logo
Healthcare startup Abridge raises $300 million, led by VC firm Andreessen Horowitz

Healthcare startup Abridge raises $300 million, led by VC firm Andreessen Horowitz

Reuters10 hours ago

June 24 (Reuters) - Healthcare firm Abridge, which uses artificial intelligence to build medical documents, has raised $300 million in a funding round, it said on Tuesday.
The funding round was led by venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz with participation from Khosla Ventures.
Founded in 2018, Pittsburgh-based Abridge automates clinical notes and medical conversations for doctors using artificial intelligence.
The latest fundraise comes after the firm raised $250 million earlier this year.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Small business AI use is lagging, but one firm is channeling Sherlock Holmes and knocking out 'grunt work'
Small business AI use is lagging, but one firm is channeling Sherlock Holmes and knocking out 'grunt work'

NBC News

time34 minutes ago

  • NBC News

Small business AI use is lagging, but one firm is channeling Sherlock Holmes and knocking out 'grunt work'

Chris Schwegmann is getting creative with how artificial intelligence is being used in law. At Dallas-based boutique law firm Lynn Pinker Hurst & Schwegmann, he sometimes asks AI to channel Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts or Sherlock Holmes. Schwegmann said after uploading opposing counsel's briefs, he'll ask legal technology platform Harvey to assume the role of a legal mind like Roberts to see how the chief justice would think about a particular problem. Other times, he will turn to a fictional character like Holmes, unlocking a different frame of mind. 'Harvey, ChatGPT ... they know who those folks are, and can approach the problem from that mindset,' he said. 'Once we as lawyers get outside those lanes, when we are thinking more creatively involving other branches of science, literature, history, mythology, that sometimes generates some of the most interesting ideas that can then be put, using proper legal judgement, in a framework that works to solve a legal problem.' It's just one example of how smaller businesses are putting AI to work to punch above their weight, and new data shows there's an opportunity for much more implementation in the future. Only 24% of owners in the recent Small Business and Technology Survey from the National Federation of Independent Business said they are using AI, including ChatGPT, Canva and Copilot, in some capacity. Notably, 98% of those using it said AI has so far not impacted the number of employees at their firms. At his trial litigation firm of 50 attorneys, Schwegmann said AI is resolving work in days that would sometimes take weeks, and said the technology isn't replacing workers at the firm. It has freed up associate lawyers from doing 'grunt work,' he said, and also means more senior-level partners have the time to mentor younger attorneys because everyone has more time. The NFIB survey found AI use varied based on the size of the small business. For firms with employees in the single digits, uptake was at 21%. At firms with fifty or more workers, AI implementation was at nearly half of all respondents. 'The data show clearly that uptake for the smallest businesses lags substantially behind their larger competitors. ... With a little attention from all the relevant stakeholders, a more equal playing field is possible,' the NFIB report said. For future AI use, 63% of all small employers surveyed said the utilization of the technology in their industry in the next five years will be important to some degree; 12% said it will be extremely important and 15% said it will not be important at all. Some of the most common uses in the survey were for communications, marketing and advertising, predictive analysis and customer service. 'We still have the need for the independent legal judgment of our associate lawyers and our partners — it hasn't replaced them, it just augments their thinking,' Schwegmann said. 'It makes them more creative and frees their time to do what lawyers do best, which is strategic thought and creative problem solving.' The NFIB data echoes a recent survey from Reimagine Main Street, a project of Public Private Strategies Institute in partnership with PayPal. Reimagine surveyed nearly 1,000 small businesses with annual revenue between $25,000 and $50,000 and also found that a quarter had already started integrating AI into daily workflows. Schwegmann said at his firm, AI is helping to even the playing field. 'One of the things Harvey lets us do is review, understand and incorporate and respond much faster than we would prior to the use of these kinds of AI tools,' he said. 'No longer does a party have an advantage because they can paper you to death.'

Test vendor moves to toss California's lawsuit over botched bar exam, says fraud claims fail
Test vendor moves to toss California's lawsuit over botched bar exam, says fraud claims fail

Reuters

time36 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Test vendor moves to toss California's lawsuit over botched bar exam, says fraud claims fail

