Dumfries Maggie's cancer care centre plans given green light
It will see Maggie's take forward the plans on land rented by NHS Dumfries and Galloway under a "peppercorn lease" arrangement.A timescale for the project has not yet been disclosed.
Maggie's chief executive, Dame Laura Lee, said the centre would be transformational for those living with cancer across the region.She said many people currently had to travel to Glasgow or Edinburgh to access support, but that would now be brought closer to home."This centre has been in development for a long time, so it is wonderful to now be able to look forward to a time when people living with cancer have our expert support closer to them," she said."Of course, we also know that there's something special about having a centre here because we know how fondly our founder Maggie Keswick Jencks is remembered in her hometown."
About 1,200 cancer diagnoses are made in Dumfries and Galloway every year, the charity said.Maggie Keswick Jenks was diagnosed with breast cancer when she was 47 and was told it had returned in 1993.She died in 1995, but not before laying the groundwork for the creation of a support centre for people with cancer, and their families.The first Maggie's centre was built at the Western General Hospital in Edinburgh the following year.The charity now has eight centres operating across Scotland and others in the UK, Netherlands and Spain.Initial plans for a centre in Dumfries were first assessed in 2014 and formally went before NHS Dumfries and Galloway in June 2018.The health board was asked to put up £250,000 towards the £4m centre, but that failed to get off the ground.In July last year, the health board – which is facing a £35m financial deficit – said it could not commit to an increased initial outlay of £1m and an ongoing £80,000 per year support package.The board's endowment committee cited financial challenges and a Scottish government moratorium on new NHS building projects.
However, a rental agreement under a "peppercorn" contract has now been agreed.That will see Maggie's charged a token sum for a long-term lease on the land.The charity said it would fundraise to meet the capital and revenue needs of the centre, but added it did not know the amount required at this stage.NHS Dumfries and Galloway chief executive, Julie White, said: "NHS Dumfries and Galloway is facing significant financial challenges, but this new Maggie's centre is set to be taken forward by the charity – with the NHS board providing the land where it will be constructed over the coming years."Although the centre will be constructed in Dumfries, Maggie's appreciate that we are a remote and rural area and are supportive of an approach serving the region in its entirety."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
24 minutes ago
- The Independent
Using AI tools can ‘deskill' certain health workers
Using AI regularly can potentially 'deskill' health workers, a new study suggests. Academics said that the finding is 'concerning' given the rapid uptake of artificial intelligence (AI) across healthcare. The new study looked at health workers who perform a test to look for early signs of bowel cancer. Endoscopists perform a test called a colonoscopy to look for precancerous growths in the bowel known as adenomas. This means these pre-cancerous growths can be detected and removed, preventing them from becoming bowel cancer. Advances in AI technology have led to the development of computer-assisted polyp detection systems, which have been found to help these health workers spot more adenomas. Researchers wanted to assess whether continuous use of AI led to a dip in performance when endoscopist perform colonoscopies without AI by analysing work conducted in Poland. The research team analysed 1,442 colonoscopies conducted by experienced health workers before and after AI systems were rolled out at certain centres in 2021. Writing in the journal Lancet Gastroenterology and Hepatology, researchers reported that the rate of detection of polyps was 6% lower after the introduction of AI in standard and non-AI assisted colonoscopies. 'To our knowledge this is the first study to suggest a negative impact of regular AI use on healthcare professionals' ability to complete a patient-relevant task in medicine of any kind,' said one of the study authors, Dr Marcin Romanczyk, Academy of Silesia in Poland. 'Our results are concerning given the adoption of AI in medicine is rapidly spreading. 'We urgently need more research into the impact of AI on health professional's skills across different medical fields. We need to find out which factors may cause or contribute to problems when healthcare professionals and AI systems don't work well together, and to develop ways to fix or improve these interactions.' In a linked editorial, Omer Ahmad, a consultant gastroenterologist and interventional endoscopist and clinical research fellow at University College London, wrote: 'These findings temper the current enthusiasm for rapid adoption of AI-based technologies such as CADe and highlight the importance of carefully considering possible unintended clinical consequences. 'The study provides the first real-world clinical evidence for the phenomenon of deskilling, potentially affecting patient-related outcomes.'
