India will play lead role in tailoring 6G technology regulations, says Jyotiraditya Scindia
Jyotiraditya Scindia
on Saturday.
The Union minister of communications also asserted that in the days to come India will play a leading role in tailoring rules for 6G technology.
"The rollout of 5G technology has taken place, and in just 22 months, the information revolution has reached 82 per cent of the population of 99 percent districts in the country. India will take the lead in shaping the upcoming
6G technology regulations
,"
Scindia
asserted.
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
If You Eat Ginger Everyday for 1 Month This is What Happens
Tips and Tricks
Undo
He also said new services are being introduced in the postal system, adding that India Post is one of the largest logistics and distribution networks in the world having 1.64 lakh (164,000) post offices and 2.5 lakh (250,000) postal workers.
"In 2008, I designed the logo for the Department of Posts, with the slogan 'Postal Service is Public Service.' Every postal worker operates with this spirit. India will continue to lead the telecom revolution," said Scindia, who was Union minister of state for communications in the first term of the Manmohan Singh-led UPA government.
Live Events
May 17 is observed as World Telecommunication and Information Society Day with the aim of raising global awareness of social changes brought about by the internet and new technologies and reducing the
digital divide
.
Endorsing the boycott of Turkiye and Azerbaijan by citizens after the two nations decided to support Pakistan during Operation Sindoor, Scindia said, "This is the will of the people. The nation comes first."
"The boycott is an emotional decision taken by the people of the nation. Citizens have made this decision voluntarily. The nation comes first, and no citizen will compromise when it comes to national interest and security," he asserted.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
22 minutes ago
- NDTV
Trump Once Again Claims He Stopped India, Pak War
Washington: US President Donald Trump on Monday once again repeated his claim that he stopped the war between India and Pakistan. Talking to the press in the Oval Office while meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, Trump claimed to have ended six wars, including the war between India and Pakistan. While answering a question, Trump said he thought that the Russia-Ukraine war would be the "easiest one" to end, but it is not. Trump said that "it is the tough one", and we have been talking about it for a long time, like "we were talking about others …India-Pakistan." Trump also indirectly mentioned India and Pakistan on his Truth Social post earlier in the day. "I've settled 6 Wars in 6 months, one of them a possible Nuclear disaster," Trump posted. Since May 10, when Trump announced on social media that India and Pakistan had agreed to a "full and immediate" ceasefire after a "long night" of talks mediated by Washington, he has repeated his claim over 40 times that he "helped settle" the tensions between India and Pakistan. India has been consistently maintaining that the understanding on cessation of hostilities with Pakistan was reached following direct talks between the Directors General of Military Operations (DGMOs) of the two militaries. Prime Minister Narendra Modi has said in Parliament that no leader of any country asked India to stop Operation Sindoor. External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar has categorically said there was no third-party intervention in bringing about a ceasefire with Pakistan during Operation Sindoor. On the day of his summit meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Friday, Trump repeated multiple times within hours his claim that he stopped the war between India and Pakistan, as well as spoke about Delhi's purchases of Russian oil.
India.com
22 minutes ago
- India.com
Delhi-Dehradun Expressway nears completion, may get open on..., plan is to complete work by...
New Delhi: PM Narendra Modi inaugurated the Delhi section of Dwarka Expressway and Urban Extension Road-2 in Delhi on Sunday, 17 August. After this, discussions have started on the projects going on in Ghaziabad as to when they will be inaugurated. Recently, Union Minister Nitin Gadkari had talked about the inauguration of the Delhi-Dehradun Expressway by October. In such a situation, it is expected that people can get the gift of the Delhi-Dehradun Expressway on this Diwali. According to the NBT, it was found that about 15% work is still left on the Delhi-Dehradun Expressway. How many parts are ready? The part from Akshardham to Baghpat is completely ready. 10% work is still left in the Baghpat to Saharanpur part. At the same time, about 5 per cent work is left from Saharanpur to Chhutman. The target is to complete both these remaining works by October. The work between Chhutman and Dehradun has been completed. In such a situation, it is being claimed that the Delhi-Dehradun Expressway will be operational by October, according to the NBT reports. How much work is remaining to be completed? At the same time, if NHAI officials are to be believed, more than 90 per cent of the work has been completed, and the remaining work is being completed rapidly. The work will be completed within two months, but sources say that it will be difficult to complete the work within three to four months, according to reports. What was the deadline? It is known that this project was to be completed in March 2024, but the completion of the project is getting delayed. Earlier, some part of it was set to open in January 2025, but later it was postponed. This expressway will mainly connect Delhi, Baghpat, Muzaffarnagar, Shamli, Saharanpur and then Dehradun. Although six lanes have been constructed at most places, for future needs, it can also be expanded from 8 to 12 lanes.
