What's your ‘biological age'? And here's how to lower it…
The newest wellness trend to step onto the scene is 'biohacking'. You may have heard of it via Bryan Johnson's infamous anti-ageing quest, or simply by the numerous podcasts that now discuss cell health and biological age.
Advertisement
View this post on Instagram
A post shared by Bryan Johnson (@bryanjohnson_)
But what really is biohacking? How do you find out your biological age? And does it really determine how long you'll live for?
Doctors specialising in stem cell and longevity research explain what biological age
really
means, how to lower it and why it's fast becoming the ultimate wellness metric in modern medicine.
What is biological age?
Biological age – a measurement of how well your body is functioning based on factors like lifestyle, stress and cellular health – is different to chronological age, as it isn't fixed, and (perhaps thankfully) you can reverse it.
According to longevity experts, biological age provides a more accurate picture of health span than the candles on our birthday cake. And increasingly, it's being treated as something we can influence.
Advertisement
Chief executive of Cellcolabs, Dr Mattias Bernow, who provided the stem cells for biohacker Bryan Johnson, explains that this measurement is, 'a marker of how old your body seems based on your health, lifestyle and cellular function.' In other words, you might be 50 on paper, but living like someone 35 – or 65.
'Two people who are both 40 years old chronologically might have very different biological ages depending on how they live, their stress levels, their metabolic health and more,' says GP and founder of London's longevity clinic, HUM2N, Dr Mohammed Enayat.
What accelerates biological ageing?
The good news is that many of the biggest culprits behind accelerated ageing are changeable. Both Enayat and Bernow point to chronic stress, poor sleep, lack of exercise, ultra-processed foods and environmental toxins as major accelerants.
Parenting itself doesn't inherently age the body, but, as Enayat points out, the chronic sleep deprivation and stress associated with caregiving certainly can.
Advertisement
Lack of sleep caused by parenting can increase your biological age
Inflammation is another central player. 'These factors contribute to increasing low-grade inflammation,' Bernow explains, 'which plays a key role in age-related decline and the development of chronic disease.'
But this process, he says, is not set in stone. 'While we can't control everything, small, consistent changes to reduce these stressors can make a meaningful difference in how we age.'
Which lifestyle changes have the biggest scientific backing when it comes to reversing it?
When it comes to slowing the clock, it turns out the best advice isn't ground-breaking – it's just often overlooked.
Quality sleep, regular movement, a balanced whole-food diet, meaningful relationships and avoiding harmful substances all rank highly on the evidence-based list.
Advertisement
Enayat also points to practices like caloric moderation, intermittent fasting and resistance training for their 'strong results in slowing biological ageing at a cellular level.'
However, these diets impact each sex differently, with intermittent fasting in particular causing more stress on women's bodies while being effective for men, meaning they will affect biological age differently.
How big a part do genetics play?
Though it's tempting to think of ageing as a genetic lottery, our DNA doesn't write the full script. 'Genes load the gun, but lifestyle pulls the trigger,' Enayat says, noting that genetics may only account for 20 to 30 per cent of ageing outcomes.
Bernow says that emerging research suggests as much as 80 per cent of ageing is governed by one's environment and behaviour.
Advertisement
Do supplements
actually
make a difference?
Supplements claim everything from healthier skin to better energy to thicker hair – but it's fair to be sceptical of whether they really make a difference, or if it's all marketing.
However, there are some supplements that have been proven to be helpful if taken correctly and absorbed properly. 'Protein is essential for preserving muscle mass,' says Enayat, while collagen 'may help with skin and joint health,' though its systemic anti-ageing benefits are modest.
Some supplements can make a difference if taken and absorbed correctly
Fish oil, magnesium, creatine and polyphenols all show promise too, but Enayat is keen to emphasise that supplement should support – not replace – healthy habits.
Bernow cautions that while some supplements, like vitamin D, are well-supported (especially in sun-deprived regions), many products on the market are poorly regulated. 'Supplements are not a substitute for healthy habits,' he says, 'but in some cases, they can play a supportive role if used thoughtfully.'
