
Gold bullion and the erosion of US trust: Europe's historical and quiet revolt — Phar Kim Beng
In recent months, both Italy and Germany have revived efforts to repatriate significant portions of their gold reserves from the United States.
Although this movement has received little attention in mainstream Western media, its implications are profound.
These actions reflect growing mistrust — not only of the US financial system — but of Washington's willingness to weaponise it, especially under the administration of President Donald J Trump.
A history of gold and mistrust
This is not the first time Europe has questioned US custodianship of its monetary sovereignty.
In 2013, under President Barack Obama, Germany's Bundesbank repatriated more than 300 tonnes of gold — worth approximately US$18.6 billion (RM79 billion) at today's prices — from New York and Paris. That move, although couched in technical justifications, was a symbolic assertion of financial independence.
Yet today's repatriation push is markedly different. It is unfolding under vastly altered geopolitical circumstances, where Trump's second term is marked by aggressive rhetoric, erratic policy swings, and punitive economic measures — including tariffs that have disproportionately targeted the European Union.
Furthermore, Trump's repeated attacks on Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell have cast doubt on the independence of America's central bank, raising red flags for European policymakers.
As noted by the TAE (The Automatic Earth), this behaviour undermines confidence in US financial stewardship and prompts urgent reassessments of where Europe's wealth should be stored.
The significance of sovereign gold
Gold, in this context, is no longer just a commodity or hedge. It has become a tangible symbol of sovereignty. That Germany and Italy are actively pursuing the return of their gold reserves — currently valued at a combined US$245 billion, according to the Financial Times — signals a shift in the geopolitical trust that once undergirded the postwar transatlantic alliance.
Indeed, gold was once central to the Bretton Woods system. Until 1971, the US dollar was convertible to gold by the Federal Reserve, anchoring international monetary stability.
During the Cold War, many European nations stored their bullion in the US as a precaution against a potential Soviet invasion.
But historical memory has its own gravitational pull.
Indeed, gold was once central to the Bretton Woods system. Until 1971, the US dollar was convertible to gold by the Federal Reserve, anchoring international monetary stability. — Picture by Choo Choy May
In the mid-1960s, President Charles de Gaulle of France ordered the transfer of nearly all French overseas gold reserves back to Paris, having lost confidence in the Bretton Woods system.
This early repatriation foreshadowed today's deeper anxieties — only now, the mistrust is rooted less in East–West confrontation than in Western disunity itself.
Germany's repatriation drive
Germany provides a clear illustration of how grassroots pressure and institutional decisions have combined to alter gold policy. Beginning in 2010, a popular movement known as 'Bring Our Gold Home' gained traction across German civil society.
As a result, the Bundesbank announced in 2013 that it would store 50 per cent of its gold reserves within Germany, relocating 674 tonnes — worth roughly US$41.8 billion today — from New York and Paris to Frankfurt.
That operation, which cost about US$9.5 million, marked a turning point in how Europe viewed US financial custodianship.
Currently, 37 per cent of the Bundesbank's gold reserves remain in New York — a number now under renewed scrutiny amid the shifting winds of global diplomacy.
Italy's growing scepticism
Italy, too, has begun intensifying calls to retrieve its gold from American vaults. While its holdings are smaller than Germany's in absolute terms, the political messaging is just as sharp.
In Rome, populist and nationalist voices have increasingly questioned why Italian wealth should remain under the indirect control of a foreign central bank — especially one seen as operating under an increasingly politicised US executive.
These concerns are compounded by Trump's aggressive tariff policy, which has treated European allies as if they were adversaries. NATO, once the bedrock of Euro–American defence cooperation, has been repeatedly devalued rhetorically by the US President.
The European Union is being treated less as a strategic partner and more as a transactional entity, to be bent to Washington's will.
A slow unravelling of trust
What is emerging is not a dramatic rupture, but a gradual erosion of confidence.
Should France or the Netherlands decide to follow Germany and Italy in removing their gold from US storage, it could mark the beginning of the end of American custodianship over Europe's monetary assets.
Such a shift would carry symbolic and systemic consequences.
It would signal that Europe no longer trusts the United States to safeguard the financial pillars of the postwar liberal order.
More critically, it would suggest that Europe is preparing for a future where US power is neither as benign nor as stable as it once seemed.
