UK employers group cuts its growth forecast over budget costs, trade fears
The British economy is now expected to expand by 0.9% this year, the British Chambers of Commerce said, down from a previous projection of 1.3%, and growth in 2026 was revised to 1.4% from 1.5%.
Gross domestic product in 2024 grew by 0.9%, according to official data.
"UK firms are facing a double whammy of rising domestic taxation and a potential global trade war," BCC's head of research, David Bharier, said.
"Businesses are telling us the that the rise in National Insurance and the minimum wage will increase costs, stall investment, and cause them to rethink their workforce plans."
Investment by businesses is expected to grow by 0.6% in 2025, down from 0.9% in the previous forecast, before speeding up to expand by 1.8% and 2.0% in 2026 and 2027 respectively, the BCC said, reflecting a boost from public spending.
Other recent surveys have shown companies warning that a rise in employment costs included in finance minister Rachel Reeves' October budget, alongside a nearly 7% increase in the minimum wage, will hit investment and hiring.
Reeves is expected to announce more spending cuts in an update on the public finances on March 26.
The BCC downgraded its outlook for exports which it expects to contract by 0.5% in 2025. That compared with a previous forecast for a 0.2% rise, reflecting concerns about global trade as U.S. President Donald Trump raises U.S. import tariffs.
The BCC said it expects exports to grow by 1% next year and 2.1% in 2027.
($1 = 0.7795 pounds)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
2 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Liverpool hijack Arsenal transfer after agreeing deal with Gary Neville and David Beckham
Liverpool are set to seal a transfer for a teenage prospect ahead of Arsenal despite the Gunners agreeing a fee for the player first this summer, ahead of the Reds Liverpool have agreed a deal with Salford City over a move for Will Wright. The Reds are set to beat Arsenal to the signing of the 17-year-old forward as they finalise talks with the player's representatives to get the transfer over the line. The Gunners agreed a deal with Salford earlier in the summer but now look to set their move hijacked. Arsenal were said to have first submitted a bid worth £250,000 plus add-ons for Wright, a figure greater than Liverpool's reported first offer of £100,000 plus add-ons. But the Merseyside club appear to have returned to win the race to continue a busy summer of transfer business. Wright is said to have favoured staying in the North West. The teenage made his Salford in January against Manchester City and went on to make two appearances in League Two for the club. Wright has regularly featured for the B team of the club, owned by Gary Neville and David Beckham. The plan is set to be for Wright to join up with Liverpool 's under-21s. Arne Slot has already seen seven players signed for his first team so far in his second summer in charge at Anfield however. Florian Wirtz has been the headline signing as Liverpool broke the British transfer record to land the German international. Slot has also added Hugo Ekitike, Jeremie Frimpong, Milos Kerkez, Armin Pecsi and Freddie Woodman as the club's spending approaches £300million. Liverpool are also set to see a significant departure in the shape of Luis Diaz. The Colombia international will sign a five-year deal with Bayern Munich after the teams agreed a £65million transfer. Diaz left Liverpool's pre-season tour to travel to Munich earlier this week after the Merseyside club agreed to the transfer over the weekend. The 28-year-old was left out of the Reds' friendly against AC Milan on Sunday. Slot has been pleased with the club's work in the market this far. "I think what I've also said is I'm really happy with the squad we had," said Slot. "That's what we also showed by not bringing in new players last season. Now we won the league, but you can see everywhere around us – in the Premier League but also we play in Europe so we want to achieve things there as well – that all of these teams try to strengthen their squads. "So, if you do the same as we did last year we will probably not be able to win it again. So, we have to improve – the players that are still here and we've tried to bring new energy in but also 'weapons', as you called it, and I think the players we've brought in have shown already in the few times we have trained together and the games we've played. Now let's wait how Hugo [Ekitike] is going to do that. Really pleased what we did until now, but already really pleased we kept the players that had an extended contract last season." Join our new WhatsApp community and receive your daily dose of Mirror Football content. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice.
Reuters
2 minutes ago
- Reuters
US oil refining trade group challenges Trump biofuel, tariff policies in letter
July 29 (Reuters) - A major U.S. refining trade group sent a list of complaints about the Trump administration's handling of biofuel policies to top Republican lawmakers, representing the first rift between the oil industry and the White House since President Donald Trump began his second term, according to a letter seen by Reuters. The letter from the American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers underscores a growing divide between oil producers and refiners in the nation's capital, a once unified club that has split in recent years over the nation's biofuels policy. Integrated oil majors like ExxonMobil (XOM.N), opens new tab and Chevron (CVX.N), opens new tab have used their large financial resources to invest in biofuel production while independent refiners like PBF Energy (PBF.N), opens new tab and CVR Energy (CVI.N), opens new tab complain that farm-friendly policy has created onerous costs that threaten plants. AFPM did not respond to a request for comment.
