Trump must change course on tariff madness
The first quarter of this year saw US firms ramping up imports to stockpile products ahead of tariff announcements. When these tariffs were paused, this position unwound slightly, and GDP rose again. With tariffs now back on the table, growth is likely to weaken.
The effects of this uncertainty may already be visible in labour markets. Figures from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) showed 73,000 new jobs in July, well below expectations of 110,000. Figures for May and June, meanwhile, were revised downwards by a huge margin.
Mr Trump can claim to have made several major correct calls in his presidency. His victories in the culture wars arguably helped to trigger a global preference cascade that shifted the tone of conversation meaningfully to the Right, while his evisceration of wasteful US bureaucracies set an example of what could be achieved by leaders willing to ignore the squealing from state employees.
On European affairs, moreover, he has been resolute and correct, telling our leaders the home truths they work furiously to deny. On migration, defence spending and the costs of net zero, Mr Trump has time and again pointed towards common sense conclusions seemingly beyond the grasp of our elite class, and on Israel and Gaza he has been a rare voice of moral sense.
His two great errors, however, have been appalling. The first was his disastrous attempt to force Kyiv into striking a deal with President Putin. This has failed, and Mr Trump has, belatedly, come around to realising the threat posed by Moscow.
The second was the imposition of tariffs on friendly nations. As a tool for decoupling from China, there is merit to Mr Trump's view. Within the West, however, it is an error, and one which he is now beginning to compound with his decision to sack the 'Biden Appointee' responsible for overseeing the BLS, and his desire to replace the official with 'someone much more competent and qualified'.
As the travails faced by Britain's Office for National Statistics demonstrate, high quality economic data is not a given. This knee-jerk firing, however, is no way to bring about improvements that financial markets can trust. Mr Trump risks, instead, further undermining confidence in the US economy – and his presidency.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
28 minutes ago
- Reuters
Breakingviews - Trump's degraded data is worse than book-cooking
WASHINGTON, Aug 4 (Reuters Breakingviews) - Donald Trump's stance on Covid-19 turned out to be a prelude for his second term. The U.S. president, who in 2020 argued that 'If we stopped testing right now, we'd have very few cases' of the coronavirus, is applying this logic to environmental, health, and - with the firing of the top Labor Department statistician — economic data. With presumably committed professional staff still in place and alternative data sources available, the main risk of isn't fake, rosy data — it's that firms, investors and policymakers will see pillars of the market crumble. The Bureau of Labor Statistics each month estimates jobs created in the prior period and updates its two previous estimates. Glum numbers on Friday prompted Trump to shoot the messenger. Following a report that 73,000 jobs were added in July, combined with a reduction of 258,000 for May and June's numbers, the president fired BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer. His argument that the employment survey is biased, and that revisions were tilted in favor of former President Joe Biden, does not survive under scrutiny. The agency revised, opens new tab down job growth by 818,000 during 2024's presidential election—hardly positive news for an incumbent administration. While this revision was large, volatility is unsurprising amid a trade war and immigration restrictionism. This president is already dismantling other research bodies, whether at the Environmental Protection Agency, or the carbon-tracking Mauna Loa observatory, or advisory boards at the Food and Drug Administration and Centers for Disease Control. Companies and whole sectors, like insurance and pharmaceuticals, rely on government data for myriad uses: carbon markets, flood insurance calculations, automaker emissions compliance, solar energy output projections, disaster planning and resilience, creditworthiness for infrastructure projects, and more. There is no explicit promise to outright cook the books. Nonetheless, any threat to the integrity of this data degrades a vast infrastructure supporting modern markets, built up over more than a century. A ham-fisted push to skew the numbers would probably be self-destructive, drawing skepticism from outside professionals. Signals like resignations of remaining career staff will be clear. And, simply put, people know whether they have a job or not. Studies from countries that have manipulated official data, like Argentina, opens new tab, show that consumers don't trust fake figures, creating black markets to exploit any spread between fantasy and reality. Even without active sabotage, outdated practices may have slid in this direction by accident: officials warned, opens new tab that the BLS needs a refresh, including by jettisoning ever-less-reliable phone surveys and favoring real-time digital sources like job postings or credit card data. Those worries now get an extra political dimension, no matter what happens. Follow Gabriel Rubin on Bluesky, opens new tab and LinkedIn, opens new tab.
Reuters
28 minutes ago
- Reuters
American Bar Association considers ending diversity requirements for board seats
Aug 4 (Reuters) - The American Bar Association is proposing to end its practice of reserving five seats on its governing board for women, racial minorities and other underrepresented groups, as the organization's diversity policies have come under scrutiny in President Donald Trump's second term. The revision, part of a slate of proposed changes, opens new tab that would reduce the size of the ABA's Board of Governors and its House of Delegates, would instead set aside three board seats for lawyers committed to 'advancing the values of diversity, equity, and inclusion,' regardless of the candidates' demographic backgrounds. The existing rules require the designated members to be "racially or ethnically diverse, a woman, or self-identify either as LGBTQ+ or as having a disability." The board, which oversees management of the ABA, would go from the current 43 members to 32 under the proposal. The House of Delegates will consider the changes when it meets on August 11 and 12. The ABA committee that developed the reforms said they are needed amid declining membership and would help the organization become more nimble and efficient. Paid and free ABA membership fell to 227,000 in 2024 from nearly 400,000 in 2015 — a decline of about 43% that an ABA spokesperson said is partly attributable to the elimination of some free and low-cost membership categories. A report from the ABA committee did not specifically reference political influence, but the organization has faced mounting pressure from the Trump administration over its diversity and inclusion efforts. An ABA spokesperson declined to comment on what prompted the revision to its diversity requirements, saying it has yet to pass. Trump in April threatened to revoke the ABA's status as the federal government's designated accreditor of law schools due to its requirement that law schools demonstrate their commitment to diversity in recruitment, admissions and programming, which he said is illegal. That rule has since been put on hold through August 31, 2026. A coalition of conservative legal groups in February asked the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to investigate several of the ABA's diversity hiring programs, claiming they discriminate by giving priority to minority applicants and other underrepresented groups. Under the Board of Governors proposal, candidates for the three diversity seats could be evaluated based on their 'involvement in groups or initiatives, lived experience, professional work, or obstacles overcome and resilience developed.' Read more: Trump executive order says ABA's role as law school accreditor may be revoked ABA keeps law school diversity rule on hold into 2026 amid Trump crackdown
Reuters
28 minutes ago
- Reuters
Bridgewater founder Ray Dalio urges Trump to reveal why he fired top labor official
Aug 4 (Reuters) - Investor Ray Dalio said on Monday he, too, would likely have fired the commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics because he "believes the data is not good", but urged U.S. President Donald Trump to disclose the reasoning behind her removal. In a post on social media platform X, Dalio - founder of hedge fund Bridgewater Associates - said leaders "manipulating numbers" to suit their political objectives could be a big problem, echoing growing concern around the quality of economic data. Trump fired Bureau of Labor Statistics Commissioner Erika McEntarfer last week, accusing her of rigging the jobs figures, but did not provide evidence of the alleged manipulation. "It would be good if President Trump made his thinking clear," Dalio said. Critics have warned Trump's move could erode trust in official U.S. economic data, with chief U.S. economist Michael Feroli saying the risks of politicizing the data collection process should not be overlooked. Trump said on Sunday he would announce a new BLS commissioner within three or four days. Dalio said the method of calculating estimates for employment numbers was "obsolete and error-prone" and called for big changes to the way government assesses what is going on with the economy. "The huge revisions in Friday's employment numbers are symptomatic of this, especially because the revisions brought the numbers toward private estimates that were in fact much better," he said in his post. Dalio handed over control of Bridgewater to a new generation of investors in 2022 and has sold his remaining stake in the firm.