Gold repatriation, therefore, is not merely about logistics or portfolio diversification.
It is about hedging against a future in which financial systems are no longer neutral, but weaponised — used to coerce compliance, punish dissent, and enforce geopolitical hierarchy.
Conclusion: A quiet but strategic revolt
The renewed gold repatriation efforts by Germany and Italy reflect a quiet but growing revolt against the unpredictability of Trump-era diplomacy and the perceived decline in US institutional reliability.
Should this trend continue, the very architecture of transatlantic financial trust — built painstakingly since 1945 — could slowly crumble.
The message from Europe is clear: in a world where alliances are questioned and financial tools are increasingly wielded as weapons, sovereignty must be made tangible again — and there is no more enduring symbol of that than gold.
* Phar Kim Beng is a professor of Asean Studies and director of the Institute of Internationalization and Asean Studies at the International Islamic University of Malaysia
** This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Malay Mail
11 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
Starmer to press Trump on Gaza ceasefire, trade at Scotland meeting
TURNBERRY, July 28 — UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer will press Donald Trump on ending 'the unspeakable suffering' in Gaza, and also talk trade, when they meet Monday at the US president's golf resort in Scotland. The talks will come a day after the US and the European Union reached a landmark deal to end a transatlantic standoff over tariffs and avert a full-blown trade war. Starmer is expected to push Trump on urging a revival of stalled ceasefire talks between Israel and Hamas as a hunger crisis deepens in the besieged Palestinian territory. The meeting at Turnberry, south-western Scotland, comes as European countries express growing alarm at the situation in Gaza, and as Starmer faces domestic pressure to follow France's lead and recognise a Palestinian state. The leaders will also discuss implementing a recent UK-US trade deal, as well as efforts to end Russia's war against Ukraine, according to a British government statement issued late Sunday. But it is the growing threat of starvation faced by Palestinians in Gaza that is set to dominate the talks, on the third full day of Trump's trip to the land where his mother was born. Starmer is expected to 'welcome the president's administration working with partners in Qatar and Egypt to bring about a ceasefire in Gaza,' a Downing Street spokesperson said. 'He will discuss further with him what more can be done to secure the ceasefire urgently, bring an end to the unspeakable suffering and starvation in Gaza and free the hostages who have been held so cruelly for so long.' Trump told reporters Sunday that the US would give more aid to Gaza but he wanted other countries to step up as well. 'It's not a US problem. It's an international problem,' he said, before embarking on crunch trade talks with EU chief Ursula von der Leyen at the resort south of Glasgow. Starmer and Trump's meeting comes after the UK PM backed efforts by Jordan and the United Arab Emirates to air drop aid to Gaza. Humanitarian chiefs remain sceptical such deliveries can deliver enough food safely for the area's more than two million inhabitants. On Sunday, Israel declared a 'tactical pause' in fighting in parts of Gaza and said it would allow the UN and aid agencies to open secure land routes to tackle the hunger crisis. Tariffs Last week, the United States and Israel withdrew from Gaza truce talks, with US envoy Steve Witkoff accusing Hamas of blocking a deal — a claim rejected by the Palestinian militant group. Starmer held talks with French and German counterparts on Saturday, after which the UK government said they agreed 'it would be vital to ensure robust plans are in place to turn an urgently-needed ceasefire into lasting peace'. But the Downing Street statement made no mention of Palestinian statehood, which French President Emmanuel Macron has announced his country will recognise in September. More than 220 MPs in Britain's 650-seat parliament, including dozens from Starmer's own ruling Labour party, have demanded that he too recognise Palestinian statehood. Number 10 said Starmer and Trump would also discuss 'progress on implementing the UK-US trade deal', which was signed on May 8 and lowered tariffs for certain UK exports but has yet to come into force. Trump said Sunday the agreement was 'great' for both sides and that Starmer was doing 'a very good job'. After their meeting they will travel together to Aberdeen in Scotland's northeast, where the US president is expected to formally open a new golf course at his resort on Tuesday. Trump played golf at Turnberry on Saturday and Sunday on his five-day visit that has mixed leisure with diplomacy, and also further blurred the lines between the presidency and his business interests. — AFP


The Star
15 hours ago
- The Star
China, EU need to make the right choice as ‘two big guys' on world stage, says Xi Jinping