How to find out your biological age and what healthy habits the experts incorporate
If this has sparked a curiosity to find out your own biological age, figuring it out requires a blood test.
'The most validated tests look at DNA methylation patterns,' says Enayat, and suggests well-known tests like the Horvath Clock, GlycanAge and TruAge.
Bernow says that Bryan Johnson uses the DunedinPACE test, which claims to show he's ageing at just 0.66 years per year (66% of his chronological age).
As for how these experts practise what they preach – they say it's all about balance and consistency.
Moderate, low impact exercise can actually lower biological age
Enayat's daily habits include either walking, strength training or stretching, prioritising plants and healthy fats, regular fasting, cold exposure and supplementing with omega-3, vitamin D, magnesium and creatine. 'The goal is consistency, not perfection,' he says.
Lifestyle
Paul Hollywood's sausage plait recipe
Read More
Bernow takes a similar approach, but with less exercise and more socialising, explaining he takes a short morning workout, has plenty of family time, eats balanced meals and drinks minimal alcohol.
'More than anything, I believe in consistency,' he says. 'Longevity isn't about extremes but about the things you do every day, for years.'
So, while biohacking might conjure visions of futuristic and expensive tech, the real secret to ageing well is actually much simpler – by prioritising balance and relaxation – not difficult at all in today's world!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Alcohol use has increased among women — and so have cases of liver disease
Alcohol-related liver disease has more than doubled in the U.S. over the last 20 years. The increase is tied to four groups that make up a greater share of heavy drinkers than they did two decades ago: Women, adults ages 45 and older, people living in poverty, and those with metabolic syndrome. Metabolic syndrome refers to a number of conditions, including high blood pressure, blood sugar, and cholesterol, that increase the risk of heart disease, stroke and type 2 diabetes. Exactly why these groups are drinking more remains unclear. Vanderbilt University School of Medicine's Dr. Peter Martin previously told NBC News that 'it's become more and more socially acceptable for women to drink as much as men' and George Koob, director of the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, told The New York Times that he believed older Americans are even less 'likely' to understand the hazards of alcohol. 'Alcohol-related liver disease is the main cause of liver-related death and these results are a major wakeup call to the dangers of drinking,' researcher Dr. Brian Lee, a hepatologist and liver transplant specialist at Keck Medicine of the University of Southern California, said in a statement after the new study published Wednesday. The findings, Lee said, provide the first comprehensive look at the demographics of heavy drinking and their relation to liver disease since the 1990s. Because the average drinking rate in the U.S. was unchanged over the last 20 years - outside of the pandemic - it suggested factors such as changing health and demographics may be playing a role. The researchers analyzed data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey of adults and children in the U.S. from 1999 through 2020. They tracked the total increase in significant liver disease, a point when scar tissue impairs the organ's function, often caused by heavy drinking. More than 51,600 adults died from liver disease in 2020 in the U.S. The researchers looked at the demographic and health profiles of adults, age 20 or older, who drank heavily - eight drinks per week for women and 15 for men, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Previous research had tied the four groups looked at in this study to a higher risk of liver disease when exposed to alcohol. A separate 2024 study, authored by Lee, found that heavy drinking rose at the pandemic's peak and continued for two years after that. Lee hypothesized that increase may have been due to stress. Liver disease deaths have also roughly doubled over the last 20 years, and the number of annual alcohol deaths due to cancer has doubled in the same time period. Lee believes the results will help to provide doctors with necessary updates to better treat patients and potentially result in more screenings and interventions for Americans in high-risk populations. 'Our results show that the makeup of the American public with heavy alcohol consumption has changed compared to 20 years ago,' he said.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