June 23 (Reuters) - The testing company that delivered California's disastrous February bar exam asked a judge on Friday to throw out the bulk of The State Bar of California's lawsuit against it, claiming that the state bar cannot rely on the company's early statements about its online testing capacity to demonstrate fraud. In a court document, opens new tab filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court, defendant Meazure Learning sought dismissal of five of the state bar's six alleged counts, including fraud and negligent misrepresentation. The company's filing, which is called a demurrer, did not address the state bar's breach of contract claim. The state bar on Monday declined to comment on the filing, and attorneys for Meazure did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The state bar sued Meazure in May, accusing, opens new tab the company of failing to live up to its promises that its systems could handle thousands of bar examinees. The state bar signed a $4.1 million contract with the company in September 2024 to administer the February and future exams, to be given both remotely and in person. The new format was meant to reduce the state bar's cost of administering the attorney licensing exam. However, the February test was marred with widespread technical and logistical problems. Some test takers were unable to log into the bar exam at all while many experienced delays, lax exam security, distracting proctors, and a copy-and-paste function that didn't work. In the new filing, Meazure argues that any comments made by the company about the number of online test takers it could handle outside of its actual contract with the state bar do not meet the standard to prove fraud of negligent misrepresentation because they are not binding. 'The court should reject plaintiff's attempt to turn Meazure's alleged breaches of contract into an intentional tort,' Meazure's demurrer reads. Meazure is already facing two proposed federal class actions from people who took the February test. State Bar Executive Director Leah Wilson said she will step down from her post in July, citing the bungled rollout of the new bar exam. Meazure, based in Birmingham, Alabama, bills itself on its website as the "largest and most experienced remote proctoring operation in the market," with more than 1,500 test centers in 115 countries. Meazure was formed through the 2020 merger of testing companies ProctorU and Yardstick. Read more: California Bar sues vendor over exam meltdown California bar exam test takers sue over 'disaster' rollout this week

US bond market braces for surge in Treasury supply in second half
US bond market braces for surge in Treasury supply in second half

Reuters

time36 minutes ago

  • Reuters

US bond market braces for surge in Treasury supply in second half

BOSTON, June 24 (Reuters) - The bond market is bracing for up to $1 trillion of additional U.S. Treasuries supply in the second half of the year once lawmakers address the looming debt ceiling problem, possibly permanently, top rates strategists said on Tuesday. Any new issuance will likely be focused on shorter-dated debt including bills. With the flood of Treasuries, market participants are left to wonder: who is going to buy them all? Treasury issuance is meant to address the U.S. government's huge fiscal deficit. President Donald Trump's sweeping tax-cut and spending bill would lead to a larger-than-expected $2.8 trillion increase in the federal deficit over the decade, despite a boost to U.S. economic output, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office projected. The U.S. Senate could vote on Friday on Republicans' tax and spending measure, said Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Tuesday, and he was confident the House would then pass that version. "We are just about to go through a level shift," said Mark Cabana, head of U.S. rates strategy at BoFA Securities, during a panel discussion on Tuesday at the Money Fund Symposium in Boston. "You're going to see this big issuance clip and it's coming within the next few months. You can debate exactly when they raise the debt limit, but the X-date is coming soon." Bessent had said that the so-called X-date when the government would exhaust remaining borrowing capacity under the federal debt ceiling would come sometime during the mid-to-late summer. When the debt ceiling is reached the Treasury is unable to increase borrowings, but if it is lifted or eliminated, the government can then issue more debt. Cabana's forecast is for new supply of Treasuries to hit $1 trillion by the end of the year. Gennadiy Goldberg, head of U.S. rates strategy at TD Securities, also expects an increase of nearly $1 trillion in issuance this year, with about $700 billion supply in August and September. A surge in Treasury supply could increase repurchase, or repo rates, which refer to the cost of borrowing short-term cash using Treasuries or other debt securities as collateral. Higher Treasury supply typically saturates the market with additional collateral, which can initially lower repo rates due to excess supply. However, if supply exceeds demand substantially, it may lead to higher repo rates as lenders demand more compensation for holding larger volumes of securities. Goldberg thinks this year's supply will be concentrated on the front end of the Treasury curve - the two-year to the seven-year sector. "Our expectation is that the Treasury keeps issuance focused on the very front end of the curve in terms of coupons. We're not expecting auction size increases until the middle to end of next year, so August or November of 2026, and we don't expect any increases in the long end either," Goldberg said. "In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if there are some decreases in size on the long end, but twos, threes, fives, sevens, that's where the Treasury is going to really look to finance themselves, not 10s, not 20s, not 30s. So it's really that and bills." Adding to Goldberg's point, Ian Lyngen, head of U.S. rates strategy at BMO Capital Markets. noted that the U.S. Treasury has become so market-sensitive that it is willing to pull back on longer-term issuance if it leads to volatility in yields. It is not just the Treasury Department that has been more cognizant of the market's reaction, he said, but also Japan's Ministry of Finance and the UK. Money market funds, whose assets hit a record $7.4 trillion in June, are well positioned to absorb part of that Treasury supply, the strategists said. However, there has been a modest shift recently away from Treasuries by these money funds and into private repo transactions because of the latter's higher rates.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store