At a meeting in Beijing recently, President Xi Jinping urged European leaders to 'make the right strategic choice' as the world grapples with profound changes. He made the remarks to European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and European Council President Antonio Costa, who are in Beijing for a summit that some Chinese analysts expect to be tone-setting for China-EU relations. 'Amid the accelerating transformation unseen in a century and an international landscape fraught with turbulence and transformation, China and Europe must once again demonstrate vision and responsibility by making the right strategic choices that meet people's expectations and stand the test of history,' Xi said. The first face-to-face EU-China summit since December 2023 convenes as the two sides mark 50 years of diplomatic relations, though celebrations are tempered by escalating trade disputes. Beijing is seeking to present itself as a stable alternative partner for Europe, particularly as US President Donald Trump has slapped steep tariffs on the 27-nation bloc. He added that the two sides should reinforce their partnership as a cornerstone in bilateral ties, saying that the West should judge China in a correct way, according to a Chinese statement released after his meeting with senior EU officials. 'If China is measured by the paths taken by the West, perceptions of China will inevitably be skewed,' Xi said, adding that the challenges Europe was facing 'were not from China'. 'It is our hope that Europe will likewise respect China's chosen development path and political system, duly acknowledge China's core interests and major concerns, and support China's pursuit of development and prosperity.' Xi also stressed the autonomy of China-EU relations, which he said were 'not targeted at, dependent on, nor subject to any third party'. 'The two sides should enhance strategic communication, strengthen mutual understanding and trust, and foster a correct perception of each other,' the Chinese leader said. Xi described China and the European Union as 'two big guys' in the world, adding that they should combine their efforts to 'firmly grasp the right direction of China-Europe relations and work together to usher in an even brighter next 50 years'. 'China and the EU must once again demonstrate foresight and responsibility, making strategic choices that meet the expectations of their peoples and stand the test of history.' In his opening remarks, Costa reaffirmed that the EU was committed to 'deepening our bilateral partnership, making concrete progress in addressing concerns with respect, goodwill and honesty and working together to uphold multilateralism'. However, he added that the two sides needed 'concrete progress' to address challenges in trade and the economy, according to an official transcript. 'We need concrete progress on issues related to trade and economy. We both want our relationship to be balanced, reciprocal and mutually beneficial,' he said. Costa also raised the hope of reaching a deal with China on climate change after Thursday's meeting. 'Our cooperation on climate change is an important example, and I look forward, as a result of today's summit, to a strong joint political message ahead of Cop30 in Brazil,' he said. In her remarks, von der Leyen referred to the growing imbalances and declared that the relationship was at an 'inflection point'. 'Rebalancing our bilateral relationship is essential. Because to be sustainable, relations need to be mutually beneficial,' von der Leyen said, adding that it was 'vital' for both China and Europe to acknowledge respective concerns so as to come forward with real solutions. She also reaffirmed the EU's strong commitment to the Paris Agreement, the climate change treaty Trump ordered the US to quit when he returned to the White House in January. After a meeting with Premier Li Qiang in the afternoon, the two sides released a joint statement on climate change, which is widely seen as one of the few areas where the two sides might make progress. While China and the EU agreed that they would lead global efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions with pledges of cooperation in green technologies, the seven-point document offered no concrete actions or goals. Still, it could offer a much-needed confidence boost in Beijing and Brussels' ability to cut their emissions further before the Cop30 UN climate change summit in Brazil in November. 'Joining forces here will send a powerful message to the world,' von der Leyen said about climate change cooperation during the meeting with Li. In the meeting at the Great Hall of the People, Xi also tried to ease concerns on the trade imbalance but said that the European Union's push to 'reduce dependence' on China should not undermine bilateral cooperation. 'The essence of China-EU economic and trade relations is complementary advantages and mutual benefit and it should be, and is entirely possible to achieve, a dynamic balance in the course of development.' Despite their shared concerns over Trump's unpredictable and aggressive tariff and security policies, tensions have been mounting between China and the EU on areas from trade to security. The EU, which has long complained about China's lack of progress to ensure a level playing field for a balanced economic and trade relationship, has increased tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles (EVs) to as much as 45 per cent for state-subsidised Chinese manufacturers. Meanwhile, China's recent restrictions on rare earth exports – introduced during the trade war with the US – have added to the frustration in Europe as