UnitedHealth says it is under a federal investigation and cooperating
Shares of UnitedHealth Group slipped Thursday after the health care giant said it was under a Department of Justice investigation. The company said it has started complying with both criminal and civil requests from federal investigators and it was cooperating with them. '(UnitedHealth) has a long record of responsible conduct and effective compliance,' the company said in a Securities and Exchange Commission filing. Earlier this year, The Wall Street Journal said federal officials had launched a civil fraud investigation into how the company records diagnoses that lead to extra payments for its Medicare Advantage, or MA, plans. Those are privately run versions of the government's Medicare coverage program mostly for people ages 65 and over. The company's UnitedHealthcare business covers more than 8 million people as the nation's largest provider of Medicare Advantage plans. The business has been under pressure in recent quarters due to rising care use and rate cuts. UnitedHealth Group Inc. said in February that it wasn't aware of the start of any new activity as the paper reported. The company said Thursday that it reached out to the Justice Department 'after reviewing media reports about investigations into certain aspects of the company's participation in the Medicare program.' UnitedHealth runs one of the nation's largest health insurance and pharmacy benefits management businesses. It also operates a growing Optum business that provides care and technology support. Company shares have mostly shed value since December, when UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson was fatally shot in midtown Manhattan on his way to the company's annual investor meeting. The stock price dropped 2%, or $6.13, to $286.50 Thursday morning.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
How old is YOUR skin? Tool that tells you the real age of your face had some sobering truths for these brave volunteers
A tool that analyses the true age of your skin has been put to the test by a group of volunteers who were brave enough to find out how old they really look to the rest of the world. Novos, a New-York based company which specialises in anti-ageing and claims to be 'pioneers in consumer longevity', has put out a test which uses AI to analyse your skin's health. The software, which the company claims is expertly trained on over three million images and 'validated by dermatology specialists', gives a score based on facial age, eye age, eye bags, wrinkles, uniformity, pores and redness. The higher the score out of 100 for redness, pores, wrinkles and eye bags, the better, whereas skincare fanatics should aim for a lower score out of 100 for their facial uniformity. For some, the test was precise and got their age spot on. Video journalist James said he was 'very happy' and even recommended exfoliating once a week, followed by using a moisturiser. AI guessed that trainee reporter Ayaat was a year younger than her real age and she said it was 'clearly accurate'. However, others were told they looked 11 years older than their real age, which ended up 'ruining' their day, with one saying that the humbling test provides a 'sobering reminder that time waits for no man'. But do you think the results are correct? MailOnline reporters and editors put it to the test and were both pleasantly and unpleasantly surprised by the result... CLAIRE EYE BAGS: 73/100 FACE WRINKLES: 95/100 UNIFORMITY: 39/100 PORES: 36/100 REDNESS: 70/100 Reacting to the results, Claire said: 'I was looking haggard today (early mornings) and I was expecting my age to be higher, so I can't complain. 'Very happy with my eye age and it seemed to have scored in my favour in everything but pores but I'll take that hit for the 31 years eye age. 'I probably need a facial to rectify pore score but I will take a look at them tonight as I've never really thought about them, so maybe that is the problem.' Claire says she uses products from The Code skincare range by her friend, Rhianna Van Der Lugt. 'She has perfected all of the products so they work well on every age as my daughter is 21 and obsessed with the moisturiser,' she said. 'I use the skin cleansing cream (with water) and rub in firmly and then wipe off with a damp flannel. I usually do this two or three times before I add some serum and then the nourish and lift moisturiser which is absolutely brilliant. 