logo
‘Encroachers can't claim right to occupy public land pending their rehabilitation': Delhi HC refuses relief to over 350 slum dwellers

‘Encroachers can't claim right to occupy public land pending their rehabilitation': Delhi HC refuses relief to over 350 slum dwellers

Indian Express2 days ago

'Encroachers cannot claim the right to continue occupying public land, pending the resolution of their rehabilitation claims under the applicable policy, as this would unduly impede public projects,' the Delhi High Court held last Friday (June 6) while deciding pleas by as many as 417 residents of Bhoomiheen Camp in Kalkaji.
The residents were seeking the HC's protection from demolition of their settlements as well as their rehabilitation.
Reasoning that the right to seek rehabilitation, as it is, is not an absolute constitutional entitlement 'available to encroachers such as themselves', Justice Dharmesh Sharma added that 'determination of eligibility for rehabilitation is a separate process from the removal of encroachers from public land.' Of the over 400-odd petitioners, the HC granted some relief to around 30 of them.
On June 2, minutes before petitions to stay demolition of homes at the slum in Southeast Delhi's Govindpuri were heard by a HC vacation bench, the civic authorities had already started razing down the hutments.
The petitioners had challenged orders by Justice Sharma, on May 26 and May 30, where he had rejected the dwellers' pleas for protection from demolition and their rehabilitation.
The petitioners had moved the court first in 2023, claiming that the Delhi Development Authority (DDA), in 'an arbitrary and illegal manner, proposed to demolish their jhuggi-jhopdis'.
The proposal, they contended, was contrary to the Delhi Slum & JJ Rehabilitation and Relocation Policy, 2015, and surveys for their rehabilitation were conducted 'by an obscure, outsourced agency appointed by DDA'. It was also pointed out that due processes were not followed.
Justice Sharma, while closing a bunch of petitions moved by the 417 dwellers, ruled, '… it is evident that the interim injunctions obtained by the petitioners have not only hindered the timely execution of the rehabilitation project but have also resulted in a significant escalation of public expenditure, thereby causing financial strain on the State. Even assuming, arguendo, that the petitioners may have plausible grounds to assert a legal right to rehabilitation, a favourable adjudication would at best extend the scope of eligible beneficiaries under the prevailing rehabilitation policy. However, such a contention cannot translate into a right to indefinitely occupy public land or retain possession of their respective jhuggi jhopri dwellings, especially when the removal is in furtherance of a larger public interest and in accordance with due process.'
What the court ruled
-Among the 417 petitioners, for 165 who were occupying upper floors of the jhuggis, and those who approached the HC without exhausting the remedy of the appellate authority after their claim for rehabilitation was rejected by the Eligibility Determination Committee (EDC), the court dismissed their petitions.
Such petitioners can, however, approach the appellate authority within six weeks, the court directed. However, the court clarified, such remedies 'shall not stand in the way of the DDA proceeding with the demolition action.'
-The court also refused to grant any relief to a bunch of petitioners whose rehabilitation claims were rejected by the EDC as well as the Appellate Authority on the ground that they had failed to produce a valid and separate ration card in their individual names.
-Justice Sharma, however, allowed relief for 26 petitioner-dwellers, whose rehabilitation claims were allowed by the appellate authority but were subsequently rejected by DDA. The court directed the competent authority 'to review, reconsider or recall their impugned decisions rejecting the claims of the present set of petitioners within six weeks, as per the 2015 policy, and to proceed with their relocation and rehabilitation in accordance with law.'
-It dismissed pleas by 50 dwellers, where the appellate authority had rejected the claims on the ground that their names do not figure in the voter lists for the years 2012-2015, before the eligibility cut-off date, or on the ground that the voter card furnished by them was found to be invalid.
-The court also dismissed pleas by six dwellers who were seeking two allotments against one jhuggi despite one allotment already made against the claimed structure.
-In the case of one petitioner where the appellate authority allowed the claim but was not allotted an alternative dwelling unit, the HC directed DDA 'to proceed with the allotment of an alternative dwelling to the petitioner within six weeks, as per the 2015 Policy.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

HC to TN: Issue GO for ‘No caste, no religion' certificates
HC to TN: Issue GO for ‘No caste, no religion' certificates