industries have faced an 'alarming situation' due to a shortage of the minerals, which are essential to making everything from EVs to military tanks and aircraft. China's deep ties with Russia also cast a shadow, with senior officials in Brussels, including von der Leyen, openly accusing Beijing of supporting Moscow in its prolonged war in Ukraine. In a move that touched a nerve in Europe, Foreign Minister Wang Yi told EU officials earlier this month that Beijing did not want to see Moscow lose the war because it feared the US could then shift more attention to China. While expectations for a breakthrough in Thursday's meeting have been low, there is hope that the talks could be a tone-setting moment for China-EU relations. Earlier on Thursday, von der Leyen said on social media that Thursday's summit was 'the opportunity to both advance and rebalance our relationship'. 'I'm convinced there can be a mutually beneficial cooperation. One that can define the next 50 years of our relations,' she wrote. Cui Hongjian, head of European Union studies at Beijing Foreign Studies University, said Beijing and Brussels should use the occasion to establish a shared understanding of their 50-year relationship and outline guiding principles to drive the relationship forward. 'It is hoped that Beijing and Brussels can come up with better and pragmatic ways to manage the interplay of competition and cooperation alongside the bilateral relationship – whether in trade or geopolitical differences – and turn competition into new opportunities for collaboration,' he said. 'I believe this highest level engagement will mark the start of a new phase in bilateral ties, where they must work to find a mutually acceptable way to engage meaningfully.' The meeting offers both China and the European Union a valuable opportunity to understand the concerns and priorities of each side, according to Feng Zhongping, director of the Institute of European Studies at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. 'China-EU relations are still undergoing changes, and we should view them objectively. They have cooperation and competition at the same time, but both sides have the willingness to engage in dialogue and negotiate,' Feng said. Cui, a former Chinese diplomat, said the two sides should 'adjust their previous approaches to communication and cooperation'. Noting the cancellation of a high-level EU-China economic and trade dialogue earlier this year, Cui said there had been a gap in terms of each side's goal for the talks, with Brussels seeking tangible outcomes and Beijing viewing the dialogue as a platform for talks, cooperation and management of competition. 'If high-level dialogues are no longer Europe's preferred approach, the critical question is whether China and the EU can identify a mutually acceptable framework to address their persistent challenges.' Observers in Europe said they were less optimistic about the future of bilateral relations. Abigael Vasselier, director of policy and European affairs at the Mercator Institute for China Studies, said on Monday that Europe was entering the summit 'with no illusion that it is going to be a deal-making moment', given that there was a mismatch over various disputes. She said she expected the summit would not change the long-term course of EU-China ties, which were deeply troubled by structural issues. - SOUTH CHINA MORNING POST


Free Malaysia Today
19 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
UK's Starmer to hold urgent talks over Gaza ‘humanitarian catastrophe'
In a strongly worded statement, Prime Minister Keir Starmer said he would hold an emergency call with France and Germany over the Gaza crisis. (AP pic) LONDON : British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said he would hold an emergency call with France and Germany over the situation in Gaza, which he described as an 'unspeakable and indefensible' humanitarian catastrophe. In a strongly worded statement late on Thursday, Starmer said he would discuss with partners 'what we can do urgently to stop the killing and get people the food they desperately need,' and called on Israel to allow aid into the Palestinian enclave. 'The suffering and starvation unfolding in Gaza is unspeakable and indefensible. While the situation has been grave for some time, it has reached new depths and continues to worsen. We are witnessing a humanitarian catastrophe,' Starmer said. 'We all agree on the pressing need for Israel to change course and allow the aid that is desperately needed to enter Gaza without delay,' he added, referring to France and Germany. Gaza's health authorities have said over 100 people have died from starvation, most of them in recent weeks. More than 100 organisations, including Mercy Corps, the Norwegian Refugee Council and Refugees International, have said mass starvation is spreading in Gaza even as tonnes of food and other supplies sit untouched just outside the enclave. Israel, which cut off all supplies to Gaza from the start of March and reopened the flow with new restrictions in May, says it is committed to allowing aid in but must control it to prevent it from being diverted by militants. Starmer said he supported US, Qatari and Egyptian efforts to secure a ceasefire in Gaza. 'A ceasefire will put us on a path to the recognition of a Palestinian state and a two-state solution,' he said.