Hochul says Mamdani's shock win has turned her into the ‘therapist in chief' — as she signals she will block his radical ‘tax the rich' plan
The governor, who is yet to endorse Mamdani after his mayoral win set off a political earthquake within the Democratic party, signalled she planned to block his push to hikes taxes for Big Apple millionaires and large corporations, if he's elected.
Gov. Kathy Hochul says Zohran Mamdani's shocking NYC mayoral primary win has turned her into New York's 'therapist in chief.'
MSNBC
Advertisement
'I've spoken to hundreds of business leaders saying, 'Listen, nothing is going to happen to this city without me being aware of it and involved in it'. So don't talk about packing up and leaving and all these other overreactions,' Hochul told MSNBC's 'Morning Joe' on Wednesday.
'I've become the therapist in chief it seems. So I'm saying to everybody, 'We're going be okay.' Maybe it's the mom in me. I know how to calm down situations and we'll get through this.'
Hochul also suggested she will block the Democratic Socialist's divisive 'tax the rich' plan.
Luiz C. Ribeiro for New York Post
Advertisement
'Don't panic everybody. Let the process play out, let the voters decide and then we'll deal with it,' she added.
Mamdani has stoked widespread outcry with his promise to raise taxes for the city's ultra-wealthy, as well as his slew of anti-Israel comments on the campaign trail — including his refusal to condemn the 'globalize the intifada' rallying cry.
Hochul said she raised the two issues directly with Mamdani when they spoke recently.
Advertisement
In addition to reassuring the business community, the governor said Mamdani's number one job was 'healing' his relationship with Jewish New Yorkers.
'I said 'You have a lot of healing to do with the Jewish community. Many of your words have been hurtful and hateful to people and their interpretation of it',' she said.
'So job number one is to straighten that relationship out if you can and to get them to understand that if you become the mayor, we don't know the outcome, but if you become a mayor that you'll be a mayor for everyone and no one should have to about being in a city and feeling less safe because of who the mayor is and their religious beliefs.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
4 minutes ago
- The Hill
Here are the Texas House Democrats who broke quorum
AUSTIN (Nexstar) — At least 51 Democratic representatives in the Texas House left Texas Sunday to block a vote Monday on redrawn maps of the state's U.S. congressional districts. Abbott threatens absent House Democrats with removal, felony charges During Tuesday's session of the House, the total number of total number of Democratic quorum breakers was 54, two fewer than Monday's 56. In total, 62 Democrats hold seats in the 89th Texas House of Representatives, according to the Legislative Reference Library of Texas. Not sure who your state legislators are? The Texas Capitol has a tool to help you find out. Here's who did not show up at the Capitol at 1 p.m. Tuesday: Gina Hinojosa – D49 Ron Reynolds – D27 James Talarico – D50 Ann Johnson – D134 Gene Wu – D137 John Bucy – D136 Trey Martinez Fischer – D116 Josey Garcia – D124 Diego Bernal – D123 Toni Rose – D110 Jon Rosenthal – D135 Jalonda Jones – D147 Venton Jones – D100 Rafael Anchia – D103 Sheryl Cole – D46 Ramon Romero – D90 Nicole Collier – D95 Harold Dutton – D142 Chris Turner – D101 Linda Garcia – D107 Charlene Ward Johnson – D139 Jessica González – D104 Ana-María Rodríguez Ramos – D102 Lauren Ashley Simmons – D146 Donna Howard – D48 Lulu Flores – D51 Vikki Goodwin – D47 Cassandra Garcia Hernandez – D115 Mihaela Plesa – D70 Suleman Lalani – D76 Ray López – D125 Christina Morales – D145 Barbara Gervin-Hawkins – D120 John Bryant – D114 Rhetta Bowers – D113 Terry Meza – D105 Aicha Davis – D109 Elizabeth Campos – D119 Alma Allen – D131 Ana Hernandez – D143 Salman Bhojani – D92 Erin Gamez – D38 Christian Manuel – D22 Vincent Perez – D77 Mary Gonzalez – D75 Claudia Ordaz – D79 Penny Morales-Shaw – D148 Senfronia Thompson – D141 Hubert Vo – D149 Yvonne Davis – D111 Erin Zwiener – D45 Armando Walle – D140 Bobby Guerra – D41 Mary Ann Perez – D144 In the end, Democrats present in the House Chamber Tuesday were Reps. Terry Canales, Oscar Longoria, Armando Martinez, Sergio Muñoz, Philip Cortez, Eddie Morales, Joe Moody and Richard Peña Raymond. Cortez and Morales were not present during Monday's session. KXAN reached out to all Texas House Democrats before 1 p.m. Monday.
