'Smoke and mirrors': Chris Bowen's claim power prices are coming down dismantled by energy expert
On Wednesday, Mr Bowen was asked if he stood by the Albanese government's commitment to cut power bills by $275 by the end of the year.
At first Mr Bowen insisted energy bills have come down since last year, pointing to ABS data released on Wednesday.
' People looked at the fact that energy prices have fallen, as I just said, by 6.2 per cent in a year just gone,' he said.
'They would have been 16.6 per cent higher if [Tehan] had had his way and energy bill relief had not applied. That was the key difference.'
Frontier Economics co-founder and Managing Director Danny Price, Shadow Energy Minister Dan Tehan and Nationals MP Matt Canavan have objected to Mr Bowen's claims.
Speaking to SkyNews.com.au, Mr Tehan said his Labor counterpart 'must come clean' with the Australian people.
Mr Tehan said once the $3.5 billion in energy bill rebates were taken out of consideration, power bills in Australia have gone up by 10 per cent since June last year, and up 32 per cent since the June before.
'We need to stop energy prices rising, not take billions of dollars from Australians every year, to give it back to them to temporarily hide the price rises,' Mr Tehan said.
'This is not honouring a commitment it is deceiving people.'
Frontier Economics Managing Director Danny Price told SkyNews.com.au the subsidy was put in place to 'disguise' the electricity price rise which was announced the Australian Energy Regulator in March.
'Cost increases across nearly all components of the DMO (Default Market Offer) have resulted in draft DMO 7 prices for residential customers increasing between 2.5 per cent and 8.9 per cent compared with DMO 6, depending on the region. Small business customers could see rises between 4.2 per cent and 8.2 per cent,' the AER said.
Mr Price said the Energy Minister's claim that electricity consumers were better off by 6.2 per cent was due to taxpayers 'paying for their own price reductions by funding the subsidies to themselves'.
Nationals Senator Matt Canavan said once the subsidies run out, power bills will go 'through the roof'.
'Chris Bowen's claim is like stealing $100 from someone and giving $20 back so they can thank him,' he said.
'It's all smoke and mirrors.'
According to Budget Paper No. 1 (2025-26), the government will commit an extra $1.8 billion to extend energy bill relief, in the form of two quarterly $75 rebates, to the end of 2025.
The rebates are on top of around $5 billion in rebates being applied to electricity bills for millions of households and small businesses since 2023.
The Frontier Economics boss said households were 'actually worse off' thanks to the Commonwealth Energy Bill Relief Fund, and pointed to the Australian Bureau of Statistics' explanation that the price reductions were an 'artifice of taxpayer funded subsidies' and the annual fall in price was directly due to the handouts.
'Electricity [prices] rose 8.1 per cent this quarter, following a 16.3 per cent rise in the March quarter,' the ABS said.
'Despite two consecutive quarterly rises in electricity, the series has recorded a fall of 6.2 per cent over the past 12 months.
'The annual fall is due to the introduction of the second round of the Commonwealth Energy Bill Relief Fund (EBRF) rebates from July 2024, which continue to reduce electricity costs in most capital cities.'
Mr Price said despite the 'massive subsidies', consumers were much worse off than a few years ago because of the relentless price rises that have already occurred that were not offset by subsidies.
'Australians now pay some of the highest electricity prices in the world. It seems as though now taxpayers will continue to pay for the ever-rising costs of renewable subsidies,' he said.
The Energy Minister also claimed on Wednesday that 'most cheapest form of energy ... is renewable'.
Mr Price said it was 'deceptive and misleading' for individuals to make comparisons between the stand-alone costs of wind and solar and coal, gas or nuclear.
'Consumers are supplied with a mix of generation sources, not just wind and solar. The only valid way that generation costs should be compared is the total cost of the least cost mix of generation,' he said.
'Frontier Economics showed that the highest cost system is one that relied on renewables and batteries. The reason is simple. Renewable generators only produce about a quarter or third of the electricity for the same capacity.'
'And then you need to pay for the costs of storing excess renewable energy to supply consumer for the majority of time that these generators do not generate electricity, and you also need to pay for the back-up generation when storages are depleted,' he said.
'Once all these costs are included, which the CSIRO don't include ... then renewables are not the cheapest form of generation."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
West Australian
31 minutes ago
- West Australian
Inheritance tax wake-up call for all expat Brits in Australia still with private pensions in the UK!
