logo
Gold bullion and the erosion of US trust: Europe's historical and quiet revolt — Phar Kim Beng

Gold bullion and the erosion of US trust: Europe's historical and quiet revolt — Phar Kim Beng

Malay Mail17-07-2025
JULY 11 — Amid trade wars, shifting alliances, and a resurgence of unilateralism, a quiet financial rebellion is unfolding in Europe. It is not led by protestors in the streets or fiery parliamentary speeches. Instead, it is taking shape deep in the vaults of global finance — through gold.
In recent months, both Italy and Germany have revived efforts to repatriate significant portions of their gold reserves from the United States.
Although this movement has received little attention in mainstream Western media, its implications are profound.
These actions reflect growing mistrust — not only of the US financial system — but of Washington's willingness to weaponise it, especially under the administration of President Donald J Trump.
A history of gold and mistrust
This is not the first time Europe has questioned US custodianship of its monetary sovereignty.
In 2013, under President Barack Obama, Germany's Bundesbank repatriated more than 300 tonnes of gold — worth approximately US$18.6 billion (RM79 billion) at today's prices — from New York and Paris. That move, although couched in technical justifications, was a symbolic assertion of financial independence.
Yet today's repatriation push is markedly different. It is unfolding under vastly altered geopolitical circumstances, where Trump's second term is marked by aggressive rhetoric, erratic policy swings, and punitive economic measures — including tariffs that have disproportionately targeted the European Union.
Furthermore, Trump's repeated attacks on Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell have cast doubt on the independence of America's central bank, raising red flags for European policymakers.
As noted by the TAE (The Automatic Earth), this behaviour undermines confidence in US financial stewardship and prompts urgent reassessments of where Europe's wealth should be stored.
The significance of sovereign gold
Gold, in this context, is no longer just a commodity or hedge. It has become a tangible symbol of sovereignty. That Germany and Italy are actively pursuing the return of their gold reserves — currently valued at a combined US$245 billion, according to the Financial Times — signals a shift in the geopolitical trust that once undergirded the postwar transatlantic alliance.
Indeed, gold was once central to the Bretton Woods system. Until 1971, the US dollar was convertible to gold by the Federal Reserve, anchoring international monetary stability.
During the Cold War, many European nations stored their bullion in the US as a precaution against a potential Soviet invasion.
But historical memory has its own gravitational pull.
Indeed, gold was once central to the Bretton Woods system. Until 1971, the US dollar was convertible to gold by the Federal Reserve, anchoring international monetary stability. — Picture by Choo Choy May
In the mid-1960s, President Charles de Gaulle of France ordered the transfer of nearly all French overseas gold reserves back to Paris, having lost confidence in the Bretton Woods system.
This early repatriation foreshadowed today's deeper anxieties — only now, the mistrust is rooted less in East–West confrontation than in Western disunity itself.
Germany's repatriation drive
Germany provides a clear illustration of how grassroots pressure and institutional decisions have combined to alter gold policy. Beginning in 2010, a popular movement known as 'Bring Our Gold Home' gained traction across German civil society.
As a result, the Bundesbank announced in 2013 that it would store 50 per cent of its gold reserves within Germany, relocating 674 tonnes — worth roughly US$41.8 billion today — from New York and Paris to Frankfurt.
That operation, which cost about US$9.5 million, marked a turning point in how Europe viewed US financial custodianship.
Currently, 37 per cent of the Bundesbank's gold reserves remain in New York — a number now under renewed scrutiny amid the shifting winds of global diplomacy.
Italy's growing scepticism
Italy, too, has begun intensifying calls to retrieve its gold from American vaults. While its holdings are smaller than Germany's in absolute terms, the political messaging is just as sharp.
In Rome, populist and nationalist voices have increasingly questioned why Italian wealth should remain under the indirect control of a foreign central bank — especially one seen as operating under an increasingly politicised US executive.
These concerns are compounded by Trump's aggressive tariff policy, which has treated European allies as if they were adversaries. NATO, once the bedrock of Euro–American defence cooperation, has been repeatedly devalued rhetorically by the US President.
The European Union is being treated less as a strategic partner and more as a transactional entity, to be bent to Washington's will.
A slow unravelling of trust
What is emerging is not a dramatic rupture, but a gradual erosion of confidence.
Should France or the Netherlands decide to follow Germany and Italy in removing their gold from US storage, it could mark the beginning of the end of American custodianship over Europe's monetary assets.
Such a shift would carry symbolic and systemic consequences.
It would signal that Europe no longer trusts the United States to safeguard the financial pillars of the postwar liberal order.
More critically, it would suggest that Europe is preparing for a future where US power is neither as benign nor as stable as it once seemed.
Gold repatriation, therefore, is not merely about logistics or portfolio diversification.
It is about hedging against a future in which financial systems are no longer neutral, but weaponised — used to coerce compliance, punish dissent, and enforce geopolitical hierarchy.
Conclusion: A quiet but strategic revolt
The renewed gold repatriation efforts by Germany and Italy reflect a quiet but growing revolt against the unpredictability of Trump-era diplomacy and the perceived decline in US institutional reliability.
Should this trend continue, the very architecture of transatlantic financial trust — built painstakingly since 1945 — could slowly crumble.
The message from Europe is clear: in a world where alliances are questioned and financial tools are increasingly wielded as weapons, sovereignty must be made tangible again — and there is no more enduring symbol of that than gold.
* Phar Kim Beng is a professor of Asean Studies and director of the Institute of Internationalization and Asean Studies at the International Islamic University of Malaysia
** This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UK voting age cut to 16 puts teens in political spotlight, sparks race for their votes
UK voting age cut to 16 puts teens in political spotlight, sparks race for their votes