The Independent
31 minutes ago
- The Independent
Attention all shoppers! This everyday item may soon put up the cost of your weekly shop…
For the sixth month in a row, food prices have risen in the UK – with the latest figures from the British Retail Consortium (BRC) revealing the worst hit items are basics, such as eggs, meat, cheese and milk. Another casualty of food inflation, according to this month's data, is the humble cuppa – with teabags seeing a sharp increase of 4 per cent this month, up from 3.7 per cent in June. These increases are cumulative. Even if food price inflation falls – and there is precious little sign of that – prices will still rise. The BRC's number isn't quite as bad as that produced by WorldPanel, formerly Kantar, though, which recorded a 5.2 per cent rise during July. But that's just comparing 'bad' with 'worse'. Even so, the fact remains that it's everyday essentials and shopping staples that are going up in price – something we should all be worried about. Food price inflation hits those on low incomes hardest. True, tea isn't something you need in order to live. But come on: if even tea is being pushed into the luxury category there's clearly a larger issue at play. So, what's to blame? As ever, it's down to a combination of factors. Food inflation has risen across the board because of the extra costs loaded onto supermarkets by, you guessed it, the government – including Rachel Reeves' decision to increase employer national insurance contributions (NICs) while lowering the threshold at which the levy kicks in. This has hit grocers particularly hard because of the high number of relatively low-waged staff they employ. The chancellor promised not to tax 'working people', but these figures clearly demonstrate that she has done exactly that. Other regulations have further tightened the screw. Grocers have been chafing at the 'extended producer responsibility scheme' – better known as the packaging tax. April created a cliff edge, with these changes hitting at the same time as a higher minimum wage, which further hiked labour costs. The supermarkets all pay above the minimum and boosted pay rates to keep them above the floor. And don't forget Brexit, which increased the cost of importing food from the EU. (Some of this is on the previous government, of course.) Combined, these measures injected a super-concentrated shot of adrenaline into food prices, exacerbated by the fact that supermarket suppliers had to grapple with the same higher NICs and wage pressures. Some individual food items, however, face specific pressures on top of all that – including tea. Although it might come from abroad, it isn't entirely immune from higher UK labour costs. Yorkshire Tea, for example, is packaged in Harrogate. However, that pales by comparison to the impact of climate change, which hits producers' yields. Like many agricultural crops, tea has rather specific requirements when it comes to temperature, rainfall, humidity and so on. Climate change is leading to more erratic weather conditions – thus lowering production. Add in geopolitical instability – the war in Ukraine, Houthi attacks on shipping, etc – and you can see why the price of your daily cuppa is leaving an unusually bitter taste. The UK-India trade deal should help. But the benefits from lower tariffs are nowhere near enough to stop the kettle boiling. Meat prices have surged as a result of a combination of increased consumption, both globally and locally, and reduced production. Eric Lyons, a Solihull-based butchers, explains in blog post that UK beef consumption is forecast to increase by 1 per cent while production is set to decline by 5 per cent. 'This is further expedited through the closure of farms. Last year, around 30 farms in Scotland shut down, significantly reducing local production and adding to the supply shortage,' the company said. Avian flu, meanwhile, has cut the number of chickens available for slaughter. Butter has been affected by reduced dairy production at a time of high demand and all the other nasties. This helps to explain why hopes that a supermarket price war – which looked to be breaking out a few months back – would put a lid on food price inflation have all but evaporated. Faced with rising consumer discontent, and more and more anguished consumers filling up MPs' inboxes, we can expect politicians to seek scapegoats. This happened the last time food price inflation spiked a couple of years back (when it was even worse). There was a great deal of chuntering among MPs about the grocery sector and the Competition & Markets Authority was drafted in. Here's what it concluded: "Overall, we didn't find widespread evidence of weak competition: profit margins were historically low; consumers were switching to get the best deals; and the lowest-price retailers were gaining market share from others.' So that one isn't going to fly. If the government wants to reduce the burden on 'working people' – the people hardest hit – at a time when so many pressures are pushing prices up, here's what it should do: Reverse the increase in national insurance, scrap the reduced threshold at which it kicks in, repeal the packaging tax, and consider rejoining the European single market. Yes, yes. I know. Those are fantasies. So prices look set to remain elevated. The best we can hope for is for the government not to dream up anything that makes it worse (such as threatening to fine supermarkets for failing to sell enough healthy food to help tackle obesity.) Ministers should think very carefully about such apparently high-minded ideas that come with an expensive sting in the tail. But I'm not holding my breath. Are you?