A major tax change in the UK could have serious consequences for thousands of British expats living in Australia with pension savings left behind in the old country. From April 2026, pension pots inherited after the age of 75 will no longer be tax-free for beneficiaries. Instead, they'll be taxed as income, at the recipient's marginal rate — potentially as high as 45 per cent.. And from April 2027, the UK is going a step further — pensions will be brought into the scope of inheritance tax, too. This 2027 change is a fresh move from the UK Treasury. Pensions, which were previously exempt from UK estate taxes, will now potentially face double taxation — income tax plus inheritance tax. If you're an Australian tax resident with a UK pension and you're assuming it'll all pass seamlessly to your family one day, then think again. Historically, UK defined contribution pensions — also known as 'private pensions' — were a handy estate planning tool. If the pension holder died before age 75, the entire pot could pass to beneficiaries tax-free, and even after 75 it was only subject to income tax when withdrawn. More importantly, pensions were excluded from the estate for UK inheritance tax purposes, meaning they avoided the UK's hefty 40 per cent estate tax altogether. But from April 2026, that income tax exemption ends for people who die over age 75. And from April 2027, the pension itself will be counted as part of the estate for inheritance tax purposes. The UK government has confirmed that from April 2027, defined contribution pensions will be reportable for inheritance tax, with the responsibility falling on executors. In some cases, families could have just six months to report and pay tax or face late penalties. If that sounds like a nightmare for grieving families navigating two tax systems, it's because it probably will be. In contrast, Australian superannuation is relatively generous when it comes to estate planning because: Adding further complexity is a lesser-known change to how the UK defines inheritance tax exposure. From April 6 this year, the UK moved to a residence-based system. If you've been a UK tax resident for 10 out of the last 20 tax years, you may be classified as a long-term resident and subject to UK inheritance tax on your worldwide assets. So, even if you've been living in Australia for years, you may still be caught by UK inheritance tax, because the new rules apply a 'tail' period of up to 10 years after you leave. For many, transferring UK pensions to Australia via a Qualifying Recognised Overseas Pension Scheme has for a long time — and in the right circumstances — made financial sense. It consolidates retirement savings, aligns your money with your tax residency and gives you more control. Now, with the emergence of this new tax regime, the argument for a transfer grows stronger. It also removes the burden from your family of having to deal with HM Revenue and Customs, complex executor responsibilities and international tax reporting. Of course, it's not always straightforward because: But with professional advice, the process can often be navigated smoothly and the long-term benefits can be significant. The UK's planned tax changes are a wake-up call for British expats in Australia because: So, if you have UK pension savings and live in Australia, it's time to reassess your strategy. A well-considered pension transfer, in the right circumstances and with the right personalised advice, could mean more of your hard-earned savings stay in the hands of your family — and not in the UK tax office. Nicholas Hart is a financial adviser and UK Pensions expert at Empire Financial Group
West Australian
31 minutes ago
- West Australian
Nick Bruining: An over 55s guide to accessing JobSeeker and superannuation before you get the age pension
With Australia's unemployment rate edging up slightly in June, many older people not yet eligible for an age pension will be weighing up their options. That can include using up their savings or tapping into their superannuation to carry them over until the age pension eligibility age of 67. Ceasing employment after turning 60 and not intending to return to work at the time you access your super is a valid 'condition of release' and allows full access to all of your nest egg. One other option is the poorly understood JobSeeker allowance payment from Centrelink. JobSeeker is a means-tested allowance benefit. Allowances are different to pension payments because they are regarded as a temporary support payment to carry you over until you return to paid employment. While the normal JobSeeker payment for a single is $789.90 a fortnight, a single over 55 receives a higher rate of $850.60 if they have been on a JobSeeker payment for nine consecutive months. Eligible couples receive $725.70 each, and as with other income support payments couples are assessed as a single entity under the means test system. JobSeeker payments form part of your taxable income for the year. For those under 60, receiving JobSeeker can also open the door to accessing some of your super before retirement. If you've been in receipt of a Centrelink income support payment for at least 26 weeks, you can apply to have up to $10,000 released from your super every 12 months. Be aware that this withdrawal is taxable. JobSeekers are subject to an asset and income test — but with big differences compared to the age and disability support pension rules. While the asset means test lower limits are identical to the pension figures, once you exceed the limit no benefit is payable. It does not taper down in the same way as a pension. For a single homeowner, the asset test limit is $321,500, excluding the value of the home. For a couple, it's $481,500. Note that Centrelink will accept the second-hand or scrap value for fixed assets, so don't calculate this number based on insured values. Importantly, all money held in superannuation accumulation phase is exempt from means testing until you hit 67. Non-homeowners are allowed an additional $252,000 