Malay Mail

time3 hours ago

  • Malay Mail

UK voting age cut to 16 puts teens in political spotlight, sparks race for their votes

LONDON, July 26 — Britain's move to lower the voting age to 16 launches the political battle for teenagers' votes, with campaign groups warning no one should make assumptions about their allegiances and parties must address the issues that affect them. For decades, election trends and polls suggested younger voters tended to lean more to the left in Britain, but recent evidence from Europe shows young voters, particularly men, backing right-wing parties, including the far-right. 'Don't take them for granted. Don't assume that their vote has already been cast before an election,' Dan Lawes, co-CEO of youth-led charity My Life, My Say, said of young voters. 'Young people want to be sold policies. But politicians have to reach them.' A diverse new generation also wants their specific concerns to be heard and addressed. According to a tracker by pollsters YouGov, the economy is the most important issue concerning the 18-24 age group, followed by housing and immigration. Data for 16- 18-year-olds was not available. A poll of 500 16-and 17-year-olds last week found that 33 per cent said they would vote for the centre-left Labour Party, led by Prime Minister Keir Starmer, while 20 per cent would support the right-wing Reform UK Party led by Nigel Farage, which leads polls of the wider population. 'We are going to give this Labour government the shock of their lives. We're going to get 16- and 17-year-olds to vote for us,' Farage said following the move. The new cohort would add around 1.6 million potential voters to the roughly 48 million eligible to vote at the 2024 election. In last year's European Parliament elections, many young voters shifted toward far-right populist parties that used social media highly effectively to address their concerns. In Germany, where 16- to 18-year-olds voted for the first time in European elections in 2024, their support helped boost the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party. In Austria, where 16- and 17-year-olds have been able to vote since 2007, polls showed that most voters under 35 voted for the far-right Freedom Party (FPO) in a 2024 parliamentary election, helping it secure first place. 'It's quite scary how many... people (my age) are following him (Farage). He's not my favourite person,' said 17-year-old student Matilda Grace. However, Anki Deo, from campaign group Hope Not Hate, said follows on social media did not directly lead to votes. 'Many young people are mistrustful of the political system and politicians — it's going to take a lot more than funny TikToks for any political party to win them over,' she said. 'Reform UK can ramp up their social media efforts, but their policy platform is still far out of line with the attitudes of the majority of young people.' Boosting trust Labour pitched the reform as a way to boost participation and trust after the lowest turnout at the 2024 national election since 2001, hoping to encourage a lifelong habit of voting. Britain's democratic system has endured a turbulent decade, marked by the divisive Brexit vote and the political upheaval that followed, including an unprecedented turnover of prime ministers and ministers. Some critics say 16- and 17-year-olds lack the maturity to vote, and the main opposition Conservative Party called the plan inconsistent, noting the new cohort still can't buy a lottery ticket, drink alcohol, marry, or join the military. Younger voters have reacted to the announcement with excitement, but also with some caution. 'Young people can be very impressionable. Some people obviously can make their own decisions and they know what propaganda is, but I think education is the most important thing,' said Ana Fonseca, a 17-year-old student, who called for mandatory lessons on politics and democracy. Rita Patel, vice chair of Operation Black Vote, which advocates for greater political representation, said the reform needed to lead to meaningful democratic participation for groups like young Black voters, who face distinct challenges and want issues like racism tackled. 'Young Black people are politicised from birth because they have no choice in this world and in this country to navigate that system that is often hostile to their needs,' Patel said. — Reuters

Meta to ban political ads on Facebook, Instagram in EU over ‘unworkable' new rules
Meta to ban political ads on Facebook, Instagram in EU over ‘unworkable' new rules

Malay Mail

time9 hours ago

  • Malay Mail

Meta to ban political ads on Facebook, Instagram in EU over ‘unworkable' new rules