'I do this morning and evening. I also try not to wear any make up at the weekend so that my skin can rest. There is also a SPF 50+ for the face which I use whenever I am in the sun and it doesn't react with my eyes and my face is really well protected.' SIOFRA FACE AGE: 36 EYE AGE: 29 ACTUAL AGE: 43 Reacting to the results, Siofra said: 'I must admit, I was dreading the results and was very much bracing myself to be told my skin looks a lot older than it should! I do go through phases where it gets some TLC, but this is very much not one of them. 'My current routine is washing my face at night and using some Lidl moisturiser twice a day. That coupled with a string of nights of broken sleep, I was preparing for the worst. So, to get a result of 36, seven years younger than my 43 years, was a great surprise. 'Even better was my eye age of 29. I fully expected that to be the worst bit due to the aforementioned restless nights, and I'd personally say that's usually my worst area when it comes to showing my age. 'However, my score was 78 out of 100 and Novos tells me that higher is better on this front. Readying the advice, it advises a lot of water, fruit and veg and I am good at ticking all these boxes - so maybe it's paid off. 'My overall facial wrinkle score wasn't so positive with a low 27, but it doesn't bother me too much. I've had deep lines on my forehead for as long as I can remember and if they start to bother me, I'll get a fringe. 'My scores for pores, redness and uniformity weren't great on paper but they don't look so bad to me. Perhaps I've gone face blind but overall I'm really happy and even tempted to try it again after I've caught up on some sleep.' KATE FACE AGE: 31 EYE AGE: 24 ACTUAL AGE: 33 EYE BAGS: 84/100. FACIAL WRINKLES: 84/100. UNIFORMITY: 51/100. PORES: 20/100. REDNESS: 48/100 Reacting to the results, Kate said: 'I had hoped my facial age results would be a little younger, out of pure vanity, but I'm also glad that I look around my age as I think age is something to be celebrated. 'My eye age being 24 was a pleasant surprise though, I have to say! My scores for Eye Bags and Facial Wrinkles is relatively high, which I'm told is a good thing and I won't be looking to have Botox any time soon. 'I wasn't too surprised by my poor Pore and Redness scores, as I struggle with oily combination skin and these have been lifelong issues for me anyway. 'Overall I'm quite pleased and plan to continue my usual skincare routine - although I might do a bit more research on reducing pore appearance and redness.' JACK FACE AGE: 36 EYE AGE: 25 ACTUAL AGE: 33 EYE BAGS: 53/100 FACE WRINKLES: 61/100 UNIFORMITY: 39/100 PORES: 39/100 REDNESS: 48/100 Reacting to the results, Jack said: 'As someone who takes pretty good care of their skin with daily SPF and retinol at night I'm pretty to shocked to have been aged up by three years. 'People usually remark that I'm babyfaced so this is a sobering reminder that time waits for no man. Maybe it's time to hit the Botox…' ED FACE AGE: 23 EYE AGE: 30 ACTUAL AGE: 25 EYE BAGS: 64/100 FACE WRINKLES: 72/100 UNIFORMITY: 33/100 PORES: 52/100 REDNESS: 45/100 Reacting to the results, Ed said: 'Well the younger facial age might explain why I keep getting ID'd while trying to buy alcohol at the supermarket. 'I'm pleasantly surprised with these results. I thought the bags under my eyes were more prominent than the AI appears to think. 'I think, my eye age, which five years older than my actual age, could be my fault due to one too many late nights followed early rises to get to work. 'All the other results I was expecting I think, my eye age, which five years older than my actual age, could be my fault due to one too many late nights followed by early rises to get to work.' OLIVER FACE AGE: 35 EYE AGE: 30 ACTUAL AGE: 30 EYE BAGS: 74/100 FACIAL WRINKLES: 60/100 UNIFORMITY: 59/100 PORES: 8/100 REDNESS: 48/100 Reacting to the results, Oliver said: 'It's a bit worrying that my pores score is so poor (as higher is better), perhaps I should see a dermatologist about that, but it's good that my eye age, eye bags and wrinkles are pretty good, so maybe my skincare routine is paying off. I've even just started using glycolic acid! 