The Hill
4 minutes ago
- The Hill
NIH broke law by withholding funding: GAO
A congressional watchdog determined Tuesday that the Trump administration broke the law when it directed the National Institutes of Health to cancel hundreds of research grants earlier this year. The Government Accountability Office (GAO) found that the NIH violated the Impoundment Control Act when it canceled 1,800 grants in an effort to follow a series of executive orders aimed at cutting federal funding for diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives, according to a report from the agency. The 1974 law regulates how the president can cancel or delay federal funds that Congress has already appropriated. The GAO also found that the NIH violated the law when it awarded $8 billion less in grants between January and June of this year compared to the same time in 2024 because of following the Trump administration's executive orders. President Trump issued several executive orders shortly after taking office in January targeting diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives. One of those orders instructed federal agencies to cancel all 'equity-related' grants and contracts within 60 days. A week later, the Trump administration directed the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) in late January to order the NIH to stop posting notices of grant review meetings in the Federal Register and to remove any documents in the process of being posted to the publication. This move prevented the agency from reviewing and awarding grants for roughly two months, according to the GAO report. 'NIH's actions to carry out these executive directives, coupled with publicly available data showing a decline in NIH's obligations and expenditures, establishes that the NIH intended to withhold budget authority from obligation and expenditure without regard to the process provided by the Impoundment Control Act,' the report reads. In the report, the GAO notes that HHS did issue notices lifting the pause related to Federal Register notices and that they are aware of the White House directing NIH officials in July to pause 'grants, research contracts, and training,' which have since been reversed. But the agency could still not confirm that more money towards grant appropriations has returned. GAO's report findings are not legally binding in any way but have the power to influence Congressional opinion. A federal court ruled in June that the grant cancellations were illegal. Some Democratic lawmakers have called for the White House to stop pausing the flow of money to the NIH medical research, which could halt future medical advances. 'It is critical President Trump reverse course, stop decimating the NIH, and get every last bit of this funding out,' said Senator Patty Murray (D-Wash), in a statement. Murray serves as vice chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee. 'The longer this goes on, the more clinical trials that will be cut short, labs that will shutter, and lifesaving research that will never see the light of day.' A spokesperson for the White House and NIH could not be immediately reached for comment. A spokesperson for the HHS sent its response to the GAO report to The Hill, noting that the submissions pause to the Federal Register has been lifted and peer-review scheduling has resumed.
The Hill
4 minutes ago
- The Hill
Does Texas Governor Greg Abbott have the power to vacate Texas House seats?
AUSTIN (Nexstar) — On Monday the Texas House officially came to a standstill, as over fifty Democratic House members fled the state to prevent the House from getting the 100 members needed to convene. Their primary intention is to stop the redrawing of Texas' U.S. Congressional map, a map President Donald Trump hopes will flip five U.S. House seats from Democratic to Republican. In the leadup to the quorum break, Republican Governor of Texas Greg Abbott threatened lawmakers by saying he'd vacate their seats and have them charged with bribery — for soliciting funds to support their trip. After the vote, he followed through, asking Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS) officers to bring back missing House members by force, and asking the Texas Rangers to look into bribery charges. 'Come and take it': Democrats call Abbott's bluff In response to Abbott's initial statements, Texas House Democratic Caucus Chair Gene Wu said, 'Come and take it.' State Rep. Jolanda Jones, D-Houston, expanded on the sentiment in a Monday morning news conference with New York Governor Kathy Hochul. 'Respectfully, he's making up some {expletive},' Jones, an attorney, said. 'He's just trying to get sound bits and he has no legal mechanisms.' While Abbott has authorized DPS officers to civilly arrest delinquent House members, their authority doesn't extend outside of Texas. 'Once they're out of state, it's almost impossible to touch them,' Maynooth Law Professor Seth Barrett Tillman said. While Tillman says he doesn't believe Abbott is acting in bad faith, he does believe his arguments won't hold up in court. 'The Governor certainly can't send his sheriffs or marshals — or certainly shouldn't send non-government workers like private bail bondsmen to cross state lines to grab people and bring them back to Texas. I think that would be lawless violence.' The governments of New York, Illinois and Massachusetts — where many members are currently located — are unlikely to be sympathetic with Abbott's cause. However, the President of the United States might be. 