Argyll and Bute councillor suspended over teen 'sexual deviant' slur
Councillor Redman, who represents the Kintyre and the Islands ward, was referred to the standards committee in January 2023.He had contacted the education department after allegations from some parents that a boy had put video recording equipment in a local school's girls-only changing area.During that call, he told the council officer because the child "cross-dressed," it was "likely" he put the recording equipment in the room.He also said: "People who cross-dressed were more likely to be sexually deviant".The school, which has not been named, and Police Scotland investigated the claims but found them to be untrue.
'Serious and unsubstantiated'
The SCS panel ruled councillor Redman "made a serious accusation on his own behalf," rather than on behalf of his constituents, which suggested the child had "undertaken a potentially criminal act".The panel also said it was not provided with any evidence to show the accusation was "based on anything other than how councillor Redman understood the child occasionally dressed".They ruled that constituted breaches of the Councillors' Code of Conduct and that the accusations were "serious and unsubstantiated".Ashleigh Dunn, chair of the hearing panel, said councillor Redman "engaged in disrespectful and discriminatory" conduct.She also noted that Mr Redman had not apologised for his actions.She said: "The code of conduct does not prevent councillors from passing on concerns constituents raise with them to council officers."The panel considered, however, that councillor Redman could have done so without engaging in disrespectful and discriminatory behaviour."Councillor Redman effectively made a serious accusation on his own behalf (as opposed to just passing on what his constituents had allegedly told him), being both that the child had undertaken a potentially criminal act and was likely also 'sexually deviant'."She added: "The panel considered that making such an accusation in the circumstances was disrespectful towards the child."
'An attack on free speech'
Councillor Redman was suspended from the Scottish Conservatives in 2019 for allegedly sharing Islamophobic and racist content on social media.He was expelled from the party two years later.He told BBC Scotland: "This ruling is a disgrace and a politically motivated attempt to silence me for standing up for the protection of girls' spaces."I was elected to represent my constituents and relay their safeguarding concerns—yet I am being punished for doing exactly that."This is not justice; it is an attack on free speech and democracy."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
a day ago
- Daily Record
Labour council leader breached code of conduct over financial connection to company director
EXCLUSIVE: The Inverclyde council leader has apologised for the "inadvertent breach" of the councillors' code of conduct. A watchdog has ruled that a Labour council leader breached ethics rules by suggesting a property director he knew could become chair of Greenock's town board. Stephen McCabe named Lord Willie Haughey as a potential independent Chair despite the peer being a director of a firm which rented a house to the councillor. But the Ethical Standards Commissioner said no breach had occurred on the sale of the property or over the rental arrangement. McCabe, who leads Inverclyde council, was the subject of complaints to the Commissioner. According to the Commissioner report, McCabe rents his property from a company of which Haughey, a major Labour donor, is a director. In February 2024, the report states that McCabe informally suggested Haughey as a candidate for the non-remunerated position of Chair of the Greenock Town Board. The Commissioner stated: 'The Respondent did not declare an interest to the Council officers when he made this suggestion. [McCabe] was not part of the decision making when selecting the candidate. Lord Haughey was selected as Chair of the Greenock Town Board.' The Commissioner summarised the first of two issues considered as: '[McCabe failed to declare an interest when he informally suggested that the Council consider Lord William Haughey as a potential independent Chair for the non-remunerated position as Chair of the Greenock Town's Board despite there being a financial connection in that Lord Haughey is the Director of a company which owns and lets the Respondent's property to him.' The Commissioner concluded that the councillor did breach the councillors' code of conduct on this matter. He summarised the second issue under investigation as: 'The Respondent sold his property at a price below market value in order to continue living there. As such, he pays no rent or rent which is lower than the market rent to his landlord. Any different may amount to a gift either on a one off or continuing basis which has not been declared.' The Commissioner said on this issue McCabe did not breach the Code. McCabe told the Record: 'When I became aware in December 2024 that I may have inadvertently breached the Councillors' Code of Conduct I immediately took the highly unusual step of referring myself to the Ethical Standards Commissioner, more than seven weeks before complaints were submitted by the other two complainers. "I co-operated fully with the investigation by the Ethical Standards Commissioner, including sharing very personal information about my marriage break-down and my son's mental health. "I accept the findings of the Commissioner's report and apologise for my inadvertent breach of the Code of Conduct. During 30 years' service as a Councillor, I have never before breached the Code of Conduct. I have received refresher training from the Council's Monitoring Officer on the Code and on managing personal connections. 'I note that the Ethical Standards Commissioner has submitted his report to the Standards Commission for Scotland, and I would hope that considering my self-referral, apology and the refresher training I have undertaken, the Commission will be satisfied that I made a genuine mistake. I am pleased that the Ethical Standards Commissioner has found that I did not breach the Code of Conduct in relation to the sale of my house.'