The Independent
24 minutes ago
- The Independent
Calorie labels rarely influence takeaway choices, survey suggests
Calorie labels rarely influence takeaway choices and are unlikely to encourage people to eat more healthily, a survey suggests. A poll of 1,040 adults living in England found the majority (77%) did not notice any calorie information during their most recent online takeaway purchase, the study, led by the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (LSHTM) and Reading and Exeter universities and published in BMJ Nutrition Prevention & Health, found. Of those who did, 71% said it did not affect their food choices. Instead, taste and price were ranked the most important factors when deciding which takeaway to order, while healthiness and low carbon footprint were ranked as the least important. Around 50% of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that alternative interventions, such as traffic-light labels and more healthy alternatives on the menus, would encourage them to make a healthier choice. People under the age of 35 were more than twice as likely to order takeaways weekly or more often than those who were older, the poll found. The study also asked respondents to report their height and weight measurements, which the research team used to calculate body mass index (BMI) scores, finding just over half of the sample had BMI scores indicating they were living with obesity (35%) or were overweight (28%). Those with BMI scores that classed them as obese or overweight were twice as likely to have weekly or more frequent takeaways compared to those with healthy or underweight BMI scores. It is estimated almost two-thirds (63%) of adults in England are overweight or living with obesity. Current guidance recommends adults should consume around 2,000 calories a day and main meals should contain around 600 calories each. Frequent consumption of out-of-home food, including takeaways, has been linked to higher energy intake and poorer diet quality. As part of a government strategy to encourage healthier eating, calorie labelling was introduced in April 2022 for large out-of-home businesses across England, including restaurants, cafes and takeaways. As well as listing the calories for each food item, menus also need to include a statement of the recommended daily calorie intake. Associate Professor Laura Cornelsen, lead author of the study based at LSHTM, said: 'While calorie labels can encourage businesses to provide healthier options, they aren't necessarily the answer to reducing unhealthy eating and tackling obesity. 'When we asked participants what they think could improve healthy eating, they suggested for example 'buy one get one free' offers on healthier dishes and more education early on in schools on food preparation. 'These are both examples of interventions that can equip people with the knowledge to plan healthier options in a way that works with their schedule and income. 'The focus should be on tackling systemic issues, like making it simpler and more affordable to purchase healthier options, rather than adding even more pressure to consumers and families to change their choices. The onus should also be on the food industry to get creative with offering tasty and affordable meals that also meet nutrition guidelines.' Study co-author Dr Cherry Law, a food economist at the University of Reading, said: 'While awareness of calorie labelling rules is quite high, most people don't notice the information when ordering online, and even when they do it rarely changes what they choose. 'The takeaway message is that we need strategies that reflect what people care about when eating out, as calorie information alone is not enough.'
The Guardian
25 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Patients like a medic in a white coat, but often mistake female doctors for nurses
Patients see doctors in a white coat as professional and trustworthy but often mistake a female medic wearing one for a nurse or medical assistant, a study has found. Female physicians are 'unfairly judged based on appearance and attire, which affected patients' perceptions of professionalism and competency', according to a global review of the evidence around patients' impressions of what doctors wear. 'Female physicians are often judged more on appearance than their male counterparts,' it said. 'The way female physicians dress significantly influences perceptions of competence and professionalism, highlighting the gendered expectations that patients hold. 'Even when male and female physicians wore identical attire, female physicians were still more likely to be misidentified as nurses or medical assistants.' The researchers found that 'gender-related perceptions of physician attire' existed across the 13 countries studied, including the US, India, Japan, China and Germany. The paper, published in the journal BMJ Open, is based on an analysis of 32 previously published studies on perceptions of doctors' clothing. 'The expectations regarding attire are often gendered, particularly affecting the recognition and respect given to female physicians,' the paper's co-authors write. Such behaviour is so widespread that hospitals and other healthcare providers should try to reduce bias among patients and 'foster equitable perceptions' of male and female medics, they add. The white coat has been a symbol of medical expertise for decades. Its association in patients' minds with cleanliness and professionalism meant that 'white medical coats became the standard attire for physicians worldwide in the 20th century'. Until then, doctors had generally worn black clothing to reflect the seriousness of meetings with patients. People receiving healthcare find the white coat reassuring, the study found. 'Regardless of gender, patients exhibited favourable attitudes towards physicians wearing white coats, perceiving the physicians as trustworthy, respectful, skilled, communicative and empathetic.' The white coat is still widely used by doctors worldwide. However, it was banned in the UK in 2008, when the government decided that medics working in the NHS should follow a 'bare below the elbows' approach to reduce their risk of spreading infections. The British Medical Association was unsure that evidence justified the change. Despite patients' preference for doctors wearing formal clothing, the Covid-19 pandemic made them more accepting of scrubs. 'Patients tended to feel more comfortable with physicians wearing scrubs after Covid-19 ceased. While the traditional white coat is seen as a symbol of professionalism and trust, patients have increasingly accepted scrubs, especially in emergency or high-risk settings,' the researchers found. Globally, male doctors seem to enjoy another advantage in many patients' minds as to what they wear. 'Patients' perceptions of male physicians' accessories have shown that details such as watches and glasses significantly impact professionalism and trustworthiness' and add to their perceived authority, the study found.
