build, compared with £4.4bn in France, and £2.2bn in South Korea. Given that upfront capital costs are the major expense with nuclear power – once it is up and running it is very cheap – that means energy bills will be two or three times higher for homes than they would be if we could build at the same price as South Korea. We all know the reason why. Britain has allowed the cost of building even a minor pedestrian bridge, never mind something as controversial as a nuclear power station, to be smothered in red tape. Planning reports run to tens of thousands of pages, legal challenges are allowed at every step of the way, and every form of wildlife is prioritised over the long-suffering British taxpayer. If Miliband was serious about hitting his net zero targets he would ruthlessly slash red tape until we got down to South Korean levels. If he could do that, we could take the cost of Sizewell C down to £10bn. And yet, the harsh truth is this. Miliband and the Green Commissars care even more about rules, regulations and state control than they do about saving the environment. If Miliband let the market work he could deliver green energy on time, at reasonable cost – but none of us should hold our breath waiting for that to happen.

BrewDog to close TEN bars as staff given ‘three days' notice'
BrewDog to close TEN bars as staff given ‘three days' notice'

The Sun

time2 hours ago

  • The Sun

BrewDog to close TEN bars as staff given ‘three days' notice'

BREWDOG is set to shut ten bars across the UK - and it's claimed staff have been given just three days' notice. Union officials have blasted bosses at the Scottish pub chain on social media following claims staff are set to be axed at several locations. 2 2 Staff were told today that several flagship stores across the country would be closing for good - starting as early as this Friday. Unite Union claims that workers impacted have only been given three days' notice before losing their jobs. The locations of the affected bars include two in Scotland and eight in England. Among those are some of the venues that are "woven into the history" of the firm, including Aberdeen, which was BrewDog's first ever bar, and Camden, their first bar in London. The full list includes: Aberdeen Flagship (Gallowgate) Brighton Camden Dundee Leeds North Street Oxford Sheffield Shepherds Bush Shoreditch York Details on the number of potential jobs that could be lost as a result of the closures are unknown at this stage. However, bosses at BrewDog have said they are undergoing an appropriate consultation process with all affected staff which will last a minimum of two weeks. They added that there will be one-to-one meetings with every member of staff who is at risk of redundancy. But they confirmed that "every effort will be made to made to redeploy as many members of staff as possible." Unite Hospitality shared the news with a post on X, formerly known as Twitter. It read: "Brew Dog have announced that they are closing 10 flagship bars from Aberdeen to Camden, as soon as THIS FRIDAY! "In what universe is THREE DAYS a morally (or legally) acceptable notice period for a proper redundancy consultation for the workers impacted?!" A statement from CEO James Taylor was posted on the shareholders' forum announcing that closures come as part of a "strategic review". He explained that the firm has "faced continued challenges" in the UK, including "rising costs, increased regulation, and economic pressures", which have resulted in the closures. He said: "Despite our best efforts, it has simply not been possible to find a formula to make these bars viable due to their size, location and other limiting factors." Taylor added: "Keeping them open would put pressure on the wider business, making it harder to invest where we know we can grow. "This decision is not simply a response to the challenging UK hospitality market but a proactive decision to redefine the bar division's focus. "This is not a decision we've taken lightly. But as we evolve BrewDog into a more focused and sustainable business, we've had to be honest about where we are - and where we're heading". In an internal note shared amongst staff, Taylor said: "To everyone who worked in these bars, and every customer who supported them - thank you. These bars helped make BrewDog what it is today, and we're grateful for your support over the years." BrewDog has been contacted for comment by The Scottish Sun. BrewDog, based in Ellon, Aberdeenshire, was co-founded by tycoons James Watt and Martin Dickie in 2007. And it is popular with punters for its innovative and often provocative approach to craft beer. Watt stepped down from his CEO role in the major pub chain back in May 2024 after 17 years. He handed it over to chief operating officer James Arrow as the "business pushes forward into the next phase of growth". But Arrow also stepped down from the role in March earlier this year due to "personal reasons". News of the closures comes after the beer giants started the new year by axing six bars. The wave of closures in January came after the Scottish firm's latest accounts revealed it lost a record £63 million. At the time, bosses said the shutters would come down at three venues in Europe, one in China and another two in England. It was the third year in a row Brewdog has closed boozers. CEO James Arrow broke the grim news to staff and shareholders. He said: 'As you will be very aware, the hospitality sector has faced unprecedented challenges over the last few years – both in the UK and around the world. 'And whilst our bar estate has been very resilient, we've not been immune, and some locations have felt the impact more acutely than others. 'Unfortunately, we recently made the tough decision to close four of our international bars. "Our focus has been on liaising with affected teams and finding them alternative locations where possible.' is your go to destination for the best celebrity news, football news, real-life stories, jaw-dropping pictures and must-see video.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store