in assets, whether as a single or a couple. The income test is complex and is calculated in the same way as the age pension. It is not the same as the Australian Taxation Office's method. In essence, if your Centrelink-assessable income exceeds $150 a fortnight, your allowance will start to reduce. The cut-off limits vary considerably based on your family situation, but for many older kid-free Australians, it is around the $1500-a-fortnight mark — and higher once you've been on benefits for more than nine months. Importantly, the 'mutual obligation' requirements for over 55s is quite different to younger recipients of JobSeeker. Mutual obligations require you to demonstrate some activity that makes you job ready. While ideally you'll continue to seek paid employment, you can meet your obligations through other activities such as formal study or approved voluntary work. In both cases, this needs to take up at least 30 hours a fortnight of your time if you are over 60. Between 55 and 60, you must continue to seek work with a maximum of 15 hours doing voluntary work in the first 12 months of unemployment. After 12 months, the same rules for over 60s apply. One important point to note: if you are over 60 and claiming JobSeeker at the same time and not simply doing voluntary work or study, you probably cannot access your super. The rules are, you can access your super once you cease any employment after turning 60. If you don't have a job to cease then, by definition you haven't satisfied this condition of release. Nick Bruining is an independent financial adviser and a member of the Certified Independent Financial Advisers Association
The Advertiser
31 minutes ago
- The Advertiser
Emissions reduction 'central' to boosting productivity
An answer to Australia's languishing productivity lies in its response to the threat of climate change, an independent government advisory body has found. Adapting to growing climate-related risks while also reducing emissions and transitioning to clean energy will enable higher productivity growth and living standards, according to an interim report by the Productivity Commission. The findings come as Treasurer Jim Chalmers prepares to convene a roundtable in search of a solution to the nation's lagging productivity. "Australia's net zero transformation is well under way," commissioner Barry Sterland said. "Getting the rest of the way at the lowest possible cost is central to our productivity challenge." By minimising the costs of reducing emissions through careful policy design, resources would be freed up for more productive activities, the interim report found. It recommended ensuring incentives to invest in technology that can achieve reductions. The Renewable Energy Target and the Capacity Investment Scheme, for example, will not support new investment in renewables after 2030, which means new market-based incentives should be implemented to eventually replace them. The report also recommends incentivising heavy vehicle operators to reduce emissions. Long-overdue reforms to Australia's main environment law would also better protect the natural world by introducing national standards and improving regional planning, while speeding up approvals for infrastructure to make energy cheaper. Though Australia has already set targets to cut greenhouse gas emissions 43 per cent by 2030 and achieve net zero emissions by 2050, the interim report found Australia will face significant climate-related risks regardless of emissions reductions. This means adapting to climate change is integral to growing productivity. The government has been urged to boost resilience to climate perils, which would lower the cost of disaster recovery and help maintain quality of life while Australia grapples with the impacts of climate change. Australians' homes in particular must become better adapted to climate risks, prompting the Productivity Commission to call for a housing resilience rating system and resources to help households, builders and insurers more easily identify upgrades. Dr Chalmers' roundtable will convene later in August and some invited to attend have already called for similar reforms. Former Treasury secretary Ken Henry in July urged the government to overhaul the nation's environment laws or risk Australia missing its most important economic goals. An answer to Australia's languishing productivity lies in its response to the threat of climate change, an independent government advisory body has found. Adapting to growing climate-related risks while also reducing emissions and transitioning to clean energy will enable higher productivity growth and living standards, according to an interim report by the Productivity Commission. The findings come as Treasurer Jim Chalmers prepares to convene a roundtable in search of a solution to the nation's lagging productivity. "Australia's net zero transformation is well under way," commissioner Barry Sterland said. "Getting the rest of the way at the lowest possible cost is central to our productivity challenge." By minimising the costs of reducing emissions through careful policy design, resources would be freed up for more productive activities, the interim report found. It recommended ensuring incentives to invest in technology that can achieve reductions. The Renewable Energy Target and the Capacity Investment Scheme, for example, will not support new investment in renewables after 2030, which means new market-based incentives should be implemented to eventually replace them. The report also recommends incentivising heavy vehicle operators to reduce emissions. Long-overdue reforms to Australia's main environment law would also better protect the natural world by introducing national standards and improving regional planning, while speeding up approvals for infrastructure to make energy cheaper. Though Australia has already set targets to cut greenhouse gas emissions 43 per cent by 2030 and achieve net zero emissions by 2050, the interim report found Australia will face significant