'We're looking for whatever we need to do to maintain this important work,' Speaker of the Texas House Dustin Burrows, R-Lubbock, said when asked about potential federal involvement. 'We will continue to work with everybody to make sure there is nothing off the table.' 'I hadn't thought about (the federal Government getting involved),' Tillman said. 'They're not breaking any federal law that I know of and if there's not I don't know what federal power, what marshal, what other agent of the government could reach into a state out of Texas, grab a member of the legislature and shift him over the state line without basically that action being called kidnapping.' 'Courts are very hesitant to overturn elections' On Sunday night, Abbott cited a non-binding 2021 opinion from Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, saying 'For any member who fails to (appear), I will invoke Texas Attorney General Opinion No. KP-0382 to remove the missing Democrats from membership in the Texas House.' Despite the citation, the opinion does not give claim the Governor has any power to remove members of the Texas legislature from office. Instead, it purports that a district court could declare a seat abandoned, and therefore treat the seat as if it had been resigned. However, in the opinion the Texas Supreme Court is cited saying abandonment is a form of resignation that requires lawmakers to actually abandon their position. '(Resignation) is a formal relinquishment; (abandonment is) a relinquishment through nonuser,' the court wrote in Honey v. Graham (1873). 'Abandonment implies nonuser, but nonuser does not, of itself, constitute abandonment. The failure to perform the duties pertaining to the office must be with actual or imputed intention on the part of the officer to abandon and relinquish the office.' Even Paxton seem skeptical of being able to vacate members during a Monday morning interview with right-wing online talk-show host Benny Johnson. 'The challenge is that wouldn't be an immediate answer,' Paxton explained to Johnson. 'We'd have to go through (the) court process and we'd have to file that maybe in district that are not friendly to Republicans. So it's a challenge because every district would be different. We'd have to go sue in every legislator's home district to try to execute on that idea.' If Paxton and Abbott even try to take vacancies to the courts, they'll face an uphill battle. '(Abbott) certainly has the power to try,' Tillman said. Tillman helped author an amicus brief in support of President Donald Trump when Colorado officials attempted to declare him ineligible for running for President. 'Terminating an elected official in the position he was elected is a big thing, which is what the Colorado Supreme Court learned… Courts are very hesitant to overturn elections. Courts are very hesitant to overturn voter's rights and courts are very hesitant to limit the participation of citizens in elections.' 'I wouldn't call that a bribe' Late on Monday afternoon, Abbott announced the Texas Rangers would open an inquiry into bribery charges against Texas House members. 'Reports indicate that many absentee Texas House Democrats have solicited or received funds to evade conducting legislative business and casting votes. Under the Texas Penal Code, any of those Democrats who solicit, accept, or agree to accept such funds to assist in the violation of legislative duties or for purposes of skipping a vote may have violated bribery laws,' Abbott wrote. 'Also, it could be a bribery violation for any other person who offers, provides, or agrees to provide such funds to fleeing Democrat House members.' Tillman says accusing the opposition of bribery is not only incorrect, but potentially disastrous. 'What we usually mean by bribery is when someone takes money or property and secretes it in their closet, and doesn't pay taxes on it and they hide what they're doing from the public because they're trying to engineer a private benefit through exercise of their office,' Tillman said. 'It seems to me, if a Democratic member attempts to break quorum as a general matter, if he's being transparent about receiving these funds, if he tells the public he's received it, if he spend it in a way that's to facilitate public action, which is breaking the quorum — he's not doing it to repave his driveway, he's not doing it to pay for his own personal rent — He's doing it to facilitate the political action he's taking, and he pays taxes on it, then I wouldn't call that a bribe. I would call that normal politics.' Tillman noted he's not an expert on Texas campaign finance law, and says this trend of calling opposition political spending a 'bribe' picked up a lot with media criticisms of Trump during his first administration. 'I think it would be bad for the country if every time people engage in normal politics, we have to drag them before the courts and try them for bribery,' Tillman said. 'And some courts are likely to make a mistake on that, and they'll actually call it bribery and convict people. And that would be a terrible thing.'
