
Trump and Putin to spar Ukraine peace and arms control at Alaska summit
The meeting of the Russian and U.S. leaders at a Cold War-era air force base in Alaska, their first face-to-face talks since Trump returned to the White House, comes amid Ukrainian and European fears that Trump might sell Kyiv out.
Trump, who once said he would end Russia's war in Ukraine within 24 hours, said on Thursday the three-and-a-half-year conflict had proven a tougher nut to crack than he had thought.
He said if his talks with Putin went well, setting up a subsequent three-way summit with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy - who was not invited to Friday's meeting - would be even more important than his encounter with Putin.
Trump is pressing for a truce to bolster his credentials as a global peacemaker worthy of the Nobel Peace Prize, something he has made clear is important to him.
Ukraine and its European allies were heartened by their conference call on Wednesday in which, they said, Trump agreed Ukraine must be involved in any talks about ceding land. Zelenskiy said Trump had also supported the idea of security guarantees in a post-war settlement, although the U.S. president has made no public mention of them.
Wednesday's call eased their fears of a Trump-Putin deal that would leave Ukraine under pressure to make territorial and other concessions.
Putin, whose war economy is showing signs of strain, needs Trump to help Russia break out of its straitjacket of ever-tightening Western sanctions, or at the very least not to hit Moscow with more sanctions, something Trump has threatened.
The day before the summit, the Kremlin leader held out the prospect of something else he knows Trump wants - a new nuclear arms control agreement to replace the last surviving one, which is due to expire in February next year.
TRUMP SAYS PUTIN WILL DO A DEAL ON UKRAINE
Trump said on the eve of the summit that he thought Putin would do a deal on Ukraine, but he has blown hot and cold on the chances of a breakthrough. Putin, meanwhile, praised what he called "sincere efforts" by the U.S. to end the war.
A source close to the Kremlin told Reuters it looked as if the two sides had been able to find some unspecified common ground beforehand.
"Apparently, some terms will be agreed upon tomorrow (Friday) because Trump cannot be refused, and we are not in a position to refuse (due to sanctions pressure)," said the source, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the matter's sensitivity.
Putin has set stringent conditions for a full ceasefire, but one compromise could be a phased truce in the air war, although both sides have accused the other of flouting a previous accord.
Analysts say Putin could try to look like he's giving Trump what he wants while remaining free to escalate in Ukraine if he wants to.
"If they (the Russians) are able to put a deal on the table that creates some kind of a ceasefire but that leaves Russia in control of those escalatory dynamics, does not create any kind of genuine deterrence on the ground or in the skies over Ukraine... that would be a wonderful outcome from Putin's perspective," said Sam Greene, director of Democratic Resilience at the Center for European Policy Analysis.
TRUMP SUGGESTS LAND TRANSFERS WILL BE NEEDED
Zelenskiy has accused Putin of bluffing and playing for time to avoid U.S. secondary sanctions and has ruled out handing Moscow any territory.
Trump has said land transfers between Russia and Ukraine could be a possible way of breaking the logjam.
Putin, whose forces control nearly one fifth of Ukraine, wants Trump to start reviving the two countries' shrunken economic, political and business ties and, ideally, not to make that process contingent on progress on Ukraine.
But it is unclear whether Putin is willing to compromise on Ukraine. In power for a quarter of a century, the Kremlin chief has staked his legacy on coming out of the war with something he can sell to his people as a victory.
Chief among his war aims is complete Russian control over the Donbas industrial region in eastern Ukraine, which comprises the Donetsk and Luhansk regions. Despite steady advances, around 25% of Donetsk remains beyond Russian control.
Putin also wants full control of Ukraine's Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions; NATO membership to be taken off the table for Kyiv; and limits on the size of Ukraine's armed forces.
Ukraine has said these terms are unacceptable and tantamount to asking it to capitulate.
(Reporting by Andrew Osborn; Additional reporting by Darya Korsunskaya in Moscow; Editing by Kevin Liffey and Jon Boyle)

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Star
28 minutes ago
- The Star
Zelenskiy says Russia continues attacking Ukraine ahead of summit
FILE PHOTO: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy attends a press conference with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz (not pictured), on the day they attend a virtual meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump and European leaders on the upcoming Trump-Putin summit on Ukraine, in Berlin, Germany, August 13, 2025. REUTERS/Liesa Johannssen/File Photo