'Overall I'm not surprised I look a bit older than I am, as I always have. The first time I bought alcohol on my 18th birthday, I wasn't even ID'd and on top of that working in a newsroom can age you (or so I'm told).' JAMES FACE AGE: 23 EYE AGE: 27 ACTUAL AGE: 23 EYE BAGS: 62/100 FACE WRINKLES: 74/100 UNIFORMITY: 37/100 PORES: 65/100 REDNESS: 49/100 Reacting to the results, James said: 'I'm very happy! It's good to know that my 'face age' is also my actual age - so that's healthy. 'As for the rest of my scores, well I have to say being the youngest on the team has it perks. 'As for advice to anyone out there who isn't happy with their skin scores, a weekly dose of exfoliating gel and some CeraVe moisturiser clearly works a treat.' ALEXIS FACE AGE: 38 EYE AGE: 40 ACTUAL AGE: 27 EYE BAGS: 72/100 FACE WRINKLES: 50/100 UNIFORMITY: 42/100 PORES: 13/100 REDNESS: 49/100 Reacting to the results, Alexis said: 'It ruined my day!' ROB FACE AGE: 36 EYE AGE: 35 ACTUAL AGE: 26 EYE BAGS: 64/100 FACE WRINKLES: 15/100 UNIFORMITY: 32/100 PORES: 46/100 REDNESS: 37/100 Reacting to the results, Rob said: 'It's not ideal that I've been aged 10 years, but I will blame it on the AI identifying the beard. It would be interesting to see the results if I had a shave. 'It looks like the only metric I've scored positively on is uniformity and eye bags, and then really poorly on the wrinkles, so clearly I need to up my game with the skin care routine. 'I'm also slightly dubious that the test is set up by a skin care company.' JON FACE AGE: 38 EYE AGE: 40 ACTUAL AGE: 34 EYE BAGS: 72/100 FACE WRINKLES: 50/100 UNIFORMITY: 42/100 PORES: 13/100 REDNESS: 49/100 Reacting to the results, Jon said: 'Oh, this is brutal. I've always been told I looked alright for my age - occasionally passing for under 30 - so for an AI to tell me I look 38 is harsh. 'I'll agree with the eye bags though - not enough sleep and too much coffee to blame for those. And I'm pinning the wrinkle score on all my laughter lines from being such a jolly guy. That's what I'm telling myself, anyway. 'Delighted my regular and expensive moisturising regime is getting results for my pores. Bit miffed to be told I have a red face - and what does it even mean to have a 'uniform' face anyway? It's not like my nose is above my eyes. 'But the cynic in me does wonder whether it's being a bit harsh on purpose. After all, this company is selling products they say make you look younger. 'Would it really say I look younger if I slapped a bit of 'longevity formulation' on my face for a month? I'm not sure it would.' STEPHEN FACE AGE: 36 EYE AGE: 25 ACTUAL AGE: 30 EYE BAGS: 53/100 FACE WRINKLES: 61/100 UNIFORMITY: 39/100 PORES: 39/100 REDNESS: 48/100 Reacting to the results, Stephen said: 'As much as I'd love to say I'm shocked, being told I look years older than I actually am isn't overly surprising. Maybe I should look at getting Botox. Stephen added that his skincare routine involves moisturising every day but 'that's it'. AMIE-BETH FACE AGE: 35 EYE AGE: 30 ACTUAL AGE: 29 EYE BAGS: 74/100 FACE WRINKLES: 60/100 UNIFORMITY: 59/100 PORES: 8/100 REDNESS: 48/100 Reacting to the results, Amie-Beth said: 'I wasn't too shocked at my facial age as I am due my next round of Botox. 'I was surprised with they eye bag score as I have just come off of night shifts so I thought that would be worse. 'I feel as I am approaching 30, I am noticing my wrinkles a lot more so the wrinkle score does make sense to me. 'The pore score has horrified me. I always pride myself in having good skin. Maybe I need to invest in a toner.' STELLA FACE AGE: 36 EYE AGE: 29 ACTUAL AGE: 28 EYE BAGS: 63/100 FACE WRINKLES: 9/100 UNIFORMITY: 60/100 PORES: 15/100 REDNESS: 44/100 Reacting to the results, Stella said: 'I am shocked! There's no way I look 36 - definitely not! 'The only spot-on result? My eye age. Because let's be real, eyes never lie. 'My eye bags results are giving me hope, but those facial wrinkle scores? I'm scratching my head wondering what I'm doing wrong. I spent so much money on skin care every month.' AYAAT FACE AGE: 22 EYE AGE: 22 ACTUAL AGE: 23 EYE BAGS: 52/100. FACIAL WRINKLES: 63/100. UNIFORMITY: 27/100 PORES: 65/100 REDNESS: 57/100 Reacting to the results, Ayaat said: 'I recently turned 23, so the eye and facial age is clearly accurate. But I was mildly surprised by the scores on wrinkles, eye bags and redness - not ever having registered those as potential 'problem areas' in skin. My skincare routine consists of cleansing in the evening with a face wash, toning morning and night, and using a thick moisturiser and SPF whenever there are high UV warnings. 'This summer, though, I have laid out in the sun more than I should have, which I know isn't great for wrinkles...'
