Shareholders demand VW reforms its ‘highly problematic' governance

TimesLIVE

19-05-2025

Volkswagen's shareholders renewed their criticism of the carmaker's corporate governance on Friday, demanding greater board independence and expressing growing concern over the dominance of the German company's controlling families.
At the carmaker's virtual annual general meeting, several major investors took aim at CEO Oliver Blume's dual role as head of Volkswagen and Porsche AG, a contentious issue since Porsche's listing as a separate company in September 2022.
"Mr Blume, again we make the urgent appeal: give up one of your board positions," said Ingo Speich of Deka Investment, stating conflicts of interest across the carmaker's governance structure were "highly problematic" and causing "grave damage to reputation and enormous financial losses.."
Volkswagen's share price has dropped by nearly 25% in the past year from €140.40 (R2,842) to €105.6 (R2,138), underperforming the European autos index and Germany's DAX, according to LSEG data.
The carmaker, which warned last month it would likely hit the bottom end of its annual profit margin forecast, is battling challenges in all its key markets, from steep tariffs in the US to fierce competition in China and high costs in Europe.
'Blatant deficiencies'
The Porsche and Piech families effectively control Volkswagen through their holding firm Porsche SE, which holds most of the voting rights in the Wolfsburg-based carmaker.
Wolfgang Porsche, who leads the supervisory boards of Porsche SE and sportscar maker Porsche AG, has previously dismissed the idea that poor governance is to blame for the carmaker's languishing share price, instead blaming weak performance and high costs.
However, four investors argued that a lack of expertise on the board in key competencies such as electrification and digitalisation were holding back the carmaker.
"The impression is becoming stronger that power, rather than the market, dominates at VW," said Hendrik Schmidt from asset manager DWS.
Blume and supervisory board chair Hans Dieter Poetsch defended the CEO's dual role on Friday, saying it benefited cost-cutting efforts underway at the two companies.
"It was clear from the beginning that [my dual role] was not intended to last forever," Blume said. "The dual role is a recipe for success."
Investors are not so sure.