The Star
28 minutes ago
- The Star
US aid cuts to Ukraine raise risk of waste and fraud, say watchdogs
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -USAID is concerned that the Trump administration's cancellation of independent aid monitoring contracts for Ukraine has increased the risk of waste, fraud and abuse, according to three U.S. watchdog agencies. "The termination of third-party monitoring contracts has further limited USAID's ability to oversee programs," the State Department, Pentagon and USAID inspectors general said in a report issued on Thursday. The U.S. Agency for International Development was the main U.S. agency that administered civilian foreign aid for more than 60 years. It is being dismantled by the Trump administration and is scheduled to be closed on September 2. The three inspectors general submit quarterly reports to Congress on their oversight of U.S. civilian support for Ukraine in its fight against Russia's full-scale invasion launched in February 2022. In January, President Donald Trump froze all U.S. foreign assistance programs pending a review of their alignment with his "America First" policies, and ordered the dismantling of USAID, which stopped disbursing funds in July. As part of this decision, billionaire Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency oversaw the termination of 83 percent of USAID programs, including some that supported Ukraine. The watchdogs' report said that USAID managed $30.2 billion in direct support for the Ukrainian government's budget, and provided a guarantee that secured a $20 billion loan for Kyiv. It said that in the three months ending June 31, 25 civilian aid programs for Ukraine were terminated, while 29 active programs, five under stop-work orders and four of unknown status were transferred to the State Department. The terminated programs included contracts with third parties that provided independent tracking of USAID funds to ensure that they were spent as intended and that helped "inform both current and future decision-making," it said. "USAID said that without independent monitoring, it cannot verify that programs are being implemented in line with award terms, increasing the risk of waste, fraud and abuse," the report said. This is especially true in conflict-affected areas "where there is a heightened potential for diversion of funds," it warned. (Reporting by Jonathan Landay; editing by Clelia Oziel)


Malaysian Reserve
an hour ago
- Malaysian Reserve
FAIR Investigative Report: Federal Takeover of DC Police Presents Opportunity to Dismantle Unlawful Sanctuary Policies and Align with National Immigration Priorities
WASHINGTON, Aug. 15, 2025 /PRNewswire/ — Today, the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) released a new investigative report examining the immigration enforcement implications of President Donald Trump's August 11, 2025 executive order federalizing the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) amid D.C.'s escalating crime crisis. The report argues that this bold federal intervention provides a pivotal chance for D.C. police and prosecutors to comply with federal immigration mandates, override the District's unlawful sanctuary policies, and prioritize the deportation of criminal illegal aliens — restoring public safety in the nation's capital. 'President Trump's decisive action to federalize MPD is a game-changer for immigration enforcement in D.C., where sanctuary policies have long shielded illegal aliens from accountability and turned our capital into a haven for criminals,' said Dale Wilcox, executive director and general counsel of FAIR. 'Our report exposes how these policies violate federal supremacy and outlines clear steps for MPD and prosecutors to align with national priorities, ensuring that no one gets a free pass based on immigration status.' Key findings and recommendations from the report include: D.C.'s Sanctuary Policies Are Unlawful: The report analyzes how D.C.'s restrictions on cooperating with federal immigration authorities — such as bans on immigration status inquiries and honoring ICE detainers — conflict with the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) and are preempted under the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution. The report also discusses how these policies exceed the District's authority under the Home Rule Act. Opportunities for MPD Under Federal Control: The report examines how President Trump has unequivocal authority under the D.C. Home Rule Act to direct a federalized MPD to bypass the District's unlawful sanctuary policies. In light of this, the report recommends that MPD implement routine immigration status checks during arrests, work with other D.C. agencies to honor ICE detainers, and report non-citizen arrestees to ICE. Prosecutors Must Reject 'Immigration Neutral' Practices: The report critiques endorsements by prominent D.C. figures of reforms favoring leniency for criminal aliens and urges even-handed prosecutions that don't advantage alien defendants at the expense of U.S. citizens. The report recommends that the U.S. Attorney for D.C. and the D.C. Attorney General adopt policies prohibiting immigration-based leniency, pursue maximum charges to trigger federal jurisdiction, coordinate with ICE as they handle cases, and track prosecution outcomes for alien defendants. 'Sanctuary policies in D.C. not only endanger residents but also undermine America's sovereignty,' said Mateo Forero, FAIR's director of investigations. 'We will continue to monitor developments in the District and will expand our investigation where appropriate — including through possible public records requests to hold government stakeholders accountable.' CONTACT: Ira Mehlman, 1-213-700-0407, imehlman@