BRUSSELS, July 26 — Meta yesterday said it will be forced to ban political advertising on its platforms in the European Union from October because of rules the Facebook and Instagram owner called 'unworkable'. The EU has a bolstered legal armoury to rein in Big Tech, against which Meta has hit out — with the support of US President Donald Trump's administration. Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg has been highly critical of European rules, accusing Brussels in January of 'censorship' while this week the US State Department denounced the EU's 'Orwellian' regulation of social media. Against this uneasy backdrop, and with EU-US trade tensions sky-high, Meta announced that political, electoral and social issue advertising will no longer be allowed from October in the bloc because of 'unworkable requirements' under new rules. 'This is a difficult decision — one we've taken in response to the EU's incoming Transparency and Targeting of Political Advertising (TTPA) regulation,' it said. 'Unfortunately, the TTPA introduces significant, additional obligations to our processes and systems that create an untenable level of complexity and legal uncertainty for advertisers and platforms operating in the EU,' Meta added. The tech giant stressed that its European users would still be able to post and debate about politics. The EU says its political advertising rules seek to increase transparency in online advertising after Facebook's Cambridge Analytica scandal, which came to light in 2018. Cambridge Analytica was a consulting firm that was found to have improperly accessed personal data from millions of Facebook users for targeted political advertising, particularly during the 2016 US election and Brexit referendum. The change is set to impact Meta's flagship platforms Facebook and Instagram, as well as WhatsApp — which is largely ad-free but announced in June it would be introducing new advertising features in some parts of the app. Meta said it was 'not the only company to have been forced into this position'. Google last year announced it would also prevent political advertising in the EU from October 2025 because of the 'significant new operational challenges and legal uncertainties'. US 'censorship' claims Meta and Brussels have locked horns on a series of issues — most recently over the firm's 'pay or consent' system regarding user data. The EU slapped a €200-million (RM992-million) fine in April after concluding Meta violated rules on the use of personal data on Facebook and Instagram. Zuckerberg has previously equated EU fines against the company to tariffs. Facebook and Instagram also face investigations under the EU's mammoth content moderation law known as the Digital Services Act (DSA). Meta's announcement comes as US officials ramp up their attacks on the DSA. The State Department took aim at the DSA on Tuesday as it accused European countries of convicting thousands of people 'for the crime of criticising their own governments,' without elaborating on the allegation. And the judiciary committee of the US House of Representatives yesterday described the EU law as a 'foreign censorship threat' that forces 'platforms to change content moderation policies that apply in the United States'. 'On paper, the DSA is bad. In practice, it is even worse,' the Republican-majority committee said in an interim report. Staunch Trump ally Jim Jordan, committee chair, will meet the EU's digital chief, Henna Virkkunen, in Brussels on Monday. Jordan will be joined by other US Congress members in a bipartisan delegation, EU digital spokesman Thomas Regnier said. The European Commission rejected the censorship claims. 'Freedom of expression is a fundamental right in the EU. And it is at the heart of our legislation, including the DSA,' Regnier said. — AFP

Intel posts higher revenue, cites cost cuts and layoffs
Intel posts higher revenue, cites cost cuts and layoffs

Malay Mail

time11 hours ago

  • Malay Mail

Intel posts higher revenue, cites cost cuts and layoffs

SAN FRANCISCO, July 26 — Intel on Thursday posted quarterly revenue that topped market expectations, saying it has cut about 15 per cent of its workforce to be 'more agile.' The US chip maker also said it 'will no longer move forward' with projects in Germany and Poland as part of a push to save billions of dollars. The struggling chip maker's earnings report came as rivals specialising in graphics processing units (GPUs) for artificial intelligence thrive due to rapid adoption of the technology. Intel is one of Silicon Valley's most iconic companies, but its fortunes have been eclipsed by Asian powerhouses TSMC and Samsung, which dominate the made-to-order semiconductor business. The company was also caught by surprise with the emergence of Nvidia as the world's preeminent AI chip provider. Intel's niche has been in chips used in traditional computing processes, steadily being eclipsed by the AI revolution. Intel reported US$12.9 billion (RM54.5 billion) in sales in the recently ended quarter, topping forecasts, but logged a US$2.9 billion loss that included US$1.9 billion in restructuring charges. 'Intel has completed the majority of the planned headcount actions it announced last quarter to reduce its core workforce by approximately 15 per cent,' the company said in an earnings release. 'These changes are designed to create a faster-moving, flatter and more agile organisation.' Intel shares were down slightly in after-hours trades that followed the release of the earnings figures. Intel chief executive Lip-Bu Tan took the helm in March, announcing layoffs as White House tariffs and export restrictions muddied the market. Malaysia-born tech industry veteran Tan has said it 'won't be easy' to overcome challenges faced by the company. — AFP

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store