Time of India

time2 hours ago

  • Time of India

HC to TN: Issue GO for ‘No caste, no religion' certificates

Chennai: Madras high court has directed the Tamil Nadu govt to issue an appropriate order enabling its revenue department to issue 'No Caste No Religion' certificates to applicants. The court noted that citizens claiming such certificates is laudable and, in the long run, would promote the prohibition of caste-based discrimination. It would also serve as an eye-opener for like-minded individuals, according to Justice M S Ramesh and Justice N Senthilkumar. H Santhosh approached the court seeking a direction to the Thirupathur collector to issue such a certificate. On Feb 22, 2024, a single judge of the court dismissed his plea. Aggrieved, he moved the present appeal, submitting that he intends to raise his children in a casteless and religion-free society. He declared he never claimed any benefit from the govt under caste or religious reservation and does not intend to claim any benefits in the future. Objecting to the appeal, the govt contended that tahsildars are not empowered to issue such a certificate. In response, the court pointed out three similar certificates issued by tahsildars of Tirupathur, Coimbatore, and Ambattur in 2019 and 2022. The court stated that even when there is a constitutional mandate under Article 25, the revenue authorities cannot evade this constitutional obligation by citing the absence of any particular rule or GO. Accordingly, the court called upon the govt to pass the necessary GO, with specific instructions to the revenue authorities to positively entertain applications seeking the grant of a certificate of "No Caste No Religion." While the Constitution of India prohibits caste-based discrimination, the bench added that caste and religion still play a significant role in social life, politics, education, and employment through reservation policies.

HC to hear afresh pleas against Maratha quota law from July 18
HC to hear afresh pleas against Maratha quota law from July 18

Time of India

time2 hours ago

  • Time of India

HC to hear afresh pleas against Maratha quota law from July 18

Mumbai: A special three-judge bench of Bombay high court will begin hearing afresh the challenges to state's latest iteration of the Maratha reservations on July 18. After the Supreme Court directive, HC, in May, constituted a new three-judge bench to hear the petitions, including those filed as public interest litigations, challenging the constitutional validity of the Socially and Educationally Backward Classes (SEBC) Act, 2024, which provides 10% reservation for the Maratha community in govt jobs and admissions to educational institutions. The state opposed the request for consideration of any interim relief. The new full bench of Justices Ravindra V Ghuge, N J Jamadar, and Sandeep Marne on Wednesday recorded submissions of advocate general Birendra Saraf. There were detailed arguments heard in 2024 on interim relief, after which there was an interim arrangement that all further admissions to educational institutions and employment would be subject to court orders. Saraf submitted that this has operated for over a year and that the request for fresh consideration of interim relief was unwarranted. Pradeep Sancheti, senior counsel for a petitioner, sought an earlier date. Other lawyers also argued, saying students who took admission last year were also affected and hence, were seeking interim orders. In May, Supreme Court asked HC to expeditiously hear the pleas, including applications by students appearing for the undergraduate and postgraduate National Eligibility cum Entrance Test of 2025. The students filed pleas seeking interim relief, claiming that a delay in the disposal of pleas was impacting their right to equal consideration in the admission process. The petitions were not fully heard when the then HC Chief Justice was transferred in Jan as Delhi high court Chief Justice. Supreme Court said if Bombay HC cannot hear the matter for final disposal then it may consider interim relief. HC has now fixed a schedule to hear the matter at length on the main challenge. Last July, HC had observed that the Maharashtra State Backward Class Commission, headed by former HC judge Justice S B Shukre, was a necessary party to be heard in one of the PILs filed before it.

Kaleshwaram project irregularities: KCR seeks in-camera hearing, becomes first ex-CM to appear before probe panel
Kaleshwaram project irregularities: KCR seeks in-camera hearing, becomes first ex-CM to appear before probe panel

Time of India

time2 hours ago

  • Time of India

Kaleshwaram project irregularities: KCR seeks in-camera hearing, becomes first ex-CM to appear before probe panel

Hyderabad: In a first for the state, former chief minister K Chandrasekhar Rao was cross-examined by the Justice (retd) PC Ghose one-man commission in connection with the Kaleshwaram project, during an in camera proceeding held at BRKR Bhavan on Wednesday. The hearing was conducted privately at KCR's request, citing health concerns and his preference to avoid a public setting during the session. KCR arrived at the commission's office around 11 am and formally sought permission for a closed-door hearing. Acting on his request, the commission cleared the courtroom of media personnel and several officials before commencing the proceedings. This marks the first time the Ghose commission—tasked with probing structural issues in the Kaleshwaram Lift Irrigation Scheme—has held an in camera hearing since it began its inquiry. The commission has so far examined over 100 individuals, including engineers, serving and former irrigation secretaries, ex-chief secretaries, and political leaders like former ministers T Harish Rao and Eatala Rajender. Senior officials said that KCR is the first former chief minister to appear before an inquiry commission both in the history of Telangana and in united Andhra Pradesh. Anticipating his appearance, thousands of BRS workers and leaders gathered outside the BRKR Bhavan, resulting in considerable commotion. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo Police personnel had a tough time managing the crowd and ensuring security in and around the premises. KCR was accompanied by Harish Rao, former ministers Mohammed Mahmood Ali and Vemula Prashanth Reddy, MLAs like Bandari Laxma Reddy, MPs Joginapally Santosh Kumar and Vaddiraju Ravichandra, and party leader RS Praveen Kumar. Notably, BRS MLC K Kavitha reached KCR's Erravelli farmhouse prior to his departure but did not proceed to the commission office, as entry was strictly restricted during the proceedings.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store