climate-related risks regardless of emissions reductions. This means adapting to climate change is integral to growing productivity. The government has been urged to boost resilience to climate perils, which would lower the cost of disaster recovery and help maintain quality of life while Australia grapples with the impacts of climate change. Australians' homes in particular must become better adapted to climate risks, prompting the Productivity Commission to call for a housing resilience rating system and resources to help households, builders and insurers more easily identify upgrades. Dr Chalmers' roundtable will convene later in August and some invited to attend have already called for similar reforms. Former Treasury secretary Ken Henry in July urged the government to overhaul the nation's environment laws or risk Australia missing its most important economic goals. An answer to Australia's languishing productivity lies in its response to the threat of climate change, an independent government advisory body has found. Adapting to growing climate-related risks while also reducing emissions and transitioning to clean energy will enable higher productivity growth and living standards, according to an interim report by the Productivity Commission. The findings come as Treasurer Jim Chalmers prepares to convene a roundtable in search of a solution to the nation's lagging productivity. "Australia's net zero transformation is well under way," commissioner Barry Sterland said. "Getting the rest of the way at the lowest possible cost is central to our productivity challenge." By minimising the costs of reducing emissions through careful policy design, resources would be freed up for more productive activities, the interim report found. It recommended ensuring incentives to invest in technology that can achieve reductions. The Renewable Energy Target and the Capacity Investment Scheme, for example, will not support new investment in renewables after 2030, which means new market-based incentives should be implemented to eventually replace them. The report also recommends incentivising heavy vehicle operators to reduce emissions. Long-overdue reforms to Australia's main environment law would also better protect the natural world by introducing national standards and improving regional planning, while speeding up approvals for infrastructure to make energy cheaper. Though Australia has already set targets to cut greenhouse gas emissions 43 per cent by 2030 and achieve net zero emissions by 2050, the interim report found Australia will face significant climate-related risks regardless of emissions reductions. This means adapting to climate change is integral to growing productivity. The government has been urged to boost resilience to climate perils, which would lower the cost of disaster recovery and help maintain quality of life while Australia grapples with the impacts of climate change. Australians' homes in particular must become better adapted to climate risks, prompting the Productivity Commission to call for a housing resilience rating system and resources to help households, builders and insurers more easily identify upgrades. Dr Chalmers' roundtable will convene later in August and some invited to attend have already called for similar reforms. Former Treasury secretary Ken Henry in July urged the government to overhaul the nation's environment laws or risk Australia missing its most important economic goals. An answer to Australia's languishing productivity lies in its response to the threat of climate change, an independent government advisory body has found. Adapting to growing climate-related risks while also reducing emissions and transitioning to clean energy will enable higher productivity growth and living standards, according to an interim report by the Productivity Commission. The findings come as Treasurer Jim Chalmers prepares to convene a roundtable in search of a solution to the nation's lagging productivity. "Australia's net zero transformation is well under way," commissioner Barry Sterland said. "Getting the rest of the way at the lowest possible cost is central to our productivity challenge." By minimising the costs of reducing emissions through careful policy design, resources would be freed up for more productive activities, the interim report found. It recommended ensuring incentives to invest in technology that can achieve reductions. The Renewable Energy Target and the Capacity Investment Scheme, for example, will not support new investment in renewables after 2030, which means new market-based incentives should be implemented to eventually replace them. The report also recommends incentivising heavy vehicle operators to reduce emissions. Long-overdue reforms to Australia's main environment law would also better protect the natural world by introducing national standards and improving regional planning, while speeding up approvals for infrastructure to make energy cheaper. Though Australia has already set targets to cut greenhouse gas emissions 43 per cent by 2030 and achieve net zero emissions by 2050, the interim report found Australia will face significant climate-related risks regardless of emissions reductions. This means adapting to climate change is integral to growing productivity. The government has been urged to boost resilience to climate perils, which would lower the cost of disaster recovery and help maintain quality of life while Australia grapples with the impacts of climate change. Australians' homes in particular must become better adapted to climate risks, prompting the Productivity Commission to call for a housing resilience rating system and resources to help households, builders and insurers more easily identify upgrades. Dr Chalmers' roundtable will convene later in August and some invited to attend have already called for similar reforms. Former Treasury secretary Ken Henry in July urged the government to overhaul the nation's environment laws or risk Australia missing its most important economic goals.