The National
a day ago
- The National
Kate Forbes has perfect response to Scottish Tories' membership offer
'OH, no.' That is a perfectly normal response to being approached by Scottish Tory leader Russell Findlay – and it is exactly the response which outgoing Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes had. The SNP MSP was minding her own business at the Black Isle Show, when Findlay decided to try and get a political jibe in. At the Black Isle show trying to recruit some new Tory members 😉🤣 — Russell Findlay MSP (@RussellFindlay1) August 8, 2025 'Ah, the former SNP politician. How are you?' Findlay said, with the camera rolling – of which Forbes was apparently unaware (just as he was apparently unaware that she is still at the very top of the SNP Government). 'A has-been', Forbes quipped in response. 'She was the future once.' The reference is to Scottish Labour's Jackie Baillie, who issued that quote after news broke of Forbes's decision to quit Holyrood in 2026. Baillie, of course, was never the future even once – but that's for another day. Back at the Black Isle, Findlay was whipping out a letter to 'formally offer' Forbes the opportunity to join the Scottish Conservatives – which is about comparable to a formal offer to hop on board the Titanic four days after it set sail. Findlay says: 'If it wasn't for your bizarre belief in breaking up the UK, you are a conservative, right?' The accusation has been levelled at Forbes before – as it has for many 'Tartan Tories' in the SNP. She seems to acknowledge as much, replying: 'You're not the first person to offer it.' But the Scottish Conservatives aren't really conservatives anymore. More a doomed Nigel Farage-tribute act. Findlay nevertheless asked if that was a 'maybe'. Who's to blame him for trying to boost the Tories' numbers? They are dwindling by the day, after all. But Forbes – after clocking the camera – had the response you'd expect: "So funny. You've got a definite not.' That's the only sane answer. After all, even dyed-in-the-wool Scottish Conservatives are jumping ship. They see the iceberg coming.
STV News
a day ago
- STV News
Report suggests billions in tax hikes to pay for SNP minimum income guarantee
A report paid for by the Scottish Government has floated the idea of billions in tax rises to fund the SNP's plans for a minimum income guarantee (MIG). The proposals amount to around £6.39bn in changes to taxes in the long-term, including income tax and council tax rises, although some of the changes would require the devolution of more financial powers. The report was conducted by WPI Economics on behalf of the Minimum Income Guarantee Group set up by the Government. The group is looking to deliver on the SNP's manifesto commitment to establish an MIG for Scots. The Scottish Government has said the aim of an MIG 'is to provide a universal guarantee of financial security achieved through an income floor beneath which no-one would be allowed to fall'. The report estimates the cost of the policy to be around £8.1bn a year. Among its proposals for raising the cash needed to fund the policy, it suggests lowering the personal allowance for Scottish income tax to £7,570 at a cost to the public of around £2.68bn. It also suggests reforming council tax by making the most expensive households pay up to 22.5% more above inflation, taxing income at 42p in the pound for salaries over £40,000 and applying Scottish income tax to dividends and savings. The report also admits 'there are short-term political difficulties around utilising existing revenue-raising powers, with the 2024 Scottish Government tax strategy committing to no major changes to Scottish income tax policy'. It lists non-tax-raising options, such as Westminster increasing Holyrood's block grant or economic growth leading to higher tax receipts. It said that the Scottish Government would probably need greater fiscal powers than it currently has to deliver the policy in the long term. The Scottish Conservatives urged ministers to immediately rule out these tax rises and 'abandon any attempts to impose even more costs on Scotland's ballooning benefits bill'. The party's social security spokesperson at Holyrood, Alexander Stewart, said: 'These staggering tax rises proposed by an SNP talking shop would pile further misery on hard-working Scots. 'The public are already suffering with £1.7bn worth of tax rises from SNP ministers – yet all the while public services have deteriorated. 'Every single taxpayer in Scotland could be hit with an eye-watering £950 bill if these tax rises were to be implemented. 'The fact these tax rises would not even be able to cover the enormous £8bn bill required to implement a minimum income guarantee should worry Scots that further tax hikes will be necessary too. 'After squandering taxpayers' money on a report even nationalists knew was doomed to fail, John Swinney should immediately rule out this multibillion-pound tax bombshell and drop the SNP's minimum income guarantee plans for good.' A spokesman for the Scottish Government said: 'These are proposals of an independent group, not the Scottish Government. 'We are taking the time to consider their recommendations before responding, taking into account affordability in the current financial context. 'We have no plans to change tax policy to finance this.' Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