Economic Times
30 minutes ago
- Economic Times
A chill is setting in that will take a long time to recover in the India-US relationship
Synopsis The India-US relationship has deteriorated, with disproportionate responses from the White House despite India's efforts to address trade concerns. Political imperatives in the US, rather than trade merits, seem to be driving the decisions, leading to a chill in relations and a hardening public mood in India. Over the past few weeks, as the India-US relationship has near-imploded, several opinions and assessments have emerged. Most analysts have been measured and thoughtful, and attempted to discern the long view. Others have been astonishingly uninformed, ranging from amateurs talking through their hats to (former) professionals opining through their golf caps. ADVERTISEMENT To be sure, any consequential policy episode must see a reckoning and self-appraisal within the government. This is to be expected in an accountable democracy. The external affairs ministry, commerce ministry and even the PMO would naturally undertake such an exercise. Were there diplomatic missteps? Could the trade negotiations have gone differently? Were gaps in Operation Sindoor's strategic comms deterministic? These are all good questions. Since there is always room for improvement, they must be asked and deliberated upon. However, this should not deflect from a fundamental and pivotal point: nothing India did, no act of commission or omission, merited the sort of response that has come from the White House and Trump regime. It's egregiously disproportionate. Inevitably, this warrants the conclusion that the issue is not about some minor sticking point that can be resolved with a 'high-level phone call' here, or more 'trade concessions' there. Advice that India should rethink its position on GM food, or making investment announcements even without resources to back them, is not particularly sensible those who should know better have advocated reckless and adventurist approaches that no Indian minister, civil servant or public official - past, present and future - can carry out. The legitimate restraints of the Indian system will always - and correctly - prevent also needs to be said India's diplomats recognised the importance of the trade and tariffs issue very early, and worked to a win-win plan. On their part, trade negotiators from the commerce ministry - again, often criticised - came up with the most ambitious market-access package in India's history. They were given the political space for it by the PM, and they delivered. ADVERTISEMENT Whatever else it is, the White House's rejection/non- acceptance of the trade offer - which would give the US an unprecedented market and strategic advantage in India - is not on merits. Even USTR insiders have that appreciation. So, what is driving the Trump regime's decision flow? How goalposts have shifted repeatedly in recent weeks would suggest that trade imperatives have long given way to political imperatives, perhaps even strategic and domestic calculations in the US president's inner council. If that is, indeed, the case, the basket of bilateral challenges could both deepen and expand in the near term. ADVERTISEMENT Either way, the relationship will take a long time to recover to the levels of political trust it has been used to over the past 20 years. A chill is setting in. The public mood is hardening, and the pressure on the Narendra Modi government - including on its ability to offer further trade concessions - is there for all to reckoning in New Delhi is that India is facing the most structured and coercive assault on its strategic autonomy - industrial and policy - in a long time. Inevitably, this perception will shape reactions. Consequences will not be limited to just the immediate future. ADVERTISEMENT No doubt there will be an economic cost. 50% tariffs are not going to be easy to manage, particularly for industries significantly dependent on US exports. Yet, this will also make other sectors wary of the geopolitical risks of excessive market exposure to the US. Rather than spur further engagement - as the trajectory of India-US relations has done in recent decades - it will induce caution and a desire to hedge and diversify. India's economic approaches towards China and Russia will become a self-fulfilling prophecy for Washington's tariff a slightly longer, but still not-too-distant, timeframe, India could conclude a trade deal with the EU. Once the EU recovers from its current 'He loves us, he loves us not' trans-Atlantic minuet, and assesses its position in the ballroom, it will note the opportunity of the moment. Next, India needs to find a non-China, non-RCEP (Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership) pathway to an economic and supply chains partnership with the Indo-Pacific. ADVERTISEMENT CPTPP (Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership) lends itself as an idea. Admittedly, CPTPP standards are very stringent. Could there be a trade-off between political comfort - the absence of arm-twisting and/or supply chains surrender - and calibrating just how much an external trade agreement could be used to drive internal reform and regulatory change? The process will not be easy, or without pain. Even so, if it is achieved, it could give India a longer-term hedge and option vis-a-vis the US. The lessons of the Summer of 2025 will alter the baseline for a reset, whenever that happens. This is not a stare-down India wanted - or, more accurately, wants. But whatever happens, India cannot allow itself to be outstared. (Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this column are that of the writer. The facts and opinions expressed here do not reflect the views of (Catch all the Business News, Breaking News, Budget 2024 Events and Latest News Updates on The Economic Times.) Subscribe to The Economic Times Prime and read the ET ePaper